Knowledge construction in online learning communities: a case study of a doctoral course

References

• Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D.R. Garrison, and W. Archer. 2001. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5, no. 2: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Croll, P. 1986. Systematic classroom observation. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Laat, M., and V. Lally. 2003. Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science 31, no. 1: 7–39. doi: 10.1023/A:1022596100142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., H. Van Keer, T. Schellens, and M. Valcke. 2010. Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior 26: 516–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgar, Frank. 2003. PhD degree completion in Canadian universities. Halifax, Canada: Graduate Students’ Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, M., S. Santo, and R. Yost. 2008. Knowledge building in an online cohort. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 9, no. 2: 151–67.
   Google Scholar
• Finegold, A. and L. Cooke. 2006. Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups. Internet and Higher Education 9: 201–15. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. and M. Riel. 2005. Collaborative online continuing education: Professional development through learning communities. Edutopia: http://www.edutopia.org/php/article.php?id=Art_481&key=338.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2001. Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15, no. 1: 7–23. doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., and J.B. Arbaugh. 2007. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education 10, no. 3: 157–72. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., and M. Cleveland-Innes. 2005. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education 19, no. 3: 133–48. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C.N., C. Lowe, and T. Anderson. 1997. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17, no. 4: 397–431. doi: 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjioannou, X., N. Shelton, D. Fu, and J. Dhanarattigannon. 2007. The road to a doctoral degree: Co-travelers through a perilous passage. College Student Journal 41, no. 1: 160–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, Kai, Tuire Palonen, Sami Paavola, and Erno Lehtenen. 2004. Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., C.J. Bonk, and C. Angeli. 2000. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science 28, no. 2: 115–52. doi: 10.1023/A:1003764722829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, no. 1: 81–112.
   Google Scholar
• Henri, F. 1992. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, ed. A.R. Kay, 117–36. Vol. 90. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K.H., and W.S. Cheung. 2011. Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: An analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instructional Science 39: 303–19. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9129-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C., and R. Pea. 2002. Findings the ties that bind: Tools in support of a knowledge-building community. In Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace, ed. K. Renninger, and W. Shumar, 321–54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hortsmanshof, Louise, and Linda Conrad. 2003. Postgraduate peer support programme: Enhancing community. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference: Learning for an unknown future, July 6–9, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A.C. 2003. The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. American Journal of Distance Education 17, no. 1: 25–43. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_3
   Google Scholar
• Kanuka, H., L. Rourke, and E. Laflamme. 2007. The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, no. 2: 260–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., and C. Hoadley. 2009. Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development 57, no. 4: 487–510. doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9120-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton, D. 2001. Promoting durable knowledge construction through online discussion. In Proceedings of the Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. ERIC document 463724.
   Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., P.A. Kirschner, and W. Jochems. 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior 19, no. 3: 335–53. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K.W. 1997. Computer-mediated communication for teenage students: A content analysis of a student messaging system. Education and Information Technologies 2: 31–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1018632406975
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K.W. 2009. Knowledge construction in an online learning environment: A case study of a doctoral course. Paper presented at the International Council of Distance Education Conference, June 7–9, in Maastricht, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K.W. 2011a. Developing learning communities in distance online courses: Pedagogical and community building strategies. In Experiential learning in virtual worlds: Opening an undiscovered country, ed. P. Jerry and L. Lindsey, 1–10. Freeland (UK): Inter-Disciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K.W. 2011b. Using collaborative peer feedback and supervision to support doctoral research at a distance. In Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (Ascilite) Conference, ed. G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown and B. Cleland, 747–57. Hobart, Australia: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Kwok Wing, Keryn Pratt, Megan Anderson, and Julie Stigter. 2006. Literature review and synthesis: Online community of practice. Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B., and C. Nelson. 2000. The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe 86, no. 6: 44–50. doi: 10.2307/40251951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. 2005. Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensure timely completions. Teaching in Higher Education 10, no. 2: 219–33. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000337963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, R., J.L. Moore, and A. Klimczak. 2004. Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research & Development 52, no. 2: 23–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02504837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., and J. Luca. 1999. Lonely outpourings or reasoned dialogue? An analysis of text-based conferencing as a tool to support learning. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE '99), 217–28. Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, D.W., and D.M. Chavis. 1986. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology 14, no. 1: 6–23. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, Barbara, Yukie Toyama, Robert Murphy, Marianne Bakia, and Karla Jones. 2009. Evaluation of evidence based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J.L., and R.M. Marra. 2005. A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38, no. 2: 191–212. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782456
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, H., and W. Ng. 2009. Fostering online social construction of science knowledge with primary pre-service teachers working in virtual teams. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 37, no. 4: 379–98. doi: 10.1080/13598660903050336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nor, N., N. Razak, and J. Aziz. 2010. E-learning: Analysis of online discussion forums in promoting knowledge construction through collaborative learning. WSEAS Transactions on Communication 9, no. 1: 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K., and C. Clark. 2009. A signature pedagogy in doctoral education: The leader-scholar community. Educational Researcher 38, no. 3: 216–21. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09334207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W., and D. Levine-Donnerstein. 1999. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research 27, no. 3: 258–84. doi: 10.1080/00909889909365539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhalto, K., J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2009. Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal of Academic Development 14, no. 3: 221–32. doi: 10.1080/13601440903106551
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., and T. Anderson. 2002. Using peer teams to lead online discussions. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, no. 1: 1–21. doi: 10.5334/2002-1
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., and H. Kanuka. 2009. Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education 23, no. 1: 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., and C. Bereiter. 2006. Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In The Cambridge handbook of the leaning sciences, ed. R. Sawyer, 97–115. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schellens, T., H. Van Keer, and M. Valcke. 2005. The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel analysis. Small Group Research 36: 704–45. doi: 10.1177/1046496405281771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrire, S. 2004. Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science 32, no. 6: 475–502. doi: 10.1007/s11251-004-2518-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., C.S. Li, and A. Pickett. 2006. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education 9: 175–90. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Shen, D., P. Nuankhieo, X. Huang, C. Amelung, and J. Laffey. 2008. Using social network analysis to understand sense of community in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research 39, no. 1: 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C.H., and M. Corry. 2001. A paradigm shift for online community research. Distance Education 22, no. 2: 245–63. doi: 10.1080/0158791010220205
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-T., T. Newby, and R. Bill. 2005. Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education 19, no. 3: 163–181.
   Google Scholar