From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept

References

• Acosta, Alberto. 2013. “Extractivism and Neoextractivism: Two Sides of the Same Curse.” In Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America, edited by Miriam Lang, and Dunia Mokrani, 61–86. Amsterdam: Rosa-Luxemburg Foundation, Quito and Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Aguinaga, Margarita, Miriam Lang, Dunia Mokrani, and Alejandra Santillana. 2013. “Critiques and Alternatives to Development: A Feminist Perspective.” In Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America, edited by Miriam Lang, and Dunia Mokrani, 41–59. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rosa-Luxemburg Foundation: Quito, Edcador and Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon. 2022. “Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 275–283. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-41.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010a. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 1): Unearthing Foundations, Exploring Diversity.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 177–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010b. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 2): Current Debates and Beyond.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (2): 255–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066151003594906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Fradejas, Alberto. 2018. “The Rise of Agro-extractive Capitalism: Insights from Guatemala in the Early 21st Century.” PhD diss., International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, Samir. 2011. Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. Oxford, United Kingdom: Fahamu.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, Daniela. 2022. “Neoliberal Extractivism: Brazil in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreucci, Diego, Melissa García-Lamarca, Jonah Wedekind, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2017. “‘Value Grabbing’: A Political Ecology of Rent.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 28 (3): 28–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027.
   Google Scholar
• Andreucci, Diego, and Isabella M. Radhuber. 2017. “Limits to “Counter-Neoliberal” Reform: Mining Expansion and the Marginalisation of Post-Extractivist Forces in Evo Morales’s Bolivia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 84: 280–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arboleda, Martín. 2020. Planetary Mine. Territories of Extraction Under Late Capitalism. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ashamole, Darlington C. 2019. “Extractive Industry and the Politics of Manhood in Nigeria’s Niger Delta: A Masculinity Perspective of Gender Implication of Resource Extractivism.” NORMA 14 (4): 255–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2019.1663988.
   Google Scholar
• Ayelazuno, Jasper Abembia. 2014. “The “New Extractivism” in Ghana: A Critical Review of Its Development Prospects.” The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2): 292–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Ayelazuno, Jasper Abembia. 2019. “Land Governance for Extractivism and Capitalist Farming in Africa: An Overview.” Land Use Policy 81 (2): 843–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier, Edward. 2011. Scarcity and Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed through Natural Resource Exploitation. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, Edward B. 2012. “Scarcity, Frontiers and Development.” The Geographical Journal 178 (2): 110–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00462.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier, Edward B. 2019. Natural Resources and Economic Development. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875681.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, Keith. 2009. “Laos and the Making of a ‘Relational’ Resource Frontier.” Geographical Journal 175 (2): 146–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00323.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington-Leigh, Christopher. 2017. “The Role of Subjective Well-Being as an Organizing Concept for Community Indicators.” In Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VII, edited by Meg Holden, Rhonda Phillips, and Chantal Stevens, 19–34. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bauerly, Brad. 2017. The Agrarian Seeds of Empire: The Political Economy of Agriculture in US State Building. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, Anthony, Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai, Denise Humphreys Bebbington, Marja Hinfelaar, and Cynthia Sanborn. 2018. Governing Extractive Industries: Politics, Histories, Ideas. 1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Mia M. 2016. “Discursive, Material, Vertical, and Extensive Dimensions of Post-Cold War Arctic Resource Extraction.” Polar Geography 39 (4): 258–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2016.1234517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henri. 2010. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beyea, Suzanne, and Leslie H. Nicoll. 1998. “Writing an Integrative Review.” AORN Journal 67 (4): 877–880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62653-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billo, Emily. 2020. “Patriarchy and Progressive Politics: Gendered Resistance to Mining Through Everyday Social Relations of State Formation in Intag, Ecuador.” Human Geography 13 (1): 16–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910895.
   Google Scholar
• Blaser, Mario, and Marisol de la Cadena. 2018. “Introduction. PLURIVERSE.” In A World of Many Worlds, edited by Marisol de la Cadena, and Mario Blaser, 1–22. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, Patrick. 2016. “BRICS Banking and the Debate Over sub-Imperialism.” Third World Quarterly 37 (4): 611–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1128816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, Jr., Saturnino M. 2020. “Agrarian Social Movements: The Absurdly Difficult but not Impossible Agenda of Defeating Right-Wing Populism and Exploring A Socialist Future.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 3–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, Saturnino, M. Ruth Hall, Ian Scoones, Ben White, and Wendy Wolford. 2011. “Towards a Better Understanding of Global Land Grabbing: An Editorial Introduction.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 209–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, Jr., Saturnino M., Cristóbal Kay, Sergio Gómez, and John Wilkinson. 2012. “Land Grabbing and Global Capitalist Accumulation: key Features in Latin America.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 33 (4): 402–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.745394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brad, Alina, Anke Schaffartzik, Melanie Pichler, and Christina Plank. 2015. “Contested Territorialization and Biophysical Expansion of Oil Palm Plantations in Indonesia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 64 (8): 100–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, Tobias Boos, and Alina Brad. 2017. “Degrowth and Post-Extractivism: Two Debates with Suggestions for the Inclusive Development Framework.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 24 (2): 36–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, Kristina Dietz, and Miriam Lang. 2016. “Neo-Extractivism in Latin America – One Side of a New Phase of Global Capitalist Dynamics.” Ciencia Política 11 (21): 125–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v11n21.57551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, Christoph Görg, and Markus Wissen. 2020. “Overcoming Neoliberal Globalization: Social-Ecological Transformation from a Polanyian Perspective and Beyond.” Globalizations 17 (1): 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1644708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruna, Natcha. 2022. “Going Beyond Efficiency-Driven Extractivism: A Climate-Smart World and the Rise of Green Extractivism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker, Stephen G. 1988. Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busscher, Nienke, Constanza Parra, and Frank Vanclay. 2020. “Environmental Justice Implications of Land Grabbing for Industrial Agriculture and Forestry in Argentina.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63 (3): 500–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1595546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cáceres, Daniel M. 2015. “Accumulation by Dispossession and Socio-Environmental Conflicts Caused by the Expansion of Agribusiness in Argentina.” Journal of Agrarian Change 15 (1): 116–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, Igor. 2019. “Data Spaces and Democracy.” RSA Journal 165 (Issue 2 (5578)): 40–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35392/89601/1.
   Google Scholar
• Caretta, Martina Angela, Sofia Zaragocin, Bethani Turley, and Kamila Orellana. 2020. “Women’s Organizing Against Extractivism: Towards A Decolonial Multi-Sited Analysis.” Human Geography 13 (1): 49–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910898.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, Noel. 2008. “Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects, and Evaluations.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1): 153–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a39100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chagnon, Christopher W., Sophia E. Hagolani-Albov, and Saana Hokkanen. 2021. “Extractivism at Your Fingertips.” In Our Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance, edited by Judith Shapiro, and John-Andrew McNeish, 176–188. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Timothy P., and Stefano B. Longo. 2021. “Global Labor Value Chains, Commodification, and the Socioecological Structure of Severe Exploitation. A Case Study of the Thai Seafood Sector.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1890041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordell, Dana, Jan-Olof Drangert, and Stuart White. 2009. “The Story of Phosphorus: Global Food Security and Food for Thought.” Global Environmental Change 19 (2): 292–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, Nick, and Ulises Ali Mejias. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism. Culture and Economic Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Maso, Giulia, Shanthi Robertson, and Dallas Rogers. 2019. “Cultural Platform Capitalism: Extracting Value from Cultural Asymmetries in RealTech.” Social & Cultural Geography 22 (4): 565–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1601246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Mike. 2006. Planet of Slums. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, Massimo. 2004. “Separating the Doing and the Deed: Capital and the Continuous Character of Enclosures.” Historical Materialism 12 (2): 57–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206041551609.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, Marisol, and Mario Blaser, eds. 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, Marisol, Marianne E. Lien, Mario Blaser, Casper Bruun Jensen, Tess Lea, Atsuro Morita, Heather Swanson, Gro B. Ween, Paige West, and Margaret Wiener. 2015. “Anthropology and STS: Generative Interfaces, Multiple Locations.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): 437–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.1.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de los Reyes, Julie. 2022. “Re-making Pascua Lama: Corporate Financialisation and the Production of Extractive Space.” Journal of Peasant Studie 49 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVore, Jonathan. 2017. “The Mind of the Copaíba Tree: Notes on Extractivism, Animism, and Ontology from Southern Bahia.” Ethnobiology Letters 8 (1): 115–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.8.1.2017.965.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, Alexander, and Jostein Jakobsen. 2019. The Violent Technologies of Extraction: Political Ecology, Critical Agrarian Studies and the Capitalist Worldeater. London, UK: Palgrave, McMillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26852-7.
   Google Scholar
• Durante, Francesco, Markus Kröger, and William LaFleur. 2021. “Extraction and Extractivisms: Definitions and Concepts.” In Our Hyper-Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance, edited by Judith Shapiro, and John-Andrew McNeish, 19–30. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127611-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnström-Fuentes, Maria. 2019. “Confronting Extractivism – the Role of Local Struggles in the (Un)Making of Place.” Critical Perspectives on International Business. Vol. ahead-of-print (No. ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-01-2018-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrnström-Fuentes, Maria, and Markus Kröger. 2018. “Birthing Extractivism: The Role of the State in Forestry Politics and Development in Uruguay.” Journal of Rural Studies 57: 197–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilenberg, Michael. 2014. “Frontier Constellations: Agrarian Expansion and Sovereignty on the Indonesian-Malaysian Border.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (2): 157–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.885433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhacham, Emily, Liad Ben-Uri, Johnathan Grozovski, Yinon M. Bar-On, and Ron Milo. 2020. “Global Human-Made Mass Exceeds all Living Biomass.” Nature 588 (7838): 442–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkin, Stephen L. 2006. “Political Theory and Political Economy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, edited by John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips, 792–809. Oxford Handbooks of Political Science. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, Bettina, and Kristina Dietz, eds. 2017. Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: Struggles Over Mining and Land. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58811-1.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2017. “Sustaining the Pluriverse: The Political Ontology of Territorial Struggles in Latin America.” In The Anthropology of Sustainability, edited by Marc Brightman, and Jerome Lewis, 237–256. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_14.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farthing, Linda, and Nicole Fabricant. 2018. “Open Veins Revisited: Charting the Social, Economic, and Political Contours of the New Extractivism in Latin America.” Latin American Perspectives 45 (5): 4–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18785882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, Marianna. 2018. “Feminist Dialogue Series – Feminist Alternatives to Predatory Extractivism: Contributions and Experiences from Latin America.” Mozambique: Friedrich-Ebert-Stifung. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d096/75d41c61361dedfd130a3751eab032b953e1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, John Bellamy. 1999. “Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 366–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/210315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, John Bellamy. 2000. Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Andre Gunder, and Barry K. Gills, eds. 1993. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, Tomas, and Matthew Himley. 2020. “Tactics of Dispossession: Access, Power and Subjectivity at the Extractive Frontier.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45 (1): 50–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Harriet, and Philip McMichael. 1989. “The Rise and Decline of National Agricultures, 1870 to the Present.” Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2): 93–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, Verónica, and Sandro A. Mezzadra. 2017. “A Critique of the Extractive Operations of Capital: Toward an Expanded Concept of Extractivism.” Rethinking Marxism 29 (4): 574–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2017.1417087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeano, Eduardo. 1997. Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent. New York, NY: New York University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Ana, and Miguel Borba de Sà. 2022. “Brazil: Development strategies and peripheral conditions.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 147–154. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-23.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, Danilo. 2009. “Turner in the Tropics: The Frontier Concept Revisited.” PhD diss., Universität Luzern.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudo, Maria Eugenia. 2020. “Dependent Development in South America: China and the Soybean Nexus.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 60–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2011. Debt: The First Five Thousand Years. New York, NY: Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David, and David Wengrow. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2016. “Del «Extractivismo Económico» al «Extractivismo Epistémico» Y «Extractivismo Ontológico»: una Forma Destructiva de Conocer, ser Y Estar en el Mundo.” Tabula Rasa 24: 123–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.60.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2020. “Epistemic Extractivism: A Dialogue with Alberto Acosta, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui.” In Knowledges Born in the Struggle: Constructing the Epistemologies of the Global South, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos, and Maria P. Meneses, 203–218. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, Eduardo. 2015. Extractivismos: ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la naturaleza. Primera edición. Cochabamba, Bolivia: CEDIB, Centro de Documentación e Información Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, Eduardo. 2018. “Extractivisms: Tendencies and Consequences.” In Reframing Latin American Development, edited by Ronaldo Munck, and Raúl Delgado Wise, 61–76. Routledge Critical Development Studies. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170084-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, Eduardo. 2021. Extractivisms: Politics, Economy and Ecology. Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gunster, Shane, and Robert J. Neubauer. 2019. “(De)Legitimating Extractivism: The Shifting Politics of Social Licence.” Environmental Politics 28 (4): 707–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1507290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Maria-Therese, and Martin Scurrah. 2019. “Unpacking the Extractivist State: The Role of Weak State Agencies in Promoting Institutional Change in Peru.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (1): 206–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Guzmán-Gallegos, María A. 2019. “Controlling Abandoned Oil Installations: Ruination and Ownership in Northern Peruvian Amazonia.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies from South America, edited by Cecilie Vindal Ødegaard, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía, 53–74. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93435-8_2.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Derek. 2002. “Environmental Change, Protest, and Havens of Environmental Degradation: Evidence From Asia.” Global Environmental Politics 2 (2): 20–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/15263800260047808.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/helsinki-ebooks/detail.action?docID=886664.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, Jason, Dylan Sullivan, and Huzaifa Zoomkawala. 2021. “Plunder in the Post-Colonial Era: Quantifying Drain from the Global South Through Unequal Exchange, 1960–2018.” New Political Economy 26 (6): 1030–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1899153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, Jessica. 2020. “The Anti-Politics of Sustainable Development: Environmental Critique from Assemblage Thinking in Bolivia.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (1): 208–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, Hamed S.A., and Barry K. Gills. 2020. “Reinventing Global Studies Through Transformative Scholarship: A Critical Proposition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Transformative Global Studies, edited by S. A. Hamed Hosseini, James Goodman, Sara C. Motta, and Barry K. Gills, 13–28. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyos, Héctor. 2019. Things with a History: Transcultural Materialism and the Literatures of Extraction in Contemporary Latin America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7312/hoyo19304.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Michael. 2012. “The Road to Debt Deflation, Debt Peonage, and Neofeudalism.” Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper No. 708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007284.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Michael. 2015. Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy. Petrolia, CA: Counterpunch Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2018. “One World Anthropology.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8 (1–2): 158–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/698315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, Cristóbal. 2022. “Contemporary dynamics of agrarian change.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 267–274. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-40.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Alice B., and Nancy Lee Peluso. 2015. “Frontiers of Commodification: State Lands and their Formalization.” Society & Natural Resources 28 (5): 473–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1014602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmerer, Robin W. 2013. Braiding Wweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed editions.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Naomi. 2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kopenawa, Davi, and Bruce Albert. 2013. The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Sharon R. 2020. “Environmental Domination.” Political Theory 48 (8): 443–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591719890833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. 2012. “Neo-mercantilist Capitalism and Post-2008 Cleavages in Economic Decision-Making Power in Brazil.” Third World Quarterly 33 (5): 887–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2013. Contentious Agency and Natural Resource Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2014. “The Political Economy of Global Tree Plantation Expansion: A Review.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (2): 235–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.890596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2016. “Spatial Causalities in Resource Rushes: Notes From the Finnish Mining Boom.” Journal of Agrarian Change 16 (4): 543–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2019. “The Global Land Rush and the Arctic.” In The Global Arctic Handbook, edited by Matthias Finger, and Lassi Heininen, 27–43. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2020. Iron Will: Global Extractivism and Mining Resistance in Brazil and India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2021. Extractivisms, Existences and Extinctions: Monoculture Plantations and Amazon Deforestation. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus, and Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes. 2021. “Forestry Extractivism: Uruguay.” In Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America, edited by Ben McKay, Alberto Alonso-Fradejas, and Arturo Ezquerro-Cañete, 186–207. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M., S. E. Hagolani-Albov, and B. Gills. 2021. “Extractivisms.” In Situating Sustainability: A Handbook of Contexts and Concepts, edited by Parker Krieg, and Reetta Toivanen, 239–252. Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-14-17.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus, and Anja Nygren. 2020. “Shifting Frontier Dynamics in Latin America.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (3): 364–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2019. “At the Intersection of Arctic Indigenous Governance and Extractive Industries: A Survey of Three Cases.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (1): 15–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.011.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, Anna F. 2020. “Re-Producing Territory: Between Resource Nationalism and Indigenous Self-Determination in Bolivia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 108 (1): 28–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila, Maija. 2021. “The Arctic Mineral Resource Rush and the Ontological Struggle for the Viiankiaapa Peatland in Sodankylä, Finland.” Globalizations 18 (4): 635–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1831818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laterra, Patricia, María Julia Eliosoff, and Agostina Costantino. 2021. “Austerity Programs in Argentina and the Structural Continuity of Extractivism: A Feminist Perspective.” Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A Triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES 10 (1): 110–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/22779760211002643.
   Google Scholar
• Leifsen, Ebsen. 2020. “The Socionature That neo-Extractivism can see: Practicing Redistribution and Compensation Around Large-Scale Mining in the Southern Ecuadorian Amazon.” Political Geography 82: 102249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, Michael, Michael Watts, and Yan Hairong. 2018. “Agrarian Marxism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5–6): 853–883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1534101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Taina Murray. 2010. “To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations.” Antipode 41: 66–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loperena, Christopher A. 2017. “Honduras is Open for Business: Extractivist Tourism as Sustainable Development in the Wake of Disaster?” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 25 (5): 618–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1231808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Catherine. 2018. “The Role of Gender in Extractive Industries.” In Extractive Industries: The Management of Resources as A Driver of Sustainable Development, edited by Tony Addison, and Alan Roe, 442–459. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machado Aráoz, Horacio. 2013. “Crisis ecológica, conflictos socioambientales y orden neocolonial: Las paradojas de NuestrAmérica en las fronteras del extractivismo.” REBELA – Revista Brasileira de Estudos Latino-Americanos 3 (1): 118–155. https://rebela.emnuvens.com.br/pc/article/view/137.
   Google Scholar
• Machado Aráoz, Horacio. 2015. “Ecología política de los regímenes extractivistas. De reconfiguraciones imperiales y re-exsistencias decoloniales en nuestra América.” Bajo el Volcán 15 (23): 11–51.
   Google Scholar
• Machlis, Gary E., Jo Ellen Force, and William R. Burch. 1997. “The Human Ecosystem Part I: The Human Ecosystem as an Organizing Concept in Ecosystem Management.” Society and Natural Resources 10 (4): 347–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, Mirca. 2019. “Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises.” Social Media + Society 5 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, Michael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25 (2): 185–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600004239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, Andrea, and Amy Kennemore. 2019. “Extraction, Revolution, Plurinationalism: Rethinking Extractivism from Bolivia.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (2): 141–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18781347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, Joan. 2011. “The EROI of Agriculture and its use by the Via Campesina.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 145–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.538582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, Facundo. 2017. “Reimagining Extractivism: Insights from Spatial Theory.” In Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: Struggles Over Mining and Land, edited by Bettina Engels, and Kristina Dietz, 21–44. Development, Justice and Citizenship. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58811-1_2.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. [1867] 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. Book One: The Process of Production of Capital. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, James. 2019. “Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Environment: Comparative Experiences, Insights, and Perspectives.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2): 301–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1554393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, Ben M. 2017. “Agrarian Extractivism in Bolivia.” World Development 97: 199–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, Ben M., Alberto Alonso-Fradejas, and Arturo Ezquerro-Cañete, eds. 2021. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, Ben M., Gustavo de L.T. Oliveira, and Juan Liu. 2020. “Authoritarianism, Populism, Nationalism and Resistance in the Agrarian South.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 41 (3): 347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, Ben M., and Henry Veltmeyer. 2021. “Industrial Agriculture and Agrarian Extractivism.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, Kristina Dietz, Bettina Engels, and Ben M. McKay, 503–514. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972468.00065.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, Phillip. 2013. “Value-chain Agriculture and Debt Relations: Contradictory Outcomes.” Third World Quarterly 34 (4): 671–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, Roger. 2020. “The Cynical State: Forging Extractivism, Neoliberalism and Development in Governmental Spaces.” Third World Quarterly 41 (1): 58–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2017. “On the Multiple Frontiers of Extraction: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism.” Cultural Studies 31 (2–3): 185–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, Sydney. 1986. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York, NY: Viking, Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Monjane, Boaventura, and Natacha Bruna. 2019. “Confronting Agrarian Authoritarianism: Dynamics of Resistance to PROSAVANA in Mozambique.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 69–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1671357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2000. “Sugar and the Expansion of the Early Modern World-Economy: Common Frontiers, Ecological Transformation, and Industrialization.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 23 (3): 409–433. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241510.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2016. “Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism.” Sociology Faculty Scholarship. Binghamton University, 1. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sociology_fac/1.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Samuel A. 2020. “Individuation Through Infrastructure: Get Full Text Research, Data Extraction and the Academic Publishing Oligopoly.” Journal of Documentation 77 (1): 129–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2020-0090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, Camila. 2015. O Brasil made in China. Para pensar as reconfigurações do capitalismo contemporâneo. São Paulo, Brazil: Fundação Rosa Luxemburgo.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2017. “Digital Intermediation of Everything: At the Intersection of Politics, Technology and Finance.” Paper presented at 4th Council of Europe Platform Exchange on Culture and Digitisation, Karlsruhe, Germany, October 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, Alf Gunvald, and Karl von Holdt. 2019. “Rising Powers, People Rising: neo-Liberalization and its Discontents in the BRICS Countries.” Globalizations 16 (2): 121–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1479018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirmal, Padini. 2020. “Nature and Gender.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2nd ed., edited by Audrey Kobayashi, 285–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10232-X’.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira, Isabel, Ossi I. Ollinaho, Eduardo Costa Pinto, Grasiela Baruco, Alexis Saludjian, José Paulo Guedes Pinto, Paulo Balanco, and Carlos Schonerwald. 2017. “Mozambican Economic Porosity and the Role of Brazilian Capital: A Political Economy Analysis.” Review of African Political Economy 44 (151): 104–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2017.1295367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosthoff, Anna-Verena, and Felix Maschewski. 2020. “Big Data and The Platform Economy: on Infrastructural Power.” Paper presented at the UN Expert Group Meeting on Population, Food Security, Nutrition and Sustainable Development. New York, NY, October 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, Anja, Markus Kröger, and Barry K. Gills. 2022. “Global Extractivisms and Transformative Alternatives.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocaklı, Beril, Tobias Krueger, Marco A. Janssen, and Ulan Kasymov. 2021. “Taking the Discourse Seriously: Rational Self-Interest and Resistance to Mining in Kyrgyzstan.” Ecological Economics 189: 107177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, Gustavo de L. T. 2018. “Chinese Land Grabs in Brazil? Sinophobia and Foreign Investments in Brazilian Soybean Agribusiness.” Globalizations 15 (1): 114–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2017.1377374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollinaho, Ossi I. 2016. “Environmental Destruction as (Objectively) Uneventful and (Subjectively) Irrelevant.” Environmental Sociology 2 (1): 53–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1114207.
   Google Scholar
• Ollinaho, Ossi I. 2018. “Virtualization of the Life-World.” Human Studies 41 (2): 193–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9455-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollinaho, Ossi I., and V. P. J. Arponen. 2020. “Incomegetting and Environmental Degradation.” Sustainability 12 (10): 4007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollinaho, Ossi I., and Markus Kröger. 2021. “Agroforestry Transitions: the Good, the bad and the Ugly.” Journal of Rural Studies 82: 210–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parenti, Christian. 2015. “The Environment Making State: Territory, Nature, and Value.” Antipode 47 (4): 829–848. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, Raj, and Jason W. Moore. 2017. A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, Utsa. 2017. “Revisiting the ‘Drain’, or Transfers from India to Britain in the Context of Global Diffusion of Capitalism.” In Agrarian and Other Histories: Essays for Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri, edited by S. Chakrabarti, and U. Patnaik, 277–319. New Delhi, India: Tulika Books.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, James, and Henry Veltmeyer. 2014. Extractive Imperialism in the Americas: Capitalism's New Frontier. Leiden, NL: Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004268869_001.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, James F., and Henry Veltmeyer. 2017. “Accumulation by dispossession – and the resistance.” In The Class Struggle in Latin America: Making History Today, edited by James F. Petras, and Henry Veltmeyer, 40–58. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2014. “Capital in the Twenty-First Century: A Multidimensional Approach to the History of Capital and Social Classes.” The British Journal of Sociology 65 (4): 736–747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, Val. 1993. “The Politics of Reason: Towards a Feminist Logic.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (4): 436–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409312345432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi Levitt, Kari. 2022. “Unravelling the Canvas of History.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 13–20. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-4.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, Shaina. 2020. “Law as Geopolitics: Judicial Territory, Transnational Economic Governance, and American Power.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (4): 1192–1207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1670041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. State, Power, Socialism. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, Jen. 2017. “Racial Extractivism and White Settler Colonialism: An Examination of the Canadian Tar Sands Mega-Projects.” Cultural Studies 31 (2–3): 353–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, Thomas F. 2021. “Contesting Total Extractivism: Between Idealism and Materialism.” Journal of Agrarian Change 12458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhuber, Isabella M. 2015. “Extractive Processes, Global Production Networks and Inequalities.” Refubium - Freie Universität Berlin Repository 89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23333.
   Google Scholar
• Raftopoulos, Malayna. 2017. “Contemporary Debates on Social-Environmental Conflicts, Extractivism and Human Rights in Latin America.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (4): 387–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1301035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Mattias Borg, and Christian Lund. 2018. “Reconfiguring Frontier Spaces: The Territorialization of Resource Control.” World Development 101: 388–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricaurte, Paola. 2019. “Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance.” Television & New Media 20 (4): 350–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, Wilder, and Henry Veltmeyer. 2015. The Politics of Agrarian Reform in Brazil: the Landless Rural Workers Movement. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Røpke, Inge. 2021. “From Value to Valuation and Appropriation. A Comment on Pirgmaier’s Paper “The Value of Value Theory for Ecological Economics”.” Ecological Economics 187: 107102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales, Antulio. 2016. “Deepening Extractivism and Rentierism: China’s Role in Venezuela’s Bolivarian Developmental Model.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 37 (4): 560–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2016.1208605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales, Antulio. 2019. “Radical Rentierism: Gold Mining, Cryptocurrency and Commodity Collateralization in Venezuela.” Review of International Political Economy 26 (6): 1311–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan. 2019. “When Data is Capital: Datafication, Accumulation, and Extraction.” Journal of Big Data 6 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan. 2020. “The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism.” Antipode 52: 562–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankey, Kyla. 2020. “The Political Economy of Mining in Colombia: The New Face of Globalization?” In Latin American Extractivism: Dependency, Resource Nationalism, and Resistance in Broad Perspective, edited by Steve Ellner, 33–54. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, ed. 2008. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. Reinventing Social Emancipation toward New Manifestos 3. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, Ian, Marc Edelman, Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Ruth Hall, Wendy Wolford, and Ben White. 2018. “Emancipatory Rural Politics: Confronting Authoritarian Populism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 2017. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300231687.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, Annie. 2021. “Generic, Growing, Green?: The Changing Political Economy of the Global Pesticide Complex.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 231–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1839053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, Sebastian. 2020. “The Political Economy of Latin American Conflicts Over Mining Extractivism.” The Extractive Industries and Society 7 (2): 767–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Stammler, Florian, and Aitalina Ivanova. 2016. “Confrontation, Coexistence or Co-Ignorance? Negotiating Human-Resource Relations in Two Russian Regions.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Stensrud, Astrid B. 2016. “Climate Change, Water Practices and Relational Worlds in the Andes.” Ethnos 81 (1): 75–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2014.929597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensrud, Astrid B. 2019. “Water as Resource and Being: Water Extractivism and Life Projects in Peru.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies from South America, edited by Cecilie Vindal Ødegaard, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía, 143–164. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93435-8_6.
   Google Scholar
• Strambo, Claudia, and Ana Carolina González Espinosa. 2020. “Extraction and Development: Fossil Fuel Production Narratives and Counternarratives in Colombia.” Climate Policy 20 (8): 931–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1719810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svampa, Maristella. 2015. “Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (1): 65–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svampa, Maristella. 2019. Neo-Extractivism in Latin America Socio- Environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szeman, Imre. 2017. “On the Politics of Extraction.” Cultural Studies 31 (2-3): 440–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teràn Mantovani, Emiliano. 2016. “Las Nuevas Fronteras de Las Commodities En Venezuela: Extractivismo, Crisis Histórica y Disputas Territoriales.” Ciencia Política 11 (21): 251–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v11n21.60296.
   Google Scholar
• Tetreault, Darcy. 2020. “The New Extractivism in Mexico: Rent Redistribution and Resistance to Mining and Petroleum Activities.” World Development 126: 104714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetreault, Darcy, Cindy McCulligh, and Carlos Lucio. 2021. “Distilling Agro-Extractivism: Agave and Tequila Production in Mexico.” Journal of Agrarian Change 21 (2): 219–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorat, Dhanashree. 2020. “Modalities of Data Colonialism and South Asian Hashtag Publics.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (1): 151–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1864874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilzey, Mark. 2019. “Authoritarian Populism and neo-Extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the Unresolved Agrarian Question and the Prospects for Food Sovereignty as Counter-Hegemony.” Critical Agrarian Studies 46 (3): 262–652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1584191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen, Tero, and Markus Kröger. 2019. “The Role of Debt, Death and Dispossession in World-Ecological Transformations: Swidden Commons and tar Capitalism in Nineteenth-Century Finland.” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (7): 1368–1388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1503173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tola, Miriam. 2018. “Between Pachamama and Mother Earth: Gender, Political Ontology and the Rights of Nature in Contemporary Bolivia.” Feminist Review 118 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0100-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torraco, Richard J. 2005. “Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples.” Human Resource Development Review 4 (3): 356–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2003. “Natural Resources and Capitalist Frontiers.” Economic and Political Weekly 38 (48): 5100–5106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4414348.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Lowell. 1994. “Social Partnership: An Organizing Concept for Industrial Relations Reform.” Workplace Topics 4 (1): 83–97. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/76107.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl, Christopher, Dominik Kulakowski, Jeffery Gerwing, Michelle Brown, and Mark Cochrane. 1996. “Sustainability: A Touchstone Concept for University Operations, Education, and Research.” Conservation Biology 10 (5): 1308–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa, Astrid. 2020. “The Rights of the Wayúu People and Water in the Context of Mining in La Guajira, Colombia: Demands of Relational Water Justice.” Human Geography 13 (1): 6–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910894.
   Google Scholar
• Velásquez, Teresa A. 2018. “Tracing the Political Life of Kimsacocha: Conflicts Over Water and Mining in Ecuador’s Southern Andes.” Latin American Perspectives 45 (5): 154–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X17726088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, Henry. 2020. “Latin America in the Vortex of Social Change: Development and Social Movement Dynamics.” World Development 130: 104916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, Henry, and Edgar Záyago Lau, eds. 2020. Buen Vivir and the Challenges to Capitalism in Latin America. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, Boris, and Sara Geenen. 2019. “The Gold Commodity Frontier: A Fresh Perspective on Change and Diversity in the Global Gold Mining Economy.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6: 413–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• Vindal Ødegaard, Cecilie, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía. 2019. “Introduction: Indigenous Peoples, Extractivism, and Turbulences in South America.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies From South America, edited by Cecilie Vindal Ødegaard, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía, 1–50. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. “The Development of the Concept of Development.” Sociological Theory 2: 102–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/223344.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. [1983] 2011. Historical Capitalism with Capitalist Civilization. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, Tony. 2010. “The Accelerating Biophysical Contradictions of Industrial Capitalist Agriculture.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 315–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00273.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, Robin, and Kathleen Knafl. 2005. “The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 (5): 546–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willow, Anna J. 2018. Understanding ExtrACTIVISM: Culture and Power in Natural Resource Disputes. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467196.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Emma, and Florian Stammler. 2016. “Beyond Extractivism and Alternative Cosmologies: Arctic Communities and Extractive Industries in Uncertain Times.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, Wendy. 2021. “The Plantationocene: A Lusotropical Contribution to the Theory.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (6): 1622–1639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1850231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Jingzhong, Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, Sergio Schneider, and Teodor Shanin. 2019. “The Incursions of Extractivism: Moving from Dispersed Places to Global Capitalism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 155–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1559834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Záyago Lau, Edgar. 2022. “The Triangle of Underdevelopment: Technology, Patents, and Monopoly.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 233–240. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-35.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Hongzhou. 2019. Securing the “Rice Bowl”: China and Global Food Security. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zhen, Zheng. 2020. “From the ‘Greening Motherland’ Campaign to the ‘Ant Forest’ App: Tree-Planting in China’s Environmental Politics.” World Rainforest Movement 251, September 24. https://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin-articles/from-the-greening-motherland-campaign-to-the-ant-forest-app-tree-planting-in-chinas-environmental-politics.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, Zac. 2017. “Bitcoin and Potosí Silver: Historical Perspectives on Cryptocurrency.” Technology and Culture 58 (2): 307–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2017.0038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar