The leadership roles of Mexico’s university presidents

References

• Acosta Silva, Adrián. 2010. Príncipes, burócratas y gerentes: El gobierno de las universidades públicas en México. 1st ed. México: ANUIES.
   Google Scholar
• ANUIES. 2019. “Anuario Educación Superior Licenciatura: Ciclo Escolar 2018-2019.” http://www.anuies.mx/informacion-y-servicios/informacion-estadistica-de-educacion-superior/anuario-estadistico-de-educacion-superior.
   Google Scholar
• Badillo-Vega, Rosalba. 2018. Präsidiale Führungsstile in Hochschulen: Vom Wandel zur Transformation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19817-6.
   Google Scholar
• Badillo-Vega, Rosalba, Angélica M. Buendía Espinosa, and Georg Krücken. 2015. “Liderazgo de los rectores frente a la “tercera misión de la universidad”: visiones globales, miradas locales.” Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa XX (65): 393–417.
   Google Scholar
• Badillo-Vega, Rosalba, Georg Krücken, and Pedro Pineda. 2019. “Changing Analytical Levels and Methods of Leadership Research on University Presidents.” Studies in Higher Education 1 (1): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1647417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldridge, J. V. 1971. Power and Conflict in the University: Research in the Sociology of Complex Organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, George C., Kelly D. McCauley, William L. Gardner, and Courtney E. Guler. 2016. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Authentic and Transformational Leadership: A Test for Redundancy.” The Leadership Quarterly, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, Catherine, Jean Bocock, Peter Scott, and David Smith. 2000. University Leadership: The Role of the Chief Executive. Buckingham [England]: Society for research to higher education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, Chester I. 1968. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, Bernard M. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, Bernard M., and Ruth Bass. 2008. The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, Michael N., Elias Samuels, and Molly Kleinman. 2014. “Do Charismatic Presidents Influence College Applications and Alumni Donations? Organizational Identity and Performance in US Higher Education.” Higher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9719-z.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, Robert. 1991. How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. 5. ed. The Jossey-Bass higher education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, Robert. 2000. Management Fads in Higher Education: Where They Come From, What They Do, Why They Fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/wiley035/00009722.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2007. “Effective Leadership in Higher Education: a Literature Review.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (6): 693–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701685114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buendía Espinosa, Angélica M., and Ana B. Pérez Díaz. 2018. Análisis del sistema universitario mexicano. Perfiles, datos e indicadores. Mexico: UAM Xochimilco.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, James M. 1978. Leadership. 1st ed. Harper Perennial political classics. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1986. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. 3rd ed. Issues in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Michael D., and James G. March. 1974. Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, David V., John W. Fleenor, Leanne E. Atwater, Rachel E. Sturm, and Rob A. McKee. 2014. “Advances in Leader and Leadership Development: A Review of 25years of Research and Theory.” The Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 63–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Pual J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh, Jessica E., Robert G. Lord, William L. Gardner, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, and Jinyu Hu. 2014. “Leadership Theory and Research in the New Millennium: Current Theoretical Trends and Changing Perspectives.” The Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 36–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, John. 1992. “Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblee Constituante.” In Rationality and Institutions: Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Februrary 11, 1991, edited by Raino Malnes, 13–50. Studies in politics and government 1. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, Mark, Paul Hanna, and Carl Walker. 2020. “The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: a Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance.” Studies in Higher Education 7 (3): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1712693.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, Uwe. 2010. “Triangulation in Qualitative Research.” In A Companion to Qualitative Research, edited by Uwe Flick, Ernst v. Kardorff, and Ines Steinke. repr, 178–83. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, David J., and John W. Meyer. 2007. “University Expansion and the Knowledge Society.” Theory and Society 36 (4): 287–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9035-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, Allan, Gay Haskins, and Ian Robertson. 2013. “Leading the Entrepreneurial University: Meeting the Entrepreneurial Development Needs of Higher Education Institutions.” In Universities in Change: Managing Higher Education Institutions in the age of Globalization, edited by Andreas Altmann and Bernd Ebersberger, 9–45. Innovation, technology, and knowledge management. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Noworthy, Simon Schwartzmann, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 2010. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Steven W., and Joe F. Donaldson. 2019. “Academic Leaders’ Response to the Volatility of Higher Education: The Influence of Institutional Logics.” Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586867.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, Raimund, and Georg Krücken. 2013. “Competition and Actorhood: A Further Expansion of the Neo-Institutional Agenda.” Sociologia Internationalis 51 (2): 181–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.3790/sint.51.2.181.
   Google Scholar
• House, Robert J., Paul J. Hanges, Javidan Mansour, Peter W. Dorfman, and Vipin Gupta. 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Futao. 2017. “Who Leads China's Leading Universities?” Studies in Higher Education 42 (1): 79–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2018. Higher Education in Germany—Recent Developments in an International Perspective 49. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra Colado, Eduardo. 2001. “Universidad de México hoy: gubernamentalidad modernización.” http://www.posgrado.unam.mx/es/la-universidad-en-mexico-hoy-gubernamentalidad-y-modernizacion.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra Colado, Eduardo. 2009. “Aseguramiento de la calidad: políticas públicas y gestión universitaria: Informe Nacional México”.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, Timothy A., and Ronald F. Piccolo. 2004. “Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (5): 755–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, Clark. 1963. The Uses of the University. The Godkin lectures at Harvard University 1963. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, Adrianna, and Peter D. Eckel. 2008. “Advancing Diversity Agendas on Campus: Examining Transactional and Transformational Presidential Leadership Styles.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 11 (4): 379–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120802317891.
   Google Scholar
• Kleimann, Bernd. 2018. “(German) Universities as Multiple Hybrid Organizations.” Higher Education 7 (2): 263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0321-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kraatz, Matthew S., and Emily S. Block. 2013. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, Paperback edition, 243–75. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, Georg. 2014. “Higher Education Reforms and Unintended Consequences: A Research Agenda.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (8): 1439–1450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krücken, Georg, and Frank Meier. 2006. “Turning the University Into an Organizational Actor.” In Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, edited by Gili S. Drori, Hokyu Hwang, and John W. Meyer, 241–257. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López Zárate, Romualdo. 2007. “Four Trajectories of Rectors in Mexican Public Universities.” Higher Education 54 (6): 795–817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9025-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López Zárate, Romualdo. 2010. “Los Rectores de las Universidades Públicas.” Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa 15 (46): 969–74.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1964. Funktionen und Folgen Formaler Organisation. Schriftenreihe der Hochschule Speyer 20. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385.
   Google Scholar
• Meindl, James R. 1995. “The Romance of Leadership as a Follower-Centric Theory: A Social Constructionist Approach.” The Leadership Quarterly 6 (3): 329–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90012-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2009. “The Wordl Institutionalization of Education.” In World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer, edited by Georg Krücken, and Gili S. Drori, 206–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlehurst, Robin, Tom Kennie, and S. Woodfield. 2010. “Leading and Managing the University – Presidents and Their Senior Management Team.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed., edited by Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, and Barry McGaw, 238–44. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Lori L., and Rick D. Rudd. 2006. “Leadership Styles of Current Extension Leaders.” Journal of Agricultural Education 47 (1): 6–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.01006.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Socorro, Elia C., and Roberto d. A. Urquiza. 2020. “Evaluación Del Liderazgo De Los Directivos De La Educación Superior Cubana: Un Procedimiento Metodológico.” Revista Cubana de Educación Superior 39 (1): e8. Online. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0257-43142020000100008&lng=es&nrm=iso.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, Daniel, Alma Harris, Jacky Lumby, Marlene Morrison, and Krishan Sood. 2006. “Leadership and Leadership Development in Highly Effective Further Education Providers. Is There a Relationship?” Journal of Further and Higher Education 30 (1): 87–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770500432096.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, Guy. 1998. “The Evaluative State Reconsidered.” European Journal of Education 33 (3): 265–84.
   Google Scholar
• Nerdinger, Friedemann W., and Erika Spieß. 1992. “Kommunikative Validierung und Datenfeedback in der Werteforschung - Ergebnisse aus Quantitativen und Qualitativen Langzeitbefragungen.” In Werte und Wandel: Ergebnisse und Methoden Einer Forschungstradition, edited by Helmut Klages, Hans-J Hippler, and Willi Herbert, 653–71. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Noorshahi, Nasrin, and Mohamad Y. D. Sarkhabi. 2008. “A Study of Relationship Between Consequences of Leadership and Transformational Leadership Style of the Presidents of Iranian Universities and Institutions of Higher Education.” Academic Leadership 6 (2): 7.
   Google Scholar
• Northouse, Peter G. 2016. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 7. ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and R. B. Johnson. 2006. “The Validity Issue in Mixed Research.” Research in the Schools 13 (1): 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, Antigoni. 2011. “Reforms, Leadership and Quality Management in Greek Higher Education.” Tertiary Education and Management 17 (4): 355–72. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13583883.2011.602705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.602705
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1977. “The Ambiguity of Leadership.” The Academy of Management Review 2 (1): 104–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409175
   Google Scholar
• Pilbeam, Colin, and Ian Jamieson. 2010. “Beyond Leadership and Management: The Boundary-Spanning Role of the Pro-Vice Chancellor.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 38 (6): 758–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pomeda, Jesus, and Fernando Casani. 2016. “Legitimating the World-Class University Concept Through the Discourse of Elite Universities Presidents?” Higher Education Research & Development 35 (6): 1269–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1160877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio Oca, Julio. 2006. La Política Educativa y la Educación Superior en México. 1995-2006: un Balance. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Schimank, Uwe. 2008. “Double Talk von Hochschulleitungen.” In Universität und Lebenswelt, edited by Wieland Jäger, and Rainer Schützeichel, 154–72. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. California paperback ed., [Nachdr.]. Berkeley, Cal: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siangchokyoo, Nathapon, Ryan L. Klinger, and Emily D. Campion. 2019. “Follower Transformation as the Linchpin of Transformational Leadership Theory: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” The Leadership Quarterly, 101341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101341.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the new Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spendlove, Marion. 2007. “Competencies for Effective Leadership in Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Management 21 (5): 407–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710760183.
   Google Scholar
• Tacke, Veronika. 1997. “Systemrationalisierung an Ihren Grenzen: Organisationsgrenzen und Funktionen von Grenzstellen in Wirtschaftsorganisationen.” In Gestaltung von Organisationsgrenzen, edited by Georg Schreyögg, and Jörg Sydow, 1–44. Managementforschung 7. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 2009. Making Sense of the Organization: Vol. 2: the Impermanent Organization. Making sense of the organization v. 2. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar