References
- Arboricultural Association (AA). (2017). Our history. Retrieved June 24, 2017, from https://www.trees.org.uk/About-Us/History
- BSI. (2010). BS3998:2010 tree work – recommendations (3rd ed.). London: British Standards Institute.
- Gilman, E. F. (2003). Branch to stem diameter affects strength of attachment. Journal of Arboriculture, 29, 291–294.
- Gray, D. E. (2009). Doing research in the real world (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
- Kane, B. (2014). Determining parameters related to the likelihood of failure of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) from winching tests. Trees: Structure and Function, 28, 1667–1677.
- Kane, B., Farrell, R., Zedaker, S. M., Loferski, J. R., & Smith, D. W. (2008). Failure mode and prediction of the strength of branch attachments. Journal of Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 34, 308–316.
- Kennard, D. K., Putz, F. E., & Niederhofer, M. (1996). The predictability of tree decay from visual assessments. Journal of Arboriculture, 22, 249–254.
- Lonsdale, D. (1999). Principles of tree hazard assessment and management. London: TSO.
- Lonsdale, D. (2000). Hazards from trees: A general guide. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
- Mattheck, C., Bethge, K., & Weber, K. (2015). The body language of trees: Encyclopaedia of visual tree assessment. Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
- Mattheck, C., & Breloer, H. (1994). The body language of trees: A handbook for failure analysis. London: TSO.
- National Tree Safety Group (NTSG). (2011). Common sense risk management of trees. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
- Pounds, R., Sutcliffe, R., Albrow, H. A., Binnie, C., & Nockolds, I. (2011). The trees and timber industry in Great Britain : size, structure and skills. Lantra.
- Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
- Slater, D. (2016a). An argument against the axiom of uniform stress being applicable to tree. Arboricultural Journal, 38(4), 143–164.
- Slater, D. (2016b). Assessment of junctions: Course notes for AA workshops. Stroud: Arboricultural Association.
- Slater, D. (2018a). The association between natural braces and the development of bark-included junctions in trees. Arboricultural Journal, 40(1), 16–38.
- Slater, D. (2018b). Natural bracing in trees: Management recommendations. Arboricultural Journal, 40(2), 106–134.
- Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2015a). The level of occlusion of included bark affects the strength of bifurcations in hazel (Corylus avellana L.). Journal of Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 41(4), 194–207.
- Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2015b). Interlocking wood grain patterns provide improved wood strength properties in forks of hazel (Corylus avellana L.). Arboricultural Journal, 37(1), 21–32.
- Smiley, E. T. (2003). Does included bark reduce the strength of codominant stems? Journal of Arboriculture, 29, 104–106.
- UK Government. (2016). What qualification levels mean. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/what-different-qualification-levels-mean/list-of-qualification-levels