Farming is easy, becoming Brazilian is hard: North American soy farmers’ social values of production, work and land in Soylandia

References

• Adams, R. 2008. Large-scale mechanized soybean farmers in Amazônia: New ways of experiencing land. Culture and Agriculture 30: 32–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-486X.2008.00005.x
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. 2010. Elite Landowners In Santarém: Ranchers, Gaúchos And The Arrival Of Soybeans In The Amazon. PhD diss, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, J.L.C. 2005. Campesinos Paraguayos y Brasiguayos en la frontera este del Paraguay. In Enclave sojero: merma de soberania y pobreza, 149–82. Asunción: Centro de estúdios rurales interdisciplinares.
   Google Scholar
• Barlett, P.F. 1993. American dreams, rural realities: Family farms in Crisis. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow-Strain, A. 2007. Intimate enemies: Landowners, power, and violence in Chiapas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brannstrom, C. 2009. South America's neoliberal agricultural frontiers: Places of environmental sacrifice or conservation opportunity. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 38, no. 3: 141–9. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.3.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannstrom, C., and P.R.B. Brandão. 2012. Two hundred hectares of good business: Brazilian agriculture in a themed space. Geographical Review 102, no. 4: 465–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2012.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodwin, P. 2012. Everyday ethics: Voices from the front line of community psychiatry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F.H. 1989. The US farm crisis and the restructuring of American agriculture: Domestic and international dimensions. In The International Farm Crisis, 46–83. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, M. de. 2011. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. 2009. Fighting like a community: Andean civil society in an Era of Indian uprisings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cravey, A.J. 2003. Toque una Ranchera, Por Favor. Antipode 35, no. 3: 603–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz, J.A.F. 1984. Modernização e conflicto na fronteira ocidental do Nordeste. Revista GeoNordeste 1, no. 1: 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, C., and K. Cook. 2013. Purdue Agricultural Economics Report (August 2013). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. https://www.agecon.purdue.edu/extension/pubs/paer/pdf/PAER8_2013.pdf (accessed September 16, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, K.M. 2002. Debt and dispossession: Farm loss in America's heartland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. 2013. 2012 Farmland Value Survey (No. File C2-70). Ames, IA: Iowa State University. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/pdf/c2-70.pdf (accessed September 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., J.C. Bausch, and S. Sweeney. 2014. Agrarian winners of neoliberal reform: The ‘Maize Boom'of Sinaloa, Mexico. Journal of Agrarian Change 14, no. 1: 26–51. doi: 10.1111/joac.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist. 2010. The Miracle of the Cerrado. The Economist, 08/28/2010 Print Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, G. 2005. Introduction: Financialization and the world economy. In Financialization and the world economy, ed. G. Epstein, 3–16. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2008. Territories of difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2014. ‘Like gold with yield’: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 777–95. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.873977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, J., E. Fisher, and A. Arce. 2013. Reframing ‘crisis’ in fair trade coffee production: Trajectories of agrarian change in Nicaragua. Journal of Agrarian Change 14, no. 1: 52–73. doi: 10.1111/joac.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gidwani, V., and R.N. Reddy. 2011. The afterlives of ‘waste’: Notes from India for a minor history of capitalist surplus. Antipode 43, no. 5: 1625–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00902.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, L., and A. Zoomers. 2013. The drivers behind the rapid expansion of genetically modified soya production into the Chaco region of Argentina. In Biofuels - Economy, environment and sustainability, ed. Z. Fang. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech: 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2001. Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2013. It is value that brings universes into being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3, no. 2: 219–43. doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.012
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2008. The new bonfire of vanities: Soybean cultivation and globalization in South America. Development 51, no. 4: 512–8. doi: 10.1057/dev.2008.55
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S.B. 2005. Soybeans, Development and conservation on the Amazon Frontier. Development and Change 36, no. 2: 375–404. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, S.B., and A. Cockburn. 2011. The fate of the forest: Developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, K. 2009. Liquidated: An ethnography of wall street. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoelle, J. 2012. Black hats and smooth hands: Elite status, environmentalism, and work among the ranchers of Acre, Brazil. Anthropology of Work Review 33, no. 2: 60–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1417.2012.01080.x
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J.M., P. Korb, and R.A. Hoppe. 2013. Economic Research Report Number 152: Farm Size and the Organization of U.S. Crop Farming (Economic Research Report No. 152). USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err152/report-summary.aspx#.UjSslWR4bfU (accessed December 10, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, L. 2011. Legitimating Foreignization in Bolivia: Brazilian Agriculture and the Relations of Conflict and Consent in Santa Cruz, Paper presented at the International Conferernce on Global Land Grabbing. 6–8 April, Brighton: university of Sussex. http://www.iss.nl/fileadmin/ASSETS/iss/Documents/Conference_papers/LDPI/23_Lee_Mackey.pdf (accessed September 20, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 2012. Capital, volume one: A critique of political economy. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2000. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in Archaic societies. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• McVey, M., P. Baumel, and B. Wisner. 2000. Brazilian soybeans - What is the potential? Ames, IA: Iowa State University. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/articles/others/McVOct00.html (accessed November 1, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mello, H.A.B. de, and S.D.S. Silva. 2011. Revisitando Contextos Bilíngues em Goiás. Dossiê Imigrantes no. 10: 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2001. Turning Callon the right way up. Economy and Society 31, no. 2: 218–33. doi: 10.1080/03085140220123135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2008. Rethinking economy. Geoforum 39, no. 3: 1116–21. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondardo, M.L. 2010. A ‘territorialização’ do agronegócio globalizado em Barreiras - BA: migração sulista, reestruturação produtiva e contradições sócio-territoriais. Revista NERA 13, no. 17: 112–30.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W. 2010a. ‘Amsterdam is standing on Norway'Part I: The alchemy of capital, empire and nature in the diaspora of silver, 1545–1648. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 1: 33–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W. 2010b. ‘Amsterdam is standing on Norway'Part II: The global North Atlantic in the ecological revolution of the long seventeenth century. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 2: 188–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes, G. 2013. Legislação de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho 2013 - 10a Edição. Gerenciamento Verde Editora, Brasilia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, C.J., M. Morehart, T. Kuethe, J. Beckman, J. Ifft, and R. Williams. 2012. Trends in US farmland values and ownership. USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/377487/eib92_2_.pdf (accessed December 10, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. 2014. E.P.A.'s Proposed Rules on Water Worry Farmers. New York Times. 05/12/2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/13/us/politics/environmental-protection-agency-water-rules.html (accessed October 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, E.J., R.A. Hoppe, D.E. Banker, R. Ebel, K. Fuglie, P. Korb, M. Livingtston, C. Nickerson, and C. Sandretto. 2011. Economic information nulletin number 88: The changing organization of US farming. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, A. 2011. Nusta Juira's gift of Quinoa: Peasants, trademarks, and intermediaries in the transformation of a Bolivian commodity economy. Anthropology of Work Review 32, no. 2: 103–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1417.2011.01062.x
   Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, A. 2012. The construction of an alternative quinoa economy: Balancing solidarity, household needs, and profit in San Agustín, Bolivia. Agriculture and Human Values 29, no. 4: 441–54. doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9371-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. de L.T. 2013. Land regularization in Brazil and the global land grab. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 261–83. doi: 10.1111/dech.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peine, E. 2009. The Private State of Agribusiness: Brazilian Soy on the Frontier of a New Food Regime. PhD diss. Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Peine, E. 2010. Corporate mobilization on the Soybean frontier of Mato Grosso, Brazil. In Contesting development: Critical struggles for social change, ed. P. McMichael, 132–46. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 2001. The great transformation. 2nd ed. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reboratti, C. 2010. Un mar de soja: la nueva agricultura en Argentina y sus consecuencias. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande no. 45: 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, S. 2012. Land and territory: Meanings of land between modernity and tradition. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 1, no. 1: 85–107. doi: 10.1177/227797601200100106
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Bethany, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teubal, M. 2006. Expansión del Modelo Sojero en la Argentina: De la Produccion de Alimentos a los Commodities. Realidad Economica, 220(mayo/junio), 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2013. Acreage (June 2013). Washington, DC: USDAo. http://www.usda.gov/nass/PUBS/TODAYRPT/acrg0612.pdf (accessed July 15, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Valdivia, G. 2010. Agrarian capitalism and struggles over hegemony in the bolivian lowlands. Latin American Perspectives 37, no. 4: 67–87. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10373354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnken, P.F. 1999. The development and growth of the soybean industry in Brazil. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2008. Environmental justice and agricultural development in the Brazilian Cerrado. In Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice, ed. David Carruthers, 213–38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar