Re-inventing the commons: community forestry as accumulation without dispossession in Nepal

References

• Agrawal, A. 1996. The community vs. the market and the state: Forest use in Uttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9, no. 1: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althusser, L., and E. Balibar. 1997 [1968]. Reading capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, S. 1976. Unequal development. London: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K.B. 2010. Marx at the margins: On nationalism, ethnicity, and non-western societies. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Angelis, M. 2001. Marx and primitive accumulation: The continuous character of capital's’ enclosures’. The Commoner 2, no. 1: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• de Angelis, M. 2003. Reflections on alternatives, commons and communities. The Commoner 6: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• de Angelis, M. 2004. Separating the doing and the deed: Capital and the continuous character of enclosures. Historical Materialism 12, no. 2: 57–87.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, J. 1976. Summary of selected parts of Kautsky's The Agrarian Question. Economy and Society 5, no. 1: 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banand, J., and J. Platteau. 1996. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Rome: FAO-UN.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World development 27, no. 12: 2021–2044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, P. M., J. Cameron and D. Seddon. 1980. Nepal in Crisis: Growth and Stagnation at the Periphery. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. 2008. Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social and Legal Studies 17, no. 3: 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, P. 2007. Primitive accumulation, enclavity, rural marginalisation & articulation. Review of African Political Economy 34, no. 111: 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr, R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford, eds. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casarino, C., and A. Negri. 2009. In praise of the common: A conversation on philosophy and politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2008. Democracy and economic transformation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, April 19 2008.
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A. 1975. The political economy of rural development in Latin America: An interpretation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57, no. 3: 490–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A. 1981. Land reform and the agrarian question in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, D. 2011. How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38: 249–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckholm E. 1976. Losing ground. New York: WW Norton for the Worldwatch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J.B. 2015. The new imperialism of globalized monopoly-finance capital: An introduction. Monthly Review 67, no. 3, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidwani, V. 2013. Six theses on waste, value and common. Social and Cultural Geography 14, no. 7: 773–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, D., and R. Fisher. 1991. Villagers, Forests and Foresters: The Philosophy, Process and Practice of Community Forestry in Nepal. Kathmandu: Sahayogi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 1997. Representing crisis: The theory of Himalayan environmental degradation and the project of development in post-rana Nepal. Development and Change 28, no. 1: 45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L.S. 1987. What are the impacts of Himalayan deforestation on the Ganges-Brahmaputra lowlands and delta? Assumptions and facts. Mountain Research and Development 7, no. 3: 256–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2006. Denaturalizing dispossession: Critical ethnography in the age of resurgent imperialism. Antipode 38, no. 5: 977–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1985. Limits to capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, B., and O. Hirst. 1975. Pre-capitalist modes of production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hobley, M. 1996. Participatory forestry: The process of change in India and Nepal. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, A., C. McFarlane, and A. Vasudevan. 2012. Rethinking enclosure: Space, subjectivity and the commons. Antipode 44, no. 4: 1247–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautsky, K. 1988. The agrarian question. Vol. 1. London, Winchester, MA: Zwan Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Levien M. 2012. The land question: Special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 933–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2010. Indigeneity, capitalism, and the management of dispossession. Current Anthropology 51, no. 3: 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2014. Land's end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. 2009. The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luxemburg, R. 2003 [1913]. The Accumulation of Capital. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malla, Y. 2001. Changing policies and the persistence of patron-client relations in Nepal: Stakeholders’ responses to changes in forest policies. Environmental History 6, no. 2: 287–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1967. Capital Vol. 1: A critical analysis of capitalist production. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, J. 1991. A reassessment of the causes and severity of Nepal's environmental crisis. World Development 19, no. 7: 805–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollett, S. 2014. A modern paradise: Garifuna land, labor, and displacement-in-place. Latin American Perspectives 41, no. 6: 27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. 2004. The second age of the third world: From primitive accumulation to global public goods? Third World Quarterly 25, no. 1: 87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeson, J.M. 1993. Commoners: Common right, enclosure, and social change in England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. 2005. ‘The expert taught us all we know’: Professionalization and knowledge in Nepalese community forestry. Antipode 37, no. 3: 581–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H. 2014. Beyond the ‘local community’: The evolution of multi-scale politics in Nepal's community forestry regimes. International Forestry Review 16, no. 3: 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel, D. 2012. In search of alternatives: Pro-poor entrepreneurship in community forestry. Journal of Development Studies 48, no. 11: 1649–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel, D., D. Khatri, and G. Paudel. 2010. Corpo-bureaucratizing community forestry: Commercialization, livelihoods, and the increased financial transaction in Community Forestry User Groups in Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 9, no. 1: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, M. 2000. The invention of capitalism: Classical political economy and the secret history of primitive accumulation. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, T. 2014. What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International 39, no. 2: 233–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribot, J.C., A. Agrawal, and A. Larson. 2006. Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development 34, no. 11: 1864–1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, K. 2007. Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, Governmentality, and post-colonial capitalism. New Delhi: Routledge India.
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, S., A. White, and D. Kaimowitz. 2004. A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty reduction: Making forest markets work for low-income producers. Washington, DC: Forest Trend, CIFORE.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., R. Hall, S.M. Borras Jr, B. White, & W. Wolford. 2013. The politics of evidence: Methodologies for understanding the global land rush. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 3: 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1984. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subedi, B., H. Ojha, K. Nicholson, and S. Binayee. 2002. An assessment of community based forest enterprises in Nepal: Case studies, lessons and implications. Kathmandu: ANSAB.
   Google Scholar
• Thirsk, J. 1985. The agrarian history of England and wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. 1991. Customs in common. London: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S.M. Borras Jr, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White, 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 189–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpe, H. 1980. The articulation of modes of production: Essays from economy and society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M.W. 2014. Gentrification, assassination and forgetting in Mexico: A feminist Marxist tale. Gender, Place & Culture 21, no. 1: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar