Gender and land dispossession: a comparative analysis

References

• Agarwal, B. 1988. Who sows? Who reaps? Women and land rights in India. Journal of Peasant Studies 15, no. 4: 531–81. doi: 10.1080/03066158808438377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 1994. A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 2002. Are we not peasants too? Land rights and women’s claims in India. SEEDS 21: 2–29.
   Google Scholar
• Banerji, P., R. Iyer, R. Rangachari, N. Sengupta, and S. Singh. 2000. India country study prepared for the World Commission on Dams. Cape Town: World Commission on Dams.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, A. 1995. In the belly of the river: Tribal conflicts over development in the Narmada Valley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behrman, J., R. Meinzen-Dick, and A. Quisumbing. 2012. The gender implications of large-scale land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 1: 49–79. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2004. Changing before our very eyes: Agrarian questions and the politics of land today. Journal of Agrarian Change 4, no. 1–2: 190–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00078.x
   Google Scholar
• Bhanot, R., and M. Singh. 1992. The oustees of Pong Dam: Their search for a home. In Big dams, displaced people, ed. E.G. Thukral, 101–42. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bisht, T.C. 2009. Development-induced displacement and women: The case of the Tehri Dam, India. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 10, no. 4: 301–17. doi: 10.1080/14442210903271312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr., and J.C. Franco. 2012. A ‘land sovereignty’ alternative? Towards a peoples’ counter-enclosure. TNI Agrarian Justice Programme Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., P. McMichael, and I. Scoones, eds. 2010. The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: Editors’ introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 575–92. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brara, R. 2006. Shifting landscapes: The making and remaking of village commons in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Y. 2011. The reproduction of inequality: Race, class, gender, and the social organisation of work at sites of large-scale development projects. Social Problems 58, no. 2: 281–303. doi: 10.1525/sp.2011.58.2.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. 1996. Out on the front lines but still struggling for voice: Women in the rubber tappers’ defense of the forest in Xapuri, Acre, Brazil. In Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences, eds. D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari, 27–61. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J. 2004. Gender conflict in Gambian wetlands. In Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements, eds. R. Peet, and M. Watts, 316–35. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J., and M. Watts. 1990. ‘Manufacturing dissent: Work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 60, no. 2: 207–41. doi: 10.2307/1160333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census of India. 2001. Census of India. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Census of India. 2011. Census of India. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea, M. 1999. The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea, M., and C. McDowell, eds. 2000. Risks and reconstruction: Experiences of resettlers and refugees. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea, M., and H.M. Mathur, eds. 2008. Can compensation prevent impoverishment?: Reforming resettlement through investments and benefit-sharing. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J.D. 1953. Enclosure and labour supply in the industrial revolution. The Economic History Review 5, no. 3: 319–43. doi: 10.2307/2591811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J. 2011. Gender and ‘land grabbing’ in sub-Saharan Africa: Women’s land rights and customary tenure. Development 54, no. 1: 35–39. doi: 10.1057/dev.2010.95
   Google Scholar
• Colson, E. 1999. Gendering those uprooted by ‘development. In Engendering forced migration: Theory and practice, ed. D. Indra, 23–39. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, E. 2011. Gendered impacts of commercial pressures on land. Report prepared for Mokoro, Cirad and the International Land Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, E., and S. Pallas. 2014. Women and land deals in Africa and Asia: Weighing the implications and changing the game. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 178–201. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.860232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan, R. 2008. Development projects and displaced women. In India social development report 2008: Development and displacement, ed. H.M. Mathur, 127–40. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, C., G. Summerfield, and D. Tsikata. 2014. Land, gender and food security. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.895021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doss, C., R. Meinzen-Dick, and A. Bomuhangi. 2014. Who owns the land? Perspectives from rural Ugandans and implications for large-scale land acquisitions. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 76–100. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.855320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duflo, E., and R. Pande. 2007. Dams. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, no. 2: 601–46. doi: 10.1162/qjec.122.2.601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, R. 2006. Conflict and collective action: The Sardar Sarovar Project in India. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, IFAD, UNCTAD and the World Bank Group. 2010. Principles for responsible agricultural investment that respects rights, livelihoods and resources. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTARD/214574-1111138388661/22453321/Principles_Extended.pdf (accessed February 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. 2004. Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. Brooklyn: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, W. 2004. Rehabilitation for the displaced. Economic and Political Weekly 39, no. 12: 1191–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, W. 2008. Sixty years of development-induced displacement in India. In India social development report 2008: Development and displacement, ed. H.M. Mathur, 89–102. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, W. 2009. Displacement and alienation from common property resources. In Displaced by development: Confronting marginalisation and gender injustice, ed. L. Mehta, 105–33. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, W., and E.G. Thukral, eds. 1989. Development, displacement, and rehabilitation: Issues for a national debate. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, W., and V. Paranjpye, eds. 1997. Rehabilitation policy and law in India: A right to livelihood. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J.L., and B. Hammond. 1913. The village labourer, 1760-1832: A study in the government of England before the Reform Bill. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 1991. Engendering everyday forms of resistance: Gender, patronage and production politics in rural Malaysia. Journal of Peasant Studies 19, no. 1: 93–21. doi: 10.1080/03066159108438472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, J. 1990. Enclosures, common rights, and women: The proletarianization of families in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The Journal of Economic History 50, no. 1: 17–42. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700035701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. 2003. Gender analysis of land: Beyond land rights for women? Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 4: 453–80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0366.00062
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., L. Kennedy, and P. Mukhopadhyay, eds. 2014. Power, policy and protest: The politics of India’s special economic zones. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, B.R. 2005. Chixoy dam legacy issues study. Santa Cruz: Center for Political Ecology. www.centerforpoliticalecology.org/chixoy-legacy-issues-study/ (accessed January 15, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Julia, and B. White. 2012. Gendered experiences of dispossession: Oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 995–1016. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.676544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. 1994. Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., and R.K. Murthy. 1999. Gender, poverty and institutional exclusion: Insights from integrated rural development programme (IRDP) and development of women and children in rural areas (DWCRA). In Institutions, relations and outcomes: A framework and case studies for gender-aware planning, eds. N. Kabeer, and R. Subrahmanian, 166–94. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. 1988. Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society 2, no. 3: 274–90. doi: 10.1177/089124388002003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedia, S. 2008. Nutrition and health impacts of involuntary resettlement: The Tehri Dam experience. In India social development report 2008: Development and displacement, ed. H.M. Mathur, 116–26. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khagram, S. 2004. Dams and development: Transnational struggles for water and power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2012. The land question: Special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 933–69. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.656268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2013. The politics of dispossession: Theorizing India’s ‘land wars’. Politics & Society 41, no. 3: 351–94. doi: 10.1177/0032329213493751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2016. Gender and land grabs in comparative perspective. In Gender equality and sustainable development pathways, ed. M. Leach, 105–31. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–98. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2015. Social impacts of oil palm in Indonesia: A gendered perspective from West Kalimantan. Occasional Paper 124. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. 1988. Village revolts: Social protest and popular disturbances in England, 1509-1640. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1977. Capital, volume I. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, L. 2009. The double bind: A gender analysis of forced displacement and resettlement. In Displaced by development: Confronting marginalisation and gender injustice, ed. L. Mehta, 3–33. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., and B. Srinivasan. 2000. Balancing pains and gains: A perspective chapter on gender and large dams. World Commission on Dams Thematic Review. Cape Town: World Commission on Dams Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Neeson, J.M. 1993. Commoners: Common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, A.G. 2010. Dispossession and resistance in India: The river and the rage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palit, C. 2009. Displacement, gender justice and people’s struggles. In Displaced by development: Confronting marginalisation and gender injustice, ed. L. Mehta, 282–94. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, B., and B.K. Rout. 2004. Development induced displacement in India: Impact on women. New Delhi: National Commission for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Porro, N.M., and J.S. Neto. 2014. Coercive harmony in land acquisition: The gendered impact of corporate ‘responsibility’ in the Brazilian Amazon. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 227–48. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.876507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkuwar, 2009. ‘We will never forgive the Government’: A personal testimony. In Displaced by development: Confronting marginalisation and gender injustice, ed. L. Mehta, 270–81. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2003. Introduction: Agrarian change, gender and land rights. Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 1-2: 2–32. doi: 10.1111/1471-0366.00049
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2009. Engendering the political economy of agrarian change. Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 197–226. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S., 2010. Before eminent domain: Toward a history of expropriation of land for the common good. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampat, P. 2010. Special economic zones in India: Reconfiguring displacement in a neoliberal order? City & Society 22, no. 2: 166–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2010.01037.x
   Google Scholar
• Sampat, P. 2015. The ‘Goan impasse’: Land rights and resistance to SEZs in Goa, India. Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 765–90. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1013098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangari, K. 1995. Politics of diversity: Religious communities and multiple patriarchies. Economic and Political Weekly 30, no. 51: 3287–310.
   Google Scholar
• Sangvai, S. 2002. The river and life: People’s struggle in the Narmada Valley. Mumbai: Earthcare Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sargeson, S. 2008. Women’s property, women’s agency in China’s ‘new enclosure movement’: Evidence from Zhejiang. Development and Change 39, no. 4: 641–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeson, S., and Y. Song. 2010. Land expropriation and the gender politics of citizenship in the urban frontier. The China Journal 64: 19–45. doi: 10.1086/tcj.64.20749245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 2008. Towards a just resettlement and rehabilitation policy for India. In India social development report 2008: Development and displacement, ed. H.M. Mathur, 39–49. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, M., and R.K. Samantray. 1992. Whatever happened to Muddavat Chenna? The tale of Nagarjunasagar. In Big dams, displaced people, ed. E.G. Thukral, 54–76. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, K.D.M. 1985. Annals of the labouring poor: Social change and agrarian England, 1660-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, B. 2007. Negotiating complexities: Collection of feminist essays. New York: Promilla and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. 1966. The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, E.G., ed. 1992. Big dams, displaced people. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, E.G. 1995. Development, displacement and rehabilitation: Is there a need for a gender perspective? Mainstream 33, no. 51: 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, E.G. 1996. Development, displacement and rehabilitation: Locating gender. Economic and Political Weekly 31, no. 24: 1500–503.
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, E.G. 2009. Displacement and protecting the lives of children. In Displaced by development: Confronting marginalisation and gender injustice, ed. L. Mehta, 82–104. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tsikata, D. 2006. Living in the shadow of large dams: Long term responses of downstream and lakeside communities of Ghana’s Volta River Project. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Tsikata, D., and J.A. Yaro. 2014. When a good business model is not enough: Land transactions and gendered livelihood prospects in rural Ghana. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 202–26. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.866261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, R. 2014. Land grabs, power, and gender in East and Southern Africa: So, what’s new? Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 52–75. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.897739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viegas, P. 1992. The Hirakud oustees: Thirty years after. In Big dams, displaced people, ed. E.G. Thukral, 29–53. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2006. Rajasthan: Closing the development gap. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Dams (WCD). 2000. Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar