Seed laws, certification and standardization: outlawing informal seed systems in the Global South

References

• Acuña, I. 2011. De campesinos a empresarios: la retórica neoliberal de la política agraria en Colombia. Espacio Abierto Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociología 20, no. 4: 641–657.
   Google Scholar
• Almekinders, C. 2000. The importance of informal seed sector and its relation with the legislative framework. Paper presented at GTZ-Eschborn. July 4–5, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, K. 2008. Seed wars: Controversies and cases on plant genetic resources and intellectual property. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bocci, R. 2009. Seed legislation and agrobiodiversity: conservation varieties. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development 103, no. 1/2: 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G.C., and S.L. Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., and B. Jacobsson, eds. 2000. A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, L. 2000. The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 273–283. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00061-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L. 2011a. Standards: Recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, L. 2011b. Food standards: The cacophony of governance. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, no. 10: 3247–3250. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, K.J. 2002. Expertise, book farming, and government agriculture: The origins of agricultural seed certification in the United States. Agricultural History 76, no. 3: 524–545. doi: 10.1525/ah.2002.76.3.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coscione, M., and V. García Pinzón. 2014. TLCs, paro nacional agrario y movimiento social en Colombia. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. September 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Da Via, E. 2012. Seed diversity, farmer's rights, and the politics of repeasantization. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 2, no. 10: 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Documento de posición por la defensa de las semillas. 2013. Red de Semillas Libres de Colombia. Accessed September 10, 2013. http://semillas.org.co/es/revista/documento-de-posici.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, J. 2013. A struggle for survival in Colombia's countryside. Eyes on Trade, August 30, 2013. http://www.bilaterals.org/?a-struggle-for-survival-in.
   Google Scholar
• Fitting, E. 2011. The struggle for maize: Campesinos, workers, and transgenic corn in the Mexican countryside. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D.K. 1990. The business of breeding: Hybrid corn in Illinois, 1890–1940. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, K. 2009. Out of Hand: Farmers Face the Consequences of a Consolidated Seed Industry. Farmer to Farmer Campaign on Genetic Engineering. Dec 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, W., and J. Van Wijk. 1995. The impact of plant breeders’ rights in developing countries: Debate and experience in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, C.F. 2002. Crisis y transformación de la agricultura colombiana 1990–2000. Bogota: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 1988. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988 and 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2010. Impending Dispossession, Enabling Repossession: Biological Open Source and the Recovery of Seed Sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 3: 367–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2013. Repurposing the Master's Tools: The Open Source Seed Initiative and the Struggle for Seed Sovereignty. Conference paper for discussion at Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue, International Conference at Yale University, September 14–15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lampland, M., and S.L. Star. 2009. Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Las leyes que privatizan y controlan el uso de las semillas, criminalizan las semillas criollas. 2013. Grupo Semillas. Bogotá, August 23, 2013. http://www.biodiversidadla.org/Principal/Secciones/Noticias/Colombia_Las_leyes_que_privatizan_y_controlan_el_uso_de_las_semillas_criminalizan_las_semillas_criollas.
   Google Scholar
• Las semillas de la discordia. 2013. Dinero.com – Publicaciones Semana S.A., September 2, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Latin America: the mantra of privatization. 2005. GRAIN. Seedling, July 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Louwaars, N., ed. 2002. Seed policy, legislation and law: Widening a narrow focus. Binghamton: Food Products Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louwaars, N. 2005. Biases and bottlenecks: time to reform the South's inherited seed laws? Seedling – 26 July 2005. GRAIN. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/473-seed-laws-biases-and-bottlenecks.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, A. 2002. De la estructura agraria al sistema agroindustrial. Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, Neville. 2001. Coordinating Regional Mechanisms for Facilitating Collaboration and Exchange of Expertise Among Stakeholders Dealing with Seed Production in Latin America and the Caribbean, in Seed Policy and Programmes in the Latin America and the Caribbean. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies 36: 139–169. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P.R. 1979. Seeds of the earth: A private or public resource? Ottawa: Canada: Mutual Press Limited Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa Jiménez, M.J., J.F. Cruz Uribe, and J. Almansa. 2013. Reflexiones en torno a la importancia de la biodiversidad y a los efectos del régimen colombiano de semillas. Compendium 16, no. 30: 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Olshan, M.A. 1993. Standards-Making Organizations and the Rationalization of American Life. Sociological Quarterly 34, no. 2: 319–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, G. 2008. Food for the few: Neoliberal globalism and biotechnology in Latin America. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, G. 2013. El regimen alimentario neoliberal y su crisis: estado, agroempresas multinacionales y biotecnología. Revista Antípoda, Issue 17, p. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Resolution 970. Colombia: ICA, March 10, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Santilli, J. 2012. Agrobiodiversity and the Law: Regulating Genetic Resources, Food Security and Cultural Diversity. New York: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seed Laws in Latin America: the offensive continues, so does popular resistance. 2013. GRAIN, Oct 30, 2013. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4808-seed-laws-in-latin-america-the-.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, R., ed. 1997. New seed and old laws: Regulatory reform and the diversification of national seed systems. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• UPOV. www.upov.int.
   Google Scholar
• Vellvé, R. 1992. Saving the seed: Genetic diversity and European agriculture. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. and P. German Castelli. 2000. The Internationalization of Brazil's Seed Industry: Biotechnology, Patents and Biodiversity. Research co-operation agreement: CPDA/UFRRJ and Action Aid. Collaborating Researcher: Ana Celia Castro. Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Winge, T. 2012. A Guide to EU Legislation on the Marketing of Seed and Plant Propagating Material in the Context of Agricultural Biodiversity. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, E.I. 2008. What if seeds were not patentable? Michigan State Law Review 2008, no. 1: 321–344.
   Google Scholar