Are half of the published papers in top-management-journals never cited? Refuting the myth and examining the reason for its creation

References

• Abramo, G., C. A. D’Angelo, and A. Soldatenkova. 2016. “The Ratio of Top Scientists to the Academic Staff as an Indicator of the Competitive Strength of Universities.” Journal of Informetrics 10 (2): 596–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, N. J., and A. W. Harzing. 2009. “When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 8 (1): 72–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “AJG Methodology”. 2020. Academic Journals Guide, Charted Association of Business Schools www.charteredabs.org, accessed 15 July 2020, https://charteredabs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AJG2018-Methodology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aksnes, D. W., and G. Sivertsen. 2004. “The Effect of Highly Cited Papers on National Citation Indicators.” Scientometrics 59 (2): 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ale Ebrahim, N., H. Ebrahimian, M. Mousavi, and F. Tahriri. 2015. “Does a Long Reference List Guarantee More Citations? Analysis of Malaysian Highly Cited and Review Papers.” The International Journal of Management Science and Business 1 (3): 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Althouse, B. M., J. D. West, C. T. Bergstrom, and T. Bergstrom. 2009. “Differences in Impact Factor Across Fields and Over Time.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (1): 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anninos, L. N. 2014. “Research Performance Evaluation: Some Critical Thoughts on Standard Bibliometric Indicators.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (9): 1542–1561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., N. Bastardoz, Y. Liu, and C. A. Schriesheim. 2014. “What Makes Papers Highly Cited?” Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 152–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., A. Ghobadian, and M. Özbilgin. 2013. “Open Access – The Wrong Answer to A Complex Case: A Response to the Finch Report.” British Journal of Management 24 (2): 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., and D. T. Hall. 2004. “Preface for the JVB Special Issue on Careers in Academia.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 64 (2): 237–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., and B. Holtom. 2008. “Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research.” Human Relations 61 (8): 1139–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., A. Konrad, H. Aguinis, and W. H. Starbuck, eds. 2008. Opening the Black Box of Editorship. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. 2011. “Free-Riding on Power Laws: Questioning the Validity of the Impact Factor as a Measure of Research Quality in Organization Studies.” Organization 18 (4): 449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2010. “Conceptualising Research Performance.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (8): 889–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, E. M. L. 2012. “Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 38 (6): 370–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., R. Lecuona, and P. Barwise. 2016. “The Relevance Gap in Business School Research: Which Academic Papers Are Cited in Managerial Bridge Journals?” Academy of Management Learning & Education 15 (4): 686–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. 2016. “The Journal Impact Factor and Alternative Metrics: A Variety of Bibliometric Measures Has Been Developed to Supplant the Impact Factor to Better Assess the Impact of Individual Research Papers.” EMBO Reports 17 (8): 1094–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosquet, C., and P.-P. Combes. 2013. “Are Academics Who Publish More Also More Cited? Individual Determinants of Publication and Citation Records.” Scientometrics 97 (3): 831–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2015. Business Research Methods. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byington, E. K., and W. Felps. 2017. “Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 16 (1): 142–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaham, M., R. L. Wears, and E. Weber. 2002. “Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated with Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals.” JAMA 287 (21): 2847–2850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calma, A., and M. Davies. 2015. “Studies in Higher Education 1976–2013: A Retrospective Using Citation Network Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (1): 4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanario, M. 1993. “Consolation for the Scientist: Sometimes It Is Hard to Publish Papers That Are Later Highly-Cited.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, E. S., W. W. Powell, K. McIlwaine, and D. Okamoto. 1995. “Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (2): 433–494.
   Google Scholar
• Corbyn, Z. 2010. “An Easy Way to Boost a Paper’s Citations.” Nature 406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.406.
   Google Scholar
• Costas, R., T. N. van Leeuwen, and M. Bordons. 2012. “Referencing Patterns of Individual Researchers: Do Top Scientists Rely on More Extensive Information Sources?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (12): 2433–2450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, N. E. 2011. “The Silent Majority: Manuscript Rejection and Its Impact on Scholars.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10 (4): 704–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipboye, R. L. 2006. “Peer Reviews in the Production of Knowledge: Why I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Appreciate the Flaws in the Review Process.” In Winning Reviews: A Guide for Evaluating Scholarly Writing, edited by Yehuda Baruch, Sherry E. Sullivan, and Hazlon N. Schepmyer, 3–26. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, F. L., and D. Reeb. 2000. “Ranking the International Business Journals.” Journal of International Business Studies 31 (4): 689–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, D. 1984. “Self-fulfilling Prophecy as a Management Tool: Harnessing Pygmalion.” Academy of Management Review 9 (1): 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., and K. Rost. 2010. “Do Rankings Reflect Research Quality?” Journal of Applied Economic 13 (1): 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., and B. Thijs. 2004. “Does Co-Authorship Inflate the Share of Self-Citations?” Scientometrics 61 (3): 395–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Teruel, A., G. González-Alcaide, M. Barrios, and M. F. Abad-García. 2015. “Mapping Recent Information Behavior Research: An Analysis of Co-Authorship and Co-Citation Networks.” Scientometrics 103 (2): 687–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. P. 1990. “Publishing by–and for?–the Numbers.” Science 250 (4986): 1331–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanel, P. H., and J. Haase. 2017. “Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargens, L. L. 1988. “Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates.” American Sociological Review 53 (1): 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, Y. S., and J. Hartley. 2017. “Sleeping Beauties in Psychology.” Scientometrics 110 (1): 301–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoorani, B. H., L. B. Nair, and M. Gibbert. 2019. “Designing for Impact: The Effect of Rigor and Case Study Design on Citations of Qualitative Case Studies in Management.” Scientometrics 121 (1): 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, Hugo, and João M. Santos. 2019. “Organisational Factors and Academic Research Agendas: An Analysis of Academics in the Social Sciences.” Studies in Higher Education. Available online first at: doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., and Y. Wu. 2014. “Regularity in the Time-Dependent Distribution of the Percentage of Never-Cited Papers: An Empirical Pilot Study Based on the Six Journals.” Journal of Informetrics 8 (1): 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. 2015. “A Generalized View of Self-Citation: Direct, Co-Author, Collaborative, and Coercive Induced Self-Citation.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 78 (1): 7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., D. M. Cable, A. E. Colbert, and S. L. Rynes. 2007. “What Causes a Management Article to Be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal?” Academy of Management Journal 50 (3): 491–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, D. 1959. Flowers for Algernon. London: Mercury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, A. V., B. Aziz, I. Shams, and J. W. Busse. 2009. “Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals.” Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (10): 1092–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E. and R. J. Vandenberg, eds. 2009. Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences. NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J. 2014. “Citation Curves of “All-Elements-Sleeping-Beauties”: “Flash in the Pan” First and Then “Delayed Recognition”.” Scientometrics 100 (2): 595–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science Are Considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and H. Willmott. 2013. “Taylorizing Business School Research: On the ‘One Best Way’ Performative Effects of Journal Ranking Lists.” Human Relations 66 (8): 1051–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, E., M. Thelwall, S. Haustein, and V. Larivière. 2015. “Who Reads Research Articles? An Alt Metrics Analysis of Mendeley User Categories.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (9): 1832–1846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen, J., and T. F. Frandsen. 2019. “Zero Impact: A Large-Scale Study of Uncitedness.” Scientometrics 119 (2): 1227–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. 2016. “Gender Inequality and Research Performance: Moving Beyond Individual-Meritocratic Explanations of Academic Advancement.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (11): 2044–2060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterloh, M., and B. S. Frey. 2015. “Ranking Games.” Evaluation Review 39 (1): 102–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, D. A. 2009. “The Use and Misuse of Journal Metrics and Other Citation Indicators.” Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis 57 (1): 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, O., W. Glänzel, and R. Danell. 2004. “Inflationary Bibliometric Values: The Role of Scientific Collaboration and the Need for Relative Indicators in Evaluative Studies.” Scientometrics 60 (3): 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., N. P. Podsakoff, P. Mishra, and C. Escue. 2018. “Can Early-Career Scholars Conduct Impactful Research? Playing “Small Ball” Versus “Swinging for the Fences”.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 17 (4): 496–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pravdić, N., and R. Pekorari. 1985. “The Citing Practices of the Authors to the National Journals in Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry.” Scientometrics 8 (3–4): 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard, C. 2013. “All the Lonely Papers, Where Do They All Belong?” Organization 20 (1): 143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remler, D. 2014. “Are 90% of Academic Papers Really Never Cited? Reviewing the Literature on Academic Citations.” Impact of Social Sciences Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/04/23/academic-papers-citation-rates-remler/.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2016. Research Methods for Business Students. 7th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. 1997. “Citations and Journal Impact Factors: Questionable Indicators of Research Quality.” Allergy 52 (11): 1050–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science.” The American Economic Review 49 (3): 253–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W. H. 2003. “Turning Lemons into Lemonade: Where Is the Value in Peer Reviews?” Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (4): 344–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W. H. 2005. “How Much Better are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication.” Organization Science 16 (2): 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., and M. A. Youndt. 2005. “The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities.” Academy of Management Journal 48 (3): 450–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, G., and M. Hult. 2003. “An Integration of Thoughts on Knowledge Management.” Decision Sciences 34 (2): 189–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J. 2006. “Introduction: Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Where, Pray Tell, Did They Get This Idea?” Organizational Research Methods 9 (2): 194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R. 2017. “The Science That’s Never Been Cited.” Nature 552 (7684): 162–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., F. Hattke, and J. Petersen. 2017. “Journal Rankings in Management and Business Studies: What Rules Do We Play By?” Research Policy 46 (10): 1707–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Xin, Heath Rose, and Alis Oancea. 2019. “Incentivising International Publications: Institutional Policymaking in Chinese Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education. Available online first at: doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672646.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., R. Rousseau, and W. Glänzel. 2016. “Diversity of References as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Journals: Taking Similarity Between Subject Fields into Account.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (5): 1257–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar