Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’

References

• Alano, L. Forthcoming. The political economy of large-scale land investments: Lessons from the Ecofuel sugarcane plantation, northern Philippines. Draft PhD diss., University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Fradejas, A. 2015. Anything but a story foretold: Multiple politics of resistance to the agrarian extractivist project in Guatemala. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Baglioni, E., and P. Gibbon. 2013. Land grabbing, large- and small-scale farming: What can evidence and policy from 20th century Africa contribute to the debate? Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1558–81. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C. 2014. Class struggle and social movements. In Marxism and social movements, ed. C. Barker, L. Cox, J. Krinsky, and A.G. Nilsen, 41–61. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Behrman, J., R. Meinzen-Dick, and A. Quisumbing. 2012. The gender implications of large-scale land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 1: 49–79. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr., and J.C. Franco. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change 12, no. 1: 34–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr., and J.C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–47. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr., J.C. Franco, and S. Monsalve Suarez. 2015. Land and food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 600–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr., J.C. Franco, and C. Wang. 2013. The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: Changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 161–79. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 28, no. 2: 209–216. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, Z. 2015. Territorial restructuring and resistance in Argentina. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Burdick, J. 1995. Uniting theory and practice in the ethnography of social movements: Notes toward a hopeful realism. Dialectical Anthropology 20, no. 3: 361–85. doi: 10.1007/BF01298535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., S. Sullivan, K. Neves, J. Igoe and D. Brockington. 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism 23, no. 2: 4–30. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2012.674149
   Google Scholar
• Byres, T.J. 1981. The new technology, class formation and class action in the Indian countryside. Journal of Peasant Studies 8, no. 4: 405–54. doi: 10.1080/03066158108438146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Navarrete, A., and K. Jansen. 2015. Oil Palm expansions without enclosure: Accumulation and environmentalisms in Mexico. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C., and T. Benjaminsen. 2015. Guerrilla agriculture? A biopolitical guide to illicit cultivation within an IUCN Category II protected area. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Corson, C. et al. 2015. The right to resist: Disciplining civil society at Rio+20. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. 2011. How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 249–79. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Soto, H. 1989. The other path: The invisible revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, K., B. Engels, O. Pye, and A. Brunnengräber, eds. 2014. The political ecology of agrofuels. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, C., G. Summerfield, and D. Tsikata, eds. 2014. Land, gender, and food security. Special Issue, Feminist Economics 20, no. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1999. Peasants against globalization: Rural social movements in Costa Rica. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and S.M. Borras Jr. Forthcoming. Political dynamics of transnational agrarian movements. Halifax: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and C. James. 2011. Peasants’ rights and the UN system: Quixotic struggle? Or emancipatory idea whose time has come? Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 81–108. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and A. León. 2013. Cycles of land grabbing in Central America: An argument for history and a case study in the Bajo Aguán, Honduras. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1697–722. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., C. Oya, and S.M. Borras Jr. 2013. Global land grabs: Historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1517–31. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.850190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green Grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 237–61. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). 2012. Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). 2014. Principles for responsible investment in agriculture and food systems. Rome: Committee on World Food Security, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FIAN (Food First Information and Action Network). 2012. The human rights impacts of tree plantations in Niassa Province, Mozambique: A report, Heidelberg: Foodfirst Information and Action Network.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, L.B. 2014. Indigenous peoples vs peasant unions: Land conflicts and rural movements in plurinational Bolivia. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 3: 297–319. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.906404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1993. The politics of food in Mexico: State power and social mobilizations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J.C. 2014. Reclaiming free prior and informed consent (FPIC) in the context of global land grabs. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute (TNI).
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J.C., D. Carranza, and J. Fernandez. 2011. New biofuel project in Isabela, Philippines: Boon or bane for local people? Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gingembre, M. 2015. Resistance or participation? Reclaiming land sovereignty amid political uncertainty in Madagascar. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Golay, C., and I. Biglino. 2013. Human rights responses to land grabbing: A right to food perspective. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1630–50. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., J.M. Jasper, and F. Polletta, eds. 2001. Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grajales, J. 2015. Land grabbing, legal contention and institutional change in Colombia. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, S., and A. du Toit. 2007. Adverse incorporation, social exclusion and chronic poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper 81. Manchester and Cape Town: Institute for Development Policy Management and Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E.J. 1959. Primitive rebels: Studies in archaic forms of social movement in the 19th and 20th centuries. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt Gimenéz, E., and A. Shattuck. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 109–44. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDI. 2014. ANZ bankrolls massive land grab in Cambodia. http://www.inclusivedevelopment.net/anz-bankrolls-massive-land-grab-in-cambodia/ (accessed March 26, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jayne, T.S., J. Chamberlin, and D.D. Headey. 2014. Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: A synthesis. Food Policy 48: 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julia, with B. White. 2012. Gendered experiences of dispossession: Oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 995–1016. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.676544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, M. 2015. Politics from below? Small-, mid-, and large-scale land dispossession in Teso, Uganda and the relevance of scale. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, B. 2014. Protests over land in Vietnam: Rightful resistance and more. Journal of Vietnamese Studies 9, no. 3: 19–54. doi: 10.1525/vs.2014.9.3.19
   Google Scholar
• Larder, N. 2015. Disrupting the land grabbing narrative through a study of responses to the Malibya project. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., and I. Scoones, eds. 2015. Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes in Africa. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–98. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, P.D., and M.J. Watts, eds. 1994. Living under contract: Contract farming and agrarian transformation in sub-Saharan Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamonova, N. 2015. Resistance or adaptation? Ukrainian peasants’ responses to large-scale land acquisitions. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, M.E., N. McKeon, and S.M. Borras Jr. 2013. Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiniello, G. 2015. Social struggles in Uganda's Acholiland: Understanding responses and resistance to Amuru sugar works. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Matondi, P.B., K. Havnevik, and A. Beyene, eds. 2011. Biofuels, land grabbing and food security in Africa. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, K. 2012. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem-services markets. Development and Change 43, no. 1: 105–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, K. 2015. Rubber, rights and resistance: The evolution of local struggles against a Chinese rubber concession in Northern Laos. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J.F. 2010. Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: Oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 821–50. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2013. ‘One does not sell the land upon which the people walk’: Land grabbing, transnational rural social movements, and global governance. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 105–22. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.760911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., G.J. Veldwisch, and J. Franco. 2012. Introduction to the special issue: Water grabbing? Focus on the (re) appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives: 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Milgroom, J. 2015. Policy processes of a land grab: At the interface of politics ‘in the air’ and politics ‘on the ground’ in Massingir, Mozambique. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Monsalve Suárez, S. 2013. The human rights framework in contemporary agrarian struggles. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 239–90. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreda, T.S. 2015. Listening to their silence? The political reaction of affected communities to large-scale land acquisitions: insights from Ethiopia. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. 2013. Women, gender and protest emergence: Contesting oil palm expansion in Sambas District, Indonesia, LDPI Working Paper 49. The Hague: Land Deal Politics Initiative. http://www.iss.nl/fileadmin/ASSETS/iss/Research_and_projects/Research_networks/LDPI/LDPI_WP_49.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Napier Commission. 1884. Evidence taken by her Majesty's commission of enquiry into the conditions of the crofters and cottars in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Digitised by Lochaber Collage Mallaig, 2007 http://www.whc.uhi.ac.uk/napier-commission/highlands-and-islands-commission
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K.J., and L.J. Li. 2006. Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oya, C. 2012. Contract farming in sub-Saharan Africa: A survey of approaches, debates and issues. Journal of Agrarian Change 12, no. 1: 1–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, J. 1975. Agrarian revolution: Social movements and export agriculture in the underdeveloped world. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L., and C. Lund. 2011. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 667–81. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. 1979. The rational peasant: The political economy of rural society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pye, O. 2010. The biofuel connection–transnational activism and the palm oil boom. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 851–74. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: Green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Sampat, P. 2015. The ‘Goan Impasse’: Land rights and resistance to SEZs in Goa, India. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., R. Hall, S.M. Borras Jr, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2013. The politics of evidence: Methodologies for understanding the global land rush. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 3: 469–83. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.801341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1976. The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seufert, P. 2013. The FAO voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 181–86. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalley, R. 2013. Plantations, contract farming and commercial farming areas in Africa: A comparative review. Working Paper 55. Brighton and Nairobi: Future Agricultures Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Sumberg, J., N.A. Anyidoho, J. Leavy, D.J.H. te Lintelo, and K. Wellard. 2012. Introduction: The young people and agriculture ‘Problem’ in Africa. IDS Bulletin. Special Issue: Young People and Agriculture in Africa 43, no. 6: 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 1986. The contentious French. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsikata, D., and J.A. Yaro. 2014. When a good business model is not enough: Land transactions and gendered livelihood prospects in rural Ghana. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 202–26. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.866261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, O., N. Mamonova, and M. Spoor. 2012. Oligarchs, megafarms and land reserves: Understanding land grabbing in Russia. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 899–931. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.675574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. 2012. Agriculture and the generation problem: Rural youth, employment and the future of farming. IDS Bulletin 43, no. 6: 9–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Ruth Hall, Ian Scoones, and Wendy Wolford. 2012. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 619–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.691879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., C.M. Park, and Julia. 2014. The gendered political ecology of agrofuels expansion. In The political ecology of agrofuels, ed. K. Dietz, B. Engels, O. Pye, and A. Brunnengräber, 53–69. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. 2015. Reclaiming the worker's property: Control grabbing, farmworkers and the Las Tunas Accords in Nicaragua. This collection.
   Google Scholar
• Wily, L.A. 2012. Looking back to see forward: The legal niceties of land theft in land rushes. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 751–75. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.674033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., Saturnino M. Borras, Ruth Hall, Ian Scoones, Ben White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 189–210. doi: 10.1111/dech.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar