White science and indigenous maize: the racial logics of the Green Revolution

References

• Author Interview. 2016. CIMMYT official. Des Moines, IA, 13 October.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-zvi, Y. 2007. “Where did Red Go?: Lewis Henry Morgan’s Evolutionary Inheritance and U.S. Racial Imagination.” CR: The New Centennial Review 7 (2): 201–29. doi:10.1353/ncr.2007.0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIMMYT. 2016a. New Screening Cycle begins for Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease in Kenya. Online, 20 April. http://www.cimmyt.org/press_release/new-screening-cycle-begins-for-maize-lethal-necrosis-disease-in-kenya/ (accessed July 9, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• CIMMYT. 2016b. DuPont Pioneer and CIMMYT form CRISPR-Cas public/private partnership. Online, 28 September. http://www.cimmyt.org/press_release/dupont-pioneer-and-cimmyt-form-crispr-cas-publicprivate-partnership/Sept. 28. (accessed July 12, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, J. 2003. Troubled Harvest: Agronomy and Revolution in Mexico - 1880–2002. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cullather, N. 2010. The Hungry World: America’s Cold War Battle Against Poverty in Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, D. 2005. Public-Private Partnership to Develop and Deliver Drought Tolerant Crops to Food-Insecure Farmers: Summary and Interpretation of the May 3–4 Strategy and Planning Meeting, Winrock International, May 31. page 5. online.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R.A. 2012. The Reorder of Things: The University and its Pedagogies of Minority Difference. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitting, E. 2011. The Struggle for Maize: Campesinos, Workers, and Transgenic Corn in the Mexican Countryside. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D. 1986. “Exporting American Agriculture: The Rockefeller Foundation in Mexico, 1943-53.” Social Studies of Science 16 (3): 457–83. doi: 10.1177/030631286016003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2001. Power: The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Volume 3, ed. James Faubion. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2013. “Agroecology: Growing the Roots of Resistance.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graddy, T.G. 2014. “Situating in situ: A Critical Geography of Agricultural Biodiversity Conservation in the Peruvian Andes and Beyond.” Antipode 46 (2): 426–54. doi: 10.1111/anti.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutterson, N. 2016. CRISPR-cas Technology. Remarks at CIMMYT 50th Anniversary Celebration. 29 September. http://www.cimmyt.org/cimmyt50/ (accessed July 13, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D.J. 1997. Modest_witness@second_millennium.FemaleMan_ meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra, ed. 2011. The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt de Alcantara, C. 1976. The Modernization of Mexican Agriculture. Geneva: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• HoSang, Daniel Martinez, Oneka LaBennett, and Laura Pulido, eds. 2012. Racial Formation in the Twenty-First Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, B.H. 1988. Foundations of International Agricultural Research: Science and Politics in Mexican Agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C.R. 2013. Just Queer Folks: Gender and Sexuality in Rural America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juma, C. 2015. How to Improve Africa’s Seed Industry. World Economic Forum. 11 September. Online. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/09/how-to-improve-africas-seed-industry/ (accessed July 14, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Kandaswamy, P. 2012. “Gendering Racial Formation.” In Racial Formation in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Daniel Martinez HoSang, Oneka LaBennett, and Laura Pulido, 23–43. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2004. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. 2nd ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahuku, G., B.E. Lockhart, B. Wanjala, M.W. Jones, J.N. Kimunye, L.R. Stewart, B.J. Cassone, et al. 2015. “Maize Lethal Necrosis (MLN), An Emerging Threat to Maize-Based Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Phytopathology 105 (7): 956–65. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0367-FI.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangelsdorf, N.B. 1966. Neil B. Manglesdorf Oral History, November 16 and December 19, 1966, Folder 1, Box 18, RG 13, Oral Histories, FA119, Rockefeller Foundation records, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Marglin, S.A. 1996. “Farmers, Seedsmen, and Scientists: Systems of Agriculture and Systems of Knowledge.” In Decolonizing knowledge: From development to dialogue, ed. Frédérique Apffel-Marglin, and Stephen A. Marglin, 185–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2016a. Gene Editing is Coming to Agriculture—with Big Implications for Food, Farmers, Eaters and Nature. Ensia, 25 January. http://ensia.us/crispr (accessed July 12, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2016b. “Stealing into the Wild: Conservation Science, Plant Breeding and the Makings of New Seed Enclosures.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (1), 169–212. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1168405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D.S., J. Kosek, and A. Pandian. 2003. Race, Nature, and the Politics of Difference. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moreton-Robinson, A. 2015. The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J.M. 2010. Firsting and Lasting: Writing Indians Out of Existence in New England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Omi, M., and H. Winant. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. Second ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2013. “The Long Green Revolution.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 1–63. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.719224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, J.H. 1997. Geopolitics and the Green Revolution: Wheat, Genes, and the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2016. “Geographies of Race and Ethnicity II: Environmental Racism, Racial Capitalism and State-Sanctioned Violence.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (4), 524–33. May, 030913251664649. doi:10.1177/0309132516646495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Foundation. 1941. Agricultural Conditions and Problems in Mexico: Report of the Survey Commission of the Rockefeller Foundation 1941, folder 37, box 5 series 323, R.G 1.1 Projects. Rockefeller Foundation Records, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Foundation. 1959. Confidential Report: Rockefeller Foundation scholarships and the Mexican Revolution in Agricultural Science, folder 22, box 5, E.C. Stakman Papers. University of Minnesota Archives, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña-Portillo, M.J. 2016. Indian Given: Racial Geographies Across Mexico and the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, S. 2009. “Putting Knowledge in its Place: Science, Colonialism, and the Postcolonial.” Postcolonial Studies 12 (1): 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, C.J. 2005. “Imperial Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Agricultural Science in Peru, 1940–1960.” Science as Culture 14 (2): 113–37. doi: 10.1080/09505430500110879
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, R.B., and A. Saldanha. 2013. Geographies of Race and Food: Fields, Bodies, Markets. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stakman, E.C. 1953. Report of E.C. Stakman, Trip to Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, and Mexico, June 30-August 6, 1953, Rockefeller Foundation. Folder 31, box 5, E.C. Stakman Papers, University of Minnesota Archives, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Stakman, E.C., R. Bradfield, and P.C. Mangelsdorf. 1967. Campaigns Against Hunger. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• TallBear, K. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• TallBear, K. 2016. “Panel Remarks. The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty.” Annual Meeting of the American Studies Association, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.K., P.G. Jones, P.J. Ericksen, and A.J. Challinor. 2011. “Agriculture and Food Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa in a 4°C+ World.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369 (1934): 117–36. doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellhausen, E.J., L.M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez X. 1952. Races of Maize in Mexico: Their Origin, Characteristics and Distribution. Cambridge, MA: Bussey Institution of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Wellhausen, E.J. 1965. “Exotic Germ Plasm for Improvement of Corn Belt Maize.” Proceedings of the 20th Annual Hybrid Corn Industry-Research Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wellhausen, E.J. 1966. Edwin J. Wellhausen Oral History, June 28, 1966, Folder 1, Box 25, RG 13, Oral Histories, FA119, Rockefeller Foundation records, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wellhausen, E.J. n.d. Officer Diary. Box 513-514, RG 12, Rockefeller Foundation records, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 1990. The Death of Ramón González: The Modern Agricultural Dilemma. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. 2005. “Knowing Scale: Intelle©tual Property Rights, Knowledge Spaces and the Production of the Global.” Social & Cultural Geography 6 (6): 903–21. doi:10.1080/14649360500353350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar