Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences

References

• Acker, S., and M. Webber. 2017. “Made to Measure: Early Career Academics in the Canadian University Workplace.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (3): 541–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. T., K. Miller, and S. Fielding. 2015. “Open for Business: Universities, Entrepreneurial Academics and Open Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 19 (6): 1540013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., C. Franzoni, and A. Geuna. 2011. “The Organization, Economics, and Policy of Scientific Research: What we do Know and What we Don’t Know-an Agenda for Research.” Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (1): 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., W. Zhu, W. Koh, and P. Bhatia. 2004. “Transformational Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Moderating Role of Structural Distance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 25 (8): 951–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccini, A., L. Barabesi, M. Cioni, and C. Pisani. 2014. “Crossing the Hurdle: The Determinants of Individual Scientific Performance.” Scientometrics 101: 2035–2062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2012. Global Education Inc. New Policy Networks and the neo-Liberal Imaginary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1978. “The Self System in Reciprocal Determinism.” American Psychologist 33 (4): 344–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2003. “Defining ‘Early Career’ in Research.” Higher Education 45 (3): 257–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2010. “Conceptualising Research Performance.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (8): 889–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M. 2013. “Facts and Fads in Academic Research Management: the Effect of Management Practices on Research Productivity in Australia.” Research Policy 42: 1679–1693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1999. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field.” In The Science Studies Reader, edited by M. Biagioli, 31–50. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., and L. Lucas. 2009. Academic Research and Researchers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carayol, N., and M. Matt. 2004. “Does Research Organization Influence Academic Production? Laboratory Level Evidence From a Large European University.” Research Policy 33: 1081–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Ceacero, D., and G. Ion. 2018. “Changes in the University Research Approach: Challenges for Academics’ Scientific Productivity.” Higher Education Policy. doi:10.1057/s41307-018-0101-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, M., M. Meoli, and A. Signori. 2016. “Performance-based Funding and University Research Productivity: The Moderating Effect of University Legitimacy.” Journal of Technology Transfer 41: 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., and R. Watermeyer. 2017. “Artifice or Integrity in the Marketization of Research Impact? Investigating the Moral Economy of (Pathways to) Impact Statements Within Research Funding Proposals in the UK and Australia.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (12): 2360–2372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N., and S. Kiesler. 2005. “Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R., S. Hillyard, and M. Reed. 2008. Knowledge, Higher Education, and the new Managerialism: the Changing Management of UK Universities. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Degn, L. 2018. “Academic Sensemaking and Behavioural Responses – Exploring how Academics Perceive and Respond to Identity Threats in Times of Turmoil.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (2): 305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. “Why do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (3): 316–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doberneck, D. M., C. R. Glass, and J. Schweitzer. 2010. “From Rhetoric to Reality: a Typology of Publically Engaged Scholarship.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 14 (4): 5–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, A., and A. Schiffauerova. 2015. “How to Receive More Funding for Your Research?” Get Connected to the Right People! PloS One 10 (7): e0133061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, F., and A. Geare. 2013. “Factors Influencing University Research Performance.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 774–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestein, S. 2015. Failure: Why Science is so Successful. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., and S. Mohapatra. 2007. “Social-Organizational Characteristics of Work and Publication Productivity among Academic Scientists in Doctoral-Granting Departments.” The Journal of Higher Education 78 (5): 542–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. 2016. University in Chains: Confronting the Military-Industrial-Academic Complex. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2008. Multivariate Data Analysis: International Version. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdarpasic, A., A. Brew, and S. Popenici. 2015. “The Contribution of Academics’ Engagement in Research to Undergraduate Education.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (4): 644–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarfelt, B., and A. D. Rushforth. 2017. “Indicators as Judgement Devices: An Empirical Study of Citizen Bibliometrics in Research Evaluation.” Research Evaluation 26 (3): 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemlin, S., C. M. Allwood, and B. R. Martin. 2008. “Creative Knowledge Environments.” Creativity Research Journal 20 (2): 196–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 2012. “Performance-based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41 (2): 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillson, D., and R. Murray-Webster. 2007. Understanding and Managing Risk Attitude. Aldershot: Gower Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. M., B. Blasi, B. Ćulum, Ž Dragšić, A. Ewen, H. Horta, and C. Rios-Aguilar. 2014. “The Methodological Illumination of a Blind Spot: Information and Communication Technology and International Research Team Dynamics in a Higher Education Research Program.” Higher Education 67 (4): 473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, H., and J. Jung. 2014. “Higher Education Research in Asia: An Archipelago, two Continents, or Merely Atomization?” Higher Education 68 (1): 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. 2000. Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Horta, H., and T. A. Lacy. 2011. “How Does Size Matter for Science? Exploring the Effects of Research Unit Size on Academics’ Scientific Productivity and Information Exchange Behaviors.” Science and Public Policy 38 (6): 449–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, H., and J. M. Santos. 2016. “An Instrument to Measure Individuals’ Research Agenda Setting: the Multi-Dimensional Research Agendas Inventory.” Scientometrics 108 (3): 1243–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ion, G., and D. Castro Ceacero. 2017. “Transitions in the Manifestations of the Research Culture of Spanish Universities.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (2): 311–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Júnior, S. K., R. L. A. Borges, and D. Prince. 2018. “Scientific Production and its Collective Determinants: An Econometric Analysis for the Brazilian Research Labs.” Science and Public Policy 45 (5): 661–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, K.-M., and T. J. Kallio. 2014. “Management-by-results and Performance Measurement in Universities – Implications for Work Motivation.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (4): 574–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. 2016. “The European Research Elite: a Cross-National Study of Highly Productive Academics in 11 Countries.” Higher Education 71 (3): 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., and D. W. Aksnes. 2015. “Explaining the Increase in Publication Productivity among Academic Staff: a Generational Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (8): 1438–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfeldt, L., C. W. Bloch, and G. Sivertsen. 2015. “Options and Limitations in Measuring the Impact of Research Grants – Evidence From Denmark and Norway.” Research Evaluation 24 (3): 256–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., and B. Read. 2013. “Research Policy and Academic Performativity: Compliance, Contestation and Complicity.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (8): 1162–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-N., J. P. Walsh, and J. Wang. 2015. “Creativity in Scientific Teams: Unpacking Novelty and Impact.” Research Policy 44: 684–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. 2007. University Governance and Academic Research: Case Studies of Research Units in Dutch and English Universities. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. 2016. “New Public Management and Research Productivity – a Precarious State of Affairs of Academic Work in the Netherlands.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (5): 828–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L., and J. Dee. 2012. Understanding Academic Work in a Changing Institutional Environment: Faculty Autonomy, Productivity and Identity in Europe and the United States. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 27. edited by J. C. Smart and M. Paulsen, 123–206. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L., J. Enders, and H. De Boer. 2008. “The Freedom to set Research Agendas—Illusion and Reality of the Research Units in the Dutch Universities.” Higher Education Policy 21 (3): 377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. S., and A. Aliyeva. 2015. “Embedded Neoliberalism Within Faculty Behaviors.” Review of Higher Education 38 (4): 537–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, P. H., and D. A. Norman. 2013. Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., and T. K. Krauze. 1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47: 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. T., and R. McGinnis. 1981. “Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity.” American Sociological Review 46 (4): 422–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, S. R., D. Miller, and C. R. John. 2005. “Readiness for Organizational Change: Do Organizational Commitment and Social Relationships in the Workplace Make a Difference?” Human Resource Development Quarterly 16 (2): 213–234.
   Google Scholar
• Mamun, S. A. K., and M. M. Rahman. 2015. “Is There any Feedback Effect Between Academic Research Publication and Research Collaboration? Evidence from an Australian University.” Scientometrics 105 (3): 2179–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martimianakis, M. A., and L. Muzzin. 2015. “Discourses of Interdisciplinarity and the Shifting Topography of Academic Work: Generational Perspectives on Facilitating and Resisting Neoliberalism.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (8): 1454–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. 2011. “The Research Excellence Framework and the “Impact Agenda”: are we Creating a Frankenstein Monster?” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 247–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., and M.-H. R. Ho. 2002. “Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural Equation Analyses.” Psychological Methods 7 (1): 64–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., and N. J. Allen. 1991. “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment.” Human Resource Management Review 1 (1): 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. E., and D. S. Rebne. 1995. “The Nonlinear Effects of Teaching and Consulting on Academic Research Productivity.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 29: 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowday, R. T., R. M. Steers, and L. W. Porter. 1979. “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 14 (2): 224–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munch, R. 2014. Academic Capitalism: Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oleksiyenko, A., and W. G. Tierney. 2018. “Higher Education and Human Vulnerability: Global Failures of Corporate Design.” Tertiary Education and Management. doi:10.1080/13583883.2018.1439094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olssen, M. 2016. “Neoliberal Competition in Higher Education Today: Research, Accountability and Impact.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (1): 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Brostrom, P. D’Este, R. Fini, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialization: a Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and K. Walsh. 2008. “Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1884–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickens, J. 2005. Attitudes and Perceptions. In Organizational Behavior in Health Care. N. Borkowski, 2nd ed. 43–69. Boston: Jones and Barlettt Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 2015. Personal knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., and B. Stensaker. 2014. “Designing the Entrepreneurial University: The Interpretation of a Global Idea.” Public Organization Review 14 (4): 497–516.
   Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J. 2012. “PhD Experience and Subsequent Outcomes: A Look at Self-Perceptions of Acquired Graduate Attributes and Supervisor Support.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (1): 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 2000. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.” Minerva 38 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postiglione, G. A., and J. Jung. 2015. “Congeniality and Research Productivity in State-Professional-Market Driven Systems of Mass Higher Education.” In The Relevance of Academic Work in Comparative Perspective, edited by W. K. Cummings, and U. Teichler, 107–120. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., and O. P. John. 2007. “Measuring Personality in one Minute or Less: A 10-Item Short Version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German.” Journal of Research in Personality 41 (1): 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings, C. M., D. A. McFarland, L. Dahlander, and D. Wang. 2015. Streams of Thought: Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Cohesion in a Multidisciplinary Era. Social Forces 93(4): 1687–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzhetsky, A., J. G. Foster, I. T. Foster, and J. A. Evans. 2015. “Choosing Experiments to Accelerate Collective Discovery.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (47): 14569–14574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. M. 2018. “Development and Validation of the Multi-Dimensional University Research Workplace Inventory (MDURWI).” Higher Education Policy 31 (3): 381–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. M., and H. Horta. 2018. “The Research Agenda Setting of Higher Education Researchers.” Higher Education 76 (4): 649–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrecker, E. 2012. “Academic Freedom in the Corporate University.” The Radical Teacher 93: 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Siler, K., K. Lee, and L. Bero. 2015. “Measuring the Effectiveness of Scientific Gatekeeping.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (2): 360–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2017. “Target-setting, Early-Career Academic Identities and the Measurement Culture of UK Higher Education.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (3): 597–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromquist, N. P. 2017. “The Professoriate: The Challenged Subject in US Higher Education.” Comparative Education 53 (1): 132–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. 2017. “Lost Souls? The Demoralization of Academic Labour in the Measured University.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (3): 625–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2013. “Discipline and Methodology in Higher Education Research.” Higher Education Research and Development 32 (1): 136–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towns, J., T. Cockerill, M. Dahan, I. Foster, K. Gaither, A. Grimshaw, and G. D. Peterson. 2014. “XSEDE: Accelerating Scientific Discovery.” Computing in Science and Engineering 16 (5): 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbree, M., E. Horlings, P. Groenewegen, I. V. Weijden, and P. Basselaar. 2015. “Organizational Factors Influencing Scholarly Performance: A Multivariate Study of Biomedical Research Groups.” Scientometrics 102: 25–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P., and Y.-N. Lee. 2015. “The Bureaucratization of Science.” Research Policy 44: 1584–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R. 2009. “Academic Manager or Managed Academic? Academic Identity Schisms in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (2): 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Woelert, P., and L. Yates. 2015. “Too Little and too Much Trust: Performance Measurement in Australian Higher Education.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (2): 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama, K. 2006. “The Effect of the Research Assessment Exercise on Organisational Culture in English Universities: Collegiality Versus Managerialism.” Tertiary Education and Management 12 (4): 311–322.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. 2015. “Competitive Funding, Citation Regimes, and the Diminishment of Breakthrough Research.” Higher Education 69: 421–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar