NATO missile defence: The political and operational case for a two-base structure

Notes

• NATO . November 2002 . “ Prague Summit Communiqué ” . In NATO Press Release (2002) November , 127 – 127 . 21, para.4(g)
   Google Scholar
• Walpole , Robert D. September 1998 . Speech at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace September , 17
   Google Scholar
• Ricks , Thomas E. and Faiola , Anthony . July 2006 . “ Experts Say Missile Failure Highlights Ineptness ” . In Washington Post July , A16 – A16 . 6
   Google Scholar
• Opall-Rome , Barbara . 2004 . Israel: Iranian Shihab to Carry New Warhead . Defense News , 19 ( 39 ) October : 22 – 22 . 11, Alon Ben-David, ‘Iran unveils redesigned Shahab missile,’ Jane's Defense Weekly 41, no. 39 (29 September 2004), p.6; Andrew Koch and Robin Hughes, ‘Tehran altering ballistic missile,’ Jane's Defense Weekly 41, no. 49 (8 December 2004), p.4.
   Google Scholar
• Covault , Craig . 2004 . Iran's ‘Sputnik’ . Aviation Week and Space Technology , 161 ( 21 ) November : 36 – 37 . 29
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David , Alon . 2005 . Iran tests solid-fuel engine for Shahab 3 . Jane's Defense Weekly , 42 ( 23 ) June : 4 – 4 . 8
   Google Scholar
• Walpole , Robert D. September 2000 . Testimony on Iran's Arms Proliferation before the Senate Government Reform Committee September , 21, Central Intelligence Agency, Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions, 1 January Through 30 June 2002, April 2003, pp.2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Shimbun , Sankei . August 2003 . Missile Defense Briefing Report no. 115 , Edited by: Berman , Ilan . August , Washington D.C. : American Foreign Policy Council . 6, quoted in in, 15 August 2003
   Google Scholar
• Jehl , Douglas . December 2004 . “ Iran Reportedly Hides Work on a Longer-Range Missile ” . In New York Times December , A19 – A19 . 2
   Google Scholar
• April 2006 . “ Iran Has Missiles Capable of Reaching Europe: Report ” . In DefenseNews.com April , 27
   Google Scholar
• Obering , Henry A. April 2006 . Statement Before the Senate Armed Services Committee Strategic Forces Subcommittee Regarding the Fiscal Year 2007 Defense Authorization Ballistic Missile Defense April , 4
   Google Scholar
• Larson , Eric V. and Kent , Glenn A. 1994 . A New Methodology for Assessing Multilayer Missile Defense Options , Santa Monica : Rand .
   Google Scholar
• Tanks , David R. 2000 . National Missile Defense: Policy Issues and Technological Capabilities , 4 – 4 . Washington D.C. : Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis . 18, 21
   Google Scholar
• Sirak , Michael . 2004 . US assesses interceptor sites in Europe . Jane's Defence Weekly , 41 ( 18 ) May : 7 – 7 . 5, Assembly of the Western European Union, Missile defence: the need for a common European initiative, Document A/1843, 3 December 2003, p. 16; ‘US Discussing Missile Site in Europe with Poland, Others,’ www.DefenseNews.com, posted 16 November 2005; Michael R. Gordon, ‘US Is Proposing European Shield for Iran Missiles,’ New York Times, 22 May 2006, p.A1.
   Google Scholar
• Flory , Peter C.W. April 2006 . Testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee Strategic Forces Subcommittee April , 11 – 11 . 4, Henry Obering, Current Status and Future Developments for US Missile Defense (Washington D.C.: George C. Marshall Institute, 2004), p.9; Ronald T. Kadish, Statement on Missile Defense Program and Fiscal Year 2005 Budget Before the Senate Armed Services Committee, 11 March 2004, p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Rance , Michael . 2003 . Missile Defence from the Inside: An Interview with the Director of the Missile Defense Agency . RUSI Journal , 148 ( 1 ) February : 43 – 43 . The Fylingdales radar is, of course, the exception that proves the rule.
   Google Scholar
• 2002 . UK Ministry of Defence, Missile Defence: a public discussion paper 11 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• BMDO . 1999 . Summary of Report to Congress on Utility of Sea-Based Assets to National Missile Defense , Washington D.C. : Department of Defense .
   Google Scholar
• Taverna , Michael A. and Nativi , Andy . 2003 . Fresh Look at BMD . Aviation Week & Space Technology , 158 ( 13 ) March : 54 – 54 . 31
   Google Scholar
• The US plans for 10 interceptors in Europe for a total cost of US$1.6 billion: Gordon Michael R. US Is Proposing European Shield for Iran Missiles New York Times 2006 May A1 A1 22, David Pugliese, ‘Raytheon, Lawmakers Lobby Canada for Radar,’ Defense News, vol. 20, no. 1 (14 March 2005), p. 11. See also US Department of Defense, ‘MDA Exhibit R-2A RDT&E Project Justification (PE 0603882C Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment),’ FY 2004 Budget Justification Material, February 2003 pp.22–23, 42.
   Google Scholar
• NATO . Prague Summit Communiqué para.4(g)
   Google Scholar
• NATO . June 2004 . “ Instanbul Summit Communiqué ” . In NATO Press Release (2004) June , 127 – 127 . 28, para. 12(g)
   Google Scholar
• NATO . June 2006 . “ Final Communiqué — Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Defence Ministers session ” . In NATO Press Release (2006) June , 064 – 064 . 8, para. 13(g)
   Google Scholar
• Yost , David S. 2006 . “ Missile defence on NATO's agenda ” . In NATO Review Autumn
   Google Scholar
• September 2006 . “ Poland Wants Security Pact, Air Defences in Exchange for Hosting US Missile Interceptors ” . In NTI: Global Security Newswire September , 14
   Google Scholar
• NATO . Instanbul Summit Communiqué para.21(g). The CPG falls between NATO's 1999 Strategic Concept (SC), and documents that provide guidance for specific planning fields, such as the Ministerial Guidance for Force Planning etc. While remaining consistent with the SC, the CPG takes into account the changes in the international system since 1999. The document, until now classified, will be made public at the Riga summit. Julianne Smith, Transforming NATO. A Primer for The NATO Summit In Riga 2006 (Washington D.C.: Center For Strategic and International Studies, 2006), pp. 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnam , Gopal . March 2006 . “ US Grapples With Global Command and Control of Ballistic Missile Defense ” . In DefenseNews.com March , 21
   Google Scholar