Performance dialogs implemented in a Finnish university

References

• Analoui, F., and P. Fell 2002. Have you been appraised? A survey of the university administrative staff. International Journal of Educational Management 16, no. 6: 279–87. doi: 10.1108/09513540210441236
   Google Scholar
• Asmu--, B 2008. Performance appraisal interviews: Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication 45, no. 4: 408–429. doi: 10.1177/0021943608319382
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, L.E., and J.F. Brett 2005. Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360[degrees] feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior 66, no. 3: 532–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumfield, V.M., E. Hall, S. Higgins, and K. Wall 2009. Catalytic tools: Understanding the interaction of enquiry and feedback in teachers' learning. European Journal of Teacher Education. 32, no. 4: 423–35.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M.E., and J.T. Karlsen 2012. An evaluation of management training and coaching. Journal of Workplace Learning 24, no. 3: 177–99. doi: 10.1108/13665621211209267
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J.A. 2005. A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. International Journal of Educational Management 19, no. 3: 218–32. doi: 10.1108/09513540510591002
   Google Scholar
• Boleman, L.G., and T.E. Deal 2006. Battles and beliefs: Rethinking the roles of today's leaders. Leadership in Action 26, no. 4: 3–7. doi: 10.1002/lia.1170
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P.W., W.G. Stephan, and J. Loveland 1986. Performance appraisal behaviors: Supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology 39, no. 3: 579–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00954.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J.J. 2006. Transactional, transformational, and transcendent leadership: Metaphors mapping the evolution of the theory and practice of governance. Leadership Review 6, spring: 62–76
   Google Scholar
• Goomas, D.T., S.M. Smith, and T.D. Ludwig 2011. Business activity monitoring: Real-time group goals and feedback using an overhead scoreboard in a distribution center. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 31, no. 3: 196–209. doi: 10.1080/01608061.2011.589715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G., and M. Uhl-Bien 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2: 219–47. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G.B. ed. 2003. Role making onto the starting work team using LMX leadership. Diversity as an asset. Dealing with diversity. LMX leadership: The series. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M.J., M. Kostera, and A.K. Kozminski 2005. The three faces of leadership: Manager, artist, priest. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hensel, R., F. Meijers, R. van der Leeden, and J. Kessels 2010. 360 degree feedback: How many raters are needed for reliable ratings on the capacity to develop competences, with personal qualities as developmental goal. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2, no. 15: 2813–30. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2010.528664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., and J. Shields 2011. Lessons from management–union partnership in teacher performance appraisal in the New South Wales public education system. International Journal of Human Resource Management 18, no. 7: 1214–27. doi: 10.1080/09585190701392048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, S., and E. Keskinen 2005. Kehityskeskustelu osana johtamista. [A PD as part of leading]. In Kehitystä ja keskustelua. Kehityskeskustelun mahdollisuudet yliopistotyössä [Development and discussion. The possibilities of PDs at the university], ed. Soili Keskinen, and Esko Keskinen, Series of the Head's office 2: 11–29. Turku: University of Turku
   Google Scholar
• Kariluoma, N., K. Rehnbäck, H. Heinonen, H. Vene, and S. Keskinen 2012. Demograafisten muuttujien merkitys esimies-alaissuhteen rakentumiselle, [The meaning of demographic variables when creating supervisor–employee relationship] (manuscript)
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen, S 2005a. Tutkimus alaistaidoista kunnissa, [Research about subordinate skills in municipalities]. Foundation of Municipal Development, publication 49, Helsinki. http://www.polemiikki.fi/files/library/attachments/verkkoutkimusjulkaisut49.pdf (accessed 8 February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen, S 2005b. Kehityskeskustelu yliopistokäytössä [PD practices at the University]. In Kehitystä ja keskustelua. Kehityskeskustelun mahdollisuudet yliopistotyössä. [Development and discussion. The possibilities of PDs at the university], ed. Soili Keskinen, and Esko Keskinen, Series of the Head's office 2: 3–8. Turku: University of Turku
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen, S., and A. Paalumäki 2007. Esimieskoulutuksen tarve ja motiivit akateemisessa työympäristössä, [The need and motive for leadership training at an academic work environment]. University of Helsinki, Human Resources and Legal Issues. Publications of University, Administration, 39
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B 2011. Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education 36, no. 1: 57–73. doi: 10.1080/03075070903443734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K 2000. The teaching of leadership on UK MBA programmes. A critical analysis from an international perspective. Journal of Management Development 19, no. 4: 297–308. doi: 10.1108/02621710010322652
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, R.A., and K.C. McCuistion 2010. Management, supervision, and leadership principles and skills: Implementation is the challenge. Rangelands 32, no. 4: 21–25. doi: 10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-10-00037.1
   Google Scholar
• Mills, D.Q. 2005. Asian and American leadership styles: How are they unique?. Working and Knowledge for Business Leaders, Harvard Business School 27, http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/4869.html (accessed 11 August 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Mo, K.W., R. Conners, and J. McCormick 1998. A study of the effectiveness of teacher appraisal in Hong Kong self-managing schools. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12, no. 1: 19–42. doi: 10.1023/A:1007912532307
   Google Scholar
• Narcisse, S, and M. Harcourt 2008. Employee fairness of performance appraisal: A Saint Lucian case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, no. 6: 1152–69. doi: 10.1080/09585190802051451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndambakuwa, Y., and J. Mufunda. 2006. Performance appraisal system impact on university academic staff job satisfaction and productivity. Performance Improvement Quarterly 19, no. 1: 117–26
   Google Scholar
• Öberg, J-H 2004. From performance dialog to salary discussions. Acatiimi 4, 1
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, H, and F. Yitzhak 2012. National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology 97, no. 2: 448–59. doi: 10.1037/a0026011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, M 2005. Main principles and practices in leader development. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 26, no. 1: 62–75. doi: 10.1108/01437730510575598
   Google Scholar
• Reinke, S.J. 2003. Does the form really matter?. Review of Public Personnel Administration 23, no. 1: 23–37. doi: 10.1177/0734371X02250109
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., D. W. Organ, and J. P. Near. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology 68, no. 4: 653–63
   Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D, and J.A. Halco 1992. Performance appraisal of managers: Goal interdependence, ratings, and outcomes. Journal of Social Psychology 132, no. 5: 629–39. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1992.9713902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki 2012a. Guidelines of developmental discussions for supervisors. https://alma.helsinki.fi/download/2000000157016/kehityskeskusteluohje2011.pdf (accessed 8 February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki 2012b. Developmental discussions. https://alma.helsinki.fi/doclink/82946 (accessed 8 February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• University of Turku 2012. Supporting performance dialogs. utu.fi/intranet/palveluhakemisto/kehity esimiehenä/kehityskeskustelujen tuki (accessed 4 June 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Wink, H 2007. Kehityskeskustelu dialogina ja diskursiivisina puhekäytäntöinä. Tapaustutkimus kehityskeskustelusta metsäteollisuuden organisaatiossa. [PD as a dialog and discursive speech. A case study from forest industry.] University of Tampere. Faculty of Educational Sciences, 1238. Academic dissertation
   Google Scholar