How experience affects assessment – a longitudinal study of assessment of university students’ essays

References

• Barrett, Steven. 2005. “Raters and Examinations.” Chapter 9. In Applied Rasch Measurment: A Book of Exemplars, edited by Sivakumar Alagumalai, David D. Curtis, and Njora Hungi, 159–77. The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, Sue, Peter Boyd, and Susan Orr. 2011. “Mark My Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–70. doi:10.1080/03075071003777716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, Sue, Birgit den-Outer, Jane Hudson, and Margaret Price. 2016. “Let’s Stop the Pretence of Consistent Marking: Exploring the Multiple Limitations of Assessment Criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3): 466–81. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Val. 2012. “Marking as Judgement.” Research Papers in Education 27 (1): 63–80. doi: 10.1080/02671520903331008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, Michelene T.H. 2006. “Two Approaches to the Study of Experts’ Characteristics.” Chapter 2. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, edited by K. Anders Ericsson, Neil Charness, Paul J. Feltovic, and Robert R. Hoffman, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Victoria. 2008. “Exploring the Nature of Examiner Thinking During the Process of Examination Marking.” Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (2): 247–64. doi:10.1080/03057640802063486.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., and S. E. Dreyfus. 1986. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the era of the Computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Lee, Sharon Parry, and Chris Morgan. 2002. “Seeking Quality in Criterion Referenced Assessment.” Paper presented at the learning Communities and Assessment Cultures Conference, University of Northumbria, August 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, Kathryn. 2001. “I Know a 2:1 When I See It: Understanding Criteria for Degree Classifications in Franchised University Programmes.” Journal of Further and Higher Education: 25 (3): 301–13. doi:10.1080/03098770126527.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, Peter, Ken Purnell, and Reyna Zipf. 2008. “Judging Quality through Substantive Conversations Between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–42. doi: 10.1080/02602930601125681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Robert R. 1998. “How Can Expertise Be Defined? Implications of Research from Cognitive Psychology.” In Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives, edited by Robin Williams, Wendy Faulkner, and James Fleck, 81–100. New York: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-13693-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Robert R., and Gavan Lintern. 2006. “Eliciting and Representing the Knowledge of Experts.” Chapter 12. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, edited by K. Anders Ericsson, Neil Charness, Paul J. Feltovic, and Robert R. Hoffman, 203–22. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, Anders, and Gunilla Svingby. 2007. “The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences.” Educational Research Review 2: 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, Margret, and Gerry Mullins. 2002. “‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How Experienced Examiners Assess Research Theses.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 369–86. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, Margret, and Gerry Mullins. 2004. “Examining the Examiners: How Inexperienced Examiners Approach the Assessment of Research Theses.” International Journal of Educational Research 41 (2): 121–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. (1958) 2005. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roisin O’Hagan, Sally, and Gillian Wigglesworth. 2014. “Who’s Marking My Essay? The Assessment of Non-Native-Speaker and Native-Speaker Undergraduate Essays in an Australian Higher Education Context.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (9): 1729–47. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.896890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, Mark N. K, and Susan M. Davis. 1998. “The Use of Assessment Criteria to Ensure Consistency of Marking: Some Implications for Good Practice.” Quality Assurance in Education 6 (3): 162–71. doi: 10.1108/09684889810220465
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, Daryl, and Eitan Eldar. 1989. “Expertise, Experience, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 8 (3): 254–60. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.8.3.254
   Google Scholar
• Suto, Irenka W. M., and Jackie Greatorex. 2008. “What Goes Through an Examiner’s Mind? Using Verbal Protocols to Gain Insights into the GCSE Marking Process.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (2): 213–33. doi: 10.1080/01411920701492050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, Alison. 1995. Competence-Based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, Claire, Val Klenowski, and Stephanie Gunn. 2010. “The Centrality of Teacherś Judgement Practice in Assessment: A Study on Standards in Modernization.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 17 (1): 59–75. doi:10.1080/09695940903565610.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, Mantz. 2011. “Summative Assessment: Dealing with the ‘Measurement Fallacy’.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 251–73. doi:10.1080/03075070903545082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar