65,128
Views
908
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Framing student engagement in higher education

Pages 758-773 | Published online: 18 Aug 2011

References

  • Ahlfeldt , S. , Mehta , S. and Sellnow , T. 2005 . Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use . Higher Education Research & Development , 24 : 5 – 20 . (doi:10.1080/0729436052000318541)
  • Appleton , J. J. , Christenson , S. L. , Kim , D. and Reschly , A. L. 2006 . Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument . Journal of School Psychology , 44 : 427 – 45 . (doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002)
  • Archambault , I. , Janosz , M. , Fallu , J.-S. and Pagani , L. S. 2009 . Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout . Journal of Adolescence , 32 : 651 – 70 . (doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007)
  • Askham , P. 2008 . Context and identity: Exploring adult learners' experiences of higher education . Journal of Further and Higher Education , 32 : 85 – 97 . (doi:10.1080/03098770701781481)
  • Australian Council for Educational Research . 2010a . Australasian Survey of Student Engagement , Camberwell : ACER .
  • Australian Council for Educational Research . 2010b . “ Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes ” . In Australasian Student Engagement Report , Camberwell : ACER .
  • Barnett , R. and Coate , K. 2005 . Engaging the curriculum in higher education , Maidenhead , UK : Open University Press .
  • Brint , S. , Cantwell , A. and Hanneman , R. 2008 . The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement . Research in Higher Education , 49 : 383 – 402 . (doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9090-y)
  • Bryson , C. , Cooper , G. and Hardy , C. Reaching a common understanding of the meaning of student engagement . Paper presented at Society of Research into Higher Education Conference . December 14–16, in Wales .
  • Bryson , C. and Hand , L. 2007 . The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 44 : 349 – 62 . (doi:10.1080/14703290701602748)
  • Bryson , C. and Hand , L. 2008 . “ An introduction to student engagement ” . In In SEDA special 22: Aspects of student engagement, ed. L. Hand and C. Bryson , 5 – 13 . Nottingham : Staff and Educational Development Association .
  • Bryson , C. , Hardy , C. and Hand , L. An in-depth investigation of students' engagement throughout their first year in university . Paper presented at UK National Transition Conference . May 22–24 , London .
  • Carini , R. M. , Kuh , G. D. and Klein , S. P. 2006 . Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages . Research in Higher Education , 47 : 1 – 32 . (doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9)
  • Chapman , E. 2003 . Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates . Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 8, no 13 www.pareonline.net
  • Chickering , A. and Gamson , Z. 1987 . Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education . AAHE Bulletin , 39 : 3 – 7 .
  • Christie , H. , Munro , M. and Wager , F. 2005 . ‘Day students’ in higher education: Widening access students and successful transitions to university life . International Studies in Sociology of Education , 15 : 3 – 30 . (doi:10.1080/09620210500200129)
  • Christie , H. , Tett , L. , Cree , V. E. , Hounsell , J. and Mccune , V. 2008 . ‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: Learning to be a university student . Studies in Higher Education , 33 : 567 – 81 . (doi:10.1080/03075070802373040)
  • Coates , H. 2007 . A model of online and general campus-based student engagement . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 : 121 – 41 . (doi:10.1080/02602930600801878)
  • Coates , H. 2010 . Development of the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE) . Higher Education , 60 : 1 – 17 . (doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9281-2)
  • Corno , L. and Mandinach , E. 2004 . “ What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years ” . In In Big theories revisited , Edited by: McInerney , D. M. and Van Etten , S. 299 – 328 . Greenwich , CT : Information Age Publishing .
  • Dall'alba , G. and Barnacle , R. 2007 . An ontological turn for higher education . Studies in Higher Education , 32 : 679 – 91 . (doi:10.1080/03075070701685130)
  • Deci , E. L. and Ryan , R. M. 2000 . The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior . Psychological Inquiry , 11 : 227 – 68 . (doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01)
  • Fazey , D. M.A. and Fazey , J. A. 2001 . The potential for autonomy in learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students . Studies in Higher Education , 26 : 345 – 61 . (doi:10.1080/03075070120076309)
  • Finn , J. D. 1993 . School engagement and students at risk , Washington , DC : National Center for Education Statistics .
  • Forgas , J. P. 2000 . Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition , Edited by: Forgas , J. P. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Foucault , M. 1977 . Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison , New York : Vintage Books, 1995 .
  • Fredricks , J. A. , Blumenfeld , P. , Friedel , J. and Paris , A. 2005 . “ School engagement ” . In In What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development, ed. K.A. Moore and L.H. Lippman , 305 – 21 . New York : Springer .
  • Fredricks , J. A. , Blumenfeld , P. and Paris , A. 2004 . School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence . Review of Educational Research , 74 : 59 – 109 . (doi:10.3102/00346543074001059)
  • Furlong , M. , Whipple , A. , St Jean , G. , Simental , J. , Soliz , A. and Punthuna , S. 2003 . Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice . The California School Psychologist , 8 : 99 – 113 .
  • Geyer , F. 2001 . “ Sociology of alienation ” . In In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, ed. N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes , 388 – 92 . Oxford : Pergamon .
  • Gibbs , R. and Poskitt , J. 2010 . Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (years 7–10): A literature review , Wellington , , New Zealand : Ministry of Education . http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/schooling/74625/2
  • Gordon , J. , Ludlum , J. and Hoey , J. J. 2008 . Validating NSSE against student outcomes: Are they related? . Research in Higher Education , 49 : 19 – 39 . (doi:10.1007/s11162-007-9061-8)
  • Grace , A. and Gouthro , P. 2000 . Using models of feminist pedagogies to think about issues and directions in graduate education for women students . Studies in Continuing Education , 22 : 5 – 28 . (doi:10.1080/713695714)
  • Griffiths , D. S. , Winstanley , D. and Gabriel , Y. 2005 . Learning shock: The trauma of return to formal learning . Management Learning , 36 : 275 – 97 . (doi:10.1177/1350507605055347)
  • Haggis , T. 2004 . Meaning, identity and ‘motivation’: Expanding what matters in understanding learning in higher education? . Studies in Higher Education , 29 : 335 – 52 . (doi:10.1080/03075070410001682538)
  • Hand , L. and Bryson , C. 2008 . “ Conclusions and implications ” . In In SEDA special 22: Aspects of student engagement, ed. L. Hand and C. Bryson , 41 – 42 . Nottingham : Staff and Educational Development Association .
  • Harris , L. R. 2008 . A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning . The Australian Educational Researcher , 35 : 57 – 79 . (doi:10.1007/BF03216875)
  • Harris , R. , Bolander , K. , Lebrun , M. , Docq , F. and Bouvy , M. Linking perceptions of control and signs of engagement in the process and content of collaborative e-learning . Paper presented at Network Learning Conference . April 5–7 , Lancaster , United Kingdom.
  • Jimerson , S. , Campos , E. and Greif , J. 2003 . Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms . The California School Psychologist , 8 : 7 – 27 .
  • Johnson , D. R. , Soldner , M. , Leonard , J. B. , Alvarez , P. , Inkelas , K. K. , Rowan-Kenyon , H. T. and Longerbeam , S. D. 2007 . Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups . Journal of College Student Development , 48 : 525 – 42 . (doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0054)
  • Kember , D. , Lee , K. and Li , N. 2001 . Cultivating a sense of belonging in part-time students . International Journal of Lifelong Education , 20 : 326 – 41 .
  • Kezar , A. and Kinzie , J. 2006 . Examining the ways institutions create student engagement: The role of mission . Journal of College Student Development , 47 : 149 – 72 . (doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0018)
  • Korzekwa, A.M. 2007. An examination of the predictive validity of National Survey of Student Engagement benchmarks and scalelets. MA diss., University of New Mexico
  • Krause , K. 2005 . “ Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied? Deconstructing the 21st century undergraduate student ” . In Paper presented at the Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students Symposium, September 21–22, in Queensland, Australia
  • Kuh , G. D. 2001 . The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties , Bloomington , IN : Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research & Planning .
  • Kuh , G. D. 2009a . The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations . New Directions for Institutional Research , 141 : 5 – 20 .
  • Kuh , G. D. 2009b . What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement . Journal of College Student Development , 50 : 683 – 706 .
  • LaNasa , S. M. , Cabrera , A. F. and Trangsrud , H. 2009 . The construct validity of student engagement: A confirmatory factor analysis approach . Research in Higher Education , 50 : 315 – 32 . (doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9123-1)
  • Lawrence , J. Engaging first year students: A collaborative approach implemented in a first year nursing course . Paper presented at 9th Pacific Rim conference – first year in higher education: Engaging students . July 12–14 , Gold Coast , Australia.
  • Lear , J. , Ansorge , C. and Steckelberg , A. 2010 . Interactivity/community process model for the online education environment . MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching , 6, http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/lear_0310.htm
  • Libbey , H. P. 2004 . Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement . Journal of School Health , 74 : 274 – 83 . (doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08284.x)
  • Llorens , S. , Schaufeli , W. , Bakker , A. and Salanova , M. 2007 . Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? . Computers in Human Behavior , 23 : 825 – 41 . (doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012)
  • Mann , S. 2001 . Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement . Studies in Higher Education , 26 : 7 – 19 . (doi:10.1080/03075070020030689)
  • McInnis , C. 2001 . “ Signs of disengagement? The changing undergraduate experience in Australian universities: Inaugural professorial lecture ” . Melbourne , , Australia : Centre for the Study of Higher Education .
  • McMahon , B. and Portelli , J. 2004 . Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement . Leadership and Policy in Schools , 3 : 59 – 76 . (doi:10.1076/lpos.3.1.59.27841)
  • Mercer , J. 2007 . Re-negotiating the self through educational development: Mature students' experiences . Research in Post-Compulsory Education , 12 : 19 – 32 . (doi:10.1080/13596740601155314)
  • National Survey of Student Engagement . 2010 . “ Benchmarks of effective educational practice ” . Bloomington , IN : Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/nsse_benchmarks.pdf .
  • Nelson Laird , T. , Shoup , R. , Kuh , G. and Schwarz , M. 2008 . The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes . Research in Higher Education , 49 : 469 – 94 . (doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9088-5)
  • Newmann , F. M. , Wehlage , G. G. and Lamborn , S. 1992 . “ The significance and sources of student engagement ” . In In Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, ed. F.M. Newmann , 11 – 39 . New York : Teachers College Press .
  • Nystrand , M. and Gamoran , A. 1991 . Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement . Research in the Teaching of English , 25 : 261 – 90 .
  • Pascarella , E. T. and Terenzini , P. T. 2005 . How college affects students: A third decade of research , Vol. 2 , San Francisco , CA : Jossey-Bass .
  • Payne , S. L. , Kleine , K. L.M. , Purcell , J. and Carter , G. R. 2005 . Evaluating academic challenge beyond the NSSE . Innovative Higher Education , 30 : 129 – 46 . (doi:10.1007/s10755-005-5015-2)
  • Pike , G. 2006 . The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores . Journal of College Student Development , 47 : 550 – 63 . (doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0061)
  • Pike , G. , Smart , J. , Kuh , G. and Hayek , J. 2006 . Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? . Research in Higher Education , 47 : 847 – 72 . (doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9018-3)
  • Poropat , A. 2009 . A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance . Psychological Bulletin , 135 : 322 – 38 . (doi:10.1037/a0014996)
  • Porter , S. R. Forthcoming . Do college student surveys have any validity? . Review of Higher Education ,
  • Riggs , E. G. and Gholar , C. R. 2009 . Strategies that promote student engagement , 2 , Thousand Oaks , CA : Corwin Press .
  • Roth , J. and Damico , S. B. 1996 . Review: Continuing the bifurcation of affect and cognition . Curriculum Inquiry , 26 : 89 – 99 . (doi:10.2307/1179903)
  • Smith , R. 2007 . An overview of research on student support: Helping students to achieve or achieving institutional targets? Nurture or de-nature? . Teaching in Higher Education , 12 : 683 – 95 . (doi:10.1080/13562510701596240)
  • Solomonides , I. and Martin , P. 2008 . “ All this talk of engagement is making me itch: An investigation into the conceptions of ‘engagement’ held by students and tutors ” . In In SEDA special 22: Aspects of student engagement, ed. L. Hand and C. Bryson , 14 – 21 . Nottingham : Staff and Educational Development Association .
  • Solomonides , I. and Reid , A. Understanding the relationships between student identity and engagement with studies . Paper presented at Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia conference . July 6–9 , Darwin .
  • Stalker , J. 2001 . Misogyny, women, and obstacles to tertiary education: A vile situation . Adult Education Quarterly , 51 : 288 – 305 . (doi:10.1177/07417130122087304)
  • Thomas , L. 2002 . Student retention in higher education: The role of institutional habitus . Journal of Education Policy , 17 : 423 – 42 . (doi:10.1080/02680930210140257)
  • Tinto , V. 1975 . Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research . Review of Educational Research , 45 : 89 – 125 . (doi:10.3102/00346543045001089)
  • Trowler , V. and Trowler , P. 2010 . Student engagement evidence summary , York , UK : Higher Education Academy .
  • Wang , M. and Holcombe , R. 2010 . Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school . American Educational Research Journal , 47 : 633 – 62 . (doi:10.3102/0002831209361209)
  • Wefald , A. J. and Downey , R. G. 2009 . Construct dimensionality of engagement and its relation with satisfaction . Journal of Psychology , 143 : 91 – 112 . (doi:10.3200/JRLP.143.1.91-112)
  • Yorke , M. 2000 . The quality of the student experience: What can institutions learn from data relating to non-completion? . Quality in Higher Education , 6 : 61 – 75 . (doi:10.1080/13538320050001072)
  • Yorke , M. and Knight , P. 2004 . Self-theories: Some implications for teaching and learning in higher education . Studies in Higher Education , 29 : 25 – 37 . (doi:10.1080/1234567032000164859)
  • Zepke , N. 2011 . Understanding teaching, motivation and external influences in student engagement: How can complexity thinking help? . Research in Post-Compulsory Education , 16 : 1 – 13 . (doi:10.1080/13596748.2011.549721)
  • Zepke , N. and Leach , L. 2010a . Beyond hard outcomes:‘Soft'outcomes and engagement as student success . Teaching in Higher Education , 15 : 661 – 73 . (doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.522084)
  • Zepke , N. 2010b . Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action . Active Learning in Higher Education , 11 : 167 – 77 . (doi:10.1177/1469787410379680)
  • Zepke , N. , Leach , L. and Butler , P. 2010a . Engagement in post-compulsory education: Students’ motivation and action . Research in Post-Compulsory Education , 15 : 1 – 17 . (doi:10.1080/13596740903565269)
  • Zepke , N. 2010b . Student engagement: What is it and what influences it? , Wellington , , New Zealand : Teaching and Learning Initiative .
  • Zepke , N. 2011 . Non-institutional influences and student perceptions of success . Studies in Higher Education , 36 : 227 – 42 . (doi:10.1080/03075070903545074)
  • Zhao , C. and Kuh , G. 2004 . Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement . Research in Higher Education , 45 : 115 – 38 . (doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de)
  • Zyngier , D. 2008 . (Re)conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time . Teaching and Teacher Education , 24 : 1765 – 76 . (doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.