Competing institutional logics in universities in the United Kingdom: schism in the church of reason

References

• Becher, T., and P. R. Trowler. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I. 1998. “Justifying the Evaluative State: New Public Management Ideals in Higher Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 4 (2): 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. M., and T. J. Hastie. 1992. Statistical Models in S. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. 2012. What Are Universities For? London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., and K. J. Brehony. 2005. “Management as Ideology: The Case of ‘New Managerialism’ in Higher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 31 (2): 217–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R., S. Hillyard, and M. Reed. 2007. Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 1–40. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1895) 1982. Rules of the Sociological Method. Translated by W.D. Halls. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1997. “Introduction.” In Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, edited by H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff. London: Cassell Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., and D. T. Wegener. 2011. Exploratory Factor Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J., and J. W. Meyer. 2007. “University Expansion and the Knowledge Society.” Theory and Society 36 (4): 287–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., M. Raynard, F. Kodeih, E. R. Micelotta, and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” The Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., and D. Urbano. 2012. “The Development of an Entrepreneurial University.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 37 (1): 43–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Statistics Agency. 2017. Joint Academic Coding System. Accessed November 2, 2017. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/support/documentation/jacs.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., and J. L. Duvall. 2004. “Determining the Number of Factors in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” In The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by D. Kaplan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, G., and F. Meier. 2006. “Turning the University Into an Organizational Actor.” In Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, edited by G. S. Dori, J. W. Meyer, and H. Hwang, 241–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D. N., and A. E. Maxwell. 1971. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Lepori, B., E. Reale, and P. Larédo. 2014. “Logics of Integration and Actors’ Strategies in European Joint Programs.” Research Policy 43 (2): 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Abingdon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., F. O. Ramirez, D. J. Frank, and E. Schofer. 2007. “Higher Education as an Institution.” In Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and Their Contexts, edited by P. J. Gumport, 187–221. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., and M. A. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pirsig, R. (1974) 2011. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values. 40th Anniversary ed. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., G. T. Fairhurst, and S. Banghart. 2016. “Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach.” Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 65–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. O. 2010. “Accounting for Excellence: Transforming Universities Into Organizational Actors.” In Higher Education, Policy and the Global Competition Phenomenon, edited by L. M. Portnoi, V. D. Rust, and S. S. Bagley, 43–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., and J. W. Meyer. 2005. “The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review 70 (6): 898–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 2006. “The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations.” The Journal of Higher Education 77 (1): 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., B. Lepori, M. Montauti, J. Enders, H. De Boer, E. Weyer, I. Bleiklie, et al. 2015. “European Universities as Complete Organizations? Understanding Identity, Hierarchy and Rationality in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 17 (10): 1444–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., and M. W. Lewis. 2011. “Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing.” Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 801–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 2008. “Institutional Logics.” In Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 99–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., M. Saunders, and V. Bamber. 2012. “Academic Practices and Disciplines in the 21st Century.” In Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, edited by P. Trowler, M. Saunders, and V. Bamber, 241–58. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., and L. Stobbe. 2009. “Doing Gender in Academic Education: The Paradox of Visibility.” Gender, Work & Organization 16 (4): 451–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent-Lancrin, S. 2004. “Building Futures Scenarios for Universities and Higher Education: An International Approach.” Policy Futures in Education 2 (2): 245–63.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2011. “Challenges for University Engagement in the UK: Towards a Public Academe?” Higher Education Quarterly 65 (4): 386–410.
   Google Scholar