Sex differences in the number of scientific publications and citations when attaining the rank of professor in Sweden

References

• Abdi, H. 2010. “Holm’s Sequential Bonferroni Procedure.” In Encyclopedia of Research Design, edited by Neil Salkind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Abramo, G., C. D’Angelo, and F. Di Costa. 2019. “A Gender Analysis of Top Scientists’ Collaboration Behavior: Evidence from Italy.” Scientometrics 120: 405–418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Y. Hun Ji, and H. Joo. 2018. “Gender Productivity Gap Among Star Performers in STEM and Other Scientific Fields.” Journal of Applied Psychology 103: 1283–1306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksnes, D., K. Rorstad, F. Piro, and G. Sivertsen. 2011. “Are Female Researchers Less Cited? A Large-Scale Study of Norwegian Scientists.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62: 628–636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnebratt, Kerstin. 2011. “Genusperspektiv - för höjd kvalitet i forskning.” Genusnytt.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 2015. “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/feminism-epistemology/.
   Google Scholar
• Bendels, M., R. Müller, D. Brueggmann, D. A. Groneberg. 2018. “Gender Disparities in High-quality Research Revealed by Nature Index Journals.” PLoS ONE 13: e0189136. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/authors?id=https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. 2014. “How to Evaluate Individual Researchers Working in the Natural and Life Sciences Meaningfully? A Proposal of Methods Based on Percentiles of Citations.” Scientometrics 98: 487–509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., R. C. Cunha, R. A. Varbanov, Y. S. Hoh, M. L. Knisley, and M. A. Holmes. 2015. “Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender.” PLoS ONE 10: e0143093. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4651362/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, H., G. Schui, A. von Eye, and G. Krampen. 2013. “How Does Scientific Success Relate to Individual and Organizational Characteristics? A Scientometric Study of Psychology Researchers in the German-speaking Countries.” Scientometrics 94: 523–539. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0760-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda, T., and M. Hillion. 2016. “Teaching Accreditation Exams Reveal Grading Biases Favor Women in Male-dominated Disciplines in France.” Science 353: 474–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukstein, D., and N. Gandelman. 2019. “Glass Ceilings in Research: Evidence from a National Program in Uruguay.” Research Policy 48: 1550–1563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico, R., P. Vermigli, and S. Canetto. 2011. “Publication Productivity and Career Advancement by Female and Male Psychology Faculty: The Case of Italy.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 4: 175–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delegationen för jämställdhet i högskolan. 2009. Utvärdering av kvantitativa rekryteringsmål för högskolans personal. SOU U2009:01. Stockholm, SE: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Delegationen för jämställdhet i högskolan. 2011. Svart på vitt – om jämställdhet i akademin. SOU 2011:1. Stockholm, SE: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S., C. Thomas, S. Desai, E. Holliday, R. Jagsi, C. Schmitt, and B. K. Enestvedt. 2016. “Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Rank, and Career Duration Among U.S. Academic Gastroenterology Faculty.” Academic Medicine 91: 1158–1163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, G., U. Holm, J. Lindholm, P. Rådberg, S. Bergström, M. Kaplan, et al. 2013. Kvotering i bolagsstyrelser. Riksdagmotion 2013/14:C224. Stockholm, SE: Sveriges riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlgren, S. 2013. “The Paradox of a Gender-balanced Workforce: The Discursive Construction of Gender Among Swedish Social Workers.” Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work 28: 19–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109912475162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlman, P. 2016. “Is there a g Factor in Academic Creative Performance? Evidence from Bibliographical Indices of Swedish Academics.” Bachelor’s thesis, Umeå University, Umeå, SE.
   Google Scholar
• Fell, C. B., and C. J. König. 2016. “Is there a Gender Difference in Scientific Collaboration? A Scientometric Examination of Co-authorships Among Industrial-organizational Psychologists.” Scientometrics 108: 113–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1967-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridner, A., A. Norell, G. Åkesson, M. Gustafsson Sendén, L. Tevik Løvseth, and K. Schenk-Gustafsson. 2015. “Possible Reasons Why Female Physicians Publish Fewer Scientific Articles than Male Physicians - a Cross-sectional Study.” BMC Medical Education 15: 67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0347-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, S. 2001. The Routledge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, N. T. 2014. “Counting and Comparing Publication Output with and Without Equalizing and Inflationary Bias.” Journal of Informetrics 8: 310–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, N. T. 2008. “Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis.” PLoS ONE 3: e4021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2603311/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. 2012. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. 4th ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmark Knutsson, Helene. 2017. “Ska Sverige hålla måttet krävs jämstalld högskola.” Göteborgs-Posten, January 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S. de Rijcke, and I. Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature 520: 429–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, E., R. Jagsi, L. D. Wilson, M. Choi, C. Thomas, and C. Fuller. 2014. “Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Position, Career Duration, and Funding Among U.S. Academic Radiation Oncology Faculty.” Academic Medicine 89: 767–773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe-Walsh, L., and S. Turnbull. 2016. “Barriers to Women Leaders in Academia: Tales from Science and Technology.” Studies in Higher Education 41: 415–428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.929102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Stefanie K., David R. Hekman, and Elsa T. Chan. 2016. “If there’s Only One Woman in Your Candidate Pool, there’s Statistically No Chance She’ll be Hired.” Harvard Business Review, April 26. https://hbr.org/2016/04/if-theres-only-one-woman-in-your-candidate-pool-theres-statistically-no-chance-shell-be-hired.
   Google Scholar
• Justitiedepartementet. 2016. “Jämn könsfördelning i bolagsstyrelser.” Government bill Ds 2016:32, 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and W. Richards. 2003. “Sex Discrimination in UK Academia.” Gender, Work & Organization 10: 213–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. 2019. “Judicious Use of Bibliometrics to Supplement Peer Evaluations of Research in Kinesiology.” Kinesiology Review 8: 100–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2017-0046
   Google Scholar
• Koch, A. J., S. D. D’Mello, and P. R. Sackett. 2015. “A Meta-analysis of Gender Stereotypes and Bias in Experimental Simulations of Employment Decision Making.” Journal of Applied Psychology 100: 128–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariviere, V., C. Ni, Y. Gingras, B. Cronin, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2013. “Global Gender Disparities in Science.” Nature 504: 211–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. A. 2006. “Men, Women, and Ghosts in Science.” PLoS Biology 4: e19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchenmueller, M., and O. Sorenson. 2018. “The Gender Gap in Early Career Transitions in the Life Sciences.” Research Policy 47: 1007–1017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutter, M., and M. Schröder. 2016. “Who Becomes a Tenured Professor, and Why? Panel Data Evidence from German Sociology, 1980–2013.” Research Policy 45: 999–1013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, G. 2019. “Explicating Politicians’ Arguments for Sex Quotas in Sweden: Increasing Power and Influence Rather than Increasing Quality and Productivity.” Frontiers in Communication 4:1. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manning, K. 2000. Rituals, Ceremonies, and Cultural Meaning in Higher Education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., U. W. Jayasinghe, and N. W. Bond. 2011. “Gender Differences in Peer Reviews of Grant Applications: A Substantive-methodological Synergy in Support of the Null Hypothesis Model.” Journal of Informetrics 5: 167–180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nationalencyklopedin. 2016. “Genusforskning.” http://www.ne.se/uppslagsverk/encyklopedi/lång/genusforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. 2016. “Gender Inequality and Research Performance: Moving Beyond Individual-meritocratic Explanations of Academic Advancement.” Studies in Higher Education 41: 2044–2060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. E., and D. M. O’Neill. 2006. “What Do Wage Differentials Tell About Labor Market Discrimination?” Research in Labor Economics 24: 293–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9121(05)24010-4
   Google Scholar
• Raj, A., P. L. Carr, S. E. Kaplan, N. Terrin, J. L. Breeze, and K. M. Freund. 2016. “Longitudinal Analysis of Gender Differences in Academic Productivity Among Medical Faculty Across 24 Medical Schools in the United States.” Academic Medicine 91: 1074–1079. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeringen. 1997. Högskolans ledning, lärare och organisation [Government Bill]. Proposition 1996/97:141. Stockholm, SE: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Riis, U., T. Hartman, and S. Levander. 2011. Darr på ribban? En uppföljning av 1999 års befordringsreform vid Uppsala universitet. Uppsala, SE: Uppsala Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J. 2016. “Taking Advantage of Citation Measures of Scholarly Impact: Hip Hip h Index!.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11: 905–908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616664436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J., F. Seaman, C. D’Oranio, E. Stremlo, and K. Mahalchik. 2012. “Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-based Indices.” Measurement 10: 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sarsons, H. 2017. “Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia.” American Economic Review 107: 141–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann, N., F. Webster, H. A. Holden, C.-A. Moulton, N. Baxter, C. Desjardins, and T. Cil. 2016. “Women in Academic Surgery: Why is the Playing Field Still not Level?” The American Journal of Surgery 211: 343–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seierstad, C., and G. Healy. 2012. “Women’s Equality in the Scandinavian Academy: A Distant Dream?” Work, Employment and Society 26: 296–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011432918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. 2014. “Creative Performance, Expertise Acquisition, Individual Differences, and Developmental Antecedents: An Integrative Research Agenda.” Intelligence 45: 66–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sköld, B., and M. Tillmar. 2015. “Resilient Gender Order in Entrepreneurship: The Case of Swedish Welfare Industries.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 7: 2–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2013-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialdemokraterna. 2016. The Swedish Social Democratic Party. An Introduction. Stockholm, SE: Socialdemokraterna.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2010. På tal om kvinnor och män. Lathund om jämställdhet 2010. Örebro: Statistics Sweden, Population Statistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2015. Personal vid universitet och högskolor 2014. Rep. No. UF 23 SM 1501. Örebro, SE: Statistics Sweden, Population Statistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2016. Women and Men in Sweden. Facts and Figures 2016. Örebro, SE: Statistics Sweden, Population Statistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Teele, D. L., and K. Thelen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50: 433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeå universitet. 2014. Plan för lika villkor vid Umeå universitet. Umeå University, SE: Dnr. FS 1.1.2-312-14.
   Google Scholar
• Universitetskanslersämbetet. 2009. Universitet och högskolor. Årsrapport 2009, Rep. No. 2009:12 R. Stockholm, SE: Universitetskanslersämbetet.
   Google Scholar
• Universitetskanslersämbetet. 2015. Universitet och högskolor. Årsrapport 2015, Rep. No. 2015:8. Stockholm, SE: Universitetskanslersämbetet.
   Google Scholar
• Universitetskanslersämbetet. 2018. Universitet och högskolor. Årsrapport 2018, Rep. No. 2018:5. Stockholm, SE: Universitetskanslersämbetet.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet. 1994. Jämställdhet mellan kvinnor och män inom utbildningsområdet. Proposition 1994/95:164. Stockholm, SE: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet. 2004. Forskning för ett bättre liv" Jämställdhet mellan kvinnor och män inom utbildningsområdet. Proposition 2004/05:80. Stockholm, SE: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet. 2013. Rekryteringsmål för en jämnare könsfördelning bland professorer - förslag om dialog mellan regeringen och lärosätet. Rep. No.U2012/2998/UH. Stockholm, SE: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• van den Basselar, P., and U. Sandström. 2016. “Gender Differences in Research Performance and its Impact on Careers: A Longitudinal Case Study.” Scientometrics 106: 143–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1775-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., and L. Stobbe. 2014. “The Support Paradox: Overcoming Dilemmas in Gender Equality Programs.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30: 163–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, F., K. Rice, J. Christian, N. Seemann, N. Baxter, C.-A. Moulton, T. Cil. 2016. “The Erasure of Gender in Academic Surgery: A Qualitative Study.” The American Journal of Surgery 212: 559–565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. E., and P. J. Rich. 2012. “Rigor, Impact and Prestige: A Proposed Framework for Evaluating Scholarly Publications.” Innovative Higher Education 37: 359–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9214-3
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. 2018. “Academic Disciplines.” October 19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_academic_disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• Wildgaard, L., J. W. Schneider, and B. Larsen. 2014. “A Review of the Characteristics of 108 Author-level Bibliometric Indicators.” Scientometrics 101: 125–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1423-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, W. M., and S. J. Ceci. 2015. “National Hiring Experiments Reveal 2:1 Faculty Preference for Women on STEM Tenure Track.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 5360–5365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418878112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2015. The Global Gender Gap Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Yousaf, R., and R. Schmiede. 2016. “Underrepresentation of Women at Academic Excellence and Position of Power: Role of Harassment and Glass Ceiling.” Open Journal of Social Sciences 4: 173–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.42023
   Google Scholar