The political economy of agroecology

References

• Altieri, M. A. 1995. Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. Boulder, USA: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antuma, S. J., P. Berentsen, and G. Giessen. 1993. Friese melkveehouderij, waarheen? Een verkenning van de Friese melkveehouderij in 2005; modelberekeningen voor diverse bedrijfsstijlen onder uiteenlopende scenario’s. Wageningen: Vakgroep Agrarische Bedrijfseconomie, LUW.
   Google Scholar
• Benvenuti, B. 1982. “De technologisch-administratieve taakomgeving (TATE) van landbouwbedrijven.” Marquetalia 5: 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Bonanno, A., and S. A. Wolf. 2018. Resistance to the Neoliberal Agri-Food Regime, A Critical Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. 1998. Labor and Monopoly Capital. The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. 25th Anniversary Edition. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, F. 1986. The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Chayanov, A. V. 1966. The Theory of Peasant Economy. Edited by D. Thorner et al. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. 2000. Reading Capital Politically. Leeds: Anti/Theses, Cardigan Centre.
   Google Scholar
• de Schutter, O. 2010. “Report Submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food to the UN General Assembly.” December 20. https://repository.un.org/handle/11176/288653
   Google Scholar
• Devienne, S., N. Garambois, P. Mischler, C. Perrot, R. Dieulot, and D. Falaise. 2016. Les exploitations d’élevage herbivore économes en intrants (ou autonomes): Quelles sont leurs caractéristiques? Comment accompagner leur développement? Rapport d’étude pour le Centre d’Études et de Prospective du Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt (MAAF), AgroParisTech-IDELE -RAD, 126 p.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and W. Wolford. 2017. “Introduction: Critical Agrarian Studies in Theory and Practice.” Antipode 49 (4). doi: 10.1111/anti.12326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eizner, N. 1985. Les paradoxes de l’agriculkture française: essai d’analyse a partir des Etats Généraux de Développement Agricole, avril 1982-fevrier 1983. Paris: Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. G., M. de Haan, K. Blanken, J. G. A. Hemmer, C. Hollander, G. Holshof, and W. Ouweltjes. 2007. “Results Low-cost Farm 2006.” Report no. 53, ASG/WUR, Lelystad.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. 2006. “Focusing on Agriculture: A Comment on Henry Bernstein’s ‘Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century?’” Canadian Journal of Development Studies XXVII (4): 461–465. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2006.9669167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garambois, N., and S. Devienne. 2012. “Les sytemes herbagers économes. Une alternative de développement agricole pour l élevage bovin laitier dans le bocage vendéen?” Economie Rurale 330–331: 56–72. doi: 10.4000/economierurale.3496
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. R. 2007. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. New York, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis. 384 p. (3rd edition 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez de Molina, M., and G. Guzman-Casado. 2017. “Agroecology and Ecological Intensification: A Discussion from a Metabolic Point of View.” Sustainability 9 (1): 86. doi:103390/su9010086 doi: 10.3390/su9010086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development. London: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Groot, J. C. J., W. Rossing, and E. A. Lantinga. 2006. “Evolution of Farm Management, Nitrogen Efficiency and Economic Performance of Dairy Farms Reducing External Inputs.” Livestock Production Science 100: 99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Groot, J. C. J., van der Ploeg, J. D., Verhoeven, F. P. M. and Lantinga, E. A. (2007). “Interpretation of Results from on-Farm Experiments: Manure–Nitrogen Recovery on Grassland as Affected by Manure Quality and Application Technique, 1, an Agronomic Analysis.” NJAS 54 (3): 235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 1998. “Regulating Meaning, Appropriating Nature: The Codification of California Organic Agriculture.” Antipode 30 (2). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-8330.00071,tipode. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 2014. Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy Without Polity Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Policy Sciences 36: 175–195. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijman, W. 2005. Boeren in het landschap, een studie naar de kosten van agrarisch natuurbeheer in de noordelijke Friese Wouden. Wageningen: WUR.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee, E. W. 1985. Groningen van Grasland naar Bouwland, 1750-1830. Wageningen: Pudoc.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. 2000. Cambiar el mundo sin tomar el poder: el significado de la revolución hoy. Madrid: El Viejo Too.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. 2010. Crack Capitalism. London/New York: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inosys. 2017. Vaches, Surfaces, Charges … Tout Augmente sauf le revenu. Quinze ans de suivi en Bretagne, Pays de la Loire et Deux-Sèvres. Réseaux d’élevage pour le conseil et la prospective. Collection Théma. 24 p. https://idele.fr/presse/publication/idelesolr/recommends/vaches-surfaces-charges-tout-augmente-sauf-le-revenu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, B. 2009. “Everyday Politics in Peasant Societies (and Ours).” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 227–243. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2014. “Re-purposing the Master's Tools: The Open Source Seed Initiative and the Struggle for Seed Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1225–1246. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.875897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. 2019. Openbare toespraak bij de opening van de FNP campagne (Friese taal), Leeuwarden, Dairy Campus, 25 January 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, A. 1982. Transformations du process de travail Agricole: incidences de l‘industrialisation sur les conditions de travail paysanne. Grenoble: INRA/IREP.
   Google Scholar
• LC (Leeuwarder Courant). 2019. “Wy sille mear foar ús iten betelje moatte.” Leeuwarder Courant, Leeuwarden, January 26, p. 1 and 33.
   Google Scholar
• Lechenet, M., F. Dessaint, G. Py, D. Makowski, and N. Munier-Jolain. 2017. “Reducing Pesticide Use While Preserving Crop Productivity and Profitability on Arable Farms.” Nature Plants 3: 17008. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N., and A. Long. 1992. Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, V., P. Gasselin, and J. D. Van der Ploeg. 2019. “Local Inter-Farm Cooperation: A Hidden Potential for the Agroecological Transition in Northern Agricultures.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42 (2): 145–179. doi: 10.1080/21683565.2018.1509168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, J., J. Leppälä, G. van der Laan, C. Colosio, M. Jakob, S. Vander Broucke, L. Girdziute, E. Merisalu, A. M. Heiberg, and R. Rautiainen. 2018. “Rural Health: Agriculture, Pesticides and Organic Dusts, 1768Safety Culture and Risk Management in Agriculture (Sacurima).” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 75 (Suppl 2), doi:10.1136/oemed-2018-ICOHabstracts.1314.
   Google Scholar
• Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, M., O. Felipe Giraldo, M. Aldasoro, H. Morales, B. G. Ferguson, P. Rosset, A. Khadse, and C. Campos. 2018. “Bringing Agroecology to Scale: Key Drivers and Emblematic Cases.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (6): 637–665. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1443313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., and J. Murdoch. 2000. “Organic vs Conventional Agriculture Knowledge, Power and Innovation in the Food Chain.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 31: 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnke, A. 2015. “Institutionalizing Economies of Opposition: Explaining and Evaluating the Success of the MST’s Cooperatives and Agroecological Repeasantization.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1087–1107. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.991720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, J. 1975. Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World. New York, .: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, P. 2018. “Agroecology and the Restoration of Organic Metabolisms in Agrifood Systems.” In The Sage Handbook of Nature, edited by T. Marsden, 1448–1467. London: SAGE Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. 1974. Les classes sociales dans le capitalisme d’aujourdhui. Paris: Maspoero.
   Google Scholar
• RAD (Reseau agriculture durable). 2015. Résultats de l’observatoire technico-économique bovin-lait du réseau agriculkture durable, synthese 2015, exercise comptable 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaud, P. 1983. “Organisation du travail agraire et identités alternatives.” Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie LXXV: 305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Reijs, J. 2007. “Improving Slurry by Diet Adjustments, a Novelty to Reduce N Losses from Grassland Based Dairy Farms.” PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. Altieri. 2017. Agroecology: Science and Politics, ICAS Small Book Series. Vancouver: Fernwood Publisher. (International edition: https://practical-action.org/10U-588QE-B869K6V111/cr.aspx).
   Google Scholar
• Saccomandi, V. 1998. Agricultural Market Economics: A Neo-Institutional Analysis of Exchange, Circulation and Distribution of Agricultural Products. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. 1975. The Economics of Multiplant Operation, Harvard University Press. Cambridge: Mass.
   Google Scholar
• Schermer, M. 2017. “From ‘Additive’ to ‘Multiplicative’ Patterns of Growth.” International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 24 (1): 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State_: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla Guzman, E. 2007. De la Sociologia Rural a la Agroecologia_: Perspectivas Agroecologicas. Barcelona, Spain: Icaria Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Slicher van Bath, B. H. 1958. Een Fries landbouwbedrijf in de tweede helft van de zestiende eeuw. Wageningen: Agronomisch-Historische Bijdragen, vierde deel, Studiejkring voor de Geschiedenis van de Landbouw, Veenman en Zonen.
   Google Scholar
• Sonneveld, M. P. W. 2004. “Impressions of Interactions: Land as a Dynamic Result of Co-Production Between Man and Nature.” PhD thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Stuiver, M., C. Leeuwis, and J. D. van der Ploeg. 2004. “The Power of Experience: Farmers’ Knowledge and Sustainable Innovations in Agriculture.” In Seeds of Transition_: Essays on Novelty Creation, Niches and Regimes in Agriculture, edited by J. S. C. Wiskerke and J. D. van der Ploeg, 1–30. Assen, The Netherlands: Royal van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Stuiver, M., J. D. van der Ploeg, and C. Leeuwis. 2003. “The VEL and VANLA Cooperatives as Field Laboratories.” NJAS 51 (1–2): 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swagemakers, P. 2008. “Ecologisch Kapitaal: Over het belang van aanpassingsvermogen, flexibiliteit en oordeelkundigheid.” PhD, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Trotta, G., and F. Milana. 2008. L’operaismo degli anni Sessanta, da ‘Quaderni rossi’ a ‘classe operaia’. Roma: Biblioteca dell’operaismo.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kamp, A., and M. de Haan. 2004. “High-Tech Farm and Low-Cost Farm in the Netherlands: What is the Solution?” Paper for Djurhälso & Utfodringskonferens 2004, ASG/WUR, Lelystad.
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen, H., P. Kuijer, G. de Groene, J. Bakker, B. Sorgdrager, A. Lenderink, J. Maas, and T. Brand. 2018. Beroepsziekten in cijfers. Amsterdam: Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. 1993. “On Potatoes and Metaphor.” In An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, edited by M. Hobart, 209–227. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. 2013. Peasants and the Art of Farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto. Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. 2018. The New Peasantries: Rural Development in Times of Globalization. 2nd ed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D., D. Barjolle, J. Bruil, G. Brunori, L. M. Costa Madureira, J. Dessein, Z. Drąg, et al. 2019. “The Economic Potential of Agroecology: Empirical Evidence from Europe.” Journal of Rural Studies, doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D., Ye Jingzhong, and S. Schneider. 2010. “Rural Development Through the Construction of New, Nested Markets: Comparative Perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (1): 133–174. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D., S. Miedema, D. Roep, R. van Broekhuizen en R. de Bruin. 1992. Boer Bliuwe Blinder … ! Bedrijfsstijlen, Ondernemerschap en Toekomstperspectieven, Bedrijfsstijlenstudie 6, AVM/CCLB en Vakgroep Agrarische Ontwikkelingssociologie. Wageningen: LU.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D., F. Verhoeven, H. Oostindie, and J. Groot. 2003. Wat smyt it op; een verkennende analyse van bedrijfseconomische en landbouwkundige gegevens van Vel & Vanla bedrijven. Wageningen, The Netherlands: WUR/NLTO noord.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D., P. Verschuren, F. Verhoeven, and J. Pepels. 2006. “Dealing with Novelties: A Grassland Experiment Reconsidered.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 8 (3): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/15239080600915568
   Google Scholar
• Wezel, A., S. Bellon, T. Doré, C. Francis, D. Vallod, and C. David. 2009. “Agroecology as a Science, a Movement and a Practice. A Review.” Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (4): 503–515. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze?: A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 44–83. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, Zhao, and J. D. van der Ploeg. 2009. “Telling Data: An Analysis of the Note Book of a Chinese Farmer.” Journal of China Agricultural University 3: 89–103.
   Google Scholar