436
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Performing property in Göllüce: land enclosures and commoning struggles in 1960s Turkey

References

  • Akbulut, B. 2017. “Commons against the Tide: The Project of Democratic Economy.” In Neoliberal Turkey and Its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment under Erdoǧan, edited by F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, and M. Arsel, 231–245. London: I.B. Tauris.
  • Aksoy, S. 1969. “Atalan ve Göllüce Olayları.” [The Atalan and Göllüce Incidents.] Milliyet, February 10.
  • Atasoy, Y. 2017. “Repossession, Re-informalization and Dispossession: The ‘Muddy Terrain’ of Land Commodification in Turkey.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (4): 657–679.
  • Aydemir, ŞS. 2006. Menderes’in Dramı [The Drama of Menderes]. Istanbul: Remzi Publications.
  • Aysu, A. 2014. “Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Köylü Mücadeleleri.” [Peasants’ Struggles from the Ottoman Empire to the Present.] In Köylülükten sonra Tarım [Agriculture after Peasantry], edited by A. Aysu, and M. S. Kayaoğlu, 613–670. Ankara: Epos.
  • Aytekin, A. 2012. “Peasant Protest in the Late Ottoman Empire: Moral Economy, Revolt, and the Tanzimat Reforms.” International Review of Social History 57 (2): 191–227.
  • Babuş, F. 2011. Devrim Havarileri: 68 Hareketinin Köy Eylemleri [Apostles of the Revolution: Rural Protests of the 68 Movement]. İstanbul: Ozan Publications.
  • Balaban, U. 2011. “The Enclosure of Urban Space and Consolidation of the Capitalist Land Regime in Turkish Cities.” Urban Studies 48 (10): 2162–2179.
  • Blomley, N. 2008. “Enclosure, Common Right and the Property of the Poor.” Social Legal Studies 17: 311–331.
  • Blomley, N. 2013. “Performing Property: Making The World.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 26 (1): 23–48.
  • Blomley, N., and J. C. Sturgeon. 2009. “Property as Abstraction.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (2): 564–566.
  • Butler, J., and A. Athanasiou. 2013. Dispossession: The Performative in the Political. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Caffentzis, G. 2010. “The Future of the Commons: Neoliberalism’s ‘Plan B’ or the Original Disaccumulation of Capital?” New Formations 69 (1): 23–41.
  • Chatterton, P. 2010. “Seeking the Urban Common: Furthering the Debate on Spatial Justice.” City 14 (6): 625–628.
  • Çetinkaya, H. 1969. “A. Menderes’in Halası’nın Arazisi İşgal Edildi.” [The Land of A. Menderes’s Maternal Aunt Occupied.] Cumhuriyet, February 3.
  • De Angelis, M. 2007. The Beginning of History: Value Struggles and Global Capital. London: Pluto Press.
  • Dursun, S. 2019. “Dispossession by Concession: Forest Commons in the Ottoman Empire and Early Turkish Republic.” In Seeds of Power, edited by O. İnal, and Y. Köse, 260–284. Winwick, Cambridgeshire: White Horse Press.
  • Erensü, Sinan. 2016. “Gezi, Ekoloji ve Karadeniz Rabıtasına Dair.” [On Gezi, Ecology and the Black Sea Region Connection.] In Değişen Karadenizi Anlamak [Understanding Change in Black Sea Region], edited by D. Yıldırım, and E. Haspolat, 485–500. Phoenix: Ankara.
  • Evliyazade, M. 1962. “Göllüce Çiftliği.” [Göllüce Farm.] Cumhuriyet, May 19.
  • Federici, S. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.
  • Federici, S. 2012. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle. Oakland: PM Press.
  • Fırat, BÖ. 2011. “‘Ve Madem ki Sokaklar Kimsenin Değil’: Talan, Dolandırıcılık ve Hırsızlığa karşı Kentsel Müşterekler Yaratmak.” [“And Since the Streets Belong to No One”: Creating Urban Commons against Plunder, Robbery and Theft.] Eğitim, Bilim, Toplum 36: 96–116.
  • Fırat, BÖ. 2019a. “Müşterekleştirme ve Çitlemenin Zamanı: Göllüce’de Toprak Mücadeleleri.” [The Time of Commoning and Enclosure: Land Struggles in Göllüce.] Praksis 49: 39–66.
  • Fırat, BÖ. 2019b. “Köylüler, Devrimciler, Toprak, İşgal: Bitmeyen ‘68’.” [Peasants, Revolutionaries, Land, Occupation: Never Ending ‘68’] In İsyan, Devrim, Özgürlük: 50 Yıl Sonra 1968 [Rebellion, Revolution, Freedom: 50 Years Later 1968], edited by Ö Turan, 499–522. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publications.
  • Gedik, Z. 2018. Interview. Göllüce, March, 25.
  • Genç, Fırat. 2019. “Çitlemeler ve Politikanın Yitimi: Türkiye’de Güncel Kentsel Rejim.” [Enclosures and the Hollowing out of the Political: Contemporary Urban Regime in Turkey] Praksis 49: 3–38.
  • Geray, C. 1974. Planlı Dönemde Köye Yönelik Çalışmalar [Studies concerning Villages in the Planned Period]. Ankara: Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü Publications.
  • Gidwani, V., and A. Baviskar. 2011. “Urban Commons.” Economic and Political Weekly 46 (50): 42–43.
  • ‘Göllüce Direnişinde Köylülere Yargı Tehdidi [Judicial Threat to Göllüce Peasants]’. 2012. Ege’de Son Söz. Accessed October 8 2020. http://egedesonsoz.com/haber/Golluce-Direnisi-nde-koylulere-yargi-tehdidi/914612/.
  • Gürel, B. 2011. “Agrarian Change and Labour Supply in Turkey, 1950–1980.” Journal of Agrarian Change 11 (2): 195–219.
  • Gürel, B. 2014. “Türkiye'de Kırda Sınıf Mücadelelerinin Tarihsel Gelişimi.” [Historical Development of Class Struggles in Rural Turkey] In Marksizm ve Sınıflar: Dünyada ve Türkiye'de Sınıflar ve Mücadeleleri [Marxism and Classes: Classes and Their Struggles in Turkey and the World], edited by S. Savran, E. A.Tonak, and K. Tanyılmaz, 303–385. İstanbul: Yordam Publications.
  • Gürel, B. 2020. “Civil War and Massacre in Maraş 1978.” In Turkey in Turmoil: Social Change and Political Radicalization during the 1960s, edited by B. Pekesen, 152–180. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
  • Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hodkinson, Stuart. 2012. “The New Urban Enclosures.” City 16 (5): 500–518.
  • İslamoğlu, H. 2004. “Politics of Administering Property: Law and Statistics in the Nineteenth Century Ottoman Empire.” In Constituting Modernity: Private Property in the East and West, edited by H. İslamoğlu, 276–320. London: I.B.Tauris.
  • Kaftan, ÇE. 1960. “Menderes’in Halası bir Köyde Hak İddia Ediyor.” [Menderes’s Maternal Aunt Makes Claim on Village.] Milliyet, July 2.
  • Karaömerlioğlu, A. 2000. “Elite Perceptions of Land Reform in Early Republican Turkey.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 27 (3): 115–141.
  • Karatali, S. S., and S. Kumral. 2019. “Capitalist Development in Hostile Conjunctures: War, Dispossession, and Class Formation in Turkey.” Journal of Agrarian Change 19 (3): 528–549.
  • Keyder, Ç. 1983. “The Cycle of Sharecropping and the Consolidation of Small Peasant Ownership in Turkey.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 10 (2-3): 130–145.
  • Keyder, Ç. 2005. “Globalization and Social Exclusion in Istanbul.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29: 124–134.
  • Keyder, Ç, and Ş Pamuk. 1984. “1945 Çiftçiyi Topraklandırma Kanunu Üzerine Tezler.” [Theses on the 1945 Land Reform Law.] Yapıt 8: 52–63.
  • Kurtege-Sefer, B. 2018. “The Apotheosis of the Green Revolution and the Throes of Landless Peasant Women in Two Aegean Villages of Turkey in the 1960s.” PhD diss., Binghamton University.
  • Kuyucu, T. 2014. “Law, Property and Ambiguity.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 609–627.
  • Kürkçü, E. 2014. Pratiğin Aklı Teorinin Heyecanı [The Intellect of Practice, The Excitement of Theory]. Ankara: Dipnot.
  • Linebaugh, P. 2008. The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberty and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Marx, K. 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin Books.
  • Midnight Notes Collective. 1990. The New Enclosures. New York: Autonomedia.
  • Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
  • Özok-Gündoğan, N. 2012. “A Peripheral Approach to the 1908 Revolution in the Ottoman Empire: Land Disputes in Peasant Petitions in Post-Revolutionary Diyarbekir.” In Social Relations in Diyarbekir, 1870-1915, edited by J. Jongerden, and J. Verheij, 179–215. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
  • Rose, C. 1994. Property And Persuasion: Essays On The History, Theory, And Rhetoric Of Ownership. Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Selçuk, İ. 1969. “Egenin Atalan İlçesinde Toprak Mücadelesi Var.” [There Is an Ongoing Struggle for Land in the Atalan District of the Aegean Region.] Cumhuriyet, March 21.
  • Serhan, Fİ. 1962a. “Göllüce Dramı.” [The Drama of Göllüce.] Cumhuriyet, May 3.
  • Serhan, Fİ. 1962b. “Göllüce Dramı.” [The Drama of Göllüce.] Cumhuriyet, May 10.
  • Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2015. “Capitalist Formations of Enclosure: Space and the Extinction of the Commons.” Antipode 47 (4): 999–1020.
  • “1970’de Köylü Hareketleri” [Peasant Movements in 1970]. 1988. Sosyalizm ve Toplumsal Mücadeleler Ansiklopedisi [Encyclopedia of Socialism and Social Struggles]. 68: 2151–2153. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Teker, A. H. 2018a. Interview. Göllüce, March, 25.
  • Teker, Ü. 2018b. Interview. Göllüce, March, 24.
  • Terzibaşoğlu, Y. 2006. “Eleni Hatun’un Zeytin Bahçeleri: 19. yüzyılda Anadolu’da Mülkiyet Hakları Nasıl İnşa Edildi?” [The Olive Orchards of Eleni Hatun: How were Property Rights Constructed in 19th Century Anatolia?] Tarih ve Toplum: Yeni Yaklaşımlar 4: 121–147.
  • Thompson, E. P. 1993. Customs in Common. London: Penguin Books.
  • Türem, U. 2017. “The State of Property: From the Empire to the Neoliberal Republic.” In Neoliberal Turkey and Its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment under Erdoǧan, edited by F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, and M. Arsel, 18–43. London: I.B. Tauris.
  • Tüzün, S. 1970. “Elmalı Toprak İşgali Üzerine bir Deneme.” [An Essay on the Elmalı Land Occupations.] Aydınlık 16: 266–275.
  • Üngör, UÜ, and M. Polatel. 2011. Confiscation and Destruction: The Young Turk Seizure of Armenian Property. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Yıldırmaz, S. 2017. Politics and the Peasantry in Post-War Turkey: Social History, Culture and Modernization. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.