Beating the bounds: how does ‘open source’ become a seed commons?

References

• Anonymous. 1975. A poster to illustrate Winstanley, a film directed by Kevin Brownlow and Andrew Mollo.
   Google Scholar
• African Biodiversity Network, and Gaia Foundation. 2016. Celebrating African rural women: Custodians of seed, food and traditional knowledge for climate resilience.
   Google Scholar
• Aistara, G.A. 2011. Seeds of kin, kin of seeds: The commodification of organic seeds and social relations in Costa Rica and Latvia. Ethnography 12, no. 4: 490–517. doi: 10.1177/1466138111400721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almekinders, C., and N.P. Louwaars. 1999. Farmers’ seed production: New approaches and practices. London: Intermediate Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, K. 2008. Seed wars: Controversies and cases on plant genetic resources and intellectual property. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, K. 2009. Free seeds, not free beer: Participatory plant breeding, open source seeds, and acknowledging user innovation in agriculture. Fordham Law Review 77: 2275–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzellini, D. 2016. Labour as a commons: The example of worker-recuperated companies. Critical Sociology (August 7). Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0896920516661856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, M., and T. Clarke. 2005. Blue gold: the fight to stop the corporate theft of the world’s water. New ed. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 2001. Who owns the sky? Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2011. The penguin and the leviathan: The triumph of cooperation over self-Interest. 1st ed. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2003. Silent theft: The private plunder of our common wealth. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2005. Brand name Bullies: The quest to own and control culture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2014. Think like a commoner: A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola, BC: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2016. Commoning as a transformative social paradigm. The Next System Project. http://thenextsystem.org/commoning-as-a-transformative-social-paradigm/.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D., and S. Helfrich, eds. 2015. Patterns of commoning. Amityville, NY: Common Strategies Group.
   Google Scholar
• Butruille, D.V., F.H. Birru, M.L. Boerboom, E.J. Cargill, D.A. Davis, P. Dhungana, G.M. Dill, et al. 2015. Maize breeding in the United States: Views from within Monsanto. In Plant breeding reviews: Volume 39, ed. J. Janick, 199–282. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J.A. 2001. Black rice: The African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, John, and International Forum on Globalization, ed. 2002. Alternatives to economic globalization: A better world is possible. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Chander, A., and M. Sunder. 2004. The Romance of the Public Domain. California Law Review 92, no. 5: 1331–73. doi: 10.2307/3481419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D. 2014. Plant breeders release first ‘open source seeds’. NPR: The Salt, April 17.
   Google Scholar
• CSA-India (Center for Sustainable Agriculture-India). 2014. Open source seed systems. http://csa-india.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Open_Source_Seed_Systems­­­_1.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. 2004. Separating the doing and the deed: Capital and the continuous character of enclosures. Historical Materialism 12, no. 2: 57–87. doi: 10.1163/1569206041551609
   Google Scholar
• Deppe, C. 1993/2000. Breed your own vegetable varieties: The gardener’s and farmer’s guide to plant breeding and seed saving. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deppe, C. 2017. Fertile Valley Seeds Catalog. http://www.caroldeppe.com/FVS%202017%20Seed%20Catalog%20&%20Order%20Form-170130.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1994/2011. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2015. Commons in the pluriverse. In Patterns of commoning, eds. D. Bollier, and S. Helfrich, 348–60. Amityville, NY: Common Strategies Group.
   Google Scholar
• ETC Group. 2015. Breaking bad: Big Ag mega-mergers in play: Dow+DuPont in the pocket? Next: Demonsanto? ETC Group Communiqué 115, December.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. 2011. Feminism and the politics of the commons. The commoner.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cornejo, J. 2004. The seed industry in US agriculture: An exploration of data and information on crop seed markets, regulation, industry structure, and research and development; US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agriculture information bulletin 786: Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• F.T. 2017. Organon: Gramsci’s organic intellectuals. FUCK Theory: Experiments in Visceral Philosophy. http://fucktheory.tumblr.com/post/42589015691/organon-gramscis-organic-intellectuals-along
   Google Scholar
• GAFF (Global Alliance for the Future of Food). 2016. The future of food: Seeds of resilience, a compendium of perspectives on agricultural biodiversity from around the world.
   Google Scholar
• Galt, R.E. 2013. Placing food systems in first world political ecology: A review and research agenda. Geography Compass 7, no. 9: 637–58. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12070
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., and M. Watts, eds. 1997. Globalising food: Agrarian questions and global restructuring. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graddy, T.G. 2013. Regarding biocultural heritage: In situ political ecology of agricultural biodiversity in the Peruvian Andes. Agriculture and Human Values 30, no. 4: 587–604. doi: 10.1007/s10460-013-9428-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2015. UPOV 91 and other seed laws: a basic primer on how companies intend to control and monopolise seeds.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2016. New mega-treaty in the pipeline: What does RCEP mean for farmers seeds in Asia? March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN and LVC (La Via Campesina). 2015. Seed laws that criminalize farmers: Resistance and fight back. http://viacampesina.org/en/images/stories/pdf/2015-Seed%20laws%20booklet%20EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1932. Notebook 11: Introduction to the study of philosophy. In Marxists.org/archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971/2010. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Eds. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. v8. New York: International Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, L.S. 1998. The political ecology of bananas: Contract farming, peasants, and agrarian change in the Eastern Caribbean. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L.M. 2014. Linux for lettuce: Hacking the seed industry. Virginia Quarterly Review 90, no. 3: 56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162, no. 3859: 1243–8. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindle, S. 2003. “‘Not by bread only?’ Common right, parish relief and endowed charity in a forest economy, c. 1600–1800,” in The poor in England, 1700–1850: An economy of makeshifts, eds. S. King, and A. Tomkins, 52–53. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P.H. 2009. Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability 1, no. 4: 1266–87. doi: 10.3390/su1041266
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P.H. 2015. Intellectual property and consolidation in the seed industry. Crop Science 55, no. 6: 2489–95. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P.H. 2016. Concentration and power in the food system: Who controls what we eat? New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Iles, A., and M. Montenegro de Wit. 2015. Sovereignty at what scale? An inquiry into multiple dimensions of food sovereignty. Globalizations 12, no. 4: 481–97. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2014.957587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illich, Ivan. 1981. Shadow Work. Open Forum Series, Boston: M. Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Jussaume, R.A., and L. Glenna. 2009. Considering structural, individual and social network explanations for ecologically sustainable agriculture: An example drawn from Washington State wheat growers. Sustainability 1, no. 2: 120–32. doi: 10.3390/su1020120
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, S., L.K. Taylor, and V. Andreotti. 2016. Ethical internationalization, neoliberal restructuring and ‘Beating the Bounds’ of higher education. In Assembling and governing the higher education institution, eds. L. Shultz, and M. Viczko, 85–110. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J.R. 1988/2004. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. 2nd ed. Science and Technology in Society. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J.R. 2014. Re-purposing the master’s tools: The Open Source Seed Initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1225–46. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.875897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J.R., M.J. Chappell, M. Colley, I.L. Goldman, C. Luby, T. Michaels, F. Morton, M. Sligh, and T. Stearns. 2014. Free as in speech, not as in beer: The Open Source Seed Initiative. In Organic seed growers conference proceedings, ed. K. Hubbard, 144–46. Corvallis, OR: Organic Seed Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, C.R. 2016. Lawn clippings: Why OSSI? – Open Source Seed Initiative Newsletter, November 21. http://osseeds.org/lawn-clippings-why-ossi/
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. 2004. Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ley de Semillas. 2015. Gaceta oficial de La Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, No. 6.207 Extraordinario edition.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. 2008. The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for All. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. 2010. Some principles of the commons. Counterpunch, January 8. http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/01/08/some-principles-of-the-commons/
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. 2014. Stop, thief! The commons, enclosures and resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, J. 2016. Landrace gardening: Do it for the taste. Mother Earth News, April 27.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, J. 2017a. For sale: Genetically-diverse promiscuously-pollinated landrace seeds grown by Joseph Lofthouse in Cache Valley in the Rocky Mountains. http://garden.lofthouse.com/seed-list.phtml.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, J. 2017b. Adaptivar landraces. http://garden.lofthouse.com/seed-list.phtml.
   Google Scholar
• Luby, C.H., J.R. Kloppenburg, and I.L. Goldman. 2016. Open source plant breeding and the Open Source Seed Initiative. In Plant breeding reviews, Vol. 40, ed. J. Janick, 271–98. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Luby, C.H., J. Kloppenburg, T.E. Michaels, and I.L. Goldman. 2015. Enhancing freedom to operate for plant breeders and farmers through open source plant breeding. Crop Science 55, no. 6: 2481–8. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.10.0708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, M.J., B.M. Frischmann, and K.J. Strandburg. 2009. Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell Law Review 95: 657–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1977. Capital: A critique of political economy. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, M., and L. Busch. 2006. Seeds of change: Intellectual property rights, genetically modified soybeans and seed saving in the United States. Sociologica Ruralis 46, no. 2: 122–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, S., and L. Sperling. 2016. Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Security 8, no. 1: 179–95. doi: 10.1007/s12571-015-0528-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2017. Stealing into the wild: conservation science, plant breeding and the makings of new seed enclosures. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 1: 169–212. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1168405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P.R. 1983. Seeds of the earth: A private or public resource? San Francisco, CA: Institute for Food and Development Policy; Inter Pares (London).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G., and W. Tymowski. 2005. Explanatory guide to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, F. 2014. Open source seed: A farmer-breeder’s perspective. In Organic seed growers conference proceedings, ed. K. Hubbard, 147–49. Corvallis, OR: Organic Seed Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., D. Lammer, S. Lyon, B. Carter, and S.S. Jones. 2005. Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary–participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20, no. 1: 48–55. doi: 10.1079/RAF200486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoiseCat, J.B. 2017. The western idea of private property is flawed. The Guardian, March 27.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M., and V. Prashad. 2016. The essentials of socialist writing. Jacobin, December 20.
   Google Scholar
• OSA (Organic Seed Alliance). 2016. State of organic seed 2016, K. Hubbard and J. Zystro, eds. https://stateoforganicseed.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., and M. Watts. 1993. Introduction: Development theory and environment in an age of market triumphalism. Economic Geography 69, no. 3: 227–53. doi: 10.2307/143449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L. 2017. Whigs and hunters: the origins of the Black Act, by E.P. Thompson. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 1: 309–21. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1264581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podoll, D. 2014. Prairie road organic seed. Open Source Seed Initiative: Plant breeders. http://osseeds.org/people/.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2012. Political ecology: A critical introduction. 2nd ed. Critical introductions to geography. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: J. Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavoni, C.M. 2017. The contested terrain of food sovereignty construction: Toward a historical, relational and interactive approach. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 1: 1–32. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1234455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 1997. Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., and S.H. Bragdon. 2016. The relationship between intellectual property rights and small-scale farmer innovations. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office.
   Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. 2017. Rebecca Solnit reads from the The mother of all questions; Discusses hope and resistance. Democracy Now, March 28.
   Google Scholar
• Tapia, M., and B. Tobin. 2013. Five guardians of the seed: The role of Andean farmers in the caring and sharing of agrobiodiversity. In Common pools of genetic resources: Equity and innovation in international biodiversity law, eds. E.C. Kamau, and G. Winter, 79–100. First edition. Routledge Research in International Environmental Law. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. 1971. The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present 50, no. 1: 76–136. doi: 10.1093/past/50.1.76
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. 1975. Whigs and hunters: The origin of the Black Act. 1st ed. (reprinted w. new postscript). Peregrine Books. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, R. and Overseas Development Institute, eds. 1997. New seed and old laws: Regulatory reform and the diversification of national seed systems. London: Intermediate Technology on behalf of the Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• UPOV 1961. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants [(UPOV) of 2 December 1961, as revised at Geneva on 10 November 1972, 23 October 1978, and 19 March 1991, Publication 221, Geneva, UPOV, 1994].
   Google Scholar
• Vera-Herrera, R. 2016. Ejercer nuestros saberes es su mejor Protección. Biodiversidad. http://www.biodiversidadla.org/index.php/layout/set/print/layout/set/print/Principal/Secciones/Documentos/Ejercer_nuestros_saberes_es_su_mejor_proteccion.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, J. 2012. Global commons revisited. Global Policy 3, no. 1: 61–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattnem, T. 2016. Seed laws, certification and standardization: outlawing informal seed systems in the global south. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 4: 850–67. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1130702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 2000. Political ecology. In A companion to economic geography, eds. E.S. Sheppard, and T.J. Barnes, 257–74. Blackwell companions to geography. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weinland, D. 2017. ChemChina and Sinochem plan $100bn merger. Financial Times, May 8.
   Google Scholar
• Yoke Ling, C., and B. Adams. 2016. Farmers’ right to participate in decision-making: Implementing article 9.2 (c) of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Working Paper. APBREBES.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, K.S. 1996. Changing fortunes: Biodiversity and peasant livelihood in the Peruvian Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar