2,114
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Should academic research be relevant and useful to practitioners? The contrasting difference between three applied disciplines

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abraham, S., and R. J. Allio. 2006. “The Troubled Strategic-Business-Advice Industry: why It’s Failing Decision Makers.” Strategy & Leadership 34 (3): 4–13.
  • Abrahamson, E., and M. Eisenman. 2001. “Why Management Scholars Must Intervene Strategically in the Management Knowledge Market.” Human Relations 54: 67–65.
  • Aguinis, H., and W. F. Cascio. 2008. “Narrowing the Science-Practice Divide: A Call to Action.” The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 46 (2): 27.
  • Arnold, P. J. 2009. “Global Financial Crisis: The Challenge to Accounting Research.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 34: 803–809.
  • Auranen, O., and M. Nieminen. 2010. “University Research Funding and Publication Performance – An International Comparison.” Research Policy 39: 822–834.
  • Bartunek, J., and S. Rynes. 2010. “The Construction and Contributions of “Implications for Practice”: What’s in Them and What Might They Offer?” Academy of Management Learning & Education 9 (1): 100–117.
  • Bazerman, M. H. 2005. “Conducting Influential Research: The Need for Prescriptive Implications.” Academy of Management Review 30 (1): 25–31.
  • Bennis, W. G., and J. O’Toole. 2005. “How Business Schools Lost Their way.” Harvard Business Review 83 (5): 96–104.
  • Biesta, G. 2007. “Why ‘What Works’ Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research.” Educational Theory 57 (1): 1–22.
  • Boynton, P. M., and T. Greenhalgh. 2004. “Selecting, Designing, and Developing Your Questionnaire.” British Medical Journal 328 (7451): 1312–1315.
  • Business SA. 2014. “Boosting the commercial returns from research (online report).” Business SA, November, 1–11.
  • Carter, C. R. 2008. “Knowledge Production and Knowledge Transfer: Closing the Research-Practice gap.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (2): 78–82.
  • Cooper, R., and R. S. Kaplan. 1992. “Activity-based systems: Measuring the costs of resource usage.” Accounting Horizons, September, 1–13.
  • Dess, G. G., and L. Markoczy. 2008. “Rather Than Searching for the Silver Bullet, use Rubber Bullets: A View on the Research – Practice gap.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (2): 57–62.
  • Diamond, M. 2005. “Accounting Education, Research and Practice: After Enron, Where do we go?” European Accounting Review 14 (2): 353–362.
  • Dyckman, T. R., and S. A. Zeff. 2015. “Accounting Research: Past, Present, and Future.” Abacus 51 (4): 511–524.
  • European Commission. 2010. Assessing Europe’s university-based research. EUR 24187 EN. Science in Society 2008 Capacities, 1.4.1. European Commission, Brussels.
  • Fendt, J., R. Kaminska-Labbe, and W. M. Sachs. 2008. “Producing and Socializing Relevant Management Knowledge: re-Turn to Pragmatism.” European Business Review 20 (6): 471–491.
  • Flynn, B. B. 2008. “Having it all: Rigor Versus Relevance in Supply Chain Management Research.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (2): 63–67.
  • Fraser, K. E. 2013. “Is Indonesia Producing Enough Business Graduates to Assist its Development Aspirations?” Industry and Higher Education 27 (2): 85–88.
  • Fraser, K. E. 2014. “Defeating the ‘Paradigm Wars’ in Accounting: A Mixed Methods Approach is Needed in the Education of PhD Scholars.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 8 (1): 49–62.
  • Fraser, K., H.-H. Hvolby, and C. Watanabe. 2011. “A Review of the Three Most Popular Maintenance Systems: How Well is the Energy Sector Represented?” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 35 (4): 287–309.
  • Fraser, K., B. Tseng, and X. Deng. 2018. “The ongoing education of engineering practitioners: How do they perceive the usefulness of academic research?” European Journal of Engineering Education 43 (6): 860–878.
  • Geuna, A., and B. R. Martin. 2003. “University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison.” Minerva 41: 277–304.
  • Grol, R., and M. Wensing. 2004. “What Drives Change? Barriers to and Incentives for Achieving Evidence-Based Practice.” Medical Journal of Australia 180: S57–S60.
  • Hambrick, D. 1994. “Presidential Address: What if the Academy Actually Mattered?” Academy of Management Review 19: 11–16.
  • Harris, H., and K. Fraser. 2010. “Towards Virtual Manufacturing: An Implementation Framework From Feasibility to Product Development.” International Journal of Product Development 11 (1/2): 136–162.
  • Hawawini, G. 2005. “The Future of Business Schools.” Journal of Management Development 24 (9): 770–782.
  • Hicks, D. 2012. “Performance-based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41: 251–261.
  • Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Accessed 1 March 2018. Cornell University, School of Hotel Administration, http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/521.
  • Hodgkinson, G. P., and D. M. Rousseau. 2009. “Bridging the Rigour-Relevance gap in Management Research: It’s Already Happening!” Journal of Management Studies 46 (3): 534–546.
  • Hope, J., and R. Fraser. 2003. Beyond Budgeting. How Managers can Break Free From the Annual Performance Trap. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Hopwood, A. G. 1973. An Accounting System and Managerial Behaviour. London: Saxon.
  • Hopwood, A. G. 2007. “Whither Accounting Research?” The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1365–1374.
  • Hopwood, A. G. 2009. “The Economic Crisis and Accounting: Implications for the Research Community.” Accounting, Organisations and Society 34: 797–802.
  • Inanga, E. L., and W. B. Schneider. 2005. “The Failure of Accounting Research to Improve Accounting Practice: a Problem of Theory and Lack of Communication.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (3): 227–248.
  • Jensen, P., and E. Webster. 2014. “Let’s spend more wisely on research in Australia.” The Conversation, Accessed 7 November 2014. http://theconversation.com/lets-spend-more-wisely-on-research-in-australia-29053.
  • Kaplan, R. S., and D. Norton. 1996. “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System.” Harvard Business Review 74 (1): 75–85.
  • Kealey, T. 1996. The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. London: Macmillan Press.
  • Kieser, A., and L. Leiner. 2009. “Why the Rigour – Relevance gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (3): 516–533.
  • Kok, S. K., and C. McDonald. 2017. “Underpinning Excellence in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (2): 210–231.
  • Lewis, J. M. 2014. “Research Productivity and Research System Attitudes.” Public Money & Management 34 (6): 417–424.
  • Lindsay, R. M. 2012. “We Must Overcome the Controversial Relationship Between Management Accounting Research and Practice.” Pacific Accounting Review 24 (3): 357–375.
  • Malmi, T., and M. Granlund. 2009. “In Search of Management Accounting Theory.” European Accounting Review 18 (3): 597–620.
  • Markides, C. 2007. “In Search of Ambidextrous Professors.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 762–768.
  • Marsh, R. 2010. “Measuring the Impact of Research.” Team Performance Management 16 (1/2): 118–119.
  • McCarthy, W. E. 2012. “Accounting Craftspeople Versus Accounting Seers: Exploring the Relevance and Innovation Gaps in Academic Accounting Research.” Accounting Horizons 26 (4): 833–843.
  • McCarthy, D., and M. Rands. 2013. “Learned Societies: a Bridge Between Research, Policy Making and Funding.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (3): 470–483.
  • McKinnon, A. C. 2013. “Starry-eyed: Journal Rankings and the Future of Logistics Research.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 43 (1): 6–17.
  • Mentzer, J. T. 2008. “Rigor Versus Relevance: Why Would we Choose Only one?” Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (2): 72–77.
  • Merchant, K. A. 1989. Rewarding Results: Motivating Profit Center Managers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Merchant, K. A. 2012. “Making Management Accounting Research More Useful.” Pacific Accounting Review 24 (3): 334–356.
  • Mohrman, S. A., and E. E. Lawler. 2011. “Research for Theory and Practice: Framing the Challenge.” In Useful Research: Advancing Theory and Practice, edited by S. A. Mohrman and E. E. Lawler, 9–36. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Muscio, A., D. Quaglione, and G. Vallanti. 2013. “Does Government Funding Complement or Substitute Private Research Funding to Universities?” Research Policy 42: 63–75.
  • Narin, F., K. S. Hamilton, and D. Olivastro. 1997. “The Increasing Linkage Between U.S. Technology and Public Science.” Research Policy 26: 317–330.
  • Neuman, W. L. 2000. Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • OECD. 2010. Performance-based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions. Workshop Proceedings. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Pallant, J. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual. 3rd ed. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Palmer, D. 2006. “Taking Stock of the Criteria we use to Evaluate one Another’s Work: ASQ 50 Years out.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (4): 535–559.
  • Pettigrew, T. J. 2001. “Management Research After Modernism.” British Journal of Management 12: S61–S70.
  • Pfeffer, J. 2007. “A Modest Proposal: how we Might Change the Process and Product of Managerial Research.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (6): 1334.
  • Pfeffer, J., and C. T. Fong. 2002. “The end of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the eye.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 1 (1): 78–95.
  • Rosenberg, N., and L. E. Birdzell. 1990. “Science, Technology and the Western Miracle.” Scientific American 263 (5): 42–54.
  • Rowley, J. 2012. “Evidence-based Marketing.” International Journal of Marketing Research 54 (4): 521–541.
  • Ryan, S., and R. Neumann. 2013. “Interdisciplinarity in an era of mew Public Management: a Case Study of Graduate Business Schools.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (2): 192–206.
  • Rynes, S. L. 2012. “The Research-Practice gap in I/O Psychology and Related Fields: Challenges and Potential Solutions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, 409–452. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rynes, S. L., J. M. Bartunek, and R. L. Daft. 2001. “Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 340–355.
  • Rynes, S. L., T. L. Giluk, and K. G. Brown. 2007. “The Very Separate Worlds of Academic and Practitioner Periodicals in Human Resource Management: Implications for Evidence-Based Management.” Academy of Management Journal 50: 987–1008.
  • Sackett, P. R., and J. R. Larson. 1990. “Research Strategies and Tactics in Industrial and Organizational Psychology.” In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough, Vol. 1, 2nd ed, 419–489. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Salter, A. J., and B. R. Martin. 2001. “The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: a Critical Review.” Research Policy 30: 509–532.
  • Schmenner, R. W., L. V. Wassenhove, M. Ketokivi, J. Heyl, and R. F. Lusch. 2009. “Too Much Theory, not Enough Understanding.” Journal of Operations Management 27 (5): 339–343.
  • Sensis. 2013. Yellow Pages: Adelaide 2014 Market Information Booklet. Australia.
  • Simons, R. 1995. Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Controls Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Tapp, A. 2004. “The Changing Face of Marketing Academia. What can we Learn From Commercial Market Research and Practitioners?” European Journal of Marketing 38 (5/6): 492–499.
  • Tapp, A. 2005. “Why Practitioners Don’t Read our Articles and What we Should do About it.” The Marketing Review 5: 3–12.
  • Tapp, A., and T. Hughes. 2008. “Why “Soft Science” is the key to Regaining Leadership in Marketing Knowledge.” European Journal of Marketing 42 (3/4): 265–278.
  • Trounson, A. 2015. “Universities ‘need to work on real-world issues.” The Australian, November 27: 9.
  • Tuan, H.-L., C.-C. Chin, and S.-H. Shieh. 2005. “The Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Motivation Towards Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 639–654.
  • Tushman, M., and C. O’Reilly. 2007. “Research and Relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s Quadrant for Doctoral Programs and Faculty Development.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 769–774.
  • Watermeyer, R. 2014. “Issues in the Articulation of ‘Impact’: the Responses of UK Academics to ‘Impact’ as a new Measure of Research Assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 359–377.
  • Weighley, S., and A. E. M. Hess. 2013. “Universities getting the most government money.” 24/7 Wall St. Accessed 7 November 2014. http://247wallst.com/special-report/2013/04/25/universities-getting-the-most-government-money/.
  • Wilkinson, B. R., and C. H. Durden. 2015. “Inducing Structural Change in Academic Accounting Research.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 23–36.
  • Williams, P. F., J. G. Jenkins, and L. Ingraham. 2006. “The Winnowing Away of Behavioral Accounting Research in the US: The Process for Anointing Academic Elites.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (8): 783–818.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.