Colleagueship in different types of post-secondary institutions: a lever for faculty vitality

References

• Braxton, J. M., W. R. Doyle, and D. Lyken-Segosebe. 2015. “Tweaking the Culture of the Community College.” New Directions for Community Colleges 2015 (171): 77–85. doi: 10.1002/cc.20156
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2016. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. 1997. “Small Worlds, Different Worlds: The Uniquenesses and Troubles of American Academic Professions.” Daedalus 126 (4): 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2000. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 1–21. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Espino, M. M., S. M. Muñoz, and J. M. Kiyama. 2010. “Transitioning from Doctoral Study to the Academy: Theorizing Trenzas of Identity for Latina Sister Scholars.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 804–818. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J. 1981. “The Dimensions of Colleagueship among College and University Faculty.” A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 2010. “Women and Men Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering: Social Organizational Indicators and Implications.” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (7): 997–1012. doi: 10.1177/0002764209356234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. D., and R. Rincones. 2012. “Interdisciplinary Scholars: Negotiating Legitimacy at the Core and from the Margins.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 36: 495–518. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.643772
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. 1981. “Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries.” Educational Communication and Technology Journal 29: 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. 2016. “Dissecting a Gendered Organization: Implications for Career Trajectories for Mid-Career Women in STEM.” The Journal of Higher Education 87 (5): 605–634. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2016.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S., and B. R. Martin. 1997. “What Is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. 2014. “Higher Education Change and Social Networks: A Review of Research.” The Journal of Higher Education 85 (1): 91–125. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2014.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., S. Ross, and T. Holden. 2012. “The How and Why of Academic Collaboration: Disciplinary Differences and Policy Implications.” Higher Education 64 (5): 693–708. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, D., I. Devine, and D. Kausilas. 2000. “Friendships of Women and Men at Work: Job Satisfaction and Resource Implications.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 15 (2): 161–84. doi: 10.1108/02683940010310346
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, E. 2014. Growing Pains: Exploring the Transition from a Community College into a Four-year Comprehensive College. All Dissertations, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Alemán, A. M. 1997. “Understanding and Investigating Female Friendship’s Educative Value.” Journal of Higher Education 2 (62): 119–59. doi: 10.2307/2959954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Alemán, A. M. 2000. “Race Talks: Undergraduate Women of Color and Female Friendships.” The Review of Higher Education 23 (2): 133–52. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxey, D., and A. Kezar. 2015. “Revealing Opportunities and Obstacles for Changing Non-tenure-track Faculty Practices: An Examination of Stakeholders’ Awareness of Institutional Contradictions.” The Journal of Higher Education 86 (4): 564–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, R. L., and T. Nolan. 2007. “Too Much of a Good Thing? Difficulties with Workplace Friendships.” University of Auckland Business Review 9 (2): 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Niehaus, E., and K. O’Meara. 2014. “Invisible But Essential: The Role of Professional Networks in Promoting Faculty Agency in Career Advancement.” Innovative Higher Education 2 (40): 159–71.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, A. M., E. T. Murakami, and L. D. Gonzales. 2015. “Weaving Authenticity and Legitimacy: Latina Faculty Peer Mentoring.” New Directions for Higher Education 171: 87–96. doi: 10.1002/he.20145
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, K., and A. Bloomgarden. 2011. “The Pursuit of Prestige: The Experience of Institutional Striving from a Faculty Perspective.” The Journal of the Professoriate 4 (1): 40–74.
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, K., and N. P. Stromquist. 2015. “Faculty Peer Networks: Role and Relevance in Advancing Agency and Gender Equity.” Gender and Education 27 (3): 338–58. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1027668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pifer, M. J., and V. L. Baker. 2013. “Managing the Process: The Intradepartmental Networks of Early-Career Academics.” Innovative Higher Education 38: 323–37. doi: 10.1007/s10755-012-9243-y
   Google Scholar
• Pifer, M. J., L. G. Lunsford, and V. L. Baker. 2015. “Academic Departments as Networks of Informal Learning: Faculty Development at Liberal Arts Colleges.” International Journal for Academic Development 20 (2): 178–92. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2015.1028065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponjuan, L., V. M. Conley, and C. Trower. 2011. “Career Stage Differences in pre-Tenure Track Faculty Perceptions of Professional and Personal Relationships with Colleagues.” The Journal of Higher Education 82 (3): 319–46. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2011.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., and A. Parker. 2004. “Education: Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path.” Science 306 (5704): 2046. doi: 10.1126/science.1103628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2012. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sipe, L., and S. Constable. 1996. “A Chart of Four Contemporary Research Paradigms: Metaphors for the Modes of Inquiry.” Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education 1 (Spring): 153–63.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22 (2): 63–75. doi: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Stupinsky, R. H., M. B. Weaver-Hightower, and Y. Kartoshkina. 2015. “Exploring and Testing Predictors of new Faculty Success: A Mixed Methods Study.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (2): 368–390. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.842220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrana, R. E., R. Ray, M. M. Espino, C. Castro, B. D. Cohen, and J. Eliason. 2015. “‘Don’t Leave Us Behind’: The Importance of Mentoring for Underrepresented Minority Faculty.” American Educational Research Journal 52 (1): 40–72. doi: 10.3102/0002831214563063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar