The re-production process of gender bias: a case of ICT professors through recruitment in a gender-neutral country

References

• ACM Code. 1992. “ ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.” http://ethics.acm.org/code-of-ethics. Accessed June 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, A., M. Griffiths, C. Keogh, K. Moore, H. Richardson, and A. Tattersall. 2006. “Being an ‘it’ in IT: Gendered Identities in IT Work.” European Journal of Information Systems 15: 368–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, A., D. Howcroft, and H. Richardson. 2004. “A Decade of Neglect: Reflecting on Gender and IS.” New Technology, Work and Employment 19 (3): 222–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailasmaa, R. 2015. Terveys-ja sosiaalipalvelujen henkilöstö 2013. [The staff of health and social services at 2013.] Tilastoraportti 26/2015, 10.12.2015. Tilastokeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Aloo, J. O., E. M. W. Simatwa, and R. A. Nyang’ori. 2011. “Impact of the School Based Teacher Recruitment Policy on the Distribution and Retention of Teachers in Public Secondary Schools in Kenya: A case Study of Nyando District.” Educational Research 2 (3): 1006–20.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, J., J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Payne, and E. Turner, eds. 2005. The Gender Politics of ICT. Enfield: Middlesex University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arruda, D., F. Bezerra, V. A. Neris, P. Rocha De Toro, and J. Wainera. 2009. “Brazilian Computer Science Research: Gender and Regional Distributions.” Scientometrics 79 (3): 651–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basow, S. A., and N. T. Silberg. 1987. “Student Evaluations of College Professors: Are Female and Male Professors Rated Differently?” Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (3): 308–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. K. 1982. “Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (2): 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berki, E. 2006. “Mentoring as a Learning Process – Relationships and Communication.” Investigations in University Teaching and Learning 3 (1), 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Berki, E., and F. Cobb-Payton. 2005. “Work-Life Balance and Identity in a Virtual World: Facts, Tensions and Intentions for Women in IT.” In Lost and Found in Virtual Reality: Women and Information Technology, edited by H. Isomäki and A. Pohjola, 275–96. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S., C. Boldyreff, F. Paterson, and M. Ross. 2004. “ Web-Based Communities for Girls and Women in IT: Countering Influences from Home, School, and Work through to Retirement.” In P. Isaias and P. Commers (Eds), 1st IADIS Conference on Web-based Communities, March 24–26, Lisbon, 477–81.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, T. 1997. “The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline.” Communications of the ACM 40 (10): 103–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveigne, S. 2009. “The Career Paths of Women (and Men) in French Research.” Social Studies of Science 39 (1): 113–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohoon, J. M., S. Nigai, and J. Kaye. 2011. “Gender and Computing Conference Papers.” Communications of the ACM 54 (8): 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, E., and M. Gaughan. 2005. ““Scientists’’ Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender Differences?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 30: 371–81.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, A., J. Fisher, and L. Dawson. 2011. “Women in ICT; Guidelines of Evaluating Intervention Programmes.” Paper presented at ECIS 2011: European Conference on Information Systems, Aalto University, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, A. 2004. “The Project of Self, the Project of Others: Mentoring, Women and the Fashioning of the Academic Subject.” Studies in Continuing Education 26 (1): 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Equality Planning. 2014. “General Information on Equality Planning.” The Office of the Ombudsman for Equality. http://www.tasa-arvo.fi/en/promoting_equality/workplace/planning. Accessed November 26, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• EU Researchers’ Report. 2013. “Country Profile: Finland.” Deloitte. https://cdn2.euraxess.org/sites/default/files/policy_library/finland_country_profile_rr2013_final.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 2010. “Women and Men Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering: Social-Organizational Indicators and Implications.” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (7): 997–1012.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Keller, E. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göker, G. 2005. “Gender in Advertisements of Information Technologies.” In Lost and Found in Virtual Reality: Women and Information Technology, edited by H. Isomäki and A. Pohjola, 239–74. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M., K. Moore, and H. Richardson. 2007. “Celebrating Heterogeneity? A Survey of Female ICT Professionals in England.” Information, Communication & Society 10 (3): 338–57.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K., and R. Gill. 1995. The Gender-Technology Relation, Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, F. S., and A. Gumbus. 2005. “Networking and Career Advancement Strategies for Women: A Study of the Effects of Networking and Mentoring on ICT Careers for Women.” In The Gender Politics of ICT, edited by J. Archibald, J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Payne and E. Turner, 297–311. Middlesex: Middlesex University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, M., S. T. Koeszegi, and E. Zedlacher. 2016. “Breaking Patterns? How Female Scientists Negotiate Their Token Role in Their Life Stories.” Gender, Work and Organization 23 (4): 397–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., and P. Dourish. 1996. “Re-Place-ing Space: the Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems.” In CSCW 1996, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 67–76. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• von Hellens, L., and S. Nielsen. 2001. “Australian Women in IT.” Communications of the ACM 44 (7): 46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hellens, L., and S. Nielsen. 2006. “Facing and Changing Reality in the Australian IT Industry.” In Encyclopaedia of Gender and Information Technology, edited by E. Trauth, Vol. 1, 185–190. Hershey: Idea Group Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, C., S. Lewis, and A. L. Humbert. 2013. “Women Scientists and Engineers in European Companies: Putting Motherhood Under the Microscope.” Gender, Work and Organization. 20 (5): 467–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Howcroft, D., and E. M. Trauth. 2008. “The Implications of a Critical Agenda in Gender and IS Research.” Information Systems Journal 18: 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, S. M. 1982. “Women and Minorities in Science. Strategies for Increasing Participation.” AAAS Selected Symposium 66. Coloranto: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L. 2001a. “On Metaphors on the Position of Women in Academia and Science.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 9 (1): 172–81.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L. 2001b. Sexism, Support and Survival in Academia. Academic Women and Hidden Discrimination in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Idman, M. 2011. “Naiset aiempaa vaativammissa tehtävissä – palkkapussi ennallaan.” [Women in More Requiring Tasks – Pay Packet Unchanged.] Tieto&Trendit 6/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kaapu, T., T. Tiainen, and A. Ellman. 2013. “User Interpretations of Virtual Prototypes: Physical Place Matters.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 25 (2): 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M.-L., and D. Lincoln. 2016. “Gender Research: Women, the Academy and the Workplace.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (5): 799–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, S. 1999. Women’s and Men’s Work: Labour Market Segregation in Finland 1970–1990. Helsinki: University of Tampere. Tilastokeskus, tutkimuksia 227.
   Google Scholar
• Kuosa, T. 2000. “Masculine World Disguised as Gender Neutral.” In Women, Work and Computerization, edited by E. Balka and R. Smith, 119–26. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1998. The Production of Space. Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. 2016. “New Public Management and Research Productivity – A Precarious State of Affairs of Academic Work in the Netherlands.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (5): 828–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, M. 1995. “Technology and Masculinity: The Case of the Computer.” European Journal of Women's Studies 2 (3): 379–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loiacono, E., L. S. Iyer, D. J. Armstrong, J. Beekhuyzen, and A. Craig. 2016. “AIS Women’s Network: Advancing Women in IS Academia.” Communications of the AIS 38. Article 38. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol38/iss1/38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliszewska, I. 2006. “Gender Bias in Computer Courses in Australia.” In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology, edited by E. M. Trauth, 501–12. London: Idea Group Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. 2014. www.stm.fi/en/gender_equality. Accessed January 2, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Naisia. 2011. Naisia ICT-alalle! – tutkimus. [Women to the ICT Field – A Study]. Teknologiateollisuus ry. SP-Paino Oy, Nurmijärvi.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen, L. 2000. “Life-Span Perspective on Human Centred Technology” [Keynote Speech]. At Eurovillage, Brussels, May 30.
   Google Scholar
• Quesenberry, J. L., and E. M. Trauth. 2012. “The (dis)Placement of Women in the IT Workforce: An Investigation of Individual Career Values and Organizational Interventions.” Information Systems Journal 22: 457–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesenberry, J. L., E. M. Trauth, and J. A. Morgan. 2006. “Understanding the “Mommy Tracks”: A Framework for Analyzing Work–Family Balance in the IT Workforce.” Information Resources Management Journal 19 (2): 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B., and B. M. Kehm. 2016. “Women as Leaders of Higher Education Institutions: A British–German Comparison.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (5): 815–27. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1147727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., S. Newell, J. Swan, L. Mathiassen, and G. Bjerknes. 2001. “The Issue of Gender Within Computing: Reflections From the UK and Scandinavia.” Information Systems Journal 11 (2): 111–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. 2003. “Girls into IT and Technology.” IEE Engineering Education, Southampton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, S. V. 2004. “The Science Glass Ceiling.” Press Release, 16.2.2004. The Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, M. 2013. “Promoting Gender Equality Without a Gender Perspective: Problem Representations of Equal Pay in Finland.” Gender, Work and Organization 20 (1): 36–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seierstad, C., and G. Healy. 2012. “Women’s Equality in the Scandinavian Academy: a Distant Dream?” Work, Employment and Society 26 (2): 296–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., L. M. Cortina, A. J. Stewart, and J. Malley. 2007. ”Voice Matters: Buffering the Impact of a Negative Climate for Women in Science.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 31: 270–281.
   Google Scholar
• Siakas, K., E. Berki, and E. Georgiadou. 2003. “SQM CODE: Cultural and Organisational Diversity Evaluation for Software Quality Management.” In The Proceedings of EuroSPI 2003 (European Software Process Improvement), edited by Messnarz, 31–45. Graz, December 10–12. University of Technology Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Sievänen-Allen, R., and K. Belinki. 1998. Suomalaisia Vaikuttaja-Naisia. Kohti Vuotta 2000. [Influential Finnish Women. Towards 2000]. WSOY: Juva.
   Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R. E., K. A. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applications and Tenure Candidates.” Sex Roles 41 (7/8): 509–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiainen, T. 2006. “Constructing Gender Bias in Computer Science.” In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology, edited by E. M. Trauth, 135–40. London: Idea Group Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Tijdens, K., and I. Eriksson. 1991. “Report of the Conference.” In Women, Work and Computerisation: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education, edited by I. V. Eriksson, B. A. Kitchenham and K. G. Tijdens, 11–12. Helsinki, June 30–July 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Trauth, E. M. 2002. “Odd Girl out: an Individual Differences Perspective on Women in the IT Profession.” Information Technology & People 15 (2): 98–118. doi:10.1108/09593840210430552.
   Google Scholar
• Trauth, E. 2011. “What Can We Learn From Gender Research? Seven Lessons for Business Research Methods.” The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 9 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, M. 1994. “Reading Computing Professionals” Codes of Ethics – A Standpoint of Finnish Office Workers.” In Feminist Voices on Gender, Technology and Ethics, edited by E. Gunnarsson and L. Trojer, 145–61. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, M. 1996. “Maailmoista Ilman Naisia Tietotekniikan Sukupuolieroihin.” [From worlds without women to gender differences in information technology.] In Työelämän Sukupuolistavat Käytännöt, edited by M. Kinnunen and P. Korvajärvi, 143–70. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, M. 2005. “The Numbers of Women in ICT and Cyborg Narratives: On the Approaches of Researching Gender in Information and Communication Technology.” In Lost and Found in Virtual Reality: Women and Information Technology, edited by H. Isomäki and A. Pohjola, 23–46. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vela, B., P. Cáceres, and J. M. Cavero. 2012. “Participation of Women in Software Engineering Publications.” Scientometrics 93 (3): 661–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zweben, S. 2010. “Computing Degree and Enrolment Trends.” Washington, DC: Computing Research Association, 2010–2011.
   Google Scholar