Bolivia's soy complex: the development of ‘productive exclusion’

References

• Alonso-Fradejas, A. 2015. Anything but a story foretold: Multiple politics of resistance to the agrarian extractivist project in Guatemala. Journal of Peasant Studies 42, nos. 3–4: 489–515. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1013468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amigos de la Tierra. 2007. Quien se beneficia de los cultivos transgénicos?. In Eco Portal. <http://www.ecoportal.net/Temas_Especiales/Transgenicos/Quien_se_beneficia_de_los_cultivos_transgenicos> (accessed October 16, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, H. 2011. Ley de Revolución Productiva Agropecuaria para el Agronegocio y la Banca. Cochabamba: CENDA.
   Google Scholar
• Asociacion de productores de oleaginosas y trigo (ANAPO). 2011. Memoria Anual 2011. Santa Cruz: ANAPO.
   Google Scholar
• Asociacion de productores de oleaginosas y trigo (ANAPO). 2014. Memoria Anual 2013. Santa Cruz: ANAPO.
   Google Scholar
• Autoridad de Fiscalización y Control Social de las Empresas (AEMP). 2012. Estudio del productor primario de la soya. La Paz Bolivia: Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Autoridad de Fiscalización y Control Social de las Empresas (AEMP). 2013. Estudio mercado del grano de soya. La Paz: Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, R.G., M. Orellana, F. Navarro, O. Diaz, and M.A. Soruco. 1996. Effects of conservation and conventional tillage systems after land clearing on soil properties and crop yield in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Soil & Tillage Research 38: 133–52. doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(96)01012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchimol, P. 2008. La concentracion de la tierra: Latifundios y pools de siembra. Pagina 12, 20 April, available at <http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/suplementos/cash/17-3460-2008-04-20.html> (accessed June 9, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, S. Gómez, C. Kay, and M. Spoor. 2012. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, nos. 3–4: 845–72. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, R. Isakson, L. Levidow, and P. Vervest. 2015. The rise of flex crops and commodities: Causes, conditions and consequences, and their implications for research. Journal of Peasant Studies, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabazon, H., and J.R. Webber. 2014. Evo Morales and the MST in Bolivia: Continuities and discontinuities in agrarian reform. Journal of Agrarian Change 14, no. 3: 435–65. doi: 10.1111/joac.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañón, E. 2012. Comunidades campesinas en territorio agroindustrial: Diferenciación social y seguridad alimentaria en el municipio de Cuatro Cañadas. In Informe 2012: ¿Comer de nuestra tierra? Estudios de caso sobre tierra y producción de alimentos en Bolivia, 85–131. La Paz Bolivia: Fundación TIERRA.
   Google Scholar
• Castañón, E. 2014. Cuando la soya se impone: transformaciones en las comunidades campesinas y sus implicaciones alimentarias. Cuestión Agraria 1, no. 1: 27–53.
   Google Scholar
• Catacora, G. 2007. Soy en Bolivia: producción de oleaginosas y dependencia. In Repúblicas Unidas de la Soja: realidades sobre la producción de soja en América del Sur, ed. J. Rulli, 235–51. Buenos Aires: Grupo de Reflexión Rural.
   Google Scholar
• Catacora-Vargas, G., P. Galeano, S. Zanon Agapito-Tenfen, D. Aranda, T. Palau, and R. Onofre Nodari. 2012. Soybean production in the Southern Cone of the Americas: Update on land and pesticide use. Center for Biosafety, Norway: GenOk.
   Google Scholar
• Colque, G. 2014a. Expansión de la frontera agrícola: Luchas por el control y apropiación de la tierra en el oriente boliviano. La Paz: TIERRA.
   Google Scholar
• Colque, G. 2014b. Seguridad y soberanía alimentaria entre los pequeños proprietarios campesinos e indígenas: marco introductorio a los estudios de caso. Cuestión Agraria 1, no. 1: 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cordoba, D., and K. Jansen. 2013. The return of the state: Neocollectivism, agrarian politics and images of technological progress in the MAS Era in Bolivia. Journal of Agrarian Change 14, no. 4: 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyzaquirre, J.L. 2014. Dependencia y autoabastecimiento alimentario en la TCO Guaraní de Macharetí. Cuestión Agraria 1, no. 1: 77–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnside, P.M. 2001. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation 28, no. 1: 23–38. doi: 10.1017/S0376892901000030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fifer, V. 1982. The search for a series of small successes: Frontiers of settlement in Eastern Bolivia. Journal of Latin American Studies 14: 407–32. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X00022471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2013. ‘FAOSTAT’. <http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html#> (accessed December 28, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Francescone, K. 2012. Paths of development in Bolivia: Contradictions of the Proceso de Cambio. Master's Thesis. Ottawa: Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• GAPSC. 2013. Gobierno Autónomo Departamental de Santa Cruz. 4to Cabildo, Cabildo del Millón. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: GAPSC.
   Google Scholar
• Giarracca, N., and M. Teubal. 2014. Argentina: Extravist dynamics of soy production and open-pit mining. In The New extractivism: A post neoliberal development model or imperialism of the twenty-first century?, ed. H. Veltmeyer and J. Petras, 47–79. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, L. 1987. Frontier expansion and settlement in lowland Bolivia. Journal of Peasant Studies 14, no. 3: 380–98. doi: 10.1080/03066158708438335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T.M. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion. Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, Susanna B. 2005. Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon Frontier. Development and Change 36, no. 2: 375–404. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia Garcia, H. 2014. Gobierno se abre a contrsuir la agenda del millón de ha. El Deber, October 29.
   Google Scholar
• Houtzager, P.P., and J. Franco. 2005. When is law a force for progressive social change? Comparisons across Rural Brazil and the Philippines. DFID Research Project.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 1992. Censo nacional de población y vivienda 1992. La Paz: INE.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 2001. Resultados Preliminares Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. Bolivia. <http://www.ine.gov.bo/> (accessed June 15, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 2012. Anuario Estadistico 2012. La Paz: INE.
   Google Scholar
• Isakson, R. 2014. Food and finance: The financial transformation of agro-food supply chains. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 749–75. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.874340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaldín, R. 2014. La persistencia de la agricultura campesina y sus implicaciones alimentarias en Villa Serrano. Cuestión Agraria 1, no. 1: 105–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jubileo. 2013. El capital privado extranjero en Bolivia contribuye a la reprimarización de la economía. Reporte de coyuntura n° 20. La Paz Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2000. Latin America's agrarian transformation, peasantization and proletarianization. In Disappearing peasantries? Rural labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America, ed. D. Bryceson, C. Kay and J. Mooij, 123–138. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2009. Development strategies and rural development: Exploring synergies, eradicating poverty. Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 103–37. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C., and M. Urioste. 2007. Bolivia's Unfinished agrarian reform: Rural poverty and development policies. In Land, poverty and livelihoods in the era of globalization: Perspectives from developing and transition countries, ed. A.H. Akram-Lodhi, S.M. Borras, and C. Kay, 41–79. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen, T.M. 2015. Food Sovereignty and the quinoa boom: challenges to sustainable re-peasantisation in the southern Altiplano of Bolivia. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 489–507.
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, T., A. Guerra, M. Calzada, L. Correa, V. Calderon, L. Soria, B. Quezada, and M. Steininger. 2008. Total historical land-use change in eastern Bolivia: Who, where, when, and how much. Ecology and Society 13, no. 1: 36–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaus. 2014. Personal communication, interview, April 14. Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Kreidler, A.G., G.A. Rodriguez, A. Rocha, and E. Antelo. 2004. La Soy Boliviana Hacia el Mercado Libre en las Américas. Economic opportunities office. La Paz: USAID/Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2009. To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Anitpode 41, no. 1: 66–93.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2011. Forum on global land grabbing: Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–98. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, L. 2011. Legitimizing foreignization in Bolivia: Brazilian agriculture and the relations of conflict and consent in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Paper presented at the Land Deal Politics Initiative (LDPI) conference on land grabs, University of Sussex (April 6-8).
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, James M., and Richard S. Thorn, eds. 1971. Beyond the revolution. Bolivia since 1952. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marques Gimenez, H. 2010. O desenvolvimento da cadeia produtiva da soja na Bolivia e q presenca brasileira: uma historia comum. Master's Thesis. Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., R. Nehring, and M. Walsh-Dilley. 2014. The ‘state of food sovereignty in Latin America: Political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1175–200. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.964217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, G. 2008. Evolución y características del sector soyero en Bolivia. In Los barones del oriente, ed. X. Soruco, W. Plata, and G. Medeiros, 173–240. Santa Cruz: Fundación TIERRA.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, R., D. Muller, F. Schierhorn, and G. Gerold. 2011. Spatiotemporal modeling of the expansion of mechanized agriculture in the Bolivian lowland forests. Applied Geography 31: 631–40. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, R., T. Pistorius, S. Rohde, G. Gerold, and P. Pacheco. 2013. Policy options to reduce deforestation based on a systematic analysis of drivers and agents in lowland Bolivia. Land Use Policy 30: 895–907. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nueva Economia. 2011. Agroindustria y desarrollo productivo. <www.nuevaeconomia.com.bo> (accessed October 8, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G., and M. Schneider. 2015. The politics of flexing soybeans: China, Brazil, and global agroindustrial restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, P. 2006. Agricultural expansion and deforestation in lowland Bolivia: The import substitution versus the structural adjustment model. Land Use Policy 23, no. 3: 205–25. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacific Credit Rating (PCR). 2012. Varios reportes de calificación de riesgos en el sector soyero. &lt; http://www.ratingspcr.com/> (accessed May 11, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Perez, M. 2007. No todo grano que brilla es oro: un análisis de la soy en Bolivia. La Paz Bolivia: CEDLA.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, M. 2014. Mercado o seguridad alimentaria, dilema de los pequeños productores agrícolas de Rurrenabaque. Cuestión Agraria 1, no. 1: 137–62.
   Google Scholar
• Redo, D., A.C. Millington, and D. Hindery. 2011. Deforestation dynamics and policy changes in Bolivia's post-neoliberal Era. Land Use Policy 28, no. 1: 227–41. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribot, J.C., and N.L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68, no. 2: 153–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, M.K., C.J. Tucker, P. Ersts, T.J. Killeen, Z. Villegas, and S.B. Hecht. 2001. Clearance and fragmentation of tropical deciduous forest in the Tierras Bajas, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Conservation Biology 15, no. 4: 856–66. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004856.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, R.V., M. Camburn, and S. Crespo. 2010. El pequeño productor en el cluster de la soy: Caso cruceño. Santa Cruz: Probioma.
   Google Scholar
• Thiele, G. 1995. The displacement of peasant settlers in the Amazon: The case of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Human Organization 54, no. 3: 273–82. doi: 10.17730/humo.54.3.h2j7748165156151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNIR y TIERRA. 2014. DOCE: Conflictos de tierra y recursos naturales en Bolivia. Boletín Trimestral, numero 2, agosto – octubre 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2007. La revolución agraria de Evo Morales. La Paz: Fundación TIERRA.
   Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2010. Land governance in Bolivia. La Paz: Fundacion TIERRA.
   Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2011. Concentración y extranjerización de la tierra en Bolivia. La Paz-Bolivia: Fundación TIERRA.
   Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2012. Concentration and ‘foreignisation’ of Land in Bolivia. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33, no. 4: 439–57. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.743878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2014. En el campo, los productores de mercancías prefieren comprar sus alimentos. Cuestión Agraria 1, no. 1: 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Valdivia, G. 2010. Agrarian capitalism and struggles over hegemony in the Bolivian Lowlands. Latin American Perspectives 37: 67–87. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10373354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2014. Bolivia: Between voluntarist developmentalism and pragmatic extractivism. In The New Extractivism: A post neoliberal development model or imperialism of the twenty-first century?, ed. H. Veltmeyer and J. Petras, 80–113. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., and J. Petras, eds. 2014. The new extractivism: A post neoliberal development model or imperialism of the twenty-first century? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, P. 2011. Analysis de la Ley de la Revolucion Productiva. Presentaciones CEDIB, Cochabamba: CEDIB.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J.R. 2011. From rebellion to reform in Bolivia: Class struggle, Indigenous liberation and the politics of Evo Morales. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1997. Eastern Lowlands natural resource management and agricultural production project. World Bank Project database. <http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?pagePK=64283627&piPK=64290415> (accessed February 16, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1998. Eastern Lowlands: Natural resource management and agricultural production project, Implementation Completion Report No. 17866. <http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1998/05/13/000009265_3980702114952/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf> (accessed December, 8 2013).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2007. World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zoomers, A. 2001. El mercado rural de tierras en Santa Cruz. In Las tierras bajas de Bolivia a fines del siglo XX, ed. M. Urioste and D. Pacheco, 310–347. La Paz: PIEB.
   Google Scholar
• Zoomers, A. 2003. Land liberalization and sustainable development in Latin America: Unravelling the land sales market of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. International Development Planning Review 25, no. 3: 245–62. doi: 10.3828/idpr.25.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar