Learning through observing peers in practice

References

• Bell, Maureen. 2002. “Peer Observation of Teaching in Australia.” Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre. http://www.jisctechdis.ac.uk/assets/Documents/resources/Peer_observation_of_teaching_in_Australia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Maureen, and Paul Cooper. 2013. “Peer Observation of Teaching in University Departments: A Framework for Implementation.” International Journal for Academic Development 18 (1): 60–73. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.633753
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Amani, and Rosina Mladenovic. 2008. “The Benefits of Peer Observation of Teaching for Tutor Development.” Higher Education 55 (6): 735–52. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, Stephen. 2001. “Participation and Continuity at Work: A Critique of Current Workplace Learning Discourses.” In Context, Power and Perspective: Confronting the Challenges to Improving Attainment in Learning at Work. Joint Network/SKOPE/TLRP International Workshop, Sunley Management Centre, University College of Northampton, November 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome. 1990. Acts of Meaning: Four Lectures on Mind and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Conor, and Deirdre O'Loughlin. 2014. “Peer Observation of Teaching: Enhancing Academic Engagement for New Participants.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 51 (4): 446–56. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2013.778067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosh, Jill. 1999. “Peer Observation: A Reflective Model.” ELT Journal 53 (1): 22–27. doi: 10.1093/elt/53.1.22
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, Amy C. 2007. “Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Lens.” In Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, edited by Roderick M. Kramer and Karen S. Cook, 239–72. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Rod. 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: Benjamin Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–33. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–522. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage. 1990. “Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, David. 2002. “Models of Peer Observation of Teaching.” Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre. http://learningandteaching.vu.edu.au/teaching_practice/improve_my_teaching/evaluation_support_for_my_teaching/Resources/id200_Models_of_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, Linda, and Paul Orsmond. 2004. “Evaluating Our Peers: Is Peer Observation a Meaningful Process?” Studies in Higher Education 29 (4): 489–503. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000236380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, Linda, and Paul Orsmond. 2005. “Reflecting on Reflective Practices within Peer Observation.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (2): 213–24. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, Christian, Marcus Sanchez Svensson, Jon Hindmarsh, Paul Luff, and Dirk Vom Lehn. 2002. “Configuring Awareness.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11 (3/4): 317–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1021247413718
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Translated and edited by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, Graham D., and Gary R. Oliver. 2012. “Seeing is Believing: The Benefits of Peer Observation.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 9 (1): Article 7. http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol9/iss1/7
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Pat. 1998. The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine their Teaching to Advance Practice and Improve Student Learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Brigett. 1989. “Cosmopolitan Obstetrics: Some Insights from the Training of Traditional Midwives.” Social Science and Medicine 28 (9): 925–44. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90317-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, Ailbhe, Eamonn Mitchell, Déirdre Ní Chróinína, Elaine Vaughan, and Elaine Murtagh. 2014. “‘In Their Shoes’: Exploring a Modified Approach to Peer Observation of Teaching in a University Setting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 51 (2): 218–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, Michael, Virginia Eatough, and Mike Osborn. 2011. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and Embodied, Active, Situated Cognition.” Theory & Psychology 21 (3): 318–37. doi: 10.1177/0959354310377544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean. 2011. Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, Ference. 1981. “Phenomenography – Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10 (2): 177–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael. 2011. Passibility: At the Limits of the Constructivist Metaphor. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael, and Kenneth Tobin. 2002. At the Elbow of Another: Learning to Teach by Coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary.’” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation 1964–1972, Volume I & II. Translated and edited by Gail Jefferson. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shortland, Sue. 2004. “Peer Observation: A Tool for Staff Development or Compliance?” Journal of Further and Higher Education 28 (2): 219–28. doi: 10.1080/0309877042000206778
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee. 1993. “Teaching as Community Property: Putting an End to Pedagogical Solitude.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 25 (6): 6–7. http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/vchn20/25/6
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1995. “Machine as Mind.” In Android Epistemology, edited by Kenneth M. Ford, Clark Glymour, and Patrick J. Hayes, 23–40. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Susan R., Natalie R. Nielsen, and Heidi A. Schweingruber. 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, John, ed. 1998. Learning in Likely Places: Varieties of Apprenticeship in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan A. 2004. “Reflecting on the Development of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and Its Contribution to Qualitative Research in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 1 (1): 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan A., Paul Flowers, and Michael Larkin. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan A., and Mike Osborn. 2008. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. 2nd, edited by Jonathan A. Smith, 53–80. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yiend, Jenny, Saranne Weller, and Ian Kinchin. 2014. “Peer Observation of Teaching: The Interaction between Peer Review and Developmental Models of Practice.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 38 (4): 465–84.
   Google Scholar