Faculty norms and university/industry linkages in STEMM

References

• Anderson, M. S., E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson. 2010. “Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists’ Subscription to Norms of Research.” The Journal of Higher Education 81 (3): 366–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, R. U., F. Hou, S. A. A. Kirmani, M. Ilyas, S. A. H. Zaidi, and M. S. Ashraf. 2018. “Student Employability via University-Industry Linkages.” Human Systems Management 37 (2): 219–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åstebro, T., N. Bazzazian, and S. Braguinsky. 2012. “Startups by Recent University Graduates and Their Faculty: Implications for University Entrepreneurship Policy.” Research Policy 41 (4): 663–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., W. Ding, and T. Stuart. 2009. “The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 57 (4): 637–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, P. C. 2009. “Government Centrality to University–Industry Interactions: University Research Centers and the Industry Involvement of Academic Researchers.” Research Policy 38 (10): 1505–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, P. C., and B. L. Ponomariov. 2007. “Reward Systems and NSF University Research Centers: The Impact of Tenure on University Scientists’ Valuation of Applied and Commercially Relevant Research.” The Journal of Higher Education 78 (1): 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., J. S. Dietz, and M. Gaughan. 2001. “Scientific and Technical Human Capital: An Alternative Model for Research Evaluation.” International Journal of Technology Management 22 (7): 716–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brint, S. 2006. “Saying the ‘Soul of Professionalism’: Freidson’s Institutional Ethics and the Defense of Professional Autonomy.” Knowledge, Work & Society 4 (2): 101–29.
   Google Scholar
• De Fuentes, C., and G. Dutrénit. 2012. “Best Channels of Academia–Industry Interaction for Long Term Benefit.” Research Policy 41 (9): 1666–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etkowitz, H. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University- Industry- Government Relations.” Social Science Information 42: 293–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1995. “The Triple Helix-University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development.” EASST Review 14 (1): 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. A. 2010. “Industry Induces Academic Science to Know Less About More.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (2): 389–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosnacht, K., S. Sarraf, E. Howe, and L. Peck. 2017. “How Important are High Response Rates for College Surveys?” Review of Higher Education 40 (2): 245–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, M., and C. Serbanica. 2014. “University-industry Linkages in the UK: Emerging Themes and ‘Unanswered’ Questions.” Promethus 32 (4): 403–39.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, R. K., D. Göktepe-Hultén, and C. Grimpe. 2017. “Who Instigates University–Industry Collaborations? University Scientists Versus Firm Employees.” Small Business Economics 48 (3): 503–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. D., and A. M. Nunez. 2014. “The Ranking Regime and the Production of Knowledge: Implications for Academia.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22 (31). doi:10.14507/epaa.v22n31.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, R., M. Kenney, D. S. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2011. “30 Years After Bayh–Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy 40 (8): 1045–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumport, P. J. 2002. “Universities and Knowledge: Restructuring the City of Intellect.” In The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by S. Brint, 47–81. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus new Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1): 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2017. “Varieties of Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurial Universities.” Higher Education 73 (6): 853–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., J. Enders, and C. Salerno. 2008. “Higher Education and its Communities: Interconnections, Interdependencies and a Research Agenda.” Higher Education 56 (3): 303–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, I. 2014. “Different Meanings of ‘Knowledge as Commodity’ in the Context of Higher Education.” Critical Sociology 40 (3): 393–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., and D. Patton. 2011. “Does Inventor Ownership Encourage University Research-Derived Entrepreneurship? A six University Comparison.” Research Policy 40 (8): 1100–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. 2004. “Obtaining Integrity? Reviewing and Examining the Charter Between Higher Education and Society.” Review of Higher Education 27 (4): 429–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucel, A., P. Robert, M. Buil, and N. Masferrer. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Skills and Education-job Matching of Higher Education Graduates.” European Journal of Education 51 (1): 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. J. 2018. “Strategic Human Resource Management for University-Industry Collaborations in Korea: Financial Incentives for Academic Faculty and Employment Security of Industry Liaison Offices.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30 (4): 461–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M.-W., and B. Bozeman. 2006. “Researchers’ Industry Experience and Productivity in University–Industry Research Centers: A “Scientific and Technical Human Capital” Explanation.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (2): 269–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, M. M., S. Slaughter, and G. Rhoades. 2008. “The State-Sponsored Student Entrepreneur.” The Journal of Higher Education 79 (6): 638–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., I. V. S. Mullis, and M. Hooper. 2016. Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. Chestnut Hill, MA: IMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., and R. Tourangeau. 2013. “Where do we go From Here? Nonresponse and Social Measurement.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645 (1): 222–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P. 2007. “Academic Capitalism and Doctoral Student Socialization: A Case Study.” The Journal of Higher Education 78 (1): 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P. 2009. “Academic Capitalism in the Pasteur’s Quadrant.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 33 (3): 301–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P. 2012. “The Role of Context in Academic Capitalism: The Industry-Friendly Department Case.” The Journal of Higher Education 83 (1): 26–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P. 2015. “Industry-Academia Linkages: Lessons from Empirical Studies and Recommendations for Future Inquiry.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol 30, edited by M. Paulsen, 469–523. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P., and J. B. Berger. 2005. “Patenting Productivity and Intellectual Property Policies at Research I Universities: An Exploratory Comparative Study.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 13 (5).
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P., and J. B. Berger. 2008. “Academic Capitalism and Academic Culture: A Case Study.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 16 (23). doi:10.14507/epaa.v16n23.2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P., A. M. Kuntz, and J. B. Berger. 2012. “Bourdieu and Academic Capitalism: Faculty “Habitus” in Materials Science and Engineering.” The Journal of Higher Education 83 (4): 558–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2006. “Are Patenting Scientists the Better Scholars? An Exploratory Comparison of Inventor-Authors with Their non-Inventing Peers in Nano-Science and Technology.” Research Policy 35 (10): 1646–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroff, I. I. 1974. “Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 39 (4): 579–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F. 2010. “The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (2): 341–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2013. Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. (NSB 16–01).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. J. 2012. “Putting University Research in Context: Assessing Alternative Measures of Production and Diffusion at Stanford.” Research Policy 41 (4): 678–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, A. L., and A. Sapir. 2017. “Shifts in the Organization and Profession of Academic Science: The Impact of IPR and Technology Transfer.” Journal of Professions and Organization 4 (1): 36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmanna, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’Este, R. Fini, A. Geuna, R. Grimaldi, A. Hughes, S. Krabel, M. Kitsong, P. Llerena, F. Lissoni, A. Salter, and M. Sobrero. 2013. Academic Engagement and Commercialization: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations. Research Policy 42: 423–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peytchev, A. 2013. “Consequences of Survey Nonresponse.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645 (1): 88–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and J. Owen-Smith. 2002. “The new World of Knowledge Production in the Life Sciences.” In The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by S. Brint, 107–32. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, J. B. 2003. “Commercializing Academic Research: Resource Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer.” Journal of Higher Education 74 (1): 26–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, J. B., and P. P. McDougal. 2005. “University Start-up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms That go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 20: 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooksby, J. H., and B. Pusser. 2014. “Learning to Litigate: University Patents in the Knowledge Economy.” In Academic Capitalism in the age of Globalization, edited by B. Cantwell and I. Kauppinen, 74–93. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, M. M. Fischer, and J. Fröhlich. 2002. “Knowledge Interactions Between Universities and Industry in Austria: Sectoral Patterns and Determinants.” Research Policy 31 (3): 303–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A. 2004. “Encouraging University Entrepreneurship? The Effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on University Patenting in the United States.” Journal of Business Venturing 19 (1): 127–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S. 2018. “Academic Entrepreneurship: Lessons Learned for Technology Transfer Personnel and University Administrators.” In World Scientific Reference on Innovation, edited by D. Libaers and D. Dunlap, 1–21. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., C. J. Archerd, and T. I. Campbell. 2004. “Boundaries and Quandaries: How Professors Negotiate Market Relations.” The Review of Higher Education 28 (1): 129–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and B. Cantwell. 2012. “Transatlantic Moves to the Market: The United States and the European Union.” Higher Education 63: 583–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the new Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., S. L. Thomas, D. Johnson, and S. N. Barringer. 2014. “Institutional Conflict of Interest: The Role of Interlocking Directorates in the Scientific Relationships Between Universities and the Corporate Sector.” The Journal of Higher Education 85 (1): 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, P., S. Gurmu, A. J. Sumell, and G. Black. 2007. “Who’s Patenting in the University?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 61 (2): 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• Szelényi, K. 2013. “The Meaning of Money in the Socialization of Science and Engineering Doctoral Students: Nurturing the Next Generation of Academic Capitalists?” The Journal of Higher Education 84 (2): 266–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J., A. W. Fuller, and M. Thursby. 2009. “US Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University.” Research Policy 38 (1): 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., and M. C. Thursby. 2007. “University Licensing.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23 (4): 620–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, J. D. 2012. “Institutional Strategy: Positioning for Prestige.” In The Organization of Higher Education: Managing Colleges for a new era, edited by M. N. Bastedo, 118–59. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., and W. A. van der Kloot. 2001. “Confirmatory Analysis of Exploratively Obtained Factor Structures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 61: 777–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vick, T. E., and M. Robertson. 2018. “A Systematic Literature Review of UK University–Industry Collaboration for Knowledge Transfer: A Future Research Agenda.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 579–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, R., L. Glenna, W. Lacy, and D. Biscotti. 2008. “Close Enough but not too far: Assessing the Effects of University–Industry Research Relationships and the Rise of Academic Capitalism.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1854–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar