Gender and generation in Southeast Asian agro-commodity booms

References

• Agarwal, B. 2015. The power of numbers in gender dynamics: Illustrations from community forestry groups. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 1: 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.936007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, N. 2016. Age and generation in the service of development? In Generationing development: A relational approach to children, youth and development, ed. Roy Huijsmans, 315–330. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Behrman, J., R. Meinzen-Dick, and A. Quisumbing. 2012. The gender implications of large-scale land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 1: 49–79. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Agrarian Change and Peasant Studies Series. Black Point, Nova Scotia; Sterling, VA: Fernwood Publishing; Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2014. Food sovereignty via the ‘peasant way’: A sceptical view. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1031–1063. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.852082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. 2011. How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 249–279. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, E., and S. Pallas. 2014. Women and Land Deals in Africa and Asia: Weighing the Implications and Changing the Game. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 178–201. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.860232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deere, C. D. 2003. Women’s land rights and rural social movements in the Brazilian agrarian reform. Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 1-2: 257–288. doi: 10.1111/1471-0366.00056
   Google Scholar
• Deere, C. D., and M. León. 2001. Empowering women: Land and property rights in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, C., G. Summerfield, and D. Tsikata. 2014. Land, gender, and food security. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.895021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. 2011. Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum 42, no. 2: 129–132. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671851100008X (accessed February 11, 2015). doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, E., M. Siscawati, B. Sijapati Basnett, and Dian Ekowati. 2017. Gendered and youth engagements with oil palm in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: insights from conjunctural feminist political ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1337002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faxon, H. O. 2017. In the law & on the land: Finding the female Farmerin Myanmar’s national land use policy. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1324424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire, K. B. 2002. Social movements and marginalized rural youth in Brazil, Egypt and Nepal. Journal of Peasant Studies 30, no. 1: 30–72. doi: 10.1080/03066150412331333232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Großmann, K. 2017. Gaharu king – Family queen. The eaglewood boom: material gendered political ecology in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1341408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras Jr., I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. “Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions “from below’.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3-4): 467–488. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijsmans, R. 2016. Generatining development: An introduction. In Generationing development: A relationsl approach to children, youth and development, ed. R. Huijsmans, 1–31. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Julia, and B. White. 2012. “Gendered experiences of dispossession: Oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3-4): 995–1016. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.676544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, V., L. Schoenberger, C. Middleton, and Borin Un. 2017. Gendered eviction, protest, and recovery: A feminist political ecology engagement with land grabbing in rural Cambodia. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1311868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2017. Gender and land dispossession: A comparative analysis. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1367291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2017. Intergenerational displacement in Indonesia’s oil palm plantation zone. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1308353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. 2017. Women, gender and protest: Contesting oil palm plantation expansion in Indonesia. Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1300579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, B. 2009. Gender justice, land and the agrarian question in Southern Africa. In Peasants and globalizations. Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question, eds. H. A. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 190–213. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. M., and M. Maffii. 2017. ‘We are not afraid to die’: Gender dynamics of agrarian change in Ratanakiri province, Cambodia. Journal of Peasant Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portilla, G. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2009. Engendering the political economy of agrarian change. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 197–226. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. 2011. Agrarian debates and gender relations: ‘Now you see them, now you don’t’. In Du grain à moudre. Genre, développement rural et alimentation, Berne: DDC- Commission nationale suisse pour l’UNESCO, 47–58. Genève: IHEID.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2004. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D. 2015. A situated view of feminist political ecology from my networks, roots and territories. In Practising feminist political ecologies: Moving beyond the ‘green economy’, eds. W. Harcourt and I.L. Nelson, 29–66. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J.W., and E. Rubin-Sokoloff. 2013. Sustaining activism: A Brazilian women’s movement an a father-daughter collaboration. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenberger, L., D. Hall, and P. Vandergeest. 2017. What happened when the land grab came to Southeast Asia? The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 4: 697–725. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1331433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, L. 2006. Women and social movements in Latin America: Power from below [Kindle version]. 4th ed. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumberg, J., N. Anyidoho, J. Leavy, J. H. te Lintelo Dolf, and Kate Wellard. 2012. Introduction: The young people and agriculture ‘problem’ in Africa. IDS Bulletin 43, no. 6: 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsikata, D., and J. A. Yaro. 2014. When a good business model is not enough: Land transactions and gendered livelihood prospects in Rural Ghana. Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 202–226. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.866261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, R. 2014. Land grabs, power, and gender in East and Southern Africa: So, what’s new? Feminist Economics 20, no. 1: 52–75. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.897739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. 2012. Agriculture and the generation problem: Rural youth, employment and the future of farming. IDS Bulletin 43, no. 6: 9–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., C.M.Y. Park, and Julia. 2015. The gendered politcal ecology of agrofuels expansion. In The political ecology of agrofuels, eds. K. Dietz, B. Engels, and O. Pye et al., 53–69. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar