Petty commodity production

References

• Adnan, S. 1985. “Classical and Contemporary Approaches to Agrarian Capitalism.” Economic and Political Weekly 20 (30): E53–PE64.
   Google Scholar
• Amirali, A. 2017. “Market Power: Traders, Farmers, and the Politics of Accumulation in Pakistani Punjab.” D Phil thesis, Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Aslany, M. 2020. Contested Capital: Rural Middle Classes in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, S. 2019. Shareholder Cities: Land Transformations Along Urban Corridors in India. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, J. 1977. “Capitalist Domination and the Small Peasantry: Deccan Districts in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Economic and Political Weekly 12 (33 and 34): 1375–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, J. 2020. A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, E. 2013. Capitalist Development in India's Informal Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Basok, T. 1989. “How Useful is the “Petty Commodity Production” Approach? Explaining the Survival and Success of Small Salvadorean Urban Enterprises in Costa Rica.” Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, Capital et Société 22 (1): 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, F., and B. Elliot. 1985. “The Petite Bourgeoisie in Late Capitalism.” Annual Review of Sociology 11: 181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 1977. “Notes on Capital and Peasantry.” Review of African Political Economy 4 (10): 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 1986. “Capitalism and Petty Commodity Production.” Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology 20: 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 1988. “Capitalism and Petty-Bourgeois Production: Class Relations and Divisions of Labour’.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 15 (2): 258–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2000. “The Peasantry’ in Global Capitalism: Who, Where and Why?’.” Socialist Register 2001 (20): 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2003. “Farewells to the Peasantry.” Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 52: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2006. “Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century?’, .” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 27 (4): 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2007. “Capital and Labour from Centre to Margins.” Living at the Margins Conference, Stellenbosch. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.2120&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H., and T. Byres. 2001. “From Peasant Studies to Agrarian Change.” Journal of Agrarian Change 1 (1): 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, K. 1985. “A View of Commercialisation in Indian Agriculture and the Development of Capitalism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 12 (4): 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S. 2014. “Is Labour Still a Relevant Category for Praxis? Critical Reflections on Some Contemporary Discourses on Work and Labour in Capitalism.” Development and Change 45 (5): 941–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bienefeld, M. 1975. “The Informal Sector and Peripheral Capitalism: The Case of Tanzania’, Bulletin.” Institute of Development Studies 6 (3): 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. 2009. “Agrarian Change and Peasant Studies: Changes, Continuities and Challenges – an Introduction’.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 1986. “The Elementary Strictures of Kinship: Unfree Relations and the Production of Commodities.” Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology 20: 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 1994. “Introduction: The new Farmers’ Movements in India’.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 21 (3-4): 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breman, J. 2019. Capitalism, Inequality and Labour in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bryceson, D. 2000. “Peasant Theories and Smallholder Policies. Past and Present.” In Disappearing Peasantries: Rural Labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1–36, edited by D. F. Bryceson, C. Kay, and J. Mooij. London: IT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Byres, T. 1979. “Of neo-Populist Pipe-Dreams: Daedalus in the Third World and the Myth of Urban Bias.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 6 (2): 210–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byres, T. 2004. “Neo-Classical Neo-Populism 25 Years On: Déjà Vu and Déjà Passé’. Towards a Critique’.” Journal of Agrarian Change 4 (1-2): 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, R. 2008. “The State of Indian Agriculture and Prospects for the Future.” In Growth, Equity, Environment and Population: Economic and Sociological Perspectives, edited by K. Chopra, and H. Hanumathna Rao, Chapter 8, 133–159. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar, C. 1993. “Agrarian Change and Occupational Diversification: Non-Agricultural Employment and Rural Development in West Bengal.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 20 (2): 205–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., and F. Carre. 2020. The Informal Economy Revisited Examining the Past, Envisioning the Future. Abingdon: Routledge., Open access.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. 1979. “The Labor Theory of Value and the Concept of Exploitation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 8 (4): 338–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPI (Maoist). 2004. “Strategy and Tactics.” http://www.bannedthought.net/India/CPI-Maoist-Docs/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Crow, B. 2001. Markets, Class and Social Change: Trading Networks and Poverty in Rural Bangladesh. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Da Corta, L., and D. Venkateshwarlu. 1999. “Unfree Relations and the Feminisation of Agricultural Labour in Andhra Pradesh, 1970–95.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 26 (2-3): 71–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, G. 1974. “Peasant Markets.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 1 (2): 240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, G., H. Russell Bernhard, B. Chiňas, S. Franklin, D. Kaplan, and E. Wolf. 1972. “Peasantries in Anthropology and History.” Current Anthropology 13 (3/4): 385–415. doi:10.1086/201302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereux, S. 2001. “Livelihood Insecurity and Social Protection: A Re-Emerging Issue in Rural Development.” Development Policy Review 19 (4): 507–519.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, F. 1993. Peasant Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, S., J. Brzeska, M. Keyzer, and A. Halsema. 2013. From Subsistence to Profit: Transforming Smallholder Farms,’ Food Policy Reports 26. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Fehlings, S., and H. Karrar. 2022. Informal Markets and Trade in Central Asia and the Caucasas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. 1965. “Systems of Production: Systems of Appropriation.” Pacific Viewpolnt 6: 145–166.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. 1978. “World Market, State and Family Farm: Social Bases of Household Production in the Era of Wage Labour.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 20 (4): 545–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. 1986. “Postscript: Small Commodity Production.” Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, Capital et Société 19 (1): 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, A., B. Harriss-White, D. Haynes, and S. Schwecke. 2021. Rethinking Markets in Modern India: Embedded Exchange and Contested Jurisdiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gayer, L., and C. Jaffrelot. 2012. Muslims in Indian Cities: Trajectories of Marginalisation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerry, C. 1974. Petty Producers and the Urban Economv: A Case Studv of Dakar’, World Employment Programme Working Paper. Geneva: International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., and A. Meer. 2020. “Extended Urbanisation and the Agrarian Question: Convergences, Divergences and Openings.” Urban Studies 58 (6): 1097–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbon, P., and M. Neocosmos. 1985. “Some Problems in the Political Economy of “African Socialism.” In Contradictions of Accumulation in Africa. Studies in Economy and State, edited by H. Bernstein, and B. K. Campbell, 153–206. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, I. 2014. “Juggling with Debt, Social Ties and Values: The Everyday Use of Microcredit in Rural South India.” Current Anthropology 55 (Suppl. 9): S40–S50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati A., K. Ganguly, and H Wardhan. 2022. “Agricultural Value Chains in India: Ensuring Competitiveness, Inclusiveness, Sustainability, Scalability, and Improved Finance, Springer.” Open Access. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/52430.
   Google Scholar
• Gururani, S. 2020. “Cities in a World of Villages: Agrarian Urbanism and the Making of India’s Urbanizing Frontiers’.” Urban Geography 41 (7): 971–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. 1982. Rural Development; Theories of Peasant Economy and Agrarian Change. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, B. 1987. “Regional Growth Linkages from Agriculture: A Critique.” Journal of Development Studies 23 (3): 114–128.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, B. 1990. “Another Awkward Class: Agricultural Merchants and Agricultural Change in India.” The Food Question, edited by H. Bernstein, B. Crow and M. Mackintosh, 91–103. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. 2021. “The Implications of “Stunted Structural Transformation” for Rural India.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement 42 (1). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.108002255189.2020.1805302?casa_token=cvIj-lKC8dYAAAAA:9Ld6LVKQIoxr4dm-CUVzQSfQ_r5SPMw5oGBAYFBcoBAOL7VBIHEXTcr_su7a0i7vnQfePfqvdOhRBg
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B. 2003. India Working: Essays on Economy and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B. 2008. Rural Commercial Capital: Agricultural Markets in West Bengal. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B. 2012. “Capitalism and the Common Man.” Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 1 (2): 109–160.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B., and S. Janakarajan. 2004. Rural India facing the 21st Century, London, Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, H. 2017. “Petty Commodities, Serious Business: The Governance of Fashion Jewellery Chains Between China and Ghana.” Global Networks 18 (2): 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell, P., C. Poulton, S. Wiggins, and A. Dorward. 2010. “The Future of Small Farms: Trajectories and Policy Priorities.” World Development 38 (10): 1349–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell, P., and C. Ramasamy. 1991. Green Revolution Reconsidered: The Impact of High-Yielding Rice Varieties in South India. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. 1994. Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. London: Michael Joseph.
   Google Scholar
• Huws, U. 2003. The Making of a Cybertariat: Virtual Work in a Real World. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jan, M. A. 2017. “Rural Commercial Capital: Accumulation, Class and Power in Pakistani Punjab.” D. Phil. thesis, Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Jan, M. A., and B. Harriss-White. 2019. “Petty Production and India’s Development.” In Life, Ideas, Influence: A Critical Examination on the Bicentenary, edited by S. Gupta, M. Musto, and B. Amini Karl Marx, 345–368. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, K. 2015. “The Debate on Food Sovereignty Theory: Agrarian Capitalism, Dispossession and Agroecology.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (1): 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. 1982. “From Peasants to Petty Commodity Production in Southeast Asia.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 14 (1): 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplinsky, R., and M. Morris. 2001. A Handbook for Value Chain Research. Ottawa: IDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, M. 2014. The Political Economy of Agricultural Markets: Insights from Within and Across Regions, pp59-79 in IDFC Rural Development Network. India Rural Development Report. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. 2017. “Agrarian Questions: Old and new.” Review of Agrarian Studies 7: 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri Dutt, K. 2018. Between the Plough and the Pick: Informal, Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in the Contemporary World. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. 1913. “Petty Production in Agriculture.” Rabochaya Pravda No. 5, July 18, in 1977, Lenin Collected Works, Moscow, Progress Publishers, 19, 280–282. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1913/jul/18b.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, M. 1968. “The Theory of the Optimising Peasant.” Journal of Development Studies 4 (3): 327–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEwan Scott, A. 1986. “Introduction: Why Rethink Petty Commodity Production?” Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology 20: 3–10. Special Issue: Rethinking petty commodity production
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S., and J. Dickinson. 1978. “Obstacles to the Development of a Capitalist Agriculture.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 5 (4): 466–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1885. “Capital, A Critique of Political Economy.” Volume two. The process of circulation of capital, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books ch17.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital, A Critique of Political Economy, Volume One. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. ch 28.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, R., and S. Ramnath. 2018. “Efficiency in Food Grains Production in India Using DEA and SFA.” Central European Review of Economics and Management 2 (1): 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2006. “Reframing Development: Global Peasant Movements and the new Agrarian Question.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 27 (4): 471–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, K. 2010. Identity Economics: Social Networks & the Informal Economy in Nigeria. New York: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, J. W. 1976. The New Economics of Growth: A Strategy for India and the Developing World. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, A. 2008. “The Rise of Neoliberal Globalization and the “New-Old’ Social Regulation of Labour: A Case of Delhi Garment Sector’.” Indian Journal of Labour Economics 51 (4): 603–618.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, A., and L. Fan. 2018. “Classes of Labour’ at the Margins of Global Commodity Chains in India and China’.” Development and Change 49 (4): 1034–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. 1973. “A Note on the Definition of Peasantries.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 1 (1): 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, M. 2021. “Commercial Micro-Credit, Neo-Liberal Agriculture and Smallholder Indebtedness: Three Bangladesh Villages.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 51 (2): 330–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C. 1978. “Informal Sector or Petty Commodity Production: Dualism or Dependence in Urban Development.” World Development 6 (9/10): 1041–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanduri, K. 2022. “Informality and Accumulation in India: From the Standpoint of Capital.” PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS). 2009. Report on the Financing of Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector and Creation of a National Fund for the Unorganised Sector. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, P. 2006. “The Need to protect Petty Production.” Macroscan. https://www.macroscan.net/anl/jul06/pdf/Petty_Production.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A. 2017. “The Hybrid State and Regulation of Land and Real Estate: A Case Study of Gurugram, Haryana.” Review of Development and Change 22 (1): 173–197.
   Google Scholar
• Reboul, E., I. Guerin, and C. Nordman. 2021. “The Gender of Debt and Credit: Insights from Rural Tamil Nadu.” World Development 146: 105–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfield, R. 1953. The Primitive World and its Transformations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. 1985. “Should Marxists be Interested in Exploitation?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (11): 30–65.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Commission on Agriculture. 1928. The State of Indian Agriculture and Prospects for the Future. Bombay: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Sankaran, K. 2008. “Informal Economy, own-Account Workers and the law: An Overview.” WIEGO law Pilot Project on the Informal Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Self Employed Womens’ Association (SEWA) nd. www.sewa.org
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1981. “Market Failure and Control of Labour Power: Towards an Explanation of ‘Structure’ and Change in Indian Agriculture. Part 1.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 5: 201–228. Part 2, 327–350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1971. Peasants and Peasant Societies. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1972. “The Awkward Class.” Political Sociology of Peasantry in a Developing Society Russia, 1910–1925. London/Oxford, Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1975. “Promysly (Russian).” The Journal of Peasant Studies 2 (2): 224–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrimali, R. 2021. Contract Farming, Capital and State: Corporatisation of Indian Agriculture. Singapore: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., B. Harriss-White, and L. Singh. 2021. “Agrarian Crisis and Agricultural Market Reforms in South Asia.” Millennial Asia 12 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1177/09763996211063444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, N., and M. Sapra. 2007. “Liberalisation in Trade and Finance: India’s Garment Sector.” In Trade Liberalisation and India’s Informal Economy, ch 3, edited by B. Harriss-White, and A. Sinha, 42–108. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S. 2020. “The Politics of Markets: Farmer–Trader Relations Under Neoliberalism in Punjab, India.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (2): 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tairako, T. 2019. “Marx on Peasants and Small-Scale Industry: The Changes of Marx's Insight Into the pre-Capitalist Societies.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 50: 15–56.
   Google Scholar
• Thorner, D. 1965. “Peasant Economy as a Category in Economic History.” Second International Conference of Economic History, cited in Dalton et al 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Titumir, R. forthcoming. Why Agricultural Productivity Falls The Political Economy of Agrarian Transition in Developing Countries. Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trotsky, L. 1967. “History of the Russian Revolution.” Vol. 1 ch 1. http://ir.lucknowdigitallibrary.com:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/11038/5876.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Vaidyanathan, A. 1986. “Labour Use in Rural India: A Study of Spatial and Temporal Variations.” Economic and Political Weekly 21 (52): A130–A146.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 1976. “Taking the Part of Peasants: Rural Development in Nigeria and Tanzania” In The Political Economy of Contemporary Africa, edited by P. Gutkind, and I. Wallerstein, 131–154. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 1988. “Why is There no Agrarian Capitalism in Nigeria?” Historical Sociology 1 (4): 345–398.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. 1955. “Types of Latin American Peasantry: A Preliminary Discussion’, American Anthropologist.” New Series 57 (3): 452–471.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, S. 2022. “Reviewing Petty Commodity Production: Toward a Unified Marxist Conception.” Review of Radical Political Economy. doi:10.1177/04866134221123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar