References
- AA (2009). A guide to good climbing practice (1st ed.). Cheltenham: Arboricultural Association.
- BSI (2010). BS3998:2010, Tree work – Recommendations. London, UK: British Standards Institute.
- Buckley, G., Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2015). Angle of inclination affects the morphology and strength of bifurcations in hazel (Corylus avellana L.). Arboricultural Journal, 37, 99–112.
- Duursma, R. A., Makela, A., Reid, D. E. B., Jokela, E. J., Porte, A. J., & Roberts, S. D. (2010). Self-shading affects allometric scaling in trees. Functional Ecology, 24, 723–730.
- Gilman, E. F. (2003). Branch to Stem Diameter Affects Strength Of Attachment; Journal Of Arboriculture, 29, 291-294.
- Jaffe, M. J., & Forbes, S. (1993). Thigmomorphogenesis: The response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation. Plant Growth Regulation, 12, 313–324.
- Kane, B. (2014). Determining parameters related to the likelihood of failure of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) from winching tests. Trees: Structure and Function, 28, 1667–1677.
- Kane, B., Farrell, R., Zedaker, S. M., Loferski, J. R., & Smith, D. W. (2008). Failure mode and prediction of the strength of branch attachments. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 34, 308–316.
- Lonsdale, D. (1999). Principles of tree hazard assessment and management (4th ed.). London: TSO.
- Mattheck, C, & Vorberg, U. (1991). The biomechanics of tree bifurcation design. Botanica Acta, 104, 399-404. doi:
- Moulia, B., Coutand, C., & Julien, J.-L. (2015). Mechanosensitive control of plant growth: Bearing the load, sensing, transducing and responding. Frontiers of Plant Science, 6, 52.
- Ozden, S., Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2017). Fracture properties of green wood formed within the forks of hazel (Corylus avellana L.). Trees: Structure and Function, 31, 903–917.
- Sendall, K. M., Lusk, C. H., & Reich, P. B. (2015). Becoming less tolerant with age: Sugar maple, shade and ontogeny. Oecologia, 179, 1011–1021.
- Slater, D. (2016). Assessment of tree forks: Course notes (1st ed.). Cheltenham: Arboricultural Association.
- Slater, D. (2018a). The association between natural braces and the development of bark-included junctions in trees. Arboricultural Journal, 40(1), 16–38.
- Slater, D. (2018b). Natural bracing in trees: Management recommendations. Arboricultural Journal, 40(2), 106–133.
- Slater, D., Bradley, R. S., Withers, P. J., & Ennos, A. R. (2014). The anatomy and grain patterns in forks of hazel (Corylus avellana L.) and other tree species. Trees: Structure and Function, 28(5), 1437–1448.
- Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2013). Determining the mechanical properties of hazel forks by testing their component parts. Trees: Structure and Function, 27(6), 1515–1524.
- Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2015a). The level of occlusion of included bark affects the strength of bifurcations in hazel (Corylus avellana L.). Journal of Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 41(4), 194–207.
- Slater, D., & Ennos, A. R. (2015b). Interlocking wood grain patterns provide improved wood strength properties in forks of hazel (Corylus avellana L.). Arboricultural Journal, 37, 21–32.
- Smiley, E. T. (2003). Does included bark reduce the strength of codominant stems? Journal of Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 29, 104–106.