One university's approach to defining and supporting professional doctorates

References

• Baltes, B., P. Hoffman-Kipp, L. Lynn, and L. Weltzer-Ward. 2010. Students’ research self-efficacy during online doctoral research courses. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 3: 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, K. 2012. Ending the first Ed.D. program. Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/03/29/country's-oldest-edd-program-will-close-down
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E.L. 1997. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bourner, T., and P. Simpson. 2005. Practitioner-centred research and the PhD Action Learning. Research and Practice 2:133–51.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., and S. Sieminski. 2006. The challenge of a distance learning professional doctorate in education. Open Learning 21: 59–69. doi: 10.1080/02680510500472239
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D. 2006. Insider action research doctorates: Generating actionable knowledge. Higher Education 54: 293–306. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-5450-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declercq, E., K. Caldwell, S.H. Hobbs, and B. Guyer. 2008. The changing pattern of doctoral education in public health from 1985 to 2006 and the challenge of doctoral training for practice and leadership. American Journal of Public Health 98: 1565–69. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.117481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, H.M., and M.E. Smith Glasgow. 2011. Global perspectives on the professional doctorate. International Journal of Nursing Studies 48: 403–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenge, L.A. 2009. Professional doctorates—A better route for researching professionals? Social Work Education 28: 165–76. doi: 10.1080/02615470701865733
   Google Scholar
• Fink, D. 2006. The professional doctorate: Its relativity to the PhD and relevance for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 1: 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S.K. 2009. The development of doctoral students: Phases of challenge and support. ASHE Higher Education Report (vol. 34, number 6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, T.G., and U. Hoppe 2009. The business professional doctorate as an informing channel: A survey and analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 4: 28–57.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B.D. 2010. Getting to finished: Strategies to ensure completion of the doctoral dissertation. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 3: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kärner, A., and V. Puura. 2008. Doctoral education in transition to knowledge-based society. TRAMES 12: 95–109. doi: 10.3176/tr.2008.1.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, H., M. Gardiner, and K. Marshall. 2008. Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research and Development 27: 77–89. doi: 10.1080/07294360701658781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., M. Brennan, and B. Green. 2009. Re-imagining doctoral education: Professional doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research and Development 28: 275–87. doi: 10.1080/07294360902839883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, S. 2004. Conceptualizing the practitioner doctorate. Studies in Higher Education 29: 757–70. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000287249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhauser, L., D. Richardson, S. Mackenzie, and M. Minkler. 2007. Advancing transdisciplinary and translational research practice: Issues and models of doctoral education in public health. Journal of Research Practice 3, no. 2: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 2005. Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and PhDs compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27: 173–88. doi: 10.1080/13600800500120027
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J.A., and D.G. Imig. 2008. A stewardship of practice in education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning (November/December): 42–50. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.40.6.42-49
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, G., and R. Davies. 2009. Second generation professional doctorates in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies 46: 1265–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiterer, U. 2008. Concluding summary. Form follows function: Research, the knowledge economy, and the features of doctoral education. Higher Education in Europe 133: 149–57.
   Google Scholar
• Servage, L. 2009. Alternative and professional doctoral programs: What is driving the demand? Studies in Higher Education 34: 765–79. doi: 10.1080/03075070902818761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, M. 2004. Doctoring the knowledge worker. Studies in Continuing Education 26: 431–41. doi: 10.1080/0158037042000265971
   Google Scholar
• Usher, R. 2002. A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy? Higher Education Research and Development 21: 143–53. doi: 10.1080/07294360220144060
   Google Scholar
• Walden University. 2011. Litmus test for a doctoral-level research problem. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Walden University. 2012. Professional doctorates: Literature, history and recommendations. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 2008. Doctoral education in the United States of America. Higher Education in Europe 33: 35–43. doi: 10.1080/03797720802228142
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G.E., C.M. Golde, L. Jones, A. Conklin-Bueschel, and P. Hutchings. 2009. The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wikeley, F., and Y. Muschamp. 2004. Pedagogical implications of working with doctoral students at a distance. Distance Education 25: 125–42. doi: 10.1080/0158791042000212495
   Google Scholar