Online communication design education: the importance of the social environment

References

• Anderson, Terry, and John Dron. 2011. “Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 12 (3). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1663. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, Deirdre. 2012. “Pedagogical Contexts.” In Assessing Creativity: Supporting Learning in Architecture and Design, edited by Hedda Haugen Askland, Michael J. Ostwald, and Anthony Williams, 17–28. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching, Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, Frank. 1995. “Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation.” Organization Studies 16 (6): 1021–46. doi: 10.1177/017084069501600605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, Bernadette. 2006. “At the End of a Huge Crit in the Summer, It Was ‘Crap’ – I’d Worked Really Hard but All She Said Was ‘Fine’ and I Was Gutted.” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 5 (2): 83–95. doi:10.1386/adch.5.2.83_1.
   Google Scholar
• Boling, Elizabeth, Martin Siegel, Kennon Smith, and Patrick Parrish. 2013. “Student Goes on a Journey; Stranger Rides Into the Classroom: Narratives and the Instructor in the Design Studio.” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 12 (2): 179–94. doi:10.1386/adch.12.2.179_1.
   Google Scholar
• Borteh, Larissa. 2018. Bauhaus Movement Overview and Analysis. The ArtStory Foundation. Accessed September 10, 2018. https://www.theartstory.org/movement-bauhaus.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Boys, Jos. 2011. Towards Creative Learning Spaces: Re-thinking the Architecture of Post-compulsory Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, Tony, and Adrian Shaugnessy. 2009. Studio Culture: The Secret Life of the Graphic Design Studio. London: Unit Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Lucila, and Pippa Yeoman. 2018. “Framing Learning Entanglement in Innovative Learning Spaces: Connecting Theory, Design and Practice.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (6): 1120–37. doi: 10.1002/berj.3483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, Hernan, and Shulamith Kreitler. 2008. “Correspondences and Divergences Between Teachers and Students in the Evaluation of Design Creativity in the Design Studio.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 35 (4). doi:10.1068/b3405.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, Katherine, Carol Brandt, Brigitte Scott, Sarah Douglas, Margarita McGrath, Yolanda Reimer, and Mitzi Vernon. 2011. “Managing the Complexity of Design Problems Through Studio-based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 5: 2. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1253.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Daalhuizen, Jaap, Oscar Person, and Valentin Gattol. 2014. “A Personal Matter? An Investigation of Students’ Design Process Experiences When Using a Heuristic or a Systematic Method.” Design Studies 35 (2): 133–59. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daalhuizen, Jaap, and Jan Schoormans. 2018. “Pioneering Online Design Teaching in a MOOC Format: Tools for Facilitating Experiential Learning.” International Journal of Design 12 (2): 1–14. doi: 10.18848/2325-1328/CGP/v12i02/1-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. 2010. “Stuck for Words.” In BBetween, edited by G. Grant, 34–5. Sydney: Billy Blue College of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbas, Osman, and Halime Demirkan. 2007. “Learning Styles of Design Students and the Relationship of Academic Performance and Gender in Design Education.” Learning and Instruction 17 (3): 345–59. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, Thomas. 1987. “Design and Studio Pedagogy.” Journal of Architectural Education 41 (1): 16–25. doi: 10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, Katja. 2018. “Online Design Education: Searching for a Middle Ground.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. doi:10.1177/1474022218758231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, Lori. 2006. “Human-centered Design Guidelines.” In Learning Spaces, edited by Diana Oblinger, 10.11–10.13. Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, Gabriela, Hagay Hochman, and Itay Dafni. 2010. “The Design Studio ‘Crit’: Teacher–Student Communication.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24 (3): 285–302. doi: 10.1017/S089006041000020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, Christine, Beth Robelia, and Joan Hughes. 2009. “Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now?” Educational Researcher 38: 246–59. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09336671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itin, Christian. 1999. “Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century.” The Journal of Experiential Education 22 (2): 91–8. doi: 10.1177/105382599902200206
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, David. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan. 2006. How Designers Think. 4th ed. Burlington, MA: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan. 2007. What Designers Know. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Fern. 2005. “Foundations for Design Education: Continuing the Bauhaus VorkursYision.” Studies in Art Education 46 (3): 211–26. doi: 10.1080/00393541.2005.11650075
   Google Scholar
• Marshalsey, Lorraine. 2015. “Investigating the Experiential Impact of Sensory Affect in Contemporary Communication Design Studio Education.” International Journal of Art and Design Education 34 (3): 336–48. doi: 10.1111/jade.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshalsey, Lorraine, and Madeleine Sclater. 2018. “Critical Perspectives of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Relation to Specialist Communication Design Studio Education Within the UK and Australia.” Research in Comparative & International Education 13 (1): 92–116. doi: 10.1177/1745499918761706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Steven, and Christina Almeida. 2002. “Self-authored Graphic Design: A Strategy for Integrative Studies.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 36 (3): 103–16. doi:10.2307/3333601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, William. 2004. Rethinking Campus and Classroom Design. Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Nottingham, Anitra. 2017. “Feel the Fear: Learning Graphic Design in Affective Places and Online Spaces.” The International Journal of Art & Design Education 36 (1): 39–49. doi:10.1111/jade.12058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. 1989. “Introduction.” In Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honour of Robert Glaser, edited by L. B. Resnick, 1–24. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Virginia. 2003. “Constructivist Pedagogy.” Teachers College Record 105 (9): 1623–40. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, Ashraf, and Nicholas Wilkinson, eds. 2007. Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future. Gateshead: The Urban International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbach, Katrina. 2011. “Graphic Design and the Aesthetics of Place.” Iridescent-Icograda Journal of Design Research 1 (2): 148–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sara, R. 2006. “Sharing and Developing Studio Practice: A Cross-disciplinary Study Comparing Teaching and Learning Approaches in the Art and Design Disciplines.” Paper presented at the Centre for Learning and Teaching in Art & Design (CLTAD), London.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shreeve, Alison. 2011. “The Way We Were? Signature Pedagogies Under Threat.” Paper presented at the 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers, Cumulus Association/DRS, Paris, May 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee. 2005. “Pedagogies of Uncertainty.” Liberal Education 91 (2): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, Michael. 2011. “Researching Design Education.” Paper presented at the 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers, Cumulus Association/DRS, Paris, May 18–19.
   Google Scholar