From boomerangs to minefields and catapults: dynamics of trans-local resistance to land-grabs

References

• Baird, I. 2014. The global land grab meta-narrative, Asian money laundering and elite capture: Reconsidering the Cambodian context. Geopolitics 19, no. 2: 431–53. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2013.811645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R.D., and D.A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, M.J. 2014. Shame campaigns and environmental justice: Corporate shaming as activist strategy. Environmental Politics 23, no. 2: 263–81. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.821824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boamah, F. 2014. Imageries of the contested concepts “land grabbing” and “land transactions”: Implications for biofuels investments in Ghana. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 54 (July): 324–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, J. 2016. Land politics, agrarian movements and scholar-activism. Inaugural Lecture, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS), The Hague. April 14.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., D. Fig, and S.S. Monsalve. 2011. The politics of agrofuels and mega-land and water deals: Insights from the ProCana case, Mozambique. Review of African Political Economy 38, no. 128: 215–34. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2011.582758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., and J.C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–47. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, and C. Wang. 2013. The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: Changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 161–79. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, S. Gómez, C. Kay, and M. Spoor. 2012. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 845–72. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2012. Cameroon palm oil plantation withdraws sustainability application, Oakland Institute, September 2012. http://www.oaklandinstitute.org/cameroon-palm-oil-plantation-withdraws-sustainability-application.
   Google Scholar
• Child, K. 2009. Civil society in Uganda: The struggle to save the Mabira forest reserve. Journal of Eastern African Studies 3, no. 2: 240–58. doi: 10.1080/17531050902972659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K. 1998. Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography 17: 1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. 2014. Financialization, distance and global food politics. Journal of Peasant Studies 41 no. ahead-of-print: 797–814. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.875536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., and E. Helleiner. 2012. Troubled futures? The global food crisis and the politics of agricultural derivatives regulation. Review of International Political Economy 19, no. 2: 181–207. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2010.514528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., S.R. Isakson, and O. Visser. 2016. The complex dynamics of agriculture as a financial asset: Introduction to symposium. Agriculture and Human Values 37, no. 1: 179–83. doi: 10.1007/s10460-016-9682-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Man, R. 2013. The business case for transparent land deals, sustainable business development, Leiden, The Netherlands. Paper prepared for presentation at the “annual world bank conference on land and poverty” The World Bank, April 8-11, 2013, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Delevingne, L. 2014. The life and death of a master of the universe. CNBC, May 28. https://www.cnbc.com/2014/05/28/how-the-suicide-of-a-blackstone-executive-shows-the-difficulties-of-doing-well-and-doing-good.html (accessed October 19, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and S.G. Tarrow. 2005. Transnational protest and global activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 287 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2009. Synergies and tensions between rural social movements and professional researchers. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 245–65. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2013. Messy hectares: Questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 3: 485–501. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.801340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., C. Oya, and S.M. Borras. 2013. Global land grabs: Historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1517–31. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.850190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2014. ‘Like gold with yield’: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 777–95. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.873977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoE. 2012a. EU financial regulation must curb food speculation. Joint civil society statement on MiFID, April 2010. http://www.wdm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Joint%20Civil%20Society%20Statment%20on%20MiFID_April%202012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FoE. 2012b. How European banks, pension funds and insurance companies are increasing global hunger and poverty by speculating on food prices and financing land grabs in poorer countries. http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/pdfs/2012/farming-money/view.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J.C., S. Monsalve, and S.M. Borras. 2015. Democratic land control and human rights. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 15: 66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gari. 2011. Tana villagers oppose sugar project over birds concerns. The Star. Feb. 8, 2011. http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/article-72870/tana-villagers-oppose-sugar-project-over-birds-concerns#sthash.2Ar3VTFu.dpuf.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2008. Seized! The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. Briefing. October 2008.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2009. The new farm owners: Corporate investors lead the rush for control over overseas farmland [online]. Barcelona, Spain: GRAIN, 20 October 2009. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/194-the-new-farm-owners.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2011. Pension funds: Key players in the global farmland grab [online]. 20 June 2011. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4287-pension-funds-key-players-in-theglobal-farmland-grab.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2012. Responsible farmland investing? Current efforts to regulate land grabs will make things worse. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4564-responsible-farmland-investing-current-efforts-to-regulate-land-grabs-will-make-things-worse.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2013. Collating and dispersing: GRAIN’s strategies and methods. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRAIN, J. Martinez-Alier, L. Temper, S. Munguti, P. Matiku, H. Ferreira, W. Soares, M.F. Porto, V. Raharinirina, W. Haas, S.J. Singh, and A. Mayer. 2014. The many faces of land grabbing. Cases from Africa and Latin America. EJOLT Report No. 10, 93 p.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN, Recommon, CAFS. 2013. Who is behind Senhuile-Senethanol? https://www.grain.org/article/entries/4815-who-is-behind-senhuile-senethanol (accessed October 19, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, M., and K. Geary. 2011. The new forests company and its Uganda plantations. Oxfam International. https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/cs-new-forest-company-uganda-plantations-220911-en_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R., and J. Martínez-Alier. 1997. Varieties of environmentalism: Essays north and south. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., M. Edelman, S.M. Borras Jr, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 467–88. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hönig, P. 2014. Civil society and land Use policy in Uganda: The Mabira forest case. Africa Spectrum 49, no. 2: 53–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imig, D., and S. Tarrow. 1999. The Europeanization of movements? A new approach to transnational contention. In Social movements in a globalizing world, ed. D. Della Porta and H. Kriesi, 112–133. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Karsenty, A., A. Vogel, and F. Castell. 2014. “Carbon rights”, REDD+ and payments for environmental services. Environmental Science & Policy 35: 20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1999. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Khagram, S., J.V. Riker, and K. Sikkink. 2002. From Santiago to Seattle: Transnational advocacy groups restructuring world politics (pp. 3–23). na.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, J. 2012. Land grabs, government, peasant and civil society activism in the Senegal river valley. Review of African Political Economy 39, no. 134: 655–64. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2012.738797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, R., G. Whiteman, and B. Banerjee. 2013. Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: The importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. Organization Studies 34, no. 5–6: 823–52.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–98. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2016. Transnational farmland investment: A risky business. Journal of Agrarian Change 15: 560–8. doi:10.1111/joac.12109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locher, M., and E. Sulle. 2014. Challenges and methodological flaws in reporting the global land rush: Observations from Tanzania. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 4: 569–92. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.919263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Sheoin, T. 2012. Power imbalances and claiming credit in coalition campaigns: Greenpeace and Bhopal. Interface 4, no. 2: 490–511.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, M.E., N. McKeon, and S.M. Borras. 2013. Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., L. Temper, D. Del Bene, and A. Scheidel. 2016. Is there a global environmental justice movement? The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 3: 731–55. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAteer, E., and S. Pulver. 2009. The corporate boomerang: Shareholder transnational advocacy networks targeting Oil companies in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global Environmental Politics 9, no. 1: 1–30. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2009. Who speaks for peasants? Civil society, social movements and the global governance of food and agriculture. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements 1, no. 2: 48–82.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2013. ‘One does not sell the land upon which the people walk’: Land grabbing, transnational rural social movements, and global governance. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 105–22. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.760911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2012. The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 681–701. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.661369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgroom, J. 2013. Policy processes of a land grab: Enactment, context and misalignment in Massingir, Mozambique. LDPI Working Paper 34.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, S. n.d. Land grabbing and regulation of foreign land ownership in Argentina. A case study of the Agrifood Agreement between the Province of Rio Negro and China. http://www.abstract.xlibx.com/a-other/56838-1-el-acaparamiento-tierras-regulaci-n-propiedad-extranjera-tierra.php.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland Institute. 2011. Nile trading and development, Inc. in South Sudan, Land Deal Brief, Oakland Institute, June 2011b.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland Institute/Janhavi Mittal. 2013. Report from the Indian-Ethiopian civil society summit on land investments New Delhi, February 5-7, 2013. Oakland Institute, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Oya, C. 2013. Methodological reflections on ‘land grab’ databases and the ‘land grab’ literature ‘rush’. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 3: 503–20. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.799465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault, T. 2003. Making space: Community organization, agrarian change, and the politics of scale in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Latin American Perspectives 30, no. 1: 96–121. Indigenous Transformational Movements in Contemporary Latin America. doi: 10.1177/0094582X02239146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. 2012. Global activism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., and K. Sikkink. 1999. The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 66: 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rowden, R. 2011. India’s role in the New global farmland grab, an examination of the role of the Indian government and Indian companies engaged in overseas agricultural land acquisitions in developing countries. New Delhi: Produced in collaboration with GRAIN and the Economics Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• RSPO. 2012. Status of complaints: Herackles farms. Statement by the RSPO, RSPO, September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenberger, L., D. Hall, and P. Vandergeest. 2017. What happened when the land grab came to Southeast Asia? The Journal of Peasant Studies 44, no. 4: 697–725. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1331433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seufert, P. 2013. The FAO voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 181–6. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1996. Spaces of vulnerability: The spaces of flows and the politics of scale. Critique of Anthropology 16: 63–77. doi: 10.1177/0308275X9601600107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2004. Scale bending and the fate of the national. In Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method, ed. E. Sheppard and R.B. McMaster, 192–212. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Staritz, C., and K. Küblböck. 2013. Re-regulation of commodity derivative markets: Critical assessment of current reform proposals in the EU and the US (No. 45). Working Paper, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, S.M., and Z. Brent. 2014. Why the World Bank is neither monitoring, nor complying with the FAO guidelines on responsible tenure of land, fisheries and forests. In Keeping land local: Reclaiming governance from the market. LRAN Briefing Paper Series No.3. http://focusweb.org/sites/www.focusweb.org/files/LandStrugglesIII_HIRES.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2005. The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Temper, L. 2012. Let them eat sugar, life and livelihood in Kenya’s Tana Delta in ecological economics from the ground up, 2013, eds H. Healy, J.M. Martinez-Alier, L. Temper, M. Walter, and J.F. Gerber. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Temper, L. 2016. Who gets the human appropriation of Net primary production (HANPP)? Biomass distribution and the ‘sugar economy’ in the Tana Delta, Kenya. Journal of Political Ecology 23: 410–33. doi: 10.2458/v23i1.20243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, L., D. del Bene, and J. Martinez-Alier. 2015. Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: The EJAtlas. Journal of Political Ecology 22: 255–78. doi: 10.2458/v22i1.21108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, C. 2014. The New politics of pastoralism: Identity, justice and global activism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 54 ( July): 207–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, S. 2011. Tanzania biofuel project´s barren promise. Ipsnews.net. http://www.ipsnews.net/2011/03/tanzania-biofuel-projects-barren-promise.
   Google Scholar
• Wudu, Simon W. 2011. Mokaya Payam leaders reject 600,000 ha land lease. Gurtong.net. http://www.gurtong.net/ECM/Editorial/tabid/124/ctl/ArticleView/mid/519/articleId/5582/Mokaya-Payam-Leaders-Reject-600000Ha-Land-Lease.aspx.
   Google Scholar