Co-authorship trends in English literary studies, 1995–2015

References

• Anderson, Lara Lomicka, and Gillian Lord. 2008. “Coauthoring: What Every Department Should Know.” Profession 2008: 202–13. doi: 10.1632/prof.2008.2008.1.202
   Google Scholar
• Battershill, Claire, Helen Southworth, Alice Staveley, Michael Widner, Elizabeth Willson Gordon, and Nicola Wilson. 2017. “Reflections on Collaboration.” In Scholarly Adventures in Digital Humanities: Making the Modernist Archives Publishing Project, 47–67. Cham: Springer. New Directions in Book History doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47211-9_4.
   Google Scholar
• Corbyn, Zöe. 2011. “Outraged European Academics Resent ‘Rankings.’” The Guardian, June 28. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2011/jun/27/journals-index-angers-european-academics.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, Lisa S., and Andrea A. Lunsford. 1992. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• English, James F. 2012. The Global Future of English Studies. Kindle ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haddow, Gaby, Jianhong (Cecelia) Xia, and Michelle Wilson. 2017. “Collaboration in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences in Australia.” Australian Universities Review 59 (1): 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. 2013. “Finding Ourselves: The Humanities as a Discipline.” American Literary History 25 (3): 509–34. doi:10.1093/alh/ajt027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hick, Darren Hudson. 2014. “Authorship, Co-authorship, and Multiple Authorship.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77 (2): 147–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman, Jarno, Koen Frenken, and Robert W. J. Tijssen. 2010. “Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration Within Europe.” Research Policy 39: 662–73. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon, Linda. 2001. “Creative Collaboration: Introduction.” Profession 2001: 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Pat, Mary Taylor Huber, and Anthony Ciccone. 2011. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jockers, Matthew L. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• José, Brian, and Margherita Berti. 2017. “The Increasingly Collaborative Nature of Linguistic Scholarship.” Journal of English Linguistics 45 (1): 88–94. doi: 10.1177/0075424216685848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. Sylvan, and Ben R. Martin. 1997. “What is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, Vincent, Yves Gringas, and Éric Archambault. 2006. “Canadian Collaboration Networks: A Comparative Analysis of the Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and the Humanities.” Scientometrics 68 (3): 519–33. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levickij, Viktor, and Mykola Lučak. 2005. “Category of Tense and Verb Semantics in the English Language.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 12 (2–3): 212–38. doi: 10.1080/09296170500172528
   Google Scholar
• Linkon, Sherry Lee. 2011. Literary Learning: Teaching the English Major. Kindle ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Chengwei, Christopher Olivola, and Balazs Kovacs. 2016. “Coauthorship Trends in the Field of Management: Facts and Perceptions.” Academy of Management Learning and Education. doi:10.5465/amle.2016.0080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunsford, Andrea A., and Lisa Ede. 2011. Writing Together: Collaboration in Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, Ana, Lana Bošnjak, and Anna Jerončić. 2011. “A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship Across Scholarly Disciplines.” PLoS One 6 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MLA (Modern Language Association). 2017a. “About the MLA International Bibliography.” https://www.mla.org/Publications/MLA-International-Bibliography/About-the-MLA-International-Bibliography.
   Google Scholar
• MLA (Modern Language Association). 2017b. “Frequently Asked Questions.” https://www.mla.org/Publications/MLA-International-Bibliography/Frequently-Asked-Questions.
   Google Scholar
• Ossenblock, Truyken L. B., Frederik Verleysen, and Tim C. E. Engels. 2014. “Coauthorship of Journal Articles and Book Chapters in the Social Sciences and Humanities (2000–2010).” Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology 65 (5): 882–97. doi: 10.1002/asi.23015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, Lisa. 2009. “Collaborative Authorship in the Humanities.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Exploring the Digital Humanities, April 21. https://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/collaborative-authorship-in-the-humanities/.
   Google Scholar
• Sword, Helen. 2011. Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sword, Helen. 2017. Air & Light & Time & Space: How Successful Academics Write. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Graeme, and Kylie Brass. 2014. Mapping the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences in Australia. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, Bryan G., David R. Hodge, Brian E. Perron, Michael G. Vaughn, and Christopher P. Salas-Wright. 2016. “The Rise of Co-Authorship in Social Work Scholarship: A Longitudinal Study of Collaboration and Article Quality, 1989–2013.” British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, Stefan, Benjamin F. Jones, and Brian Uzzi. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316: 1036–39. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar