Trainee therapists’ views on the alliance in psychotherapy and supervision: a longitudinal study

References

• Adelson, J. L., & Owen, J. (2012). Bringing the psychotherapist back: Basic concepts for reading articles examining therapist effects using multilevel modeling. Psychotherapy, 49, 152–162. doi: 10.1037/a0023990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambling, M., King, R., Raue, P., Schweitzer, R., & Lambert, W. (2006). Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 317–331. doi: 10.1080/10503300500268524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2013). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Biaggio, M. K., Gasparikova-Krasnec, M., & Bauer, L. (1983). Evaluation of clinical psychology graduate students: The problem of the unsuitable student. Professional Practice of Psychology, 4, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2007). When values collide: Field instructors’ experiences of providing feedback on devaluating competence. The Clinical Supervisor, 26, 99–117. doi: 10.1300/J001v26n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. doi: 10.1177/0011000083111007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Cavi, L. (1973). The SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale- Preliminary report. Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 9, 13–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drisko, J. (2013). The common factors model: Its place in clinical practice and research. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 83, 398–413. doi: 10.1080/00377317.2013.833435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counsellor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322–329. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competence-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. R., Iwakabe, S., & Stalikas, A. (2005). Perspective divergence in the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 15(1–2), 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, G. J. (2002). The impact of psychotherapy supervision on client outcome: A critical examination of 2 decades of research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice and Training, 39, 354–367. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.39.4.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridell, M., Cesarec, Z., Johansson, M., & Thorson, S. M. (2002). Swedish norms, standardization and validation of the Symptom Checklist 90 (Svensk normering, standardisering och validering av SCL-90) (Vol. 15, 6979). Stockholm, Sweden: SIS.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (Ed.). (2001). The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva, R., & Krystal, J. H. (2004). Move over ANOVA: Progress in analysing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 310–317. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, W. E., Curry, K. T., Bandalos, D. L. (2002). Reliability generalization of Working Alliance Inventory Scale Scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 659–673 (Special Issue: Reliability Generalization (RG) as a Measurement Meta-Analytic Method). doi: 10.1177/0013164402062004008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modelling with SPSS. London: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2013). Training and supervision in psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (p. 785). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenroth, M., Ackerman, S., Clemence, A., Strassle, C., & Handler, L. (2002). Effects of structured clinical training on patient and therapist perspectives of alliance early in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39, 309–323. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.39.4.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, E. L. (1992). Supervision: A way of teaching and learning. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 177–214). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9–16. doi: 10.1037/a0022186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsoff (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 529–556). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlighan, D. M., & Shaughnessy, P. (1995). Analysis of the development of the working alliance using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 338–349. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.42.3.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N. (2004). Psychotherapy supervision: What lies beneath. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 1–19. doi: 10.1093/ptr/kph001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Brittan-Powell, C. S., & Pannu, R. K. (1997). The influence of supervisory racial identity interaction and racial matching on the supervisory working alliance and supervisee multicultural competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36, 284–304. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1997.tb00396.x
   Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The Supervisory Working Alliance, Trainee Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 447–455. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02472.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., & Friedlander, M. L. (1995). The Relationship Between the Supervisory Working Alliance and Trainees' Experience of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity. Counselor Education & Supervision, 34, 220. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1995.tb00244.x
   Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 10–24. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Mori, Y., & Mehr, K. E. (2013). Effective and ineffective supervision. Counselling Psychologist, 41, 28–47. doi: 10.1177/0011000012442648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1981). Supervision: A conceptual model. Counselling Psychologist, 10, 3–42. doi: 10.1177/0011000082101002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 437–447. doi: 10.1348/014466507X197415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muse-Burke, J. L., Ladany, N., & Deck, M. (2001). Understanding and conducting supervision research. In L. J. Bradley & N. Ladany (Eds.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (3rd ed., pp. 28–62). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., Ambühl, H., Rønnestad, M. H., Davis, J., Gerin, P., & Davis, M., SPR Collaborative Research Network. (1999). Development of psychotherapists: concepts, questions, and methods of a collaborative international study. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 127–153. doi: 10.1080/10503309912331332651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2005). How psychotherapists develop. A study of therapeutic work and professional growth. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, D. M. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counselling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 108–115. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2005). Using the SPSS Mixed Procedure to Fit Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Multilevel Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 717–741. doi: 10.1177/0013164405278558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønnestad, M. H., & Ladany, N. (2006). The impact of psychotherapy training: Introduction to the Special Section. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 261–267. doi: 10.1080/10503300600612241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). The journey of counsellor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30, 5–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., Stevens, C., & Rothman, M. (2007). A relational approach to supervision. In C. A. Falender & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (pp. 137–157). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. M. A. (2011). Longitudinal data analyses using linear mixed models in SPSS: Concepts, procedures and illustrations. The Scientific World Journal, 11, 42–76. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B., Glick, M. J., Osatuke, K., Hardy, G. E., Shapiro, D. A., Agnew-Davies, R.,  … Barkham, M. (2004). Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: Are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 81–92. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counsellor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 5965. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.28.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca, G. A., & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: I. The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 429–437. doi: 10.1080/10503300802641444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 207–210. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, L. (2002). The therapy relationship in cognitive therapy: A review. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 179–191. doi: 10.1017/S1352465802002059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. (2011). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 235–256. doi: 10.1080/07325223.2011.619417
   Google Scholar
• Webb, A., & Wheeler, S. (1998). How honest do counsellors dare to be in the supervisory relationship? An exploratory study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 26, 509–524. doi: 10.1080/03069889808253860
   Google Scholar
• Yourman, D. B., & Farber, B. A. (1996). Nondisclosure of distortion in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 33, 567–575. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.33.4.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar