3,193
Views
128
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature

Pages 17-31 | Published online: 16 May 2008

References

  • Åkerlind, G.S.. 2004. A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 363–76. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000216679
  • Åkerlind, G.S.. 2005a. Variation and commonality in the phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 321–34. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284672
  • Åkerlind, G.S.. 2005b. Ways of experiencing being a university researcher. 145–55. In Bowden and Green 2005
  • Biggs, J.B., and K.F. Collis. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy, New York: Academic Press.
  • Bills, D.. 2004. Supervisors’ conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 85–97. doi: 10.1080/1360144042000296099
  • Bowden, J., P. Green. eds., 2005. Doing developmental phenomenography, 145–55. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Bowden, J., P. Green, R. Barnacle, N. Cherry, and R. Usher. 2005. Academics’ ways of understanding success in research activities, in Bowden and Green 2005, 128–144.
  • Brew, A.. 2001. Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–85. doi: 10.1080/03075070120076255
  • Bruce, C., B. Pham, and I. Stoodley. 2004. Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 219–38. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000190804
  • Department of Education, Science and Training. 2005. Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. Final advice on the preferred RQF model, Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/research_quality_framework/final_advice_on_preferred_rqf_model.htm
  • Ingerman, Å., and S. Booth. 2003. Expounding on physics: A phenomenographic study of physicists talking of their physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1489–508. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070298
  • Kember, D.. 1997. A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255–75. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X
  • Kiley, M., and G. Mullins. 2005. Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they?. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 245–62. doi: 10.1080/00313830500109550
  • Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and awareness, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Meyer, J.H.F., M.P. Shanahan, and R.C. Laugksch. 2005. Students’ conceptions of research: I – A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225–44. doi: 10.1080/00313830500109535
  • Neumann, R.. 1993. Research and scholarship: Perceptions of senior academic administrators. Higher Education, 25, 97–110. doi: 10.1007/BF01384743
  • Pham, B., C. Bruce, and I. Stoodley. 2005. Constituting information technology research: The experience of IT researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 215–32. doi: 10.1080/07294360500153927
  • Pratt, D., and Assoc. 1998. Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education, Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
  • Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1999. Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Prosser, M., E. Martin, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden, and H. MiddletonUniversity academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science, In press
  • Samuelowicz, K., and J. Bain. 1992. Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00138620
  • Samuelowicz, K., and J. Bain. 2001. Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–395. doi: 10.1023/A:1004130031247
  • Wood, K.. 2000. The experience of learning to teach: Changing student teachers’ ways of understanding teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 75–93. doi: 10.1080/002202700182862

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.