From land enclosures to lab enclosures: digital sequence information, cultivated biodiversity and the movement for open source seed systems

References

• Aceituno-Mata, L., J. Tardío, M. Pardo-De-Santayana, P. Benyei, L. Calvet-Mir, and V. Reyes-García. 2017. La biodiversidad agrícola como bien comunal: problemáticas y estrategias. In El Futuro de la Alimentación y Retos de la Agricultura para el Siglo XXI; ICAS Colloquium. Vitoria, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ajates, R. 2020. “An Integrated Conceptual Framework for the Study of Agricultural Cooperatives: From Repolitisation to Cooperative Sustainability.” Journal of Rural Studies 78: 467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajates, R. 2021. “Reducing the Risk of Co-Optation in Alternative Food Networks: Multi-Stakeholder Cooperatives, Social Capital, and Third Spaces of Cooperation.” Sustainability 13 (20).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajates Gonzalez, Raquel. 2017. “Going Back to go Forwards? From Multi-stakeholder Cooperatives to Open Cooperatives in Food and Farming.” Journal of Rural Studies 53: 278–290. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambler, J., A. A. Diallo, P. K. Dearden, P. Wilcox, M. Hudson, and N. Tiffin. 2021. “Including Digital Sequence Data in the Nagoya Protocol Can Promote Data Sharing.” Trends in Biotechnology 39 (2): 116–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araghi, F. 2009. “Accumulation by Displacement: Global Enclosures, Food Crisis, and the Ecological Contradictions of Capitalism.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 32 (1): 113–146. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40647791#metadata_info_tab_contents.
   Google Scholar
• Aubry, S. 2019. “The Future of Digital Sequence Information for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.” Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1046. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubry, S., C. Frison, J. C. Medaglia, E. Frison, M. Jaspars, M. Rabone, et al. 2021. “Bringing Access and Benefit Sharing Into the Digital age.” People Plants Planet 4: 5–12. doi:10.1002/ppp3.10186.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley, M., E. Karger, M. Ruiz Muller, F. Perron-Welch, and S. Siva Thambisetty. 2020. Fact-finding Study on How Domestic Measures Address Benefit-sharing Arising from Commercial and Non-commercial use of Digital Sequence Information on Genetic Resources and Address the Use of Digital Sequence Information on Genetic Resources for Research and Development. CBD/DSI/AHTEG/2020/1/5, 1–66. San Francisco, CA: Law Insider.
   Google Scholar
• Barnhizer, D., and D. Barnhizer. 2019. The Artificial Intelligence Contagion: Can Democracy Withstand the Imminent Transformation of Work, Wealth and the Social Order?. Atlanta: SCB Distributors.
   Google Scholar
• Bioleft. 2022. About Bioleft. https://www.bioleft.org/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. 2007. “Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice.” https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/4975/GrowthofCommonsParadigm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. R., and D Scott. 2020. “Digital Biopiracy and the (dis) Assembling of the Nagoya Protocol.” Geoforum 117: 24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C., J. Foyer, and B. Wynne. 2014. “Genetic Fallout in bio-Cultural Landscapes: Molecular Imperialism and the Cultural Politics of (not) Seeing Transgenes in Mexico.” Social Studies of Science 44 (6): 901–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, M., and T. Van Hintum. 2020. “Genebank Operation in the Arena of Access and Benefit-Sharing Policies.” Frontiers in Plant Science 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. 2018. Smart Farming – Automated and Connected Agriculture. https://www.engineering.com/DesignerEdge/DesignerEdgeArticles/ArticleID/16653/Smart-FarmingAutomated-and-Connected-Agriculture.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera Medaglia, J. 2020. “Digital Sequence Information (DSI) and Benefit-Sharing Arising from its use: An Unfinished Discussion.” GRUR International 69 (6): 565–566. doi:10.1093/grurint/ikaa057.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y.-M., K. Kallam, H. Tidd, G. Gendarini, A. Salzman, and N. J. Patron. 2020. “Rational Design of Minimal Synthetic Promoters for Plants.” Nucleic Acids Research 48 (21): 11845–11856. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. 2018. “Smart’ Farming Techniques as Political Ontology: Access, Sovereignty and the Performance of Neoliberal and not-so-Neoliberal Worlds.” Sociologia Ruralis 58 (4): 745–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. 2020. “Automated Agrifood Futures: Robotics, Labor and the Distributive Politics of Digital Agriculture.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 184–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casagrande, David, E. C. Jones, F. S. Wyndham, J. R. Stepp, and R. Zarger. 2017. “Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene.” Anthropology Today 33 (1): 23–25. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys, P., and M. Edelman. 2020. “The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, M. R., W. F. Tracy, E T Lammerts Van Bueren, M. Diffley, and C. J. Almekinders. 2022. “How the Seed of Participatory Plant Breeding Found Its Way in the World through Adaptive Management.” Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su14042132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, C., A. Paton, J. S. Borrell, C. Williams, P. Wilkin, A. Antonelli, W. J. Baker, R. Buggs, M. F. Fay, R. Gargiulo, O. M. Grace, B. G. Kuhnhäuser, Y. Woudstra, and P. J. Kersey. 2021. “Uses and Benefits of Digital Sequence Information from Plant Genetic Resources: Lessons Learnt from Botanical Collections.” Plants, People, Planet 4 (1): 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cremaschi, A., and P. van Zwanenberg. 2020. “Bioleft: Open Source Seeds for low-Input Farming Systems.” J. Fair Trade 2: 39–44. doi:10.13169/jfairtrade.2.1.0039.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, M., D. Short, and N. South. 2018. “Ecocide, Genocide, Capitalism and Colonialism: Consequences for Indigenous Peoples and Glocal Ecosystems Environments.” Theoretical Criminology 22 (3): 298–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P. 2020. AI in the Wild: Sustainability in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DivSeek. 2022. “DivSeek signs MOU with International Treaty.” https://divseekintl.org/news-mou-itpgrfa/.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, J. M., and A. W. Ebert. 2021. “A Critical Review of the Current Global ex Situ Conservation System for Plant Agrobiodiversity. I. History of the Development of the Global System in the Context of the Political/Legal Framework and its Major Conservation Components.” Plants 10 (8): 1557.
   Google Scholar
• Esquinas-Alcazar, J. 2005. “Protecting Crop Genetic Diversity for Food Security: Political, Ethical and Technical Challenges.” Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 946–953. doi:10.1038/nrg1729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETC. 2018. Secuencias genéticas digitales: Tema clave para el Convenio sobre Diversidad Biológica.
   Google Scholar
• ETC. 2010. “Synthetic Biology: Creating Artificial Life Forms.” Briefing and Recommendations for CBD Delegates to COP 10. http://www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/pdf_file/ETC_COP10SynbioBriefing081010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ETC. 2022. “Food Barons 2022 Crisis Profiteering, Digitalization and Shifting Power.” https://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/files/food-barons-2022-full_sectors-final_16_sept.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fanzo, J., C. Davis, R. McLaren, and J. Choufani. 2018. “The Effect of Climate Change Across Food Systems: Implications for Nutrition Outcomes.” Global Food Security 18: 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 1983. “International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources.” Resolution 8/83. C 83/REP/8. 22 November. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2017. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2019a. “The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture.” In FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments, edited by J. Bélanger, and D. Pilling, 572pp. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2019b. Comisión de Recursos Genéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Información Digital sobre Secuencias “De Recursos Genéticos para la Alimentación y para la Agricultura y su Importancia para la Seguridad Alimentaria”. http://www.fao.org/3/my588es/my588es.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2022. Report of the Evaluation of the Third Project Cycle of the Benefit-sharing Fund of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Item 10 of the Provisional Agenda, Ninth Session of the Governing Body, 19-24 September 2022. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. 2000. “The Plant Patent Act of 1930: A Sociological History of its Creation.” Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 82: 621–644.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2019. “Land Grab/Data Grab: Precision Agriculture and its new Horizons.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (5): 893–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2020. “The Digital Revolution, Data Curation, and the new Dynamics of Food Sovereignty Construction.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 208–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M. 2021. “Open Source Seeds and the Revitalization of Local Knowledge.” Sustainability 13 (21)): 12270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. 2000. “What on Earth is the Modern World-System? Food Getting and Territory in the Modern era and Beyond.” Journal of World-Systems Research 6 (2): 480–515.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. “Agriculture and the State System: The Rise and Decline of National Agricultures, 1870 to the Present.” Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2): 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frison, C. 2018. Redesigning the Global Seed Commons: Law and Policy for Agrobiodiversity and Food Security. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fullilove, C. 2018. “Microbiology and the Imperatives of Capital in International Agro-Biodiversity Preservation.” Osiris 33 (1): 294–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney, Jim, Redeat Tibebu, Rebecca Bart, Getu Beyene, Dejene Girma, NdjidoArdo Kane, Emma S. Mace, Todd Mockler, Thomas E. Nickson, Nigel Taylor, and Gina Zastrow-Hayes. 2020. “Open Access to Genetic Sequence Data Maximizes Value to Scientists, Farmers, and Society.” Global Food Security 26: 100411–100419. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100411.
   Google Scholar
• Gaia Foundation. 2021. Seed Sovereignty. Available: https://www.seedsovereignty.info/.
   Google Scholar
• García, E. 2021. “¿Verde y Digital? No Puede ser. Review of La Servitude électrique: Du Rêve de Liberté à la Prison Numérique, by Dubey, G. and Gras, A., 2021.” Pasajes 63: 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Global Coalition of Open Source Seed Initiatives. 2022. About. Available: www.gossi.net.
   Google Scholar
• González Merino, A. 2022. Acceso a los recursos fitogenéticos e información digital de secuencias:¿ El desarrollo de nuevas tecnologías afecta el reconocimiento al conocimiento tradicional?. Sociedades Rurales, Producción Y Medio Ambiente Año 21 (42).
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development. Basil: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2015. UPOV 91 and other seed laws. GRAIN Report.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, M. 2017. “Digital Society and Capitalism.” Palgrave Communications 3 (1): 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Growing Underground. 2022. About. Available: https://growing-underground.com/about/.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2022. World’s first raspberry picking robot cracks the toughest nut: soft fruit. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jun/01/uk-raspberry-picking-robot-soft-fruit.
   Google Scholar
• Halewood, M. 2013. “What Kind of Goods are Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture? Towards the Identification and Development of a new Global Commons.” International Journal of the Commons 7 (2): 278–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. 2014. Linux for lettuce. Available: http://www.vqronline.org/reporting-articles/2014/05/linux-lettuce.
   Google Scholar
• Hassen, G. J. 2010. “Digital Feudalism - An Analysis of Ownership and Control in the Information Age.” Phoenix Law Review 4: 1027–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Hassoun, A., A. Aït-Kaddour, A. M. Abu-Mahfouz, N. B. Rathod, F. Bader, F. J. Barba, A. Biancolillo, et al. 2022. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution in the Food Industry – Part I: Industry 4.0 Technologies.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2034735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A. 1998. “The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets.” Harvard Law Review 111: 622–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinrichs, C. C. 2014. “Transitions to Sustainability: A Change in Thinking About Food Systems Change?” Agriculture and Human Values 31 (1): 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HIVOS, Biodiversity. 2018. “Policy Brief: Building Resilience through “Open Source Seed Systems” for Climate Change Adaptation in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania: What are the options for policy? An Open Source Seed Systems (OSSS).” The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Iaksch, J., E. Fernandes, and M. Borsato. 2021. “Digitalization and Big Data in Smart Farming–a Review.” Journal of Management Analytics 8 (2): 333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IISD. 2022. “Summary of the Ninth Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: 19-24th September 2022.” Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (782). International Institute for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• in silico Plants. 2022. About the journal. https://academic.oup.com/insilicoplants/pages/About.
   Google Scholar
• ISF. 2022. The World Seed Congress will bring together 2,000 specialists and 200 companies from 60 countries. Press Release. Available: https://www.seedtoday.com/article/267178/the-world-seed-congress-will-bring-together-2-000-specialists-and-200-companies-from-60-countries.
   Google Scholar
• Kasveista. 2022. Open Source Varieties for Vertical Farming. https://kasveista.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Kersey, P. J., J. Collemare, C. Cockel, D. Das, E. M. Dulloo, L. J. Kelly, E. Lettice, et al. 2020. “Selecting for Useful Properties of Plants and Fungi –Novel Approaches, Opportunities, and Challenges.” Plants, People, Planet 2 (5): 409–420. doi:10.1002/ppp3.10136.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. 2017. “Technology: The Future of Agriculture.” Nature 544: S21–S23. doi:10.1038/544S21a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. R. 1988 [2004]. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 14922000. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2010. “Impeding Dispossession, Enabling Repossession: Biological Open Source and the Recovery of Seed Sovereignty.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2014. “Re-purposing the Master’s Tools: The Open Source Seed Initiative and the Struggle for Seed Sovereignty.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41 (6): 1225–1246. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.875897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J., and D. L. Kleinman. 1987. “The Plant Germplasm Controversy.” Bioscience 37 (3): 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotschi, J., and B. Horneburg. 2018. “The Open Source Seed Licence: A Novel Approach to Safeguarding Access to Plant Germplasm.” PLOS Biology 16 (10), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotschi, J., B. Schrimpf, A. Waters-Bayer, and B. Horneburg. 2022. “Financing Organic Plant Breeding-New Economic Models for Seed as a Commons.” Sustainability 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610023.
   Google Scholar
• Kotschi, J., and J. Wirz. 2015. “Who Pays for Seeds.” Thoughts on Financing Organic Plant Breeding. https://www.agrecol.de/files/Kotschi_&_Wirz%20Engl_12_05_15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laird, S. A., R. P. Wynberg, A. Iranzadeh, and A. S. Kooser. 2018. Fact-finding and scoping study on digital sequence information on genetic resources in the context of the convention on biological diversity and the Nagoya Protocol. Ad hoc technical expert group on digital sequence information on genetic resources. CBD/DSI/AHTEG/2018/1/3, Issue. CBD. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e95a/4ddd/4baea2ec772be28 edcd1 0358/dsi-ahteg-2018-01-03-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laird, S., R. Wynberg, M. Rourke, F. Humphries, M. R. Muller, and C. Lawson. 2020. “Rethink the Expansion of Access and Benefit Sharing.” Science 367 (6483): 1200–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T., D. Barling, and M. Caraher. 2009. Food Policy: Integrating Health, Environment and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, C. R. 2016. At last the seed. https://www.mofga.org/resources/seeds/at-last-the-seed/.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Duke university Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louwaars, N. 2002. “Seed Policy, Legislation and Law.” Journal of New Seeds 4 (1-2): 1–14. doi:10.1300/J153v04n01_01.
   Google Scholar
• Louwaars, N. 2019. “Open Source Seed, a Revolution in Breeding or yet Another Attack on the Breeder’s Exemption?” Frontiers in Plant Science, 1127. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01127/full.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MASIPAG. 2022. About. Available: https://masipag.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, Z., et al. 2021. “The Global Divide in Data-Driven Farming.” Nature Sustainability 4: 154–160. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00631-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinrath, S. D., J. W. Losey, and V. W. Pickard. 2011. “Digital Feudalism: Enclosures and Erasures from Digital Rights Management to the Digital Divide.” In Advances in Computers, Vol. 81, 237–287. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, A. P. 2020. “Citizen Science and Ecological Democracy in the Global Science Regime: The Need for Openness and Participation.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (3): 221–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, N. I., and M. Pedersen. 2018. Open Source Seed Networking: Towards a Global Community of Seed Commons: A Progress Report. The Hague: HIVOS.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2016. “Stealing Into the Wild: Conservation Science, Plant Breeding and the Makings of new Seed Enclosures.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (1): 169–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2017. “Beating the Bounds: How Does ‘Open Source’ Become a Commons for Seed?” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (1): 44–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2021. “Can Agroecology and CRISPR mix? The Politics of Complementarity and Moving Toward Technology Sovereignty.” Agriculture and Human Values 39: 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P. 2018. “What’s Cooking for Climate Change? Techno-fixing Dinner for 10 Billion.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74 (6): 390–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzurakis, M. 2019. How much Biodiversity will be Available for Future Generations? IPC Participation at the Governing Body of the International Seed Treaty, November 25, 2019. Available online at: https://www.foodsovereignty.org/gb8-itpgrfa/.
   Google Scholar
• Naeem, M., T. Jamal, J. Diaz-Martinez, S. A. Butt, N. Montesano, M. I. Tariq, E. De-la-Hoz-Franco, and E. De-La-Hoz-Valdiris. 2022. “Trends and Future Perspective Challenges in Big Data.” Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications 3: 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5036-9_30.
   Google Scholar
• Nawaz, S., T. Satterfield, and S. Hagerman. 2021. “From Seed to Sequence: Dematerialization and the Battle to (re) Define Genetic Resources.” Global Environmental Change 68: 102260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P. 2015. “Dealing with Big Data through Data Cooperatives.” . https://www.intelligenthq.com/social-business-2/dealing-with-big-data-through-data-cooperatives-in-the-sharing-economy/.
   Google Scholar
• Nishikawa, Y., and M. Pimbert. 2022. Agroecology and Endogenous Development, Seeds for Diversity and Inclusion. Palgrave Macmillan. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007978-3-030-89405-4.
   Google Scholar
• No Patents on Seeds. 2020. 2020 Annual Report. Available: https://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/sites/default/files/news/2020%20Annual%20report%20No%20patents%20on%20seeds_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, P. 2020. Digital Sequence Information –Technical Aspects. Final Report, Issue. M. University. Available: https://ec.europaeu/environment/nature/biodi versi ty/inter natio nal/abs/pdf/Final_Report_techn ical_aspec ts_of_DSI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2013. “The Long Green Revolution.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschard, K. 2016. “Farmers’ Rights to Seed: Conflicts in International Legal Regimes.” Right to Food and Nutrition Watch, 22–23. Available at: www.righttofoodandnutrition.org.
   Google Scholar
• Peschard, K., and S. Randeria. 2020a. “Taking Monsanto to Court: Legal Activism Around Intellectual Property in Brazil and India.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (4): 792–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschard, K., and S. Randeria. 2020b. “Keeping Seeds in our Hands’: The Rise of Seed Activism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (4): 613–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyret, H., J. K. M. Brown, and G. P. Lomonossoff. 2019. “Improving Plant Transient Expression Through the Rational Design of Synthetic 5′ and 3′ Untranslated Regions.” Plant Methods 15 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s13007-019-0494-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. 2016. Saving More Than Seeds: Practices and Politics of Seed Saving. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1965. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B. 2019. “Logged out: Ownership, Exclusion and Public Value in the Digital Data and Information Commons.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N., and L. Schiebinger. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rete Semi Rurali. 2022. Evolutionary wheat mixture for climate change adaptation. https://rsr.bio/en/progetto/mixwheat/
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H. J., and S. Müller-Wille. 2018. The Gene: From Genetics to Postgenomics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohden, F., and A. H. Scholz. 2021. “The International Political Process Around Digital Sequence Information Under the Convention on Biological Diversity and the 2018–2020 Intersessional Period.” Plants, People, Planet 4 (1): 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, J. 2013. “The Socionatural Engineering of Reductionist Metaphors: A Political Ecology of Synthetic Biology.” Environment and Planning A 45 (5): 1127–1143. doi:10.1068/a45195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotz, S., E. Duncan, M. Small, J. Botschner, R. Dara, I. Mosby, M. Reed, and E. D. G. Fraser. 2019. “The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review.” Sociologia Ruralis 59 (2): 203–229. doi:10.1111/soru.12233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, M. 2018. “Who are ‘Indigenous and Local Communities’ and What is ‘Traditional Knowledge’ for Virus Access and Benefit-Sharing? A Textual Analysis of the Convention on Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol.” Journal of Law and Medicine 25 (3): 707–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, M. 2021. “Access and Benefit-Sharing DNA Componentry for Plant Synthetic Biology: Bioparts Expressed in Plant Chassis.” Plants, People, Planet 4 (1): 76–83.
   Google Scholar
• RtFaNW. 2016. Keeping Seeds in Peoples’ Hands, Issue 08. Right to Food and Nutrition Watch Consortium. Available: www.righttofoodandnutrition.org%2Ffiles%2FR_t_F_a_N_Watch_2016_ENG_WEB.pdf&clen=2224481&chunk=true.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, A. H., U. Hillebrand, J. Freitag, S. Devanshi, C. Seitz, T. Thiele, and E. Van Zimmeren. 2020. Finding compromise on ABS & DSI in the CBD: Requirements & policy ideas from a scientific perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T., and N. Schneider 2017. Ours to Hack and to own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, a new Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet. New York: OR Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond, World Economic Forum, 14 January 2016, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Z. 2018. Digital Feudalism. Medium. Available: https://towardsdatascience.com/digital-feudalism-b9858f7f9be5.
   Google Scholar
• Seed Savers Network Kenya. 2021. About. Available; https://seedsaverskenya.org.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2020. Reclaiming the Commons: Biodiversity, Indigenous Knowledge, and the Rights of Mother Earth. London: Synergetic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sievers-Glotzbach, S., J. Tschersich, N. Gmeiner, L. Kliem, and A. Ficiciyan. 2020. “Diverse Seeds–Shared Practices: Conceptualizing Seed Commons.” International Journal of the Commons 14 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, D. 2021. “Keep Calm and Carry on: Climate-Ready Crops and the Genetic Codification of Climate Myopia.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (5): 1048–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and M. Fressoli. 2021. “Post-automation.” Futures 132), doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, S. J., D. M. Macall, P. W. B. Phillips, and J. de Beer. 2020. “Implications of Biological Information Digitization: Access and Benefit Sharing of Plant Genetic Resources.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property, doi:10.1111/jwip.12151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, N., L. Di Silvio, I. Dunsford, M. Ellis, A. Glencross, and A. Sexton. 2018. “Bringing Cultured Meat to Market: Technical, Socio-Political, and Regulatory Challenges in Cellular Agriculture.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 78: 155–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2011. “Pluralizing Progress: From Integrative Transitions to Transformative Diversity.” Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions 1: 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, B. J., J Baudry, and D Mahr. 2019. “Citizen Science’? Rethinking Science and Public Participation.” Science and Technology Studies 32 (2): 52–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Sl, A. Spicer, and S. Böhm. 2011. “Becoming Global (un) Civil Society: Counter-Hegemonic Struggle and the Indymedia Network.” Globalizations 8 (5): 703–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Food Trust. 2017. The hidden cost of UK food. Available: https://sustainablefoodtrust.org/key-issues/true-cost-accounting/.
   Google Scholar
• Swiderska, K. 2018. Why indigenous seed-saving women are the stewards of biodiversity. IIED. Available: https://www.iied.org/qa-why-indigenous-seed-savingwomen-are-stewards-biodiversity.
   Google Scholar
• Traoré, A. 2018. The Dematerialisation of Plan Genetic Resources: A Peasant´s Perspective. Right to Food and Nutrition Watch.
   Google Scholar
• UNDROP. 2018. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas. A/RES/73/165. Available: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1661560/files/A_RES_73_165-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2021. Draft Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO General Conference, 41st, 2021 [869]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378841.
   Google Scholar
• UPOV. 1991. International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. https://www.upov.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/upov_pub_221.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, A. 2020. “Code Kept on ice for 1000 Years.” New Scientist 245 (3276): 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. H., N. Álvarez-Berríos, N. Quiñones-Vilches, and J. L. Medina-Muñiz. 2011. “The Economics of Information, Studiously Ignored in the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing.” Law, Environment and Development Journal 7.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. H., M. Ruiz Muller, K. Angerer, D. Delgado-Gutiérrez, and A. Gálvez Ballón. 2021. “Bounded Openness: A Robust Modality of Access to Genetic Resources and the Sharing of Benefits.” Plants, People, Planet 4 (1): 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• von Wettberg, E., and C. K. Khoury. 2020. “Access to Crop Digital Information and the Sharing of Benefits Derived from its use: Background and Perspectives.” Plants, People, Planet 2 (3): 178–180.
   Google Scholar
• Wattnem, T. 2016. “Seed Laws, Certification and Standardization: Outlawing Informal Seed Systems in the Global South.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (4): 850–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEF. 2018. Innovation with a Purpose: The Role of Technology Innovation in Accelerating Food Systems Transformation. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilczeck, F. 2019. “Ecology of Intelligence.” Edge. https://www.edge.org/conversation/frank_wilczekecology- of-intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Willett, W., et al. 2019. “Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems.” The Lancet 393 (10170): 447–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, L., and P. Thomas. 2022. The agroecotech trap. A bigger conversation. Available: https://abiggerconversation.org/the-agroecotech-trap/#_edn1.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Future of Food: Harnessing Digital Technologies to Improve Food System Outcomes, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and The World Bank, 2019. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31565.
   Google Scholar
• Wynberg, R., R. Andersen, S. Laird, K. Kusena, C. Prip, and O. T. Westengen. 2021. “Farmers’ Rights and Digital Sequence Information: Crisis or Opportunity to Reclaim Stewardship Over Agrobiodiversity?” Frontiers in Plant Science, 1608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynberg, R., and S. A. Laird. 2018. “Fast Science and Sluggish Policy: The Herculean Task of Regulating Biodiscovery.” Trends in Biotechnology 36 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., C. Li, and C. Gao. 2020. “Applications of CRISPR–Cas in Agriculture and Plant Biotechnology.” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21 (11): 661–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar