And then there were none: what a UCU archive tells us about employee relations in marketising universities

References

• Ackers, P. 2002. “Reframing Employment Relations: The Case for Neo-Pluralism.” Industrial Relations Journal 33 (1): 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S. 2001. “Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism.” Organization Science 12 (2): 215–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P., and C.-W. Kwon. 2013. “The Mutation of Professionalism as a Contested Diffusion Process: Clinical Guidelines as Carriers of Institutional Change in Medicine.” Journal of Management 50 (5): 930–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agasisti, T., and G. Catalano. 2006. “Governance Models of University Systems – Towards Quasi-Markets? Tendencies and Perspectives: A European Comparison.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 28 (3): 245–62.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, E. B. 1987. “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development.” Environmental Conservation 14 (2): 101–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 364–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis, D. 2010. Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, C. 2016. Employment Relations: Fairness and Trust in the Workplace. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, S., and J. Waring. 2016. “Becoming Hybrid: The Negotiated Order on the Front Line of Public–Private Partnerships.” Human Relations 69 (10): 1937–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, R. 2012. “Living with the h-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy.” The Sociological Review 60 (2): 355–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K., and M. Tschirhart. 1992. “Postindustrial Environments and Organizational Effectiveness in Colleges and Universities.” The Journal of Higher Education 63 (1): 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIPD. 2018. “ Employee Relations: An Introduction.” https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/employees/factsheet.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, K. R., and C. K. Prahalad. 1996. “A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism.” Organization Science 7 (5): 477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., and I. Kessler. 2000. “Consequences of the Psychological Contract for the Employment Relationship: A Large Scale Survey.” Journal of Management Studies 37 (7): 903–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., and I. Kessler. 2002. “Exploring Reciprocity Through the Lens of the Psychological Contract: Employee and Employer Perspectives.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 11 (1): 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, N., and T. Dundon. 2006. “The Psychological Contract: A Critical Review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 8 (2): 113–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DBEIS. 2017. Trade Union Membership 2016. Statistical Bulletin. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/616966/trade-union-membership-statistical-bulletin-2016-rev.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De Vita, G., and P. Case. 2016. “‘The Smell of the Place’: Managerialist Culture in Contemporary UK Business Schools.” Culture and Organization 22 (4): 348–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R. 1998. “‘New Managerialism’ and Higher Education: The Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. C., and S. Roy. 2017. “Academic Research in the 21st Century: Managing Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Pervasive Incentives and Hypercompetition.” Environmental Engineering Science 34 (1): 51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmott, M. 2005. “ What Is Employee Relations? Change Agenda.” CIPD. https://stirling.rl.talis.com/items/8EA7D9F7-8772-3EC6-7B3A-D9643E978E42.html.
   Google Scholar
• ESRC No date. “ ‘New Managerialism’ and the Management of UK Universities.” http://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/R000237661/read.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., and M.-A. Parmentier. 2010. “ Doing Qualitative Research with Archival Data: Making Secondary Data a Primary Resource, 2010.” http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/15075/volumes/v37/NA-37.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, O. 2003. “Managerialism in UK Universities: Unstable Hybridity and the Complications of Implementation.” In The Higher Education Managerial Revolution?, edited by A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, and I. M. Larsen, 155–78. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. 1988. “Can We Trust Trust?” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by D. Gambetta, 213–37. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gennard, J., and G. Judge. 2005. Employee Relations. London: CIPD.
   Google Scholar
• Gennard, J., G. Judge, T. Bennett, and R. Saundry. 2016. Managing Employment Relations. London: CIPD.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Mulé, E., S. H. Courtright, D. DeGeest, J.-Y. Seong, and D.-S. Hong. 2016. “Channeled Autonomy: The Joint Effects of Autonomy and Feedback on Team Performance Through Organizational Goal Clarity.” Journal of Management 42 (7): 2018–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D. 2002. “Human Resource Management, Corporate Performance and Employee Wellbeing: Building the Worker into HRM.” Journal of Industrial Relations 44 (3): 335–58.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, D., and N. Conway. 1998. Fairness at Work and the Psychological Contract. London: CIPD.
   Google Scholar
• Kalfa, S., A. Wilkinson, and P. J. Gollan. 2018. “The Academic Game: Compliance and Resistance in Universities.” Work, Employment and Society 32 (2): 274–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, K.-M., T. J. Kallio, J. Tienari, and T. Hyvönen. 2016. “Ethos at Stake: Performance Management and Academic Work in Universities.” Human Relations 69 (3): 685–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and C.-A. Clarke. 2014. “It’s a Bittersweet Symphony, This Life: Fragile Academic Selves and Insecure Identities at Work.” Organization Studies 35 (3): 335–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P., A. Thornhill, and M. Saunders. 2003. Employee Relations: Understanding the Employment Relationship. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mangen, C., and M. Brivot. 2015. “The Challenge of Sustaining Organizational Hybridity: The Role of Power and Agency.” Human Relations 68 (4): 659–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, C. 2017. “Whose Responsible for Irresponsible Business? An Assessment.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (2): 157–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S., C. Neylon, M. P. Eve, D. P. O’Donnell, and D. Pattinson. 2017. “Excellence R Us’: University Research and the Fetishisation of Excellence.” Palgrave Communications. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/articles/palcomms2016105.
   Google Scholar
• Mordhorst, M., and S. Schwarzkopf. 2017. “Theorising Narrative in Business History.” Business History 59 (8): 1155–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and S. J. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. 2014. “University, Ltd: Changing a Business School.” Organization 21 (2): 281–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzey, J. C. V. 1997. “Sustainability Constraints Versus ‘Optimality’ Versus Intertemporal Concern, and Axioms Versus Data.” Land Economics 73 (4): 448–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelsmaekers, K., G. Jacobs, and C. Rollo. 2014. Trust and Discourse: Organizational Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M., and M. Kramer. 2011. “Creating Shared Value.” Harvard Business Review 89: 62–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. I. 2002. “New Managerialism, Professional Power and Organisational Governance in UK Universities: A Review and Assessment.” In Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, edited by A. Amaral, G. Jones, and B. Karseth, 163–85. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rosewell, K., and P. Ashwin. 2018. “Academics’ Perceptions of What It Means to be an Academic.” Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1499717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. 1995. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, M., J. Hassard, and S. Decker. 2014. “Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 250–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., and C. Rerup. 2018. “Routine Regulation: Balancing Conflicting Goals in Organizational Routines.” Administrative Science Quarterly 63 (1): 170–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. 1978. Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organisational Needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, R., and R. Watermeyer. 2018. “Competing Institutional Logics in Universities in the United Kingdom: Schism in the Church of Reason.” Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1504910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. 2008. Control in the Age of Empowerment. Harvard: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., and A. K. Mishra. 1999. “Giving Up Control Without Losing Control.” Group & Organization Management 24 (2): 155–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teelken, C. 2012. “Compliance or Pragmatism: How Do Academics Deal with Managerialism in Higher Education? A Comparative Study in Three Countries.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (3): 271–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian 2017. “ UCL Staff Morale.” https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/04/ucl-staff-morale-at-all-time-low-because-of-management-poll-finds-academic-business-university.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourish, D., and H. Willmott. 2015. “In Defiance of Folly: Journal Rankings, Mindless Measures and the ABS Guide.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCU. 2012. “ 2012 Occupational Stress Survey – The Relationships Stressor in HE.” http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/5521/The-Relationships-stressor-higher-education/pdf/ucu_occstress12_herelationships.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UCU. 2016. Workload Is an Education Issue: UCU Workload Survey Report 2016. https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/8195/Workload-is-an-education-issue-UCU-workload-survey-report-2016/pdf/ucu_workloadsurvey_fullreport_jun16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von Nordenflycht, A. 2010. “What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms.” Academy of Management Review 35 (1): 155–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R. P. 2017. Managing Academics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R. P., and W. O’Donohue. 2012. “Academic Identity Tensions in the Public University: Which Values Really Matter?” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (6): 565–73.
   Google Scholar