Indigenous land claims or green grabs? Inclusions and exclusions within forest carbon politics in Indonesia

References

• Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agung, P., G. Galudra, M. Van Noordwijk, and R. Maryani. 2014. Reform or reversal: The impact of REDD+ readiness on forest governance in Indonesia. Climate Policy: 1–21. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.941317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMAN. 2014. Pidato Sekretaris Jenderal AMAN menyambut hari Kebangkitan Masyarakat Adat Nusantara 2014 dan 15 Tahun AMAN.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and C. McFarlane. 2011. Assemblage and geography. Area 43, no. 2: 124–127. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astuti, R. and A. McGregor. 2015b. Responding to the Green Economy: How REDD+ and the One Map Initiative are transforming forest governance in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 12: 2273–2293. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1082422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astuti, R., and A. McGregor. 2015a. Governing carbon, transforming forest politics: A case study of Indonesia’s REDD+ Task Force. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56, no. 1: 21–36. doi:10.1111/apv.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, L. 2009. Who owns the land? Looking for law and power in reformasi East Kalimantan. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, C., I.A.P. Resosudarmo, J. McCarthy, and A. Dermawan. 2006. Forest and decentralization in Indonesia: An overview. In Decentralization of forest administration in Indonesia: Implications for forest sustainability, economic development and community livelihoods, 1–15. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, C. 2013. Assembling the sea: Materiality, movement and regulatory practices in the Cardigan Bay scallop fishery. Cultural Geographies 20, no. 1: 21–41. doi:10.1177/1474474012463665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. and J.C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reactions “from below”. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–1747. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.843845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 209–216. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.559005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., C. Kay, S. Gómez, and J. Wilkinson. 2012. Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 33, no. 4: 402–416. doi:10.1080/02255189.2012.745394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumpus, A.G. and D.M. Liverman. 2008. Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography 84, no. 2: 127–155. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00401.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepek, M.L. 2011. Foucault in the forest: Questioning environmentality in Amazonia. American Ethnologist 38, no. 3: 501–515. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2011.01319.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson, C., K.I. MacDonald, and B. Neimark. 2013. Grabbing “green”: Markets, environmental governance and the materialization of natural capital. Human Geography 6, no. 1: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2009. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, A. 2014. New tech, better map on tap to protect Indonesian forests, CIFOR Forests News Blog. http://blog.cifor.org/22534/new-tech-better-map-on-tap-to-protect-indonesian-forests (accessed October 23, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J.-D. 2011. The Deleuze-Guattarian assemblage: Plastic habits. Area 43, no. 2: 148–153. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01006.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 237–261. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, C., M. Sirait, and A. Kusworo. 2000. Getting the boundaries right: Indonesia’s urgent need to redefine its forest estate. Souetheast Asia Policy Research Working Paper, No. 25, World Agroforestry Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990. The history of sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction. Reissue ed. Trans. and ed. R. Hurley. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. 1st ed. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., M. EdelmanJr, S. M. Borras, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 467–488. doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T. M. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S. 2015. Politics of appearances: Some reasons why the UN-REDD project in Central Sulawesi failed to unite the various stakeholders. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56, no. 1: 37–47. doi:10.1111/apv.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howson, P. and S. Kindon. 2015. Analysing access to the local REDD+ benefits of Sungai Lamandau, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56, no. 1: 96–110. doi:10.1111/apv.12089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indonesian REDD+ Task Force. 2012. REDD+ National Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, H.N. 2015. BP REDD+ officially disbanded. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/01/29/bp-redd-officially-disbanded.html (accessed July 29, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Larder, N. 2015. Space for pluralism? Examining the Malibya land grab. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 839–858. doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1029461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2000. Articulating Indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History 42, no. 1: 149–179. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500002632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2001. Masyarakat Adat, difference, and the limits of recognition in Indonesia’s forest zone. Modern Asian Studies 35, no. 3: 645–676. doi:10.1017/S0026749X01003067.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2007a. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36, no. 2: 263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2007b. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2014a. Fixing non-market subjects: Governing land and population in the global south. Foucault Studies, no. 18: 34–48. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i18.4650
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2014b. Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier.
   Google Scholar
• Liverman, D.M. 2009. Conventions of climate change: Constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere. Journal of Historical Geography 35, no. 2: 279–296. doi:10.1016/j.jhg.2008.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, L. 2014. A Surprising Indigenous View of REDD+ - Mina Setra and Frances Seymour, Center For Global Development. http://www.cgdev.org/blog/surprising-indigenous-view-redd-mina-setra-and-frances-seymour (accessed October 23, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Mahanty, S. and C.L. McDermott. 2013. How does ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’ (FPIC) impact social equity? Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for REDD+. Land Use Policy 35: 406–416. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, M.E., N. McKeon, and S.M. Borras. 2013. Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 1–23. doi:10.1080/14747731.2013.764151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. 2011. Veritable inventions: cities, policies and assemblage. Area 43, no. 2: 143–147. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., J. A. C. Vel, and S. Afiff. 2012. Trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure: Development schemes, virtual land grabs, and green acquisitions in Indonesia’s Outer Islands. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 521–549. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, A. 2015. Policy: REDD+ in Asia Pacific. Nature Climate Change 5, no. 7: 623–624. doi:10.1038/nclimate2692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, A., E. Challies, P. Howson, R. Astuti, R. Dixon, B. Haalboom, M. Gavin, L. Tacconi, and S. Afiff. 2015. Beyond carbon, more than forest? REDD+ governmentality in Indonesia. Environment and Planning A 47, no. 1: 138–155. doi:10.1068/a140054p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, A., S. Weaver, E. Challies, P. Howson, R. Astuti, and B. Haalboom. 2014. Practical critique: Bridging the gap between critical and practice-oriented REDD+ research communities. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 55, no. 3: 277–291. doi:10.1111/apv.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijaard, E. 2015. Commentary: The Final Blow for Indonesia’s Forests?. The Jakarta Globe. http://thejakartaglobe.beritasatu.com/opinion/commentary-final-blow-indonesias-forests/ (accessed March 31, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S.E. 2001. Spatial governmentality and the new urban social order: Controlling gender violence through law. American Anthropologist 103, no. 1: 16–29. doi: 10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, S. and B. Adams. 2012. Market masquerades: Uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Development and Change 43, no. 1: 133–158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01748.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nababan, A. 2013. Kebijakan umum menuju pengakuan dan perlindungan masyarakat adat dan wilayah adatnya di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Penyempurnaan UU PA Sebagai Peraturan Pokok Agraria, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
   Google Scholar
• Oels, A. 2005. Rendering climate change governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7, no. 3: 185–207. doi:10.1080/15239080500339661.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L. 1995. Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode 27, no. 4: 383–406. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L. and P. Vandergeest. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies 60, no. 3: 761–812. doi:10.2307/2700109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, K. 2012. Rethinking community: Conservation, practice, and emotion. Emotion, Space and Society 5, no. 3: 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2011.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rachman, N.F. 2013. Undoing categorical inequality: customary communities, agrarian conflicts, and struggle for inclusive citizenship in Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Resosudarmo, B.P. 2005. The politics and economics of Indonesia’s natural resources. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Roewiastuti, M.R. 2013. Panduan atas putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012: Hutan Adat bukan lagi Hutan Negara. AMAN, AIPP, Sajogyo Institute, Rainforest Foundation Noruega, IWGIA, Tanah Air Beta.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Safitri, M. 2014. One land administration. Jakarta: Epistema Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Safitri, M. 2015. Mencari Perusak Hutan. Kompas.
   Google Scholar
• Saich, A., D. Dapice, T. Masoud, D. Perkins, J. Pincus, J. Rosengard, T. Vallely, B. Wilkinson, and J. Williams. 2010. From reformasi to institutional transformation: A strategic assessment of Indonesia’s prospects for growth, equity and democratic governance. Cambridge, MA: Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Satgas REDD+. 2013. Peran Masyarakat Adat dalam Penanggulangan Dampak Perubahan Iklim, www.reddplus.go.id. http://www.reddplus.go.id/berita/dari-media/339-peran-masyarakat-adat-dalam-penanggulangan-dampak-perubahan-iklim.
   Google Scholar
• Saturi, S. 2012. Peta wilayah adat diakomodir masuk One Map Indonesia, Mongabay.co.id. http://www.mongabay.co.id/2012/11/15/peta-wilayah-adat-diakomodir-masuk-one-map/.
   Google Scholar
• Saturi, S. 2013. AMAN Targetkan Pemetaan 40 Juta Hektar Hutan Adat Selesai 2020. Mongabay.co.id.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, S. 2014. Indonesia’s moratorium on new forest licenses: An update. Land Use Policy 38: 37–40. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel, S.J. 2012. Governance institutions, resource rights regimes, and the informal mining sector: Regulatory complexities in Indonesia. World Development 40, no. 1: 189–205. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Jakarta Post. 2014. REDD+ Agency hopes for committed new government.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. 2003. Generating materials. In Using social theory: Thinking through research, 89–104. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Witoelar, W. 2013. Dialog antara Wimar Witoelar dan Kuntoro Mangkusubroto tentang REDD+. TVRI.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S. M. Borras, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 189–210. doi:10.1111/dech.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, G. 2011. Indigenous people and customary land ownership under domestic Redd frameworks: A case study of Indonesia. Law, Environment and Development Journal 7: 1–17.
   Google Scholar