The Plantationocene as analytical concept: a forum for dialogue and reflection

References

• Afrizal. 2015. “Third-Party Intervention in Terminating Oil Palm Plantation Conflicts in Indonesia: A Structural Analysis.” Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 30 (1): 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj30-1e.
   Google Scholar
• Aga, Aniket. 2021. Genetically Modified Democracy: Transgenic Crops in Contemporary India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; Orient Blackswan.
   Google Scholar
• Agard-Jones, Vanessa. 2013. “Bodies in the System.” Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 17 (3): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1215/07990537-2378991.
   Google Scholar
• Aikens, Natalie, Amy Clukey, Amy King, and Isadora Wagner. 2019. “South to The Plantationocene.” ASAP Journal. October 17. https://asapjournal.com/south-to-the-plantationocene-natalie-aikens-amy-clukey-amy-k-king-and-isadora-wagner/.
   Google Scholar
• Allewaert, Monique. 2013. Ariel’s Ecology: Plantations, Personhood, and Colonialism in the American Tropics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, Cristiana. 2018. “Portuguese in the Cane: The Racialization of Labour in Hawaiian Plantations.” In Changing Societies: Legacies and Challenges. Volume I: Ambiguous Inclusions: Inside Out, Inside In, edited by Sofia Aboim, Paulo Granjo, and Alice Ramos, 65–96. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais. https://doi.org/10.31447/ics9789726715030.03.
   Google Scholar
• Beckford, George, L. 1972. Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies of the Third World. Barbados: The University of the West Indies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behal, Rana P. 2014. One Hundred Years of Servitude: Political Economy of Tea Plantations in Colonial Assam. Princeton, NJ: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beilin, Katarzyna Olga, and Sainath Suryanarayanan. 2017. “The War Between Amaranth and Soy: Interspecies Resistance to Transgenic Soy Agriculture in Argentina.” Environmental Humanities 9 (2): 204–229. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-4215211.
   Google Scholar
• Benítez-Rojo, Antonio. 1996. The Repeating Island: The Caribbean and the Postmodern Perspective. Translated by James E. Maraniss. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman-Arévalo, Eloísa, and Diana Ojeda. 2020. “Ordinary Geographies: Care, Violence, and Agrarian Extractivism in “Post-Conflict” Colombia.” Antipode 52 (6): 1583–1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besky, Sarah. 2013. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Plantations in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandar, Brenna. 2018. Colonial Lives of Property. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, Adam. 2018. “The Present Imperative of Marronage.” Afro-Hispanic Review 37 (2): 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2017.0004.
   Google Scholar
• Borras Jr, Saturnino M., Jennifer C. Franco, S. Ryan Isakson, Les Levidow, and Pietje Vervest. 2016. “The Rise of Flex Crops and Commodities: Implications for Research.” Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (1): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1036417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, Tom , and Henry Bernstein. 1992. “Introduction: Proletarianisation and Deproletarianisation on the Colonial Plantation.” In Plantations, Proletarians and Peasants in Colonial Asia, edited by Valentine Daniel, Henry Bernstein, and Tom Brass, 1–41. London: Frank Cass & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Calmon, Daniela. 2020. “Shifting Frontiers: The Making of Matopiba in Brazil and Global Redirected Land Use and Control Change.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (2): 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1824183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield, Matthew, Molly D. Anderson, and Philip McMichael. 2021. “UN Food Systems Summit 2021: Dismantling Democracy and Resetting Corporate Control of Food Systems.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5:661552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.661552.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, Judith A. 2021. “Subsistence in the Plantationocene: Dooryard Gardens, Agrobiodiversity, and the Subaltern Economies of Slavery.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (5): 1075–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1725488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2018. “Seed Care in the Palm Oil Sector.” Environmental Humanities 10 (2): 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7156816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2021a. “Can There Be Justice Here? Indigenous Perspectives from the West Papuan Oil Palm Frontier.” Borderlands 20 (1): 11–48. https://sciendo.com/article/10.21307borderlands-2021-002.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2021b. “Children of the Palms: Growing Plants and Growing People in a Papuan Plantationocene.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 27 (2): 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2021c. “The Beetle or the Bug? Multispecies Politics in a West Papuan Oil Palm Plantation.” American Anthropologist 123 (2): 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13592.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2021d. “Eating and Being Eaten: The Meanings of Hunger among Marind.” Medical Anthropology 40 (7): 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2021.1916013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2021e. “Gastrocolonialism: The Intersections of Race, Food, and Development in West Papua.” International Journal of Human Rights 26 (5): 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1968378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2022a. In the Shadow of the Palms: More-Than-Human Becomings in West Papua. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2022b. “Plantation.” Environmental Humanities 14 (2): 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, Sophie. 2022c. “(Un)Worlding the Plantationocene: Extraction, Extinction, Emergence.” Etropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics 21 (1): 165–191. https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.21.1.2022.3838.
   Google Scholar
• Chwałczyk, Franciszek. 2020. “Around the Anthropocene in Eighty Names—Considering the Urbanocene Proposition.” Sustainability 12 (4458): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crutzen, Paul J. 2006. “The “Anthropocene”.” In Earth System Science in the Anthropocene: Emerging Issues and Problems, edited by Eckart Ehlers, and Thomas Krafft, 13–18. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, Patrícia , and Sergio Sauer. 2022. “Desmantelamento e desregulação de políticas ambientais e apropriação da terra e de bens naturais no Cerrado.” Raízes: Revista De Ciências Sociais E Econômicas 42 (2): 298–315. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2022.v42.747.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Mike. 2001. Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Janae, Alex A. Moulton, Levi Van Sant, and Bryan Williams. 2019. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, … Plantationocene?: A Manifesto for Ecological Justice in an Age of Global Crises.” Geography Compass 13:e12438. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Janvry, Alain. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, Alain, Elisabeth Sadoulet, and Wendy Wolford. 2001. “The Changing Role of the State in Latin American Land Reforms.” In Access to Land, Rural Poverty, and Public Action, edited by Alain de Janvry, Gustavo Gordillo, Jean-Philippe Platteau, and Elisabeth Sadoulet, 270–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Mark , and Andrés León Araya. 2013. “Cycles of Land Grabbing in Central America: An Argument for History and a Case Study in the Bajo Aguán, Honduras.” Third World Quarterly 34 (9): 1697–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, Euclides. 2020. “Agricultural Corridors as ‘Demonstration Fields’: Infrastructure, Fairs and Associations Along the Beira and Nacala Corridors of Mozambique.” Journal of Eastern African Studies 14 (2): 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1743094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandin, Greg. 2010. Fordlandia: The Rise and Fall of Henry Ford’s Forgotten Jungle City. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, Julie. 2019. Wilted: Pathogens, Chemicals, and the Fragile Future of the Strawberry Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttal, Shalmali. 2006. “Land and Resource Alienation in Cambodia.” March 7. https://focusweb.org/land-and-natural-resource-alienation-in-cambodia/.
   Google Scholar
• Guttal, Shalmali. 2011. “Whose Lands? Whose Resources?” Development 54 (1): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2010.109.
   Google Scholar
• Guttal, Shalmali. 2013. “Cambodia: The Curse of Concessions.” World Rainforest Movement Bulletin 193. https://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin-articles/cambodia-the-curse-of-concessions.
   Google Scholar
• Guttal, Shalmali. 2014. “Redefining Governance; Challenging Markets in Keeping Land Local; Reclaiming Governance from the Market.” In Land Struggles, edited by Land Research Action Network (LRAN) and Focus on the Global South. LRAN Briefing Paper Series 3.
   Google Scholar
• Guttal, Shalmali. 2015. “Challenging Financial Sector Backing to Land Enclosures.” https://focusweb.org/challenging-financial-sector-backing-to-land-enclosures/.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 2015. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities 6 (1): 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna, Noboru Ishikawa, Scott F. Gilbert, Kenneth Olwig, Anna L. Tsing, and Nils Bubandt. 2016. “Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene.” Ethnos 81 (3): 535–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, Saidiya. 1997. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth Century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Kregg. 2020. The Government of Beans: Regulating Life in the Age of Monocrops. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. L. R. (1938) 1963. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jegathesan, Mythra. 2021. “Black Feminist Plots Before the Plantationocene and Anthropology’s “Regional Closets”.” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12037.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney-Lazar, Miles , and Noboru Ishikawa. 2019. “Mega-Plantations in Southeast Asia.” Environment and Society 10 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2019.100105.
   Google Scholar
• King, Tiffany L. 2016. “The Labor of (Re)Reading Plantation Landscapes Fungible(Ly).” Antipode 48 (4): 1022–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, Joshua, and Idalina Baptista. 2023. “Corridors as Empty Signifiers: The Entanglement of Mozambique’s Colonial Past and Present in its Development Corridors.” Planning Perspectives.https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2023.2173636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshy, Susan, Lisa M. Cacho, Jodi A. Byrd, and Jordan Jefferson. 2022. Colonial Racial Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krupa, Christopher. 2022. A Feast of Flowers: Race, Labor, and Postcolonial Capitalism in Ecuador. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpf, Desirée. 2021. “Multispecies Monocultures: Organic Agriculture and Resistance on Indian Tea Plantations.” Berliner Blätter 84:49–61. https://doi.org/10.18452/22971.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Tanya M. 2017. “After the Land Grab: Infrastructural Violence and the ‘Mafia System’ in Indonesia’s Oil Palm Plantation Zones.” Geoforum 96:328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania M. 2023. “Indonesia’s Plantationocene.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2201633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tanya M. , and Pujo Semedi. 2021. Plantation Life: Corporate Occupation in Indonesia’s Oil Palm Zone. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, Gabriela R., Mairon G. Bastos Lima, and Tiago N. P. dos Reis. 2021. “Maldevelopment Revisited: Inclusiveness and Social Impacts of Soy Expansion Over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba.” World Development 139:105316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makki, Fouad. 2014. “Development by Dispossession: Terra Nullius and the Social-Ecology of New Enclosures in Ethiopia.” Rural Sociology 79:79–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybury-Lewis, Biorn. 1994. The Politics of the Possible: The Brazilian Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964-1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, Achille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, Katherine. 2011. “On Plantations, Prisons, and a Black Sense of Place.” Social & Cultural Geography 12 (8): 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.624280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, Katherine. 2013. “Plantation Futures.” Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 17 (3): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1215/07990537-2378892.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, Sidney W. 1986. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mitman, Gregg. 2021. Empire of Rubber: Firestone’s Scrambel for Land and Power in Liberia. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monjane, Boaventuroa, and Natacha Bruna. 2019. “Confronting Agrarian Authoritarianism: Dynamics of Resistance to PROSAVANA in Mozambique.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1671357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2017. “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of our Ecological Crisis.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (3): 594–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2018. “The Capitalocene, Part II: Accumulation by Appropriation and the Centrality of Unpaid Work/Energy.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (2): 237–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1272587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Sophie S., Monique Allewaert, Pablo F. Gómez, and Gregg Mitman. 2019. “Plantation Legacies.” Edge Effects. January 22. http://edgeeffects.net/plantation-legacies-plantationocene/#rf1-16709.
   Google Scholar
• Nally, David. 2008. ““That Coming Storm”: The Irish Poor Law, Colonial Biopolitics, and the Great Famine.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (3): 714–741. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25515149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, Andrew. 2016. “Farming is Easy, Becoming Brazilian is Hard: North American Soy Farmers’ Social Values of Production, Work and Land in Soylandia.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (2): 442–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.998651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, Andrew. 2018a. “Financialization of Work, Value, and Social Organization among Transnational Soy Farmers in the Brazilian Cerrado.” Economic Anthropology 5 (2): 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, Andrew. 2018b. “Farming Out of Place: Transnational Family Farmers, Flexible Farming, and the Rupture of Rural Life in Bahia, Brazil.” American Ethnologist 45 (3): 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, Andrew. 2021. “Working the Plantationocene.” Exertions. https://doi.org/10.21428/1d6be30e.932d8ce0.
   Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, Andrew. 2022. “Tidy Fields and Clean Shirts: A Comparative Ethnography of Good Farming in South Dakota and Luis Eduardo Magalhaes.” Culture, Agriculture, Food, and Environment 44 (1): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paprocki, Kasia. 2021. Threatening Dystopias: The Global Politics of Climate Change Adaptation in Bangladesh. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paredes, Alyssa. 2021. “Experimental Science for the ‘Bananapocalypse’: Counter Politics in the Plantationocene.” Ethnos. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.1919172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, Alyssa. 2023. “We are Not Pests.” In The Promise of Multispecies Justice, edited by Sophie Chao, Karin Bolender, and Eben S. Kirskey, 77–102. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, Nancy L. 1992. Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plowright, Raina K., and Peter J. Hudson. 2021. “From Protein to Pandemic: The Transdisciplinary Approach Needed to Prevent Spillover and the Next Pandemic.” Viruses 13 (7): 1298. http://doi.org/10.3390/v13071298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosterman, Roy L., Mary N. Temple, and Timothy M. Hanstad. 1990. Agrarian Reform and Grassroots Development: Ten Case Studies. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, Anibal. 2000. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism and Latin America.” Nepantla 1 (3): 533–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Cedric. 2000. Black Marxism: The Making of Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudge, Alice. 2023. Sensing Others: Voicing Batek Ethical Lives at the Edge of a Malaysian Rainforest. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Stuart. 1985. Sugar Plantations in the Formation of Brazilian Society: Bahia 1550-1835. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Debarati. 2017. Everyday Sustainability: Gender Justice and Fair Trade Tea in Darjeeling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shankland, A., and E. Gonçalves. 2016. “Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA.” World Development 81: 35–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigaud, Lygia. 1979. Os Cclandestinos e os direitos: estudo sobre trabalhadores da cana-de-açúcar de Parnambuco. São Paulo: Livraria Duas Cidades.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 2011. Cosmopolitics II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolcke, Verena. 1988. Coffee Planters, Workers, and Wives: Class Conflict and Gender Relations on São Paulo Coffee Plantations, 1850-1980. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, Ann L. 1995. Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra’s Plantation Belt, 1870-1979. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Striffler, Steve. 2001. In the Shadows of State and Capital: The United Fruit Company, Popular Struggle, and Agrarian Restructuring in Ecuador, 1900–1995. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Deborah. 2023. “Afterlives: The Recursive Plantation.” In Global Plantations in the Modern World: Sovereignties, Ecologies, Afterlives, edited by Colette Le Petitcorps, Marta Macedo, and Irene Peano, 353–364. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, Helen. 2011. Africa as a Living Laboratory: Empire, Development, and the Problem of Scientific Knowledge, 1870-1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, Anna L., Andrew S. Mathews, and Nils Bubandt. 2019. “Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape Structure, Multispecies History, and the Retooling of Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 60: S186–S197. https://doi.org/10.1086/703391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail, Leroy , and Landeg White. 1978. “Plantation Protest: The History of a Mozambican Song.” Journal of Southern African Studies 5 (1): 1–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2636763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, Michael. 1983. Silent Violence: Food, Famine and Peasantry in Northern Nigeria. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, Wendy. 2010. This Land is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, Wendy. 2021a. “The Plantationocene: A Lusotropical Contribution to the Theory.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (6): 1622–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1850231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, Wendy. 2021b. “The Colonial Roots of Agricultural Modernization in Mozambique: The Role of Research from Portugal to ProSavana.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1680541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, Wendy , and Ryan Nehring. 2015. “Constructing Parallels: Brazilian Expertise and the Commodification of Land, Labour and Money in Mozambique.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 36 (2): 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2015.1036010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, Clyde. 2000. Development Arrested: The Blues and Plantation Power in the Mississippi Delta. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Tong. 2021. “The Socioeconomic and Environmental Drivers of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.” Ambio 50 (4): 822–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01497-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynter, Sylvia. 1971. “Novel and History, Plot and Plantation.” Savacou 5 (June): 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, Kathryn. 2019. A Billion Black Anthropocenes Or None. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar