Resistance, class struggle and social movements in Latin America: contemporary dynamics

References

• Abya Yala. 2009. “Diálogo de Alternativas y Alianzas de los Movimientos Indígenas, Campesinos y Sociales del Abya Yala.” Minga Informativa de Movimientos Sociales, La Paz 26. https://movimientos.org/es/enlacei/show_text.php3%3Fkey%3D13864.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, A. 2011. “Extractivismo y neoextractivismo: dos caras de la misma maldición.Quito.” http://www.polodemocratico.co/pdf/Alberto%20Acosta.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. 2012. “Communities Constructing Their Own Alternatives in the Face of Crisis.” Mountain Research and Development 32 (S1): S12–S22. doi: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00088.S1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkin, D., and A. Sánchez. 2017. “The Collective Revolutionary Subject: New Forms of Social Transformation.” Draft of a paper prepared for the conference ‘Revolutions’, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, September.
   Google Scholar
• Bárcenas, Francisco López, and Mayra Eslava Galicia. 2011. El mineral o la vida la legislaciión minera en México. Mexico City: COAPI.
   Google Scholar
• Barraza, W. 2017. The Dawn, September 8. http://www.thedawn-news.org/2017/09/12/argentina-native-communities-face-eviction-death-if-protective-law-is-not-renewed-by-congress.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., and J. Bury, eds. 2013. ‘Subterranean Struggles: New Dynamics of Mining, Oil and Gas in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., S. Hickey, and D. C. Mitlin, eds. 2008. Can NGOs Make a Difference: The Challenge of Development Alternatives. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, David. 2014. “The Commons as a Template for Transformation.” Great Transformation Initiative, April. http://www.greattransition.org/publication/the-commons-as-a-template-for-transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., Saturnino, Marc Edelman, and Cristóbal Kay. 2008. “Transnational Agrarian Movements: Origins and Politics, Campaigns and Impact.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2–3): 169–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., S., J. Franco, S. Gomez, C. Kay, and M. Spoor. 2012. “Land Grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4): 845–872. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbach, Roger. 1994. “Roots of the Postmodern Rebellion in Chiapas.” New Left Review 1 (205): 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• CONAIE. 2015. Porque nuestra lucha histórica es junto a las comunas, pueblos y nacionalidades ¡Vamos todos al levantamiento indígena y popular! Quito: CONAIE. http://www.pueblosencamino.org/index.php/asi-si/resistencias-y-luchas-sociales02/1425-ecuador-conaie-vamos-todos-al-levantamiento-indigena-y-popular (11/02/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2012. Neoextracciónismo y Primarización: ¿la subida y decadencia de los términos del intercambio en América del Sur? Presentation at the International Seminar ‘Como Sembrar el Desarrollo en América Latina’, UNAM—IIE. México, DF. October 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dávalos, Pablo, and Verónica Albuja. 2014. “Ecuador: Extractivist Dynamics, Politics and Discourse.” In The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model? edited by H. Veltmeyer, and J. Petras, 144–171. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Mike. 2006. A Planet of Slums. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, Alain, and Elisabeth Sadoulet. 2000. “Rural Poverty in Latin America: Determinants and Exit Paths.” Food Policy 25: 389–409. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00023-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Wise, R., and H. Veltmeyer. 2016. Agrarian Transformation, Migration and Development. Halifax, UK: Fernwood Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Durston, J. 1998. Building Social Capital in Rural Communities (Where it Doesn’t Exist): Theoretical and Policy Implications of Peasant Empowerment in Chiquimula, Guatemala. Santiago: ECLAC.
   Google Scholar
• Echalar Flores, Humberto. 2015. El Estado ficticio al Estado real (Plurinacional). Cochabamba: Editorial Kipus.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Marc. 2014. “Food Sovereignty: Forgotten Genealogies and Future Regulatory Challenges.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 959–978. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.876998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and S. M. Borras Jr. 2018. Political Dynamics of Transnational Agrarian Movements. Halifax: Fernwood Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and W. Wolford. 2017. “Introduction: Critical Agrarian Studies in Theory and Practice.” Antipode 49 (4): 959–976. doi:10.1111/anti.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Yves. 2012. The Ugly Canadian: Stephen Harper’s Foreign Policy. Vancouver: RED.
   Google Scholar
• EZLN, Sexta Comisión. 2015. El pensamiento crítico frente a la hidra capitalista, Vol. 1. http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2015/07/13/indice-volumen-uno-participaciones-de-la-comision-sexta-del-ezln-en-el-seminario-el-pensamiento-critico-frente-a-la-hidra-capitalista.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Ben. 2001. Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• FPIMCCBV - Foro de los Pueblos indígenas, minería, cambio climático and buen vivir. 2010. Suscribe Declaración. Lima: Servicios en Comunicación Intercultural Servindi, Noviembre 23.
   Google Scholar
• Giarracca, N., and M. Teubal. 2014. “Argentina: Extractivist Dynamics of Soy Production and Open-Pit Mining.” In The New Extractivism, edited by H. Veltmeyer, and J. Petras, 479–489. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Girvan, N. 2014. “Extractive Imperialism in Historical Perspective.” In Extractive Imperialism in the Americas, edited by J. Petras, and H. Veltmeyer, 49–61. Leiden: Brill Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Todd, and Jeffery Webber. 2016. Canadian Imperialism in Latin America. Halifax: Fernwood Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2009. “Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo. Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo sudamericano actual.” In Extractivismo, Política y Sociedad, 187–225. Quito: CLAES/CAAP. http://extractivismo.com/documentos/capitulos/GudynasExtractivismoSociedadDesarrollo09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2013. “Postextractivismo y alternativas al desarrollo desde la sociedad civil.” In Alternativas al capitalismo. Colonialismo del Siglo XXI, 189–224. Quito: Ediciones Abya Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2015. Extractivismos. Ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la Naturaleza. Bolivia: CEDIB.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Derek. 2013. “Primitive Accumulation, Accumulation by Dispossession and the Global Land Grab.” Third World Quarterly 34 (9): 1582–1604. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, John. 2002. Change the Word Without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• IWGIA—International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. 2010. The Indigenous World 2010. Copenhagen. http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/0001_I__2010_EB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Cristóbal. 2009. “Development Strategies and Rural Development: Exploring Synergies, Eradicating Poverty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 103–137. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, Michael. 1996. Reconceptualizing the Peasantry. Boulder, CO: Westview Pre.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Emilio, and Victor Tokman. 2000. “La estratificación social bajo tension en la era de la globalización.” Revista CEPAL 72: 7–30. doi: 10.18356/8b8cfcf5-es
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, David. 1978. “The Death of Land Reform: A Polemic.” World Development 6 (3): 339–345. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(78)90112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes Pereira, João Márcio. 2015. “Continuidade, Ruptura ou Reciclagem? Uma Análise do Programa Político do Banco Mundial após o Consenso de Washington.” Revista de Ciências Sociais 58 (2): 461–498.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes Pereira, João Márcio, and Paulo Alentejano. 2017. “Brazil: Class Struggle in the Countryside.” In Class Struggle in Latin America, edited by J. Petras, and H. Veltmeyer, 105–133. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. 1998. “The NGO Sector and its Role in Strengthening Civil Society and Securing Good Governance.” In Civil Society and International Development, edited by A. Bernard, H. Helmich, and P. Lehning, 229–243. Paris: OECD Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• OCMAL—Observatorio de Conflictos Mineros de América Latina. 2016. Mapa de conflictos mineros, proyectos y empresas mineras en América Latina. [consulted January 28]. Available from: http://mapa.conflictosmineros.net/ocmal_db.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, A. 2001. “Community vs. Class.” In Transcending Neoliberalism: Community-Based Development in Latin America, edited by H. Veltmeyer, and A. O’Malley, 205–219. West Hartford Conn: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, Gerardo. 1999. Farewell to the Peasantry?: Political Class Formation in Rural Mexico. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, G. 2007. “Review Article: Class or Identity Politics? A False Dichotomy.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48 (1): 73–80. doi: 10.1177/0020715207076370
   Google Scholar
• Otero, G., and H. Jugenitz. 2003. “Challenging National Borders From Within: The Political-Class Formation of Indigenous Peasants in Latin America*.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 40 (5): 503–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2003.tb00002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnke, Anthony, Rebecca Tarlau, and Wendy Wolford. 2015. “Understanding Rural Resistance: Contemporary Mobilization in the Brazilian Countryside.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42: 1069–1085. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1046447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, Jeffery M. 1975. Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2001. Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21^st Century. London: ZED Press / Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2005. Social Movements and State Power: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2006. “Social Movements and the State: Political Power Dynamics in Latin America.” Critical Sociology 32 (1): 83–104. doi: 10.1163/156916306776150278
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2009. Espejismos de la Izquierda en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Lumen.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2017. The Class Struggle in Latin America: Contemporary Dynamics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and M. Zeitlin. 1968. Latin America: Reform or Revolution? A Reader.
   Google Scholar
• Prada Alcoreza, Raúl. 2013. “Buen Vivir as a Model for State and Economy.” In Beyond Development: Alternative Visions From Latin America, edited by M. Lang, and D. Mokrani, 145–158. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Robles, W., and H. Veltmeyer. 2015. The Politics of Agrarian Reform in Brazil: The Landless Rural Workers Movement. Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, Peter, and Maria Elena Martinez-Torres. 2013. Food sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue, Conference Paper #4, International Conference, Yale University, September 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe-Fernández, J. and O. Nuñez 2001. “Globalización e Imperialismo: La Transferencia De Excedentes De América Latina.” In Globalización, Imperialismo y Clase Social, edited by J. Saxe-Fernández, 87–166. Buenos Aires/México: Editorial Lumen.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurmann, F. 1993. ‪Beyond the Impasse: New Directions in Development Theory. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sena-Fobomade. 2011. Se intensifica el extractivismo minero en América Latina. La Paz: Foro Boliviano sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, 03-02, 2005. http://fobomade.org.bo/art-1109.
   Google Scholar
• Spronk, S., and J. R. Webber. 2007. “Struggles Against Accumulation by Dispossession in Bolivia: The Political Economy of Natural Resource Contention.” Latin American Perspectives 34 (2): 31–47. doi: 10.1177/0094582X06298748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedile, João Pedro. 2008. “The Class Struggles in Brazil: The Perspective of the MST.” Socialist Register 44: 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Tetreault, D., C. McCulligh, and Carlos Lucio, eds. 2018. Social Environmental Conflicts in Mexico: Resistance to Dispossession and Alternatives From Below. Basingstoke, UK and New York: Macmillan Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, Henry. 2005. “The Dynamics of Land Occupation in Latin America.” In Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, edited by Sam Moyo, and Paris Yeros, 285–316. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2008. “Civil Society and Local Development.” Interações (Campo Grande, Brazil), 9 (2), July/Dec. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2011. Social Capital and Local Development, in The Critical Development Studies Handbook: Tools for Change. Halifax: Fernwood Publications and London: Pluto Books.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2013. “The Political Economy of Natural Resource Extraction: A New Model or Extractive Imperialism?” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 34 (1): 79–95. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2013.764850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2014. “Bolivia: Between Voluntarist Developmentalism and Pragmatic Extractivism.” In Neoextractivism, edited by H. Veltmeyer, and J. Petras, 80–114. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., and J. Petras. 2014. The New Extractivism: A New Development Model or Imperialism of the 21^st Century? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, Leandro. 2014. Land and Freedom. The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Via Campesina. 2012. Agrarian Reform in the 21st Century: Building a New Vision, Redefining Strategies, and Celebrating Victories. Press Release, July 19.
   Google Scholar
• Via Campesina-Brazil. 2008. Por qué nos movilizamos? ALAI-América Latina en Movimiento, Asamblea Popular, Junio 10. http://alainet.org/active/24605&langes.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Jefferey. 2011. Red October: Left-Indigenous Struggles in Modern Bolivia. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Jeffery. 2013. “From Left-Indigenous Insurrection to Reconstituted Neoliberalism in Bolivia: Political Economy, Indigenous Liberation, and Class Struggle, 2000–2011.” In The New Latin American Left: Cracks in the Empire, edited by J. R. Webber, and B. Carr, 149–190. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, Wendy. 2010. This Land is Ours Now: Social Mobilization Dynamics.and the Meaning of Land in Brazil. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zibechi, R. 2012. Territories in Resistance: A Cartography of Latin American Social Movements. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar