On the effects of student interest, self-efficacy, and perceptions of the instructor on flow, satisfaction, and learning outcomes

References

• Abbott, J. 2000. “‘Blinking Out’ and ‘Having the Touch’: Two Fifth-Grade Boys Talk About Flow Experiences in Writing.” Written Communication 17: 53–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdous, M., and C. J. Yen. 2010. “A Predictive Study of Learner Satisfaction and Outcomes in Face-to-Face, Satellite Broadcast, and Live Video-Streaming Learning Environments.” Internet and Higher Education 13 (4): 248–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrantes, J. L., C. Seabra, and L. F. Lages. 2007. “Pedagogical Affect, Student Interest, and Learning Performance.” Journal of Business Research 60: 960–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011. “Student Engagement with Science in Early Adolescence: The Contribution of Enjoyment to Students’ Continuing Interest in Learning About Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36: 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., G. M. Marakas, and Y. Yoo. 2002. “A Comparative Study of Distributed Learning Environments on Learning Outcomes.” Information Systems Research 13 (4): 404–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. F., K. M. Long, J. O’Mara, and B. B. Judd. 2008. “Students’ Predispositions and Orientations Toward Communication and Perceptions of Instructor Reciprocity and Learning.” Communication Education 57 (1): 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aube, C., E. Brunelle, and V. Rousseau. 2014. “Flow Experience and Team Performance: The Role of Team Goal Commitment and Information Exchange.” Motivation and Emotion 38 (1): 120–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., C. Barbaranelli, G. V. Caprara, and C. Pastorelli. 1996. “Multifaceted Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning.” Child Development 67: 1206–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beile, P. M., and D. N. Boote. 2004. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20: 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., A. K. Goodboy, and S. A. Myers. 2017. “Conditional Processes of Effective Instructor Communication and Increases in Students’ Cognitive Learning.” Communication Education 66 (2): 129–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricteux, C., J. Navarro, L. Ceja, and G. Fuerst. 2017. “Interest as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Challenge/Skills Balance and Flow at Work: An Analysis at Within-Individual Level.” Journal of Happiness Studies 18 (3): 861–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., L. Mickles, S. Rahman, and C. Fernandez. 2016. “The Effect of Instructor Fluency on Students’ Perceptions of Instructors, Confidence in Learning, and Actual Learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (2): 161–72.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, I.-S. 2017. “Computer Self-Efficacy, Learning Performance, and the Mediating Role of Learning Engagement.” Computers in Human Behavior 72: 362–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe, K., Y. Kang, B. S. Seo, and B. Yang. 2015. “Experiences of Learning Flow Among Korean Adolescents.” Learning and Individual Differences 39: 180–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn, M., D. Sullivan, and E. Fox. 2012. “An Examination of the Impact of Team Teaching on Student Learning Outcomes and Student Satisfaction in Undergraduate Business Capstone Courses.” American Journal of Business Education 5 (2): 149–58.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1988. “The Flow Experience and its Significance for Human Psychology.” In Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, edited by M. Csikszentmihalyi, and I. S. Csikszentmihalyi, 15–35. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: the Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, S. S., C. J. Fullagar, M. J. Simmons, and M. Zhu. 2015. “Contagious Flow: Antecedents and Consequences of Optimal Experience in the Classroom.” Journal of Management Education 39 (3): 319–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachner, A. M., and B. M. Saxton. 2015. “If You Don’t Care, Then Why Should I? The Influence of Instructor Commitment on Student Satisfaction and Commitment.” Journal of Management Education 39 (5): 549–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duque, L. C., and J. R. Weeks. 2010. “Towards a Model and Methodology for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction.” Quality Assurance in Education 18 (2): 84–105.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J. 2004. “A Study of Flow Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom.” Canadian Modern Language Review 60 (5): 549–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeser, S., and N. Baumann. 2016. “Fluctuation of Flow and Affect in Everyday Life: A Second Look at the Paradox of Work.” Journal of Happiness Studies 17: 105–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., and N. Ashill. 2016. “The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Update.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 14 (2): 185–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., H. J. Wen, and N. Ashill. 2006. “The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 4 (2): 215–35.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban-Millat, I., F. J. Martínez-López, D. Luna, and I. Rodríguez-Ardura. 2014. “The Concept of Flow in Online Consumer Behavior.” In Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management, edited by F. J. Martínez-López, 371–402. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., and A. L. H. Gaffney. 2015. “Understanding the Role of Instructor Rapport in the College Classroom.” Communication Research Reports 32 (4): 340–6. doi:10.1080/08824096.2015.1089847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghani, J. A. 1995. “Flow in Human-Computer Interactions: Test of a Model.” In Human Factors in Information Systems: Emerging Theoretical Bases, edited by J. M. Carey, 291–309. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., G. A. Cranmer, M. Sollitto, S. Labelle, and A. L. Lancaster. 2017. “What do College Students Want? A Prioritization of Instructional Behaviors and Characteristics.” Communication Education 66 (3): 280–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., and S. A. Mayers. 2008. “The Effect of Teacher Confirmation on Student Communication and Learning Outcomes.” Communication Education 57 (2): 153–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. M., and M. S. Poole. 2009. “Antecedents of Flow in Online Shopping: A Test of Alternative Models.” Information Systems Journal 19: 369–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. M., and Y. K. Ro. 2008. “Capturing Flow in the Business Classroom.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 6: 437–62. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00185.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., and J. Koivisto. 2014. “Measuring Flow in Gamification: Dispositional Flow Scale-2.” Computers in Human Behavior 40: 133–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnish, R. J., and K. R. Bridges. 2011. “Effect of Syllabus Tone: Students’ Perceptions of Instructor and Course.” Social Psychology of Education 14 (3): 319–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., and T. S. Proitz. 2016. “Why Use Learning Outcomes in Higher Education? Exploring the Ground for Academic Resistance and Reclaiming the Value of Unexpected Learning.” Education Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 28: 205–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, A. F., and S. J. Rasmussen. 2018. “Using Pinterest to Stimulate Student Engagement, Interest, and Learning in Managerial Accounting Courses.” Journal of Accounting Education 43: 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J.-C., P.-Y. Chiu, H.-F. Shih, and P.-S. Lin. 2012. “Computer Self-Efficacy, Competitive Anxiety and Flow State: Escaping From Firing Online Game.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 11 (3): 70–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J.-C., M.-Y. Hwang, E. Szeto, C.-R. Tsai, Y.-C. Kuo, and W.-Y. Hsu. 2016. “Internet Cognitive Failure Relevant to Self-Efficacy, Learning Interest, and Satisfaction with Social Media Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 214–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H.-Y., and X. Lin-Siegler. 2012. “How Learning About Scientists’ Struggles Influences Students’ Interest and Learning in Physics.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (2): 469–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honicke, T., and I. Broadbent. 2016. “The Influence of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review.” Educational Research Review 17: 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., and R. C. Eklund. 2002. “Assessing Flow in Physical Activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dis­positional Flow Scale-2.” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 24: 133–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., and H. W. Marsh. 1996. “Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Optimal Experience: The Flow State Scale.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 18 (1): 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. S., A. D. Bugeja, and L. K. Barber. 2014. “More Content or More Policy? A Closer Look at Syllabus Detail, Instructor Gender, and Perceptions of Instructor Effectiveness.” College Teaching 62 (4): 129–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, P., A. Dhir, S. Chen, and R. Rajala. 2016. “Flow in Context: Development and Validation of the Flow Experience Instrument for Social Networking.” Computers in Human Behavior 59: 358–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, M. 2018. “Facilitating Flow Experience in Physical Education Settings.” Psychology of Sport & Exercise 38: 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen, J., L. Kairisto-Mertanen, and T. Penttila. 2013. “Innovation Pedagogy and Desired Learning Outcomes in Higher Education.” On the Horizon 21 (4): 333–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kiili, K. 2005. “Content Creation Challenges and Flow Experience in Educational Games: The IT-Emperor Case.” The Internet and Higher Education 8 (3): 183–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L. E., and C. MacCann. 2016. “What is Students’ Ideal University Instructor Personality? An Investigation of Absolute and Relative Personality Preferences.” Personality and Individual Differences 102: 190–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, S., and T. Morris. 2014. “The Effect of Performance Context and Skill Level on the Frequency of Flow Experiences.” European Journal of Sport Science 14 (sup1): S478–86. doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.718364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., and D. Nadler. 2013. “Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement: Why do Implicit Beliefs, Goals, and Effort Regulation Matter?” Learning and Individual Differences 25: 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y.-C., and B. R. Belland. 2016. “An Exploratory Study of Adult Learners’ Perceptions of Online Learning: Minority Students in Continuing Education.” Educational Technology, Research and Development 64 (4): 661–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBarbera, R. 2013. “The Relationship Between Students’ Perceived Sense of Connectedness to the Instructor and Satisfaction in Online Courses.” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 14 (4): 209–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W., M.-J. Lee, and M. Bong. 2014. “Testing Interest and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Academic Self-Regulation and Achievement.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 39: 86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-S., Y.-C. Chang, K.-H. Liew, and C.-P. Chu. 2016. “Effects of Concept Map Extraction and a Test-Based Diagnostic Environment on Learning Achievement and Learners’ Perceptions.” British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (4): 649–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., B. Bridgeman, and R. M. Adler. 2012. “Measuring Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Motivation Matters.” Educational Researcher 41 (9): 352–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, H., and T. Noble. 2010. “Supporting Positive Pupil Relationships: Research to Practice.” Educational and Child Psychology 27: 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., A. K. Goodboy, and Members of COMM 600. 2014. “College Student Learning, Motivation, and Satisfaction as a Function of Effective Instructor Communication Behaviors.” Southern Communication Journal 79 (1): 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, T. P., D. L. Hoffman, and Y. F. Yung. 2000. “Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach.” Marketing Science 19 (1): 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oades, L. G., P. Robinson, S. Green, and G. B. Spence. 2011. “Towards a Positive University.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 6 (6): 432–9. doi:10.1080/17439760.2011.634828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orus, C., M. J. Barles, D. Belanche, L. Casalo, E. Fraj, and R. Gurrea. 2016. “The Effects of Learner-Generated Videos for YouTube on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction.” Computers & Education 95: 254–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G., A. M. Johnson, R. Atkinson, and M. Reisslein. 2013. “Investigating the Impact of Pedagogical Agent Gender Matching and Learner Choice on Learning Outcomes and Perceptions.” Computers & Education 67: 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, D. D., J. Mazanov, D. Meacheam, G. Heaslip, and J. Hanson. 2016. “Attitude, Digital Literacy and Self Efficacy: Flow-on Effects for Online Learning Behavior.” Internet and Higher Education 29: 91–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, C., C. M. Bachen, and P. E. Hernández-Ramos. 2012. “Flow and Cooperative Learning in Civic Game Play.” New Media & Society 14 (8): 1321–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., D. R. Lane, and J. C. McCroskey. 2006. “Teacher Immediacy and the Teacher– Student Relationship.” In Handbook of Instructional Communication: Rhetorical and Relational Perspectives, edited by T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, and J. C. McCroskey, 167–93. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rogatko, T. P. 2009. “The Influence of Flow on Positive Affect in College Students.” Journal of Happiness Studies 10: 133–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roick, J., and T. Ringeisen. 2018. “Students’ Math Performance in Higher Education: Examining the Role of Self-Regulated Learning and Self-Efficacy.” Learning and Individual Differences 65: 148–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000a. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and new Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000b. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55: 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scager, K., S. F. Akkerman, A. Pilot, and T. Wubble. 2014. “Challenging High-Ability Students.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (4): 659–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweickle, M., S. Groves, S. A. Vella, and C. Swann. 2017. “The Effects of Open vs. Specific Goals on Flow and Clutch States in a Cognitive Task.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 33: 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., R. M. Ernst, J. Gillham, K. Reivich, and M. Linkins. 2009. “Positive Education: Positive Psychology and Classroom Interventions.” Oxford Review of Education 35 (3): 293–311. doi:10.1080/03054980902934563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., and J. O. Pawelski. 2003. “Positive Psychology: FAQs.” Psychological Inquiry 14 (2): 159–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, D., M.-H. Cho, C.-L. Tsai, and R. Marra. 2013. “Unpacking Online Learning Experiences: Online Learning Self-Efficacy and Learning Satisfaction.” Internet and Higher Education 19: 10–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuell, T. J. 1986. “Cognitive Conceptions of Learning.” Review of Educational Research 56 (4): 411–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekpe, J. S. 2005. “An Examination of the Multidimensionality of Flow Construct in a Computer-Mediated Environment.” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 6 (1): 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sklett, V. H., H. W. Loras, and H. Sigmundsson. 2018. “Self-Efficacy, Flow, Affect, Worry and Performance in Elite World Cup Ski Jumping.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suskie and Banta. 2009. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, C., R. J. Keegan, D. Piggott, and L. Crust. 2012. “A Systematic Review of the Experience, Occurrence, and Controllability of Flow States in Elite Sport.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 13: 807–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., and J. E. Herring. 2005. “Teacher Influence in the Classroom: A Preliminary Investigation of Perceived Instructor Power, Credibility, and Student Satisfaction.” Communication Research Reports 22 (3): 235–46.
   Google Scholar
• Trevino, N. N., and S. C. DeFreitas. 2014. “The Relationship Between Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Achievement for First Generation Latino College Students.” Social Psychology Education 17: 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. J. 2011. “Classroom Assessment Techniques for Promoting More Positive Experiences in Teaching and Learning.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 6 (6): 440–5. doi:10.1080/17439760.2011.634825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C. A. 2013. “Using Adaptive Learning Technologies to Personalize Instruction to Student Interests: The Impact of Relevant Contexts on Performance and Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (4): 932–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-L., J.-C. Liang, C.-Y. Lin, and C.-C. Tsai. 2017. “Identifying Taiwanese Junior-High School Students’ Mathematics Learning Profiles and Their Roles in Mathematics Learning Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance.” Learning and Individual Differences 54: 92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., and A. B. Frymier. 2010. “The Relationship Between Student Perceptions of Instructor Human and Students’ Reports of Learning.” Communication Education 59 (1): 48–62.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., L. K. Trevino, and L. Ryan. 1993. “The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interaction.” Computers in Human Behaviors 9: 411–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiechowski, L., and T. L. Washburn. 2014. “Online Finance and Economics Courses: A Comparative Study of Course Satisfaction and Outcomes Across Learning Models.” American Journal of Business Education (Online) 7 (1): 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, W. J., and S. B. Emmerson. 2013. “The Experience of the Flow State in Live Music Performance.” Psychology of Music 41 (3): 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Y. Lu, B. Wang, and W. Huang. 2011. “What Makes Them Happy and Curious Online? An Empirical Study on High School Students’ Internet Use from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” Computers & Education 56: 346–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 1990. “Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview.” Educational Psychologist 25: 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar