Understanding Quadruple Helix relationships of university technology commercialisation: a micro-level approach

References

• Ambos, T. C., K. Makela, J. Birkinshaw, and P. D'este. 2008. “When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions.” Journal of Management Studies 45: 1424–1447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnkil, R., A. Järvensivu, P. Koski, and T. Piirainen. 2010. Exploring Quadruple Helix – Outlining User-Oriented Innovation Models. University of Tampere, Institute for Social Research, Work Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and L. Coenen. 2005. “Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters.” Research Policy 34 (8): 1173–90. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2010. “Knowledge Economy and Research Innovation.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (7): 845–57. doi:10.1080/03075070903406533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T. 2009. “University-industry Collaboration Strategies: A Micro Level Perspective.” European Journal of Innovation Management 12 (2): 161–176. doi:10.1108/14601060910953951.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., and D. F. J. Campbell. 2009. ““Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3/4): 201–34. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., and R. Rakhmatullin. 2014. “The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5 (2): 212–39. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, M. 2015. “Academic Entrepreneurship and Traditional Academic Duties: Synergy or Rilvary?” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1029901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, L., and D. Kirk, 2007. “University-industry Collaboration: Grafting the Entrepreneurial Paradigm onto Academic Structures.” European Journal of Innovation Management 10 (3): 316–332. doi: 10.1108/14601060710776734
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D., and J. Jonker. 2005. “Stakeholder Relationships: The Dialogue of Engagement.” Corporate Governance 5 (5): 51–57. doi:10.1108/14720700510630059.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 191–205. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.1893928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P. 1986. “Deconstructing the Defence for Quantification in Social Science: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles on the Parametric Strategy.” Qualitative Sociology 9 (2): 126–44. doi:10.1007/BF01314412.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, A. 2010. Towards the Entrepreneurial University. Coventry: National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., and J. Birkenshaw. 2004. “The antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Role of Organisational Ambidexterity.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (2): 209–226. doi: 10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. 2007. “Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4): 315–27. doi:10-1007/s10551-007-9509-y doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova, I. 2014. “Quadruple Helix Systems and Symmetry: A Step Towards Helix Innovation System Classification.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5 (2): 357–69. doi:10-1007/s13132-014-0201-z doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0201-z
   Google Scholar
• Labelle, F., and K. G. Aka. 2012. “Le processus d’innovation durable en contexte PME: Les effets d’un système générant des retombées positives.” Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship 25 (4): 479–98. doi:10.1080/08276331.2012.10593585.
   Google Scholar
• sLawler, C. 2011. “The Capitalisation of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 746–47. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.594602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 2011. “The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3 (1): 25–35. doi:10-1007/s13132-011-0049-4 doi: 10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
   Google Scholar
• Locke, K., and K. Golden-Biddle. 1997. “Constructing Opportunities for Contribution: Structuring Intertextual Coherence and “Problematizing” in Organisational Studies.” Academy of Management Journal 40 (5): 1023–62. doi:10.2307/256926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. P., P. Marques-Gou, and A. Simon-Villar. 2010. “Gauging Readiness for the Quadruple Helix: A Study of 16 European Organisations.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 1 (3): 173–90. doi:10.1007/s13132-010-0012-9.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., D. S. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2008. “Research and Technology Commercialization.” Journal of Management Studies 45: 1401–1423. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mate-Sanchez-Val, M., and R. Harris. 2014. “Differential Empirical Innovation Factors for Spain and the UK.” Research Policy 43 (2): 451–63. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., W. Keogh, B. Galbraith, and D. Laurie. 2005. “Defining and Improving Technology Transfer Business and Management Processes in University Innovation Centres.” Technovation 25 (12): 1418–29. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, M., R. McAdam, R. B. Galbraith, B., and K. Miller. 2010. “An Exploratory Study of Principal Investigator Roles in UK University Proof-of-Concept Processes: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective.” R&D Management 40 (5): 455–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00619.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., K. Miller, M. McAdam, and S. Teague. 2012. “The Development of University Technology Transfer Stakeholder Relationships at a Regional Level: Lessons for the Future.” Technovation 32 (1): 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever, E., A. Anderson, and S. Jack. 2014. “Social Embeddedness in Entrepreneurship Research: The Importance of Context and Community.” In Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, edited by  E. Chell, and M. Karatas-Ozkan, 222–235. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mian, S. 2011. Science and Technology Based Regional Entrepreneurship: Global Experience in Policy and Program Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., M. McAdam, and R. McAdam. 2014. “The Changing University Business Model: A Stakeholder Perspective.” R&D Management 44 (3): 265–87. doi:10.1111/radm.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., R. McAdam, S. Moffett, A. Alexander, and P. Puthusserry. 2016. Knowledge Transfer in University Quadruple Helix Ecosystems: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective. R&D Management, 46: 383–399. doi:10.1111/radm.12182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” The Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–86. doi:10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., and M. Schultz. 2006. “Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies.” Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4): 323–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x.
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., and A. Pozzali. 2013. “The Effect of Cultural Distance in University-industry Collaborations. Some evidence from Italian universities.” Journal of Technology Transfer 38 (4): 486–508. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9262-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., and G. Vallanti, 2014. “Perceived Obstacles to University-industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments.” Industry and Innovation 21 (5): 410–429. doi:10.1080/13662716.2014.969935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B., W. B. Havebeck, G. Duysters, V. Gisling, and A. van den Oord. 2007. “Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity.” Research Policy 36 (7): 1016–1034. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, B.A., S.J. Bell, and G. J. Whitwell. 2011. “Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool.” Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3): 357–78. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamuro, H., and J. Nishimura. 2013. “Impact of University Intellectual Property on the Performance of University-Industry Research Collaboration.” Journal of Technology Transfer 38 (3): 273–301. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9253-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Kane, C., V. Magematin, W. Geoghegan, and C. Fitzgerald. 2014. “University Technology Transfer Offices: The Search for Identity to Build Legitimacy.” Research Policy 44 (2): 421–37. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Brostrom, P. D’Este, R. Fini, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–42. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. 2009. “For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing up (and reviewing) Qualitative Research.” Academy of Management Journal 52 (5): 856–862. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.44632557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preeble, J. F. 2005. “Towards a Comprehensive Model of Stakeholder Management.” Business and Society Review 110 (4): 407–31. doi:10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 doi: 10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00023.x
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., and H. Etzkowitz. 2013. “Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society.” Industry and Higher Education 27 (4): 237–62. doi:10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, R., and A. Rosli. 2015. “Indicators of University-industry Knowledge Transfer Performance and their Implications for Universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (10): 1970–1991. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.914914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 81 (2): 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Edward UK: Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif, H., W., Liu, and S. Ismail. 2014. “Higher Education System and the ‘Open’ Knowledge Transfer: A View from Perception of Senior Managers at University Knowledge Transfer Offices.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1860–84. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.818645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbano, D., and M. Guerrero. 2013. “Entrepreneurial Universities: Socioeconomic Impacts of Academic Entrepreneurship in a European Context.” Economic Development Quarterly 27 (1): 40–55. doi:10.1177/0891242412471973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2014. “Issues in the Articulatiom of ‘Impact’: The Responses of UK Academics to ‘Impact’ as a New Measure of Research Assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 359–77. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2003. “Commercialising Higher Education in the UK: The State, Industry and Peer Review.” Studies in Higher Education 28 (2): 129–41. doi:10.1080/0307507032000058127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., M. Wright, and G. Abdelgawad. 2014. “Contextualisation and Advancement of Entrepreneurship Research.” International Small Business Journal 32 (5): 479–500. doi:10.1177/0266242613519807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar