Understanding rural resistance: contemporary mobilization in the Brazilian countryside

References

• Abers, R. 2000. Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Abers, R.N., and M.E. Keck. 2009. Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil's participatory water policy. Politics & Society 37, no. 2: 289–314. doi: 10.1177/0032329209334003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, A. 2010. El Buen Vivir en el camino del post-desarrollo. Una lectura desde la Constitución de Montecristi. Policy Paper, 9(5), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. 1990. Engendering democracy in Brazil: Women's movements in transition politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S., E. Dagnino, and A. Escobar, eds. 1998. Cultures of politics, politics of cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 2002. Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Public Culture 14, no. 1: 21–47. doi: 10.1215/08992363-14-1-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artaraz, K. 2012. Cuba's internationalism revisited: Exporting literacy, ALBA, and a new paradigm for south-south collaboration. Bulletin of Latin American Research 31: 22–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2011.00645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E.A., and M. Bernstein. 2008. Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory 26, no. 1: 74–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G. 2005. Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastide, R. 1959. Brasil, terra de contrastes. São Paulo: Difusão Européis do Livro.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. 2011. Pachakutik: Indigenous movements and electoral politics in Ecuador. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bob, C. 2005. The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media, and international activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. 2001. State-society relations in land reform implementation in the Philippines. Development and Change 32: 545–75. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. 2008. La Vía Campesina and its global campaign for agrarian reform. Journal of Agrarian Change 8, no. 2–3: 258–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–21. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2004. The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., and V.S. Coelho, eds. 2007. Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dagnino, E. 2007. Citizenship: A perverse confluence. Development in Practice 17, no. 4–5: 549–56. doi: 10.1080/09614520701469534
   Google Scholar
• Da Matta, R. 1991. Carnivals, rogues and heroes: An interpretation of the Brazilian dilemma. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R.J. 2007. Introduction: Peasant, state and class. The Journal of Peasant Studies 34, no. 3–4: 351–70. doi: 10.1080/03066150701830000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, B. 1974. African peasants and revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1(3), 269–290.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, A.A. 2003. The Vía Campesina: Peasant women on the frontiers of food sovereignty. Canadian Woman Studies 23, no. 1: 140–5.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, A.A. 2007. La Via Campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, M.C. 1998. Brazil: The once and future country. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Economist, the. 2010. The miracle of the Cerrado. published on August 26, 2010. http://www.economist.com/node/16886442
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2009. Synergies and tensions between rural social movements and professional researchers. Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 245–65. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1999. Peasants against globalization: rural social movements in Costa Rica. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2010. Postconstructivist political ecologies. The international handbook of environmental sociology, 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P., ed. 1997. State-society synergy: Government and social capital in development. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, B.M., C.A. Welch, and Elena C. Gonçalves. 2010. Agrofuel policies in Brazil: Paradigmatic and territorial disputes. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 793–819. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1992. The politics of food in Mexico: State, power and social mobilization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, N. 1998. The Chiapas rebellion: The struggle for land and democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E.J. 1973. Peasants and politics. The Journal of Peasant Studies 1, no. 1: 3–22. doi: 10.1080/03066157308437870
   Google Scholar
• Houtzager, P. 1998. State and unions in the transformation of the Brazilian countryside, 1964–1979. Latin American Research Review, 33, no. 2: 103–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtzager, P. 2001. Collective action and patterns of political authority: Rural workers, church, and state in Brazil. Theory and Society 30, no. 1: 1–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1011076016977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1991. Democracy's third wave. Journal of democracy, 2(2), 12–34. doi: 10.1353/jod.1991.0016
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J.C., and C. Perrow. 1977. Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review 42, no. 2: 249–68. doi:10.2307/2094604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulertz, M. 2013. Land and water grabs and the green economy. In Handbook of Land and Water Grabs in Africa: Foreign direct investment and food and water security, ed. M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo, and J. Warner, 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Lebon, N. 1996. Professionalization of women's health groups in São Paulo: The troublesome road towards organizational diversity. Organization 3, no. 4: 588–609. doi: 10.1177/135050849634016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H.M., J. Peck, and E. Sheppard. 2007. Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. 1994. New farmers’ movements in India as structural response and collective identity formation: The cases of the Shetkari Sanghatana and the BKU. The Journal of Peasant Studies 21, no. 3–4: 95–125. doi: 10.1080/03066159408438556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, J. D. S. 1981. Os camponeses e a política no Brasil. Petrópolis, RJ Brazil: Vozes, 61.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug. 1999. Political process and the development of the Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., C. Tilly, and S. Tarrow. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J.D., and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 6: 1212–41. doi: 10.1086/226464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2005. Global development and the corporate food regime. Research in Rural Sociology and Development 11: 265–99. doi: 10.1016/S1057-1922(05)11010-5
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2006. Peasant prospects in the neoliberal age. New Political Economy 11, no. 3: 407–18. doi: 10.1080/13563460600841041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. 1989. Nomads of the present. London, UK: Hutchinson Radius.
   Google Scholar
• Mertes, T. 2004. A movement of movements: Is another world possible?. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, R. 1915. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. 1993. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world (Vol. 268). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development 24, no. 6: 1073–87. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, J.M. 1978. Agrarian revolution. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. 1997. The end of the peasantry: The rural labor movement in Northeast Brazil. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F.F., and R. Cloward. 1977. Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S.L. 1979. The rational peasant: The political economy of rural society in Vietnam. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postero, N. 2006. Now we are citizens: Indigenous politics in postmulticultural Bolivia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J.W., & E. Sokoloff-Rubin. (2013). Sustaining Activism: A Brazilian Women’s Movement and a Father-Daughter Collaboration. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, C.M. 2010. Da delegacia da mulher à lei maria da penha: absorção/tradução de demandas feministas pelo estado. Revista Crítica Da Ciencias Socias 89: 153–70.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1977. The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1994. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlau, R. 2013. Coproducing rural public schools in Brazil: Contestation, clientelism, and the landless workers’ movement. Politics & Society 41, no. 3: 395–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in movement. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2008. Contentious performances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. 2007. Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Joel S. Migdal, Atul Kohli, Vivienne Shue, and Peter Evans 1999. Mutual empowerment of state and society: Its nature, conditions, mechanisms and limits. Comparative Politics 31, no. 2: 231–49. doi: 10.2307/422146
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E.R. 1969. Peasant wars of the twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2007. From confusion to common sense: Using political ethnography to understand social mobilization in the Brazilian Northeast. In New Perspectives in political ethnography, ed. Lauren Joseph, Mathew Mahler, and Javier Auyero, 14–37. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2010a. Participatory democracy by default: Land reform, social movements and the state in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 1: 91–109. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2010b. This land is ours now: Social mobilization and the meanings of land in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, D. 2004. Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar