Producing nature-based solutions: infrastructural nature and agrarian change in San Martín, Peru

References

• Andueza, Luis. 2021. “Value, (Use) Values, and the Ecologies of Capital: On Social Form, Meaning, and the Contested Production of Nature.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (5): 1105–1125. doi:10.1177/0309132520947473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A., and D. Kaimowitz. 2000. “When Does Technological Change in Agriculture Promote Deforestation?” In Tradeoffs or Synergies? Agricultural Intensification, Economic Development and the Environment, edited by David R. Lee, and Christopher B. Barrett, 89–114. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Augusto, María Claudia. 2018. “When State and Society Meet: The Land-Use Planning Policy in San Martin (2002-2018).” Debates En Sociología 47: 9–39. doi:10.18800/debatesensociologia.201802.001.
   Google Scholar
• Ballvé, Teo. 2012. “Everyday State Formation: Territory, Decentralization, and the Narco Landgrab in Colombia.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (4): 603–622. doi:10.1068/d4611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., M. Saturnino, Ian Scoones, Amita Baviskar, Marc Edelman, Nancy Lee Peluso, and Wendy Wolford. 2022. “Climate Change and Agrarian Struggles: An Invitation to Contribute to a JPS Forum.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1956473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, W., and S. Prudham. 2017. “On the Themed Collection, ‘The Formal and Real Subsumption of Nature.’” Society & Natural Resources 30 (7): 877–884. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1304600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carse, Ashley. 2012. “Nature as Infrastructure: Making and Managing the Panama Canal Watershed.” Social Studies of Science 42 (4): 539–563. doi:10.1177/0306312712440166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, W., and E. Andersson. 2017. “Where Forest Carbon Meets Its Maker: Forestry-Based Offsetting as the Subsumption of Nature.” Society & Natural Resources 30 (7): 829–843. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1284291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J., M. D. Aguila Mejía, R. Ramírez Reátegui, and C. Sandbrook. 2020. “Why Joint Conservation and Development Projects Often Fail: An in-Depth Examination in the Peruvian Amazon.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (2): 365–398. doi:10.1177/2514848619873910.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, Y., H. Faust, and T. Tscharntke. 2009. “Cacao Boom and Bust: Sustainability of Agroforests and Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation.” Conservation Letters 2 (5): 197–205. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00072.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., and G. Bell. 2007. “The Infrastructure of Experience and the Experience of Infrastructure: Meaning and Structure in Everyday Encounters with Space.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 (3): 414–430. doi:10.1068/b32035t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2013. Building a Green Infrastructure for Europe. Luxembourg: Publishing Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace (Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace). 2019. Financing Emissions Reductions for the Future: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2019. Washington DC: Forest Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace (Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace). 2021. ‘Market in Motion’, State of Voluntary Carbon Markets 2021. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Ekers, Michael. 2015. “A Fix in the Forests: Relief Labor and the Production of Reforestation Infrastructure in Depression-Era Canada.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (12): 2537–2554. doi:10.1177/0308518X15609211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekers, Michael, and Alex Loftus. 2013. “Revitalizing the Production of Nature Thesis: A Gramscian Turn?” Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 234–252. doi:10.1177/0309132512448831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FONAM (Fondo Nacional del Ambiente). 2017. Peru Low Carbon Economy 2017 Carbon Projects, Voluntary Markets, REDD+, NAMAs & NDCs. http://fonamperu.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Peru-low-carbon-economy-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J. C., and S. M. Borras Jr. 2019. “Grey Areas in Green Grabbing: Subtle and Indirect Interconnections between Climate Change Politics and Land Grabs and Their Implications for Research.” Land Use Policy 84: 192–199. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GORESAM (Regional Government of San Martín). 2022. “Dirección Regional de Agricultura: Proyecto Cacao.” Accessed August 15, 2022. https://portal.regionsanmartin.gob.pe/portal/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=6984d24b63794be28aa12a5153e097ff.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Peru. 2016. Estrategia Nacional de Bosques y Cambio Climático. https://www.unredd.net/documents/un-redd-partner-countries-181/national-redd-strategies-1025/15861-peru-national-strategy-on-forests-a-climate-change/file.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hance, J. 2018, June 28. “Biodiversity is the 'infrastructure that supports all ife'.” The Guardian, UK. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/radical-conservation/2018/jun/28/biodiversity-is-the-infrastructure-that-supports-all-life.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, Daniela Soto, and Peter Newell. 2022. “Oro Blanco: Assembling Extractivism in the Lithium Triangle.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (5): 945–968. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2080061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, Melissa, and Ian Scoones. 2015. Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri. [1974] 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, J., and S. Jacobs. 2017. “Nature-Based Solutions for Europe's Sustainable Development.” Conservation Letters 10 (1): 121–124. doi:10.1111/conl.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. 1982. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. London: Wildwood House.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. 2015. Last Futures Nature, Technology, and the End of Architecture. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Sara H., and Patrick Bigger. 2022. “Infrastructural Nature.” Progress in Human Geography 46 (1): 86–107. doi:10.1177/0309132521993916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesshöver, C., T. Assmuth, K. N. Irvine, G. M. Rusch, K. A. Waylen, B. Delbaere, D. Haase, et al. 2017. “The Science, Policy and Practice of Nature-Based Solutions: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.” Science of the Total Environment 579: 1215–1227. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G., and S. Hecht. 2016. “Sacred Groves, Sacrifice Zones and Soy Production: Globalization, Intensification and Neo-Nature in South America.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (2): 251–285. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1146705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. 2015. “Tradeoffs in Carbon Commodification: A Political Ecology of Common Property Forest Governance.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 67: 64–77. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, Maritza, and Anke Kaulard. 2022. “Forest as ‘Nature’ or Forest as Territory? Knowledge, Power, and Climate Change Conservation in the Peruvian Amazon.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–22. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2134010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfecto, Ivette, M. Estelí Jiménez-Soto, and John Vandermeer. 2019. “Coffee Landscapes Shaping the Anthropocene: Forced Simplification on a Complex Agroecological Landscape.” Current Anthropology 60 (S20): S236–S250. doi:10.1086/703413.
   Google Scholar
• Piu, H. C., and M. Menton. 2014. The Context of REDD+ in Peru: Drivers, Agents and Institutions. Occasional Paper 106. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Prudham, Scott. 2015. “Property and Commodification.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, edited by Tom Perreault, Gavin Bridge, and James McCarthy, 430–445. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pye, Oliver. 2019. “Commodifying Sustainability: Development, Nature and Politics in the Palm Oil Industry.” World Development 121: 218–228. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, Gabe. 2022. “Climate Rentierism after Coal: Forests, Carbon Offsets, and Post-Coal Politics in the Appalachian Coalfields.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (5): 924–944. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2078710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SERFOR (Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre). 2016. Primer Informe Parcial del Inventario Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre. Lima: SERFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Shanee, Sam, Noga Shanee, Will Lock, and Maria Espejo-Uribe. 2020. “The Development and Growth of Non-Governmental Conservation in Peru: Privately and Communally Protected Areas.” Human Ecology 48 (6): 681–693. doi:10.1007/s10745-020-00188-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Neil. 1990. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Neil. 2007. “Nature as Accumulation Strategy.” Socialist Register 43 (43): 16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391. doi:10.1177/00027649921955326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Sian. 2009. “Green Capitalism, and the Cultural Poverty of Constructing Nature as Service Provider.” Radical Anthropology 3: 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2007. “Technonatural Revolutions: The Scalar Politics of Franco’s Hydro-Social Dream for Spain, 1939–1975.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 9–28. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00233.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercek, Mark. 2017. “The Best Investment Opportunity Ever: Investing in Nature 101.” Forbes, US, October 11. https://www.forbes.com/sites/marktercek/2017/10/11/the-best-investment-opportunity-ever-investing-in-nature-101/#648533303f1f.
   Google Scholar
• Tomateo, Claudia. 2021. “Indigenous Land Systems and Emerging of Green Infrastructure Planning in the Peruvian Coastal Desert: Tensions and Opportunities.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 23 (5): 683–700. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2021.1960806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan, S., L. Bear, P. Harvey, S. Lazar, L. M. Rival, and A. Simone. 2018. “Attention to Infrastructure Offers a Welcome Reconfiguration of Anthropological Approaches to the Political.” Critique of Anthropology 38 (1): 3–52. doi:10.1177/0308275X16683023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, Stephanie. 2020. “Making Nature into Infrastructure: The Construction of Oysters as a Risk Management Solution in New York City.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (3): 761–785. doi:10.1177/2514848619887461.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2017. The Origins of Capitalism: A Longer View. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar