Publishing not perishing: how research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews

References

• Aitchison, C., and A. Lee. 2006. “Research Writing: Problems and Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 265–78. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., J. Catterall, P. Ross, and S. Burgin. 2012. “‘Tough Love and Tears’: Learning Doctoral Writing in the Sciences.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (4): 435–47. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.559195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, and H. R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to Meta-analysis. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bretag, T. 2012. “Publish or Perish: Ramifications for Online Academic Publishing.” In Misbehaviour Online in Higher Education, edited by L. A. Wankel and C. Wankel, 11–24. London: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell Collaboration. 2012. “About Us.” Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/about_us/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• CEBC (Centre for Evidence Based Conservation). 2010. “Guidelines for Systematic Review in Environmental Management.” Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. www.environmentalevidence.org/Authors.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane Collaboration. 2012. “Cochrane Reviews.” Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. A., and B. C. J. M. Fauser. 2005. “Balancing the Strengths of Systematic and Narrative Reviews.” Human Reproductive Update 11 (2): 103–104. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 2000. “The Relevance of Systematic Reviews to Educational Policy and Practice.” Oxford Review of Education 26 (3–4): 356–78. doi: 10.1080/713688543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2010. “Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data.” PLOS ONE 5: e10271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. N., C. D. Johnson, and A. Adams. 2006. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 5 (3): 101–17. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. 2009. “American and Australian Doctoral Literature Reviewing Practices and Pedagogies.” Doctor of Philosophy diss., Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Guitart, D., C.M. Pickering, and J. Byrne. 2012. “Past Results and Future Directions in Urban Community Garden Research.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11 (4): 364–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2001. “On ‘Systematic’ Reviews of Research Literatures: A ‘Narrative’ Response to Evans and Benfield.” British Educational Research Journal 27 (5): 543–54. doi: 10.1080/01411920120095726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J.P.T., and S. Green, eds. 2009. “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.” Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B. 2008. “Rethinking Doctoral Publication Practices: Writing From and Beyond the Thesis.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 283–94. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D.A. 2004. “The Scientific Impact of Nations: What Different Countries Get for their Research Spending.” Nature 430 (6997): 311–16. doi: 10.1038/430311a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P.A. 2003. “The Politics of Publication: Authors, Reviewers and Editors Must Act to Protect the Quality of Research.” Nature 422 (6926): 259–61. doi: 10.1038/422259a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M.R. 2004. “Academic Literacies: A Pedagogy for Course Design.” Studies in Higher Education 29 (6): 741–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M., and B. Street. 1998. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–72.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, J.D., R. Tierney, and S.T. Walsh. 2011. “Publish or Perish: How are Research and Reputation Related?” Serials Review 37 (4): 244–57. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2011.10765398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, I., L. Steckley, and R. Murray. 2012. “Time is not Enough: Promoting Strategic Engagement with Writing for Publication.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 641–54. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.527934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, M.R., C.M. Rickard, and R. Jones. 2006. “Publish or Perish: A Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Academic Publications Rates.” Higher Education Research & Development 25 (1): 19–35. doi: 10.1080/07294360500453053
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, C., and F. Nozza. 2008. “Objective Assessment of Scientific Performances World-wide.” Scientometrics 76 (3): 527–41. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1786-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, D., M. Egan, V. Hamilton, and M. Petticrew. 2004. “Promoting Walking and Cycling as an Alternative to Using Cars: Systematic Review.” British Medical Journal 329 (7469): 763–66. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M. 2001. “Systematic Reviews from Astronomy to Zoology: Myths and Misconceptions.” British Medical Journal 322 (7278): 98–101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7278.98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., and J. Byrne. 2013. “The Benefits of Publishing Systematic Quantitative Reviews for PhD Candidates and other Early Career Researchers.” Higher Education Research & Development. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C.M., and W. Hill. 2007. “Impacts of Recreation and Tourism on Plant Biodiversity and Vegetation in Protected Areas in Australia.” Journal of Environmental Management 85 (4): 791–800. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, J. 2009. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 14. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=13.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, L., and P. Kanowski. 2008. “PhD by Publication: A Student's Perspective.” Journal of Research Practice 4 (2): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., C. Pickering, and J. Byrne. 2012. “A Systematic Quantitative Review of Urban Tree Benefits, Costs, and Assessment Methods Across Cities in Different Climatic Zones.” Urban Forest and Urban Greening 11 (4): 351–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, R.D., P. Foland, and R. Gorelsky. 2009. “Do New SCI Journals have a Different National Bias?” Scientometrics 79 (2): 351–63. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0423-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven, R., C.M. Pickering, and G. Castley. 2011. “A Review of the Impacts of Nature-based Recreation on Birds.” Journal of Environmental Management 92 (10): 2287–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2002. “Quality Assurance Issues for a PhD by Published Work: A Case Study.” Quality Assurance in Education 10 (2): 71–78. doi: 10.1108/09684880210423555
   Google Scholar
• Young, N.S., J.P.A. Ioannidis, and O. Al-Ubaydli. 2008. “Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science.” PLOS Medicine 5 (10): 1418–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar