In the law & on the land: finding the female farmer in Myanmar’s National Land Use Policy

References

• Agarwal, B. 1994. A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 2014. Food security, productivity, and gender inequality. In Oxford handbook of food, politics, and society, edited by Ronald J. Herring, 273–300. Cary, NC, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belford, A., Hnin Yadana Zaw, and Antoni Slodkowski. 2016. Aung San Suu Kyi prepares to tackle military land grabs in litmus test for Myanmar government. South China Morning Post. http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/1998700/aung-san-suu-kyi-prepares-tackle-military-land-grabs-litmus. August 3 2016. (accessed December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Berhman, J., R. Meinzien-Dick, and A. Quisumbing. 2012. The gender implications of large-scale land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 1: 49–79. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doss, C., C. Kovarik, A. Peterman, A.R. Quisumbing, and M. Bold. 2013. Gender inequalities in ownership and control of land in Africa: Myth versus Reality. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01308.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, C., G. Summerfield, and D. Tsikata. 2014. Land, gender, and food security. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.895021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, Rebecca. 2011. Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum 42, no. 2: 129–32. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faxon, H.O. 2015. Form 7: 7 cases of farmland registration in Kachin State. Yangon: Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, S. 2015. Politics of translation. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 225–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEN (Gender Equality Network). 2014. Towards gender equality in the National Land Use Policy.
   Google Scholar
• GEN (Gender Equality Network). 2015. Raising the curtain: Cultural norms, social practices, and gender equality in Myanmar. Yangon. http://raisethecurtain.org.
   Google Scholar
• wa Gĩthĩnji, M.W., C. Konstantinidis, and A. Barenberg. 2014. Small and productive: Kenyan women and crop choice. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 101–29. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.878467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, C. 2006. Activist research v. cultural critique: Indigenous land rights and the contradictions of politically engaged anthropology. Cultural Anthropology 21, no. 1: 96–120. doi: 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14, no. 3: 575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 1991. Engendering everyday resistance: Gender, patronage and production politics in rural Malaysia. Journal of Peasant Studies 19, no. 1: 93–121. doi: 10.1080/03066159108438472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBRD/WB (The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / World Bank). 2001. Engendering development through gender equality in rights, resources, and voice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeya, C. 2005/6. The ‘traditional’ high status of women in Burma: A historical reconsideration. Journal of Burma Studies 10: 51–81. doi: 10.1353/jbs.2005.0003
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. 2003. Gender analysis of land: Beyond land rights for women? Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 4: 453–80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0366.00062
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. 2012. ‘Cosmopolitan’ villagers and populist democracy in Thailand. South East Asia Research 20, no. 3: 343–60. doi: 10.5367/sear.2012.0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, R.M. 2004. ‘Who is the developed woman?’: Women as a category of development discourse, kumaon, India. Development and Change 35, no. 5: 57–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyi Pyar Chit Saw, and M. Arnold. 2014. Administering the State in Myanmar: An overview of the general administrative department. The Asia Foundation/MDRD-CESD Subnational Governance in Myanmar Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LUASC (Land Use Allocation and Scrutising Committee). 2014a. National Land Use Policy (draft 5 – released October 18, 2014). Nay Pyi Taw: Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
   Google Scholar
• LUASC (Land Use Allocation and Scrutising Committee). 2014b. Press release: Consultation meeting on draft National Land Use Policy. Inya Lake Hotel, Yangon. October 18 2014. Nay Pyi Taw: Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
   Google Scholar
• LUASC (Land Use Allocation and Scrutising Committee). 2016. National Land Use Policy (final draft – released January 2016). Nay Pyi Taw: Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
   Google Scholar
• Maber, E. 2014. (In)Equality and action: The role of women's training initiatives in promoting women's leadership opportunities in Myanmar. Gender & Development 22, no. 1: 141–56. doi: 10.1080/13552074.2014.889340
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G.E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, S. 2016. Are the odds for justice ‘stacked’ against them? challenges and opportunities to securing land claims by smallholder farmers in Myanmar. Critical Asian Studies 48, no. 3: 443–60. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2016.1196888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2014. Rethinking land grab ontology. Rural Sociology 79, no. 1: 34–55. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, S.E. 2006. Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metro, R. 2014. From the form to the face to face: IRBs, ethnographic researchers, and human subjects translate consent. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 45, no. 2: 167–84. doi: 10.1111/aeq.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoletti, P. 2014. ‘Women’s participation in the subnational governance of Myanmar’, subnational governance in Myanmar Discussion Paper No. 3. Yangon: MDRI-CESD and The Asia Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• MOECAF (Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry). 2015. Consolidated comments from NLUP public consultations. Nay Pyi Taw: Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C.T. 1988. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30: 61–88. doi: 10.1057/fr.1988.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namati. 2015. Returns of Grabbed Land in Myanmar: Progress After 2 Years. https://namati.org/resources/returnsgrabbedlandmyanmar/. (accessed June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Namati. 2016. Gendered aspects of land rights in Myanmar: Evidence from Paralegal Casework. https://namati.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Namati-Gender-policy-brief-FINAL-1.pdf (Accessed December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, Andrea J. 2011. Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class, and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42, no. 2: 153–62. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obendorf, R. 2012. Legal review of recently enacted farmland Law and vacant, fallow and virgin lands management Law: Improving the legal & policy frameworks relating to land management in Myanmar. Yangon: Food Security Working Group and Land Core Group.
   Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, B. 2007. A bigger piece of a very small Pie: Intrahousehold resource allocation and poverty reduction in Africa. Development and Change 38, no. 1: 21–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, B. 2009. Gender justice, land and the Agrarian question in Southern Africa. In Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question, ed. A.H. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 190–213. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. 2014. Delivering lessons from Myanmar's Dry zone: Lessons from lessons from Mandalay and Magwe on realizing the economic potential of small-scale farmers. Yangon: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, S.L. 2001. Languages of Sex and AIDS in Nepal: Notes on the social production of commensurability. Cultural Anthropology 16, no. 4: 418–541. doi: 10.1525/can.2001.16.4.481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2007. Liberalisation and the debates on women's access to land. Third World Quarterly 28, no. 8: 1479–500. doi: 10.1080/01436590701637342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2009. Engendering the political economy of agrarian change. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 197–226. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resurreccion, B.P., and E.E. Sajor. 2010. ‘Not a real worker;’ gendering migrants in Thailand’s shrimp farms. International Migration 48, no. 6: 102–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riles, A. 2000. The network inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D.E., and D. Edmunds. 1997. Women, Men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes. World Development 25, no. 8: 1351–71. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00036-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Castañeda, L. 2016. In the shadow of benchmarks. Normative and ontological issues in the governance of land. Environment and Planning A 48, no. 4: 681–98. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15615767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, A., and K. Jolliffe. 2015. Forced migration and the Myanmar peace process. UNHCR. New Issues in Refugee Research Research Paper No. 274.
   Google Scholar
• Tharapi Than. 2014. Women in modern Burma. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung. 2004. Behind the teak curtain: Authoritarianism, agricultural policies and political legitimation in Burma/Myanmar. London: Paul Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• TNI (Transnational Institute). 2015. Linking women and land in Myanmar: Recognising Gender in the National Land Use Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TWU (Tavoyan Women’s Union). 2014. Our lives, not for sale: Tavoyan Women speak out against the Dawei special economic zone project.
   Google Scholar
• U Shwe Thein. 2014. Opportunities for CSOs to bring voices of grassroots into National Land Use Policy. Presentation to the land core group, Yangon, Myanmar, October 1, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Welker, M. 2012. The Green revolution’s ghost: Unruly subjects of participatory development in rural Indonesia. American Ethnologist 39, no. 2: 389–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, K. 2015. Commercial agriculture expansion in Myanmar: Links to deforestation, conversion timber, and land conflicts. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. World development report on gender equality and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar