Emancipatory rural politics: confronting authoritarian populism

References

• ActionAid, Friends of the Earth, Inclusive Development International, and Rede Social de Justiça e Direitos Humanos. 2017. Invested in exploitation? TIAA’s links to land grabbing and deforestation. Washington, DC: ActionAid USA.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, H. 1973. Peasant classes and primordial loyalties. The Journal of Peasant Studies 1, no. 1: 23–62. doi: 10.1080/03066157308437871
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Fradejas, A., S.M. Borras Jr., T. Holmes, E. Holt-Giménez, and M. Robbins. 2015. Food sovereignty: Convergence and contradictions, conditions and challenges. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 431–48. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1023567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M.A., and V.M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 3: 587–612. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.582947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, N. 2016. Age and generation in the service of development? In Generationing development: A relational approach to children, youth and development, ed. R. Huijsmans, 315–330. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1973 [1951]. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., J. Grin, B. Pel, and S. Jhagroe. 2016. The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 18, no. 5: 557–67. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. 2005. Being and event. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. 2016. Twenty-four notes on the uses of the word “people”. In What is a people?, eds. A. Badiou, P. Bourdieu, J. Butler, G. Didi-Huberman, S. Khiari, and J. Rancière, 21–31. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beban, A., S. So, and K. Un. 2017. From force to legitimation: Rethinking land grabs in Cambodia. Development and Change 48, no. 2: 590–612. doi: 10.1111/dech.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlet, C., and M. Lyons. 2000. Right-wing populism in America: Too close for comfort. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H., and T.J. Byres. 2001. From peasant studies to agrarian change. Journal of Agrarian Change 1, no. 1: 1–56. doi: 10.1111/1471-0366.00002
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. 1977. The unsettling of America: Culture and agriculture. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl, J. 2012. Bookchin, Öcalan, and the dialectics of democracy. Paper presented at Challenging Capitalist Modernity: Alternative Concepts and the Kurdish Question, February 3-5 2012, Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Biehl, J., and M. Bookchin. 1998. The politics of social ecology: Libertarian municipalism. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow-Strain, A. 2007. Intimate enemies: Landowners, power and violence in Chiapas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2014. Think like a commoner: A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, B., and Z. Exley. 2016. Rules for revolutionaries: How big organizing can change everything. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
   Google Scholar
• Bookchin, M. 1982. The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. 2016. Land politics, agrarian movements and scholar-activism. Inaugural lecture. The Hague: ISS.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, and S. Monsalve. 2015. Land and food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 600–17. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1029225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., S.M., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 209–16. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 1991. Moral economists, subalterns, new social movements, and the (re-) emergence of a (post-) modernized (middle) peasant. The Journal of Peasant Studies 18, no. 2: 173–205. doi: 10.1080/03066159108438449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, Z.W., C.M. Schiavoni, and A. Alonso-Fradejas. 2015. Contextualising food sovereignty: The politics of convergence among movements in the USA. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 618–35. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1023570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J., E. Laclau, and S. Žižek. 2000. Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, K. 2013. Youth, dirt, and the spatialization of subjectivity: An intersectional approach to white rural imaginaries. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 38, no. 4: 623–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, A., and A. Deaton. 2017. Mortality and morbidity in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/case-deaton-postconference-april-10-2017-with-appendix-figs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cemgil, C., and C. Hoffmann. 2016. The ‘Rojava revolution’ in Syrian Kurdistan: A model of development for the Middle East? IDS Bulletin 47, no. 3: 53–76. doi: 10.19088/1968-2016.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassens, A. 2011. The resurgence of tribal taxes in the context of recent traditional leadership laws in South Africa. South African Journal on Human Rights 27, no. 3: 522–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys, P., and D. Delgado Pugley. forthcoming 2017. Peasant and indigenous transnational social movements engaging with climate justice. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'Etudes du Développement 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. 2014. Financialization, distance and global food politics. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 797–814. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.875536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 2005. Reflections on youth: From the past to the postcolony. In Makers and breakers: Children and youth in postcolonial Africa, eds. A. Honwana and F.de Boeck, 19–30. Oxford: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Conde, M., and P. Le Billon. 2017. Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214790X17300035 (accessed May 30, 2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortes, P. 2015. The feminization of international migration and its effects on the children left behind: Evidence from the Philippines. World Development 65: 62–78. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crankshaw, A. 2016. A food sovereignty critique of the G8 New Alliance on food security and nutrition. MA thesis., University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K.W. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99. doi: 10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• D’Alisa, G., F. Demaria, and G. Kallis. 2014. Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, A. 2014. The rise of social protection in development: progress, pitfalls and politics. The European Journal of Development Research 26, no. 3: 311–21. doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2014.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deere, C., and F. Royce. 2009. Social movements in Latin America: Organizing for sustainable livelihoods. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, C.M., and A. Blackwell. 2014. Worlds apart: Poverty and politics in rural America. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, J., and D.S. Massey, eds. 2006. Crossing the border: Research from the Mexican migration project. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, M. 2015. The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 5: 903–28. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.994510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist. 2017. America’s opioid epidemic is worsening. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/03/daily-chart-3 (accessed April 28, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1999. Peasants against globalization: rural social movements in Costa Rica. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2003. Transnational peasant and farmer movements and networks. In Global civil society 2003, eds. M. Kaldor, H. Anheier, and M. Glasius, 185–200. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and S.M. Borras Jr. 2016. Political dynamics of transnational agrarian movements. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman M., C. Oya, and S.M. Borras Jr. 2013. Global land grabs: historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1517–31. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.850190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F. 1950 [1894]. The peasant question in France and Germany. In Selected works, volume 2, eds. K. Marx and F. Engels, 420–440. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2014. ‘Like gold with yield’: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 777–95. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.873977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 237–61. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatheuer, T. 2011. Buen Vivir: A brief introduction to Latin America’s new concepts for the good life and the rights of nature. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation, Publication Series on Ecology No. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., ed. 1990. The challenge of rural democratisation: Perspectives from Latin America and the Philippines. Journal of Development Studies (special issue) 26, no. 4: 79–96. doi: 10.1080/00220389008422171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 2007. Accountability politics: Power and voice in rural Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J.C. 2001. Elections and democratization in the Philippines. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J.C. 2016. The right to land at crossroads in Myanmar. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/article/the-right-to-land-at-crossroads-in-myanmar (accessed April 11, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26: 56–80. doi: 10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2013. A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after Polanyi. New Left Review 81: 119–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2017. The end of progressive neoliberalism. Dissent 64, no. 2: 130–4. doi: 10.1353/dss.2017.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and A. Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 1982. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., ed. 2001. The global third way debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2009. Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo: Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo sudamericano actual. In Extractivismo, política y sociedad, eds. J. Schuldt, A. Acosta, A. Barandiará, A. Bebbington, M. Folchi, A. Alayza, and E. Gudynas, 187–225. Quito: CAAP/CLAES.
   Google Scholar
• Gusterson, H. 2017. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist 44, no. 2: 209–14. doi: 10.1111/amet.12469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haiven, M. 2014. Cultures of financialization: Fictitious capital in popular culture and everyday life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1980. Popular-democratic versus authoritarian populism. In Marxism and democracy, ed. A. Hunt, 157–87. London: Laurence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1985. Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al. New Left Review 151: 115–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1986. Gramsci’s relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry 10, no. 5: 4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., M. Edelman, S.M. Borras Jr, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 467–88. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., and T. Kepe. 2017. Elite capture and state neglect: New evidence on South Africa’s land reform. Review of African Political Economy 44: 122–30. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2017.1288615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., I. Scoones, and D. Tsikata, eds. 2015a. Africa’s land rush: Rural livelihoods and agrarian change. Oxford: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. 2004. Growth fetish. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., and I. Nelson, eds. 2015. Practising feminist political ecologies: Moving beyond the ‘green economy’. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, N. 2016. Violent activism, Islamist ideology, and the conquest of public space among youth in Indonesia. In Youth identities and social transformations in modern Indonesia, ed. K. Robinson, 200–213. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, C. 2014. Days of destruction, days of revolt. New York: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, L. 2006. What’s new about youth? Development and Change 37: 1425–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00537.x
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, N. 2010. Badiou, Balibar, Rancière: Re-thinking emancipation. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E.J. 1973. Peasants and politics. The Journal of Peasant Studies 1, no. 1: 3–22. doi: 10.1080/03066157308437870
   Google Scholar
• Holt Giménez, E., and A. Shattuck. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 109–44. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honwana, A., and F. De Boeck 2005. Makers and breakers: Children and youth in postcolonial Africa. Oxford: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Huizer, G. 1975. How peasants become revolutionaries: some cases from Latin America and Southeast Asia. Development and Change 6, no. 3: 27–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1975.tb00682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISSC, IDS and UNESCO. 2016. World social science report 2016. Challenging inequalities: Pathways to a just world. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2011. In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics 70, no. 5: 873–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashi, E., and M. Watts. 2010. Curse of the black gold: 50 years of oil in the Niger Delta. http://edkashi.com/project/curse-of-the-black-gold/ (accessed May 5, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, B. 2009. Everyday politics in peasant societies (and ours). The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 227–43. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadse, A., P.M. Rosset, H. Morales, and B.G. Ferguson. 2017. Taking agroecology to scale: The zero budget natural farming peasant movement in Karnataka, India. The Journal of Peasant Studies 4: 1–28. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1276450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, C. 2016. Five charts that show Americans families’ debt crisis. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_united_states_of_debt/2016/05/the_rise_of_household_debt_in_the_u_s_in_five_charts.html (accessed April 29, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2014. Re-purposing the master’s tools: The open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1225–46. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.875897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V.I. 1964. The development of capitalism in Russia. 4th ed. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2010. To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode 41, no. 1: 66–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2014. Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, G., and S. Frostenson. 2017. How the opioid epidemic became America’s worst drug crisis ever, in 15 maps and charts. Vox. http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/3/23/14987892/opioid-heroin-epidemic-charts (accessed April 28, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. 2014. The U.S. car colossus and the production of inequality. American Ethnologist 41, no. 2: 232–45. doi: 10.1111/amet.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, A. 2016. There’s a terrifying mall ‘blight’ threatening communities across America. Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/what-will-happen-when-malls-shut-down-in-america-2016-9 (accessed April 29, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Malamud, A. 2017. Qué cosa fuera la patria sin Correa. Nueva Sociedad. http://nuso.org/articulo/que-cosa-fuera-la-patria-sin-correa/ (accessed March 20, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Mamonova, N. 2016. Naive monarchism and rural resistance in contemporary Russia. Rural Sociology 81(3): 316–42. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Alier, J., L. Temper, D. Del Bene, and A. Scheidel. 2016. Is there a global environmental justice movement? The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 3: 731–55. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1859]1968. Preface to a contribution to the critique of political economy. In Selected works, eds. K. Marx and F. Engels, 180–4. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1852]1978. The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R.C. Tucker, 594–617, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. 2016. Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2006. Peasant prospects in the neoliberal age. New Political Economy 11, no. 3: 407–18. doi: 10.1080/13563460600841041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., G. Veldwisch, and J. Franco. 2012. Water grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives 5, no. 2: 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Monnat, S. 2016. Deaths of despair and support for Trump in the 2016 presidential election. The Pennsylvania State University Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education Research Brief – 12/04/16, http://aese.psu.edu/directory/smm67/Election16.pdf (accessed May 30, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. Jr. 1966. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreda, T.S. 2015. Listening to their silence? The political reaction of affected communities to large-scale land acquisitions: Insights from Ethiopia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 517–39. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.993621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, R.J., and R. Bruno, eds. 2015. Dimensões rurais de políticas Brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad Editora Ltda.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research 66, no. 3: 745–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo, S., and P. Yeros. 2005. Reclaiming the land: The resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo, S., P. Jha, and P. Yeros. 2013. The classical agrarian question: Myth, reality and relevance today. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 2, no. 1: 93–119.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., and M. Scott. 2014. Household vulnerability in rural areas: Results of an index applied during a housing crash, economic crisis and under austerity conditions. Geoforum 51: 75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaki, Y. 2014. Peasants and the redshirt movement in Thailand: Some dissenting voices. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 1: 1–28. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.873409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntsebeza, L. 2006. Democracy compromised: Chiefs and the politics of the land in South Africa. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, R.A. 1975. The origins of crowd psychology: Gustave LeBon and the crisis of mass democracy in the third republic. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G., and P. Schmitter. 2013. Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, J.M. 1978. Agrarian revolution. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 3: 663–706. doi: 10.1080/03066150903143079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L., and C. Lund. 2011. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 667–81. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault, T., G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, eds. 2015. The Routledge handbook of political ecology. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Picketty, T. 2014. Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollin, R. 2013. Austerity economics and the struggle for the soul of US capitalism. Social Research 80, no. 3: 749–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S.L. 1979. The rational peasant: The political economy of rural society in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2000. Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, no. 1: 12–40. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putzel, J. 1995. Managing the ‘main force’: The communist party and the peasantry in the Philippines. The Journal of Peasant Studies 22, no. 4: 645–71. doi: 10.1080/03066159508438591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiñones, S. 2015. Dreamland: The true tale of America’s opiate epidemic. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 1998. Disagreement. Politics and philosophy. London: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2013. The people are not a brutal and ignorant mass. Verso Books blog. http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1226-the-people-are-not-a-brutal-and-ignorant-mass-jacques-ranciere-on-populism (accessed May 5, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2016. The populism that is not to be found. In What is a people?, ed. A. Badiou, 100–6. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S., ed. 2002. Shifting burdens: Gender and agrarian change under neoliberalism. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rede Social, GRAIN, Inter Pares, and Solidarity Sweden-Latin America. 2015. Foreign pension funds and land grabbing in Brazil. Barcelona: GRAIN.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. 2013. Choice, recognition and the democracy effects of decentralization. In The imperative of good local governance: Challenges for the next decade of decentralization, eds. J. Öjendal and A. Dellnäs, 93–120. Tokyo: UNU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. 2014. Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 667–705. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.894911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribot, J., and N.L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68, no. 2: 153–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, M.J. 2015. Exploring the ‘localisation’ dimension of food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 449–68. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1024966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., B. Machín Sosa, A. Roque Jaime, and D. Ávila Lozano. 2011. The Campesino-to-Campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: Social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 161–91. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2017. National rural youth service programme. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform. http://www.gov.za/about-government/government-programmes/national-rural-youth-service-corps-programme (accessed May 2, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ryter, L. 2002. Youth, gangs and the state in Indonesia. PhD diss., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, R., M. Edelman, P. Heller, and J. Teichman. 2007. Social democracy in the global periphery: Origins, challenges, prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, S., and S. Leite. 2012. Agrarian structure, foreign investment in land, and land prices in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 873–98. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.686492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, S., and G. Mészáros. 2017. The political economy of land struggle in Brazil under Workers' Party governments. Journal of Agrarian Change 17, no. 2: 397–414. doi: 10.1111/joac.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000. Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy 61, no. 1: 79–103. doi: 10.1080/19187033.2000.11675254
   Google Scholar
• Schiavoni, C.M. 2017. The contested terrain of food sovereignty construction: Toward a historical, relational and interactive approach. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 1: 1–32. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1234455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 2016. The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41: 293–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Leach, and P. Newell, eds. 2015. The politics of green transformations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1977. The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G. 2011. The new economics of sustainable consumption: Seeds of change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, T., A. Chrisafis, and M. Tait. 2017. Marine Le Pen’s Rise in ‘forgotten France’ – Video. https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2017/apr/20/marine-le-pens-rise-in-forgotten-france-video-front-national-burgundy?CMP = Share_iOSApp_Other (accessed May 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. 2016. Why has “development” become a political issue in Indian politics? Brown Journal of World Affairs 23, no. 1: 189–203.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, D. Abrol, E. Arond, and A. Ely. 2016. Grassroots innovation movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and G. Seyfang. 2013. Constructing grassroots innovations for sustainability. Global Environmental Change 23, no. 5: 827–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2016. Grassroots innovations and democracy. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2015. From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress. In The politics of green transformations, eds. I. Scoones, M. Leach, and P. Newell, 54–67. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2015. Commodities consensus: Neo-extractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly 114, no. 1: 65–82. doi: 10.1215/00382876-2831290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2017. Populismos latinoamericanos en el fin del ciclo progresista. Público GT. http://publicogt.com/2017/04/16/populismos-latinoamericanos-en-el-fin-del-ciclo-progresista/ (accessed April 17, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2009. The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33, no. 3: 601–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. 1971. The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present 50: 76–136. doi: 10.1093/past/50.1.76
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., and S. Tarrow. 2006. Contentious politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TNI (Transnational Institute). 2015. Assessment of 6th draft of the National Land Use Policy (NLUP). Amsterdam: TNI. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/assessment-of-6th-draft-of-the-national-land-use-policy-nlup (accessed April 18, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Tramel, S. 2016. The road through Paris: Climate change, carbon, and the political dynamics of convergence. Globalizations 13, no. 6: 960–69. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1173376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsikata, D. 2009. Gender, land and labour relations and livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa in the era of economic liberalisation: Towards a research agenda. Feminist Africa 12: 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Üstündağ, N. 2016. Self-Defense as a revolutionary practice in rojava, or how to unmake the state. South Atlantic Quarterly 115, no. 1: 197–210. doi: 10.1215/00382876-3425024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utting, P., ed. 2015. Social and solidarity economy: Beyond the fringe. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., and J. Petras. 2014. The new extractivism: A post-neoliberal development model or imperialism of the 21st century? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L., and C. Kay. 2017. Agribusiness, peasants, left-wing governments, and the state in Latin America: An overview and theoretical reflections. Journal of Agrarian Change 17, no. 2: 239–57. doi: 10.1111/joac.12215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., and N. Peluso. 2013. Resource violence. In Critical environmental politics, ed. C. Death, 184–198. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2011. Sisters of the soil: Urban gardening as resistance in Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 5, no. 1: 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. 2016. Remembering the Indonesian peasants’ front and plantation workers’ union (1945–1966). The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 1: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1101069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, and W. Wolford. 2012. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 619–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.691879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman, H., A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe. 2010. Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature and community. Halifax: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E.R. 1969. Peasant wars of the twentieth century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2010. Participatory democracy by default: Land reform, social movements and the state in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 1: 91–109. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2016. State-society dynamics in contemporary Brazilian land reform. Latin American Perspectives 43, no. 2: 77–95. doi: 10.1177/0094582X15623768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 189–210. doi: 10.1111/dech.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J., and P. Lu. 2011. Differentiated childhoods: impacts of rural labor migration on left-behind children in China. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 355–77. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J., C. He, J. Liu, W. Wang, and S. Chen. 2016. Left-behind elderly: shouldering a disproportionate share of production and reproduction in supporting China’s industrial development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–29. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1186651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar