Cross-class alliances and urban middle classes with peasant characteristics: a historical-spatial approach to agency in territory-based rural mobilisations in Turkey

References

• Adaman, F., and M. Arsel. 2010. “Globalization, Development, and Environmental Policies in Turkey.” In Understanding the Process of Economic Changes in Turkey: An Institutional Approach, edited by T. Çetin, and F. Yilmaz, 319–335. New York: Nova Science Pub Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Adnan, S. 2013. “Land Grabs and Primitive Accumulation in Deltaic Bangladesh: Interactions Between Neoliberal Globalization, State Interventions, Power Relations and Peasant Resistance.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 87–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.753058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akşit, B. 1998. “İç Göçlerin nesnel ve öznel toplumsal tarihi üzerine gözlemler: Köy tarafından bir bakış.” In Türkiye’de İç Göç, Sorunsal Alanları ve Araştırma Yöntemleri Konferansı Bildiriler Kitabı, 22–37. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S., E. Dagnino, and A. Escobar. 1998. Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures. Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, M., B. Akbulut, and F. Adaman. 2015. “Environmentalism of the Malcontent: Anatomy of an Anti-Coal Power Plant Struggle in Turkey.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (2): 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.971766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avcı, D. 2017. “Mining Conflicts and Transformative Politics: A Comparison of Intag (Ecuador) and Mount Ida (Turkey) Environmental Struggles.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 84: 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviskar, A. ed. 2007. Waterscapes: The Cultural Politics of a Natural Resource. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, A. 2017. “What the Eye Does Not See: The Yamuna in the Imagination of Delhi.” The SAGE Handbook of the 21st Century City, 298. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402059.n16.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. 2007. Minería, movimientos sociales y respuestas campesinas: una ecología política de transformaciones territoriales (Vol. 2). Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, L. 1975. “Peasants and Revolution: The Case of China.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 2 (3): 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066157508437938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M. 2016 (April 14). “Land Politics, Agrarian Movements and Scholar-Activism.” Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/93021.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., J. C. Franco, S. Gómez, C. Kay, and M. Spoor. 2012. “Land Grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4): 845–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.679931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsuk, I., P. Dinç, S. Kavak, and P. Sayan. eds. 2021. Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Resistance in Turkey: Construction, Consolidation, and Contestation. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 2000. Peasants, Populism and Postmodernism: The Return of the Agrarian Myth. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, C. 1998. “Labour Migration and Economic Conditions in Nineteenth-Century Anatolia.” Middle Eastern Studies 34 (4): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209808701241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L. 1985. “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements.” Social Research 52 (4): 663–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson, C., and K. I. MacDonald. 2012. “Enclosing the Global Commons: The Convention on Biological Diversity and Green Grabbing.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.664138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. 2007. The Beginning of History: Value Struggles and Global Capital. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Del Bene, D., A. Scheidel, and L. Temper. 2018. “More Dams, More Violence? A Global Analysis on Resistances and Repression Around Conflictive Dams Through co-Produced Knowledge.” Sustainability Science 13 (3): 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0558-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2008. “Transnational Organizing in Agrarian Central America: Histories, Challenges, Prospects.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2–3): 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00169.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erensu, S. 2011. “Problematizing Green Energy: Small Hydro Plant Developments in Turkey.” ESEE 2011 Conference, Istanbul, 14–18. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/download/31024000/esee2011_c36142_1_1307137792_1401_2288.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Erensu, S. 2013. “Abundance and Scarcity Amidst the Crisis of ‘Modern Water’: The Changing Water-Energy Nexus in Turkey.” In Contemporary Water Governance in the Global South: Scarcity, Marketization and Participation, edited by L. M. Harris, J. A. Goldin, and C. Sneddon, 61–78. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erensu, S. 2018. “Powering Neoliberalization: Energy and Politics in the Making of a new Turkey.” Energy Research & Social Science 41: 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. “Green Grabbing: A new Appropriation of Nature?” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, J., L. Mehta, and G. J. Veldwisch. 2013. “The Global Politics of Water Grabbing.” Third World Quarterly 34 (9): 1651–1675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., and T. Skocpol. 1989. “Explaining Revolutions in the Contemporary Third World.” Politics & Society 17 (4): 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürel, B., B. Küçük, and S. Taş. 2019. “The Rural Roots of the Rise of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey.” Critical Agrarian Studies 46 (3): 457–479.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., I. Scoones, and D. Tsikata. 2015. Africa’s Land Rush: Rural Livelihoods & Agrarian Change (Vol. 42). Rochester, NY: Boydell & Brewer.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C. M. 1990. Tea and the Domestication of the Turkish State (No. 1). Florida: Eothen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C., and I. Beller-Hann. 1998. “Markets, Morality and Modernity in North-East Turkey.” In Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers, edited by T. M. Wilson, and H. Donnan, 237–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. M., and M. Işlar. 2014. “Neoliberalism, Nature, and Changing Modalities of Environmental Governance in Contemporary Turkey.” In Global Economic Crisis and the Politics of Diversity, edited by Y. Atasoy, 52–78. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, A. 2017. “Blue Grabbing: Reviewing Marine Conservation in Redang Island Marine Park, Malaysia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 79: 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J. 1974. “Peasant Land Occupations.” Past and Present 62: 120–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/62.1.120.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E., and T. Ranger. eds. 2012. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Işlar, M. 2012. “Privatised Hydropower Development in Turkey: A Case of Water Grabbing?” Water Alternatives 5: 376–391.
   Google Scholar
• İnal, R., and C. Saraçoğlu. 2022. “The Making of Citizenship via tea Production: State-Sponsored Economic Growth, Nationalism and State in Turkey.” Nations and Nationalism 28 (4): 1444–1458. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. 2018. “An Urban Proletariat with Peasant Characteristics: Land Occupations and Livestock Raising in South Africa.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5–6): 884–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1312354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavak, S. 2021. “Rethinking the Political Economy of Rural Struggles in Turkey: Space, Structures, and Altered Agencies.” Journal of Agrarian Change 21 (2): 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, J. T. 1993. “Claiming the Land: Take-Overs by Villagers in the Philippines with Comparisons to Indonesia, Peru, Portugal, and Russia.” Journal of Peasant Studies 20 (3): 459–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066159308438518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khagram, S. 2018. Dams and Development. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, S. 2015. “Corporate Social Responsibility in Local Context: International Capital, Charitable Giving and the Politics of Education in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 15 (3): 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1091181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, M. J. 2000. “Understanding Peasant Revolution: From Concept to Theory and Case.” Theory and Society 29 (1): 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007059213368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlu, K. 2021. “The Need to Look Beyond the Right to Property: An Assessment of the Constitutional Court of Turkey’s Judgments on Urgent Expropriations for Hydropower Plants.” In Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Resistance in Turkey, edited by I. Borsuk, P. Dinç, S. Kavak, and P. Sayan, 129–150. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. 1st edition. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. 1994. “New Farmers’ Movements in India as Structural Response and Collective Identity Formation: The Cases of the Shetkari Sanghatana and the BKU.” Journal of Peasant Studies 21 (3–4): 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066159408438556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. 2014. Stop, Thief!: The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance. Binghamton: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 1996. “To map Contentious Politics.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1 (1): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.1.1.y3p544u2j1l536u9.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2012. “The Land Grab and Corporate Food Regime Restructuring.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4): 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.661369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. 1st edition. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, J. M. 1974. “Migration in Turkey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 22 (4): 634–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivera, O., and T. Lewis. 2004. Cochabamba: water war in Bolivia. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahnke, A., R. Tarlau, and W. Wolford. 2015. “Understanding Rural Resistance: Contemporary Mobilization in the Brazilian Countryside.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1046447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, J. M. 1978. Agrarian Revolution. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2011. Social Movements in Latin America: Neoliberalism and Popular Resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2018. “Class Struggle Back on the Agenda in Latin America.” Journal of Developing Societies 34 (1): 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X17753000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petras, J. F., and H. Veltmeyer. 2019. “Neoliberalism and Social Movements in Latin America: Mobilizing the Resistance.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation, edited by B. Berberoglu, 177–211. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., and J. M. Jasper. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. L. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, T., J. Berdegué, and G. Escobar. 2001. “Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Latin America: Overview and Policy Implications.” World Development 29 (3): 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00112-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D. E. 2015. “Networked, Rooted and Territorial: Green Grabbing and Resistance in Chiapas.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4): 695–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.993622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rulli, M. C., A. Saviori, and P. D’Odorico. 2013. “Global Land and Water Grabbing.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (3): 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213163110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1977. The Moral Economy of the Peasant:Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia . New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2015. “Capitalist Formations of Enclosure: Space and the Extinction of the Commons.” Antipode 47 (4): 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 1994. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobreiro, T. 2015. “Can Urban Migration Contribute to Rural Resistance? Indigenous Mobilization in the Middle Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1241–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.993624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tugal, C. 2015. “Elusive Revolt: The Contradictory Rise of Middle-Class Politics.” Thesis Eleven 130 (1): 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513615602183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). 2012. Tarımsal Üretim Verileri. Retrieved 9 July, 2016, from http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). 2016. Nüfus Verileri. Retrieved 9 July 2016, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Nufus-ve-Demografi-109.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D. 2018. The new Peasantries: Rural Development in Times of Globalization. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2019. “Resistance, Class Struggle and Social Movements in Latin America: Contemporary Dynamics.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (6): 1264–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1493458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper Torch Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2004. “This Land is Ours now: Spatial Imaginaries and the Struggle for Land in Brazil.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402015.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, Ş, and Ö Şendeniz. 2013. “HES direnişlerinde kadinlarin deneyimleri: findikli örneği.” Fe Dergi 5 (1): 42–58.
   Google Scholar