Fostering interdisciplinary research in universities: a case study of leadership, alignment and support

References

• Basadur, M.S. 2004. Leading others to think innovatively together. Creative Leadership. Leadership Quarterly 15: 103–21. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B.M. 1990. Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, R., and J. Mouton. 1961. Group dynamics – Key to decision making. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boix Mansilla, V., and H. Gardner. 2003. Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier. An empirical exploration of ‘symptoms of quality’. Paris: CNRS and Institut Nicod. http://www.interdisciplines.org.
   Google Scholar
• Branscomb, L., G. Holton, and G. Sonnert. 2001. Cutting edge basic research in the service of public objectives: A blueprint for an intellectually bold and socially beneficial science policy. Consortium for Science Policy Outcomes, Arizona State University, May 2001. http://www.cspo.org/products/reports/scienceforsociety.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 1993. A typology of multidisciplinary education in gerontology and geriatrics: are we really doing what we say we are? Journal of Interprofessional Care 7, no. 3: 217–27. doi: 10.3109/13561829309014986
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., B. Holbrook, and P. Atkinson. 1996. Qualitative data analysis: Technologies and representations. Sociological Research Online 1, no. 1. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html (accessed July 10, 2012). doi: 10.5153/sro.1
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J., C. Pearce, and M. Perry. 2003. Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can enhance new product development team dynamics and effectiveness. In C.L. Pearce and J.A. Conger, Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 8–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drath, W. 2001. The deep blue sea: Rethinking the source of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Drath, W., C. McCauley, P. Paulus, E. Velsor, P. O'Connor, and J. McGuire. 2008. Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 19: 635–53. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes, T., P. Rodgers, and M. Smyth. 2009. Towards a new disciplinary framework for contemporary creative design practice. CoDesign 5, no. 2: 99–116. doi: 10.1080/15710880902910417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, F.E. 1967. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. 2004. Social creativity: Turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices, 1: 152–61. doi: 10.1145/1011870.1011889
   Google Scholar
• Fu, P.P., and G. Yukl. 2000. Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the United States and China. The Leadership Quarterly 11, no. 2: 252–66. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00039-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., J.K. Hazy, and B. Lichtenstein. 2010. Complexity and the nexus of leadership: Leveraging nonlinear science to create ecologies of innovation. Englewood Cliffs: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Great Western University. 2010. Organisational structures: Proposals for change. Anonymous, online.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G., P. Medhurst, and T. Green. 2006. Interdisciplinarity in interdisciplinary research programmes in the UK. University of Hull. http://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/Interdisciplinarity_UK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. 2002. Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 13: 423–51. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersey, P., and K. Blanchard. 1988. Management of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• House, R.J. 1971. A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 16: 321–38. doi: 10.2307/2391905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi K., J. Klein, H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2010. Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy 39, no. 1: 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. 1996. Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. 2008. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35, no. 2S: S116–S123. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, B., M. Uhl-Bien, R. Marion, A. Seers, J.D. Orten, and C. Schreiber. 2006. Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emergence: Complexity & Organization 8: 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, S., and K.J. Gergen. 1999. Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, N., and R.N. Zare. 1999. Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality. Science 283, no. 5402: 642–43. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5402.642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. 2004. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., and J. Conger. 2003. All those years ago. The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, ed. C. Pearce and J. Conger, 1–18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pirrie, A., V. Wilson, J. Elsegood, J. Hall, S. Hamilton, R. Harden, D. Lee, and J. Stead. 1998. Evaluating multidisciplinary education in health care. Edinburgh: SCRE.
   Google Scholar
• Pisapia, J. 2009. The strategic leader. Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pisapia, J., T. Townsend, and J. Razzaq. 2013. University efforts to support interdisciplinary research: Leadership and unintended consequences. Glasgow: Adam Smith Research Foundation, University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., S.M. MacKenzie, J. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzaq, J., Pisapia, J., & Townsend, T. 2013. Towards an understanding of interdisciplinarity: The case of a British university. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies.
   Google Scholar
• REF 2014. 2011. Assessment framework and guidance on submissions (REF 2 July 2011). http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2011-02/ (accessed September 2, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Salter, L., and A. Hearn. 1996. Interdisciplinarity. In Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research, ed. L. Salter and A. Hearn. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 26–43.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R., and M. Stauffacher. 2010. Goals, functions and products of transdisciplinarity. Key note presentation at TD Conference 2012: Implementation in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research, Practice and Teaching. http://www.transdisciplinarity.ch/e/Network/international/2010/index.php (accessed April 13, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., K. Hall, B. Taylor, and R. Moser. 2008. The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35: S77–S89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., S. Misra, R. Moser, K. Hall, and B. Taylor. 2008. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35: S96–S115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M. 2006. Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly 17: 654–76. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., R. Marion, and B. McKelvey. 2007. Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly 18: 298–318. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, S., and I. Shankar. 2008. Adventures in transdisciplinary learning. Studies in Higher Education 33, no. 50: 551–65. doi: 10.1080/03075070802373008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar